National Housing Bank ‘will boost delivery of new homes'
The National Housing Bank, a subsidiary of Homes England, will be publicly owned and act as a consistent partner to the private sector, bringing stability and certainty to housing developers and investors, the Government said.
It will be designated as a public financial institution and will work with mayors and local leaders to back housing projects meeting regional priorities.
It is hoped the bank will help to unlock a wide range of sites, including bigger ones which struggle to get upfront lending given their risk and complexity.
The Government also said the move will help SMEs (small and medium-sized enterprises) to grow and build out their housing pipeline more quickly.
The bank will deploy some of the £2.5 billion in low-interest loans announced at the spending review to support the building of social and affordable homes.
It will be backed with £16 billion of financial capacity, on top of £6 billion of existing finance to be allocated this Parliament, the Government said.
It said the new public investment could help build more than 500,000 new homes.
Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary Angela Rayner said: 'Our foot is firmly on the accelerator when it comes to making sure a generation is no longer locked out of homeownership – or ensuring children don't have to grow up in unsuitable temporary accommodation, and instead have the safe and secure home they deserve.'
The announcement builds on plans for a 10-year affordable homes programme and comes ahead of a 10-year infrastructure strategy to be published on Wednesday, setting out plans to 'rebuild the UK' over the decade ahead.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves said: 'The new National Housing Bank will unlock £53 billion of additional private investment.'
Homes England chairwoman Pat Ritchie said: 'Establishing the National Housing Bank, as a part of Homes England, builds on the agency's expertise at providing a wide range of finance to partners and places to unlock the delivery of new housing and mixed-use schemes.'
A spokesperson for the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors said: 'The launch of a National Housing Bank is an exciting innovation which could propel much-needed investment into housebuilding.
'The industry, and especially SMEs, need all the support they can get for the country to build.
'Confidence is key if the Government is to meet its 1.5 million home target and new streams of investment and support should invigorate new and existing projects.'
The Conservatives warned the remit of the new bank must be 'laser-focused'.
Kevin Hollinrake, the shadow housing secretary, said: 'While the ambition to increase housing supply is welcome, history teaches us that governments are often poor at picking winners and Homes England has very mixed results.
'The new National Housing Bank must be laser-focused: it must not crowd out private capital, must not subsidise developments that would have proceeded anyway and must not be lured into funding pie-in-the-sky or unviable projects – instead its role should be limited to de-risking only those schemes that are genuinely unable to attract finance, to ensure taxpayer money is not wasted and private investment is not crowded out.
'But beyond this we must look at the root cause of the housing problem – including why SME developers have been driven out of the market and why financing has become so unattractive that the Government needs to step in. Only Kemi Badenoch and the Conservatives are doing the deep thinking necessary to address these root issues.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Starmer vows Labour will not 'take away safety net' vulnerable people rely on
In a speech to the Welsh Labour conference that came after a major U-turn on reforms in the face of a backbench rebellion, he said fixing the "broken" system must be done in a "Labour way" Keir Starmer has vowed Labour will not "take away the safety net" vulnerable people rely on - but said "everyone agrees" the welfare system needs to be fixed. In a speech to the Welsh Labour conference that came after a major U-turn on reforms in the face of a backbench rebellion, he said fixing the "broken" system must be done in a "Labour way". "We cannot take away the safety net that vulnerable people rely on, and we won't, but we also can't let it become a snare for those who can and want to work," the Prime Minister said. "Everyone agrees that our welfare system is broken: failing people every day, a generation of young people written off for good and the cost spiralling out of control. "Fixing it is a moral imperative, but we need to do it in a Labour way." He called Welsh First Minister Eluned Morgan a "fierce champion" and "the best person to lead Wales into the future" to applause and cheers from the audience. Baroness Morgan had publicly criticised the welfare plans and called for Sir Keir to change tack on restrictions on winter fuel payments, which he also eventually reversed. Mr Starmer told the BBC she was "right to raise concerns" and promised to "deliver on those as far as we can". In her speech to the conference, Baroness Morgan said she was pleased the Government listened to her concerns and reversed planned welfare cuts. "I'm glad the UK Government is a listening government and they heard our concerns and changed their approach to welfare cuts," she said. "We were really concerned about the impact these changes could have on some of our poorest and most vulnerable communities, and we made that clear to our colleagues in Westminster. "And I am really glad they listened because that decision brings huge and welcome relief to thousands of people in Wales who rely on this support to live with dignity." Farmers gathered outside the conference in Llandudno to protest ahead of Sir Keir's speech, with about 20 tractors parked on the promenade in the north Wales resort town by late morning. Later, some 150 protesters joined a march for Palestine outside the conference, walking solemnly to the venue where they stood for a few minutes to the beat of a drum. A small group of pro-Israel protesters shouted "free the hostages" and held signs saying "free Gazans from Hamas". Sir Keir also said any deal between the Tories, Reform UK and Plaid Cymru at next year's key elections in Wales would amount to a "backroom stitch-up". The elections to the Senedd will use a proportional system for the first time, meaning coalitions are likely. The Prime Minister said it would risk a "return to the chaos and division of the last decade" and risk rolling back the progress his party is starting to make. He told the Llandudno conference it would be "working families left to pick up the bill". "Whether that's with Reform or with Plaid's determination to cut Wales off from the rest of the country, with no plan to put Wales back together," he said. "I know that these are the parties that talk a big game, but who is actually delivering?" Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch has not ruled out making deals with Plaid Cymru or Reform at the next Senedd election. Reform UK is eyeing an opportunity to end Labour's 26 years of domination in the Welsh Parliament. Labour performed poorly in this year's local elections in England, which saw Nigel Farage's party win a swathe of council seats. Sir Keir also took aim at Nigel Farage, calling him a "wolf in Wall Street clothing" who has "no idea what he's talking about". He said the Reform UK leader "isn't interested in Wales" and has no viable plan for the blast furnaces at Port Talbot.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Tories strike unprecedented deal with Reform on migrant crime
The Conservatives have struck an unprecedented deal with Reform UK in an attempt to force the Government to reveal the true extent of migrant crime. All five Reform MPs are backing an amendment to a Government bill that would require ministers to reveal the nationality and legal status of all offenders convicted and sentenced by magistrates and judges. It is thought to be the first time that Reform has stepped in to back a Tory policy in such a way. Supporters of the amendment said it was significant that it was on immigration, given how divisive the issue has proved between the two parties. At the general election, Reform backed the UK leaving the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), contrasting with the Tories' more ambivalent approach. While the Tories have backed an annual cap on migration, Reform wants ' net zero immigration '. 'No precedent' Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, has since indicated that it is likely the Tories will seek to leave the ECHR and has commissioned a review to investigate the impact and practicalities of quitting. The Tory-led amendment to the Victims and Courts Bill has been signed by the five Reform MPs – Nigel Farage, the party leader, Richard Tice, the deputy leader, Lee Anderson, a former Tory MP, Sarah Pochin and James McMurdock. A Tory source said: 'It is the first time they have worked together, and on immigration. There is no precedent for this.' Reform, however, played down the significance. Mr Tice said it was a 'good amendment' that merited cross-party backing. But he warned against 'overthinking it' as a sign of wider co-operation between the two major Right-wing parties against Sir Keir Starmer. The amendment would require quarterly publications of the nationality, method of entry to the UK, visa route and status, asylum status and country of birth of convicted offenders, along with details of their offence type and sentence length. Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, plans to force it to a vote of MPs in the Commons and said that, if passed, it would end the 'shameful cover-up' by state authorities, which has prevented the public from being told the scale of crime committed by foreign nationals. It would mirror an approach by some US states and Denmark, where league tables compiled from the government data have shown that the crime rates of the top four nations – Kuwait, Tunisia, Lebanon and Somalia – are eight times those of Danish nationals. The Telegraph has previously published data on migrant crime rates, but only as a result of the figures being released by Government departments under freedom of information laws. That research suggested foreign nationals were convicted of up to a quarter of sex crimes despite census data showing that they made up just 9.3 per cent of the population. Labour has proposed its own league tables of migrant crime rates based on the nationalities and foreign criminals living in communities while awaiting deportation. Albanians, Romanians and Poles are expected to be among the top nationalities for crimes including violence, robbery, theft and drug production and dealing. It is understood that Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, overruled Home Office officials who have previously claimed it is too difficult to provide quality data on foreign criminals. She has told them she wants it published by the end of the year. Her immigration white paper also proposed that the Home Office should be informed of all crimes committed by foreign nationals in the UK as part of a deportation crackdown.
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
I'm bullish about Britain. You should be too
There's been too much doom in our politics of late. Too much fatalism about our future. So, why then, am I bullish about Britain? My confidence isn't due to a lack of awareness or complacency about our present malaise. I see it, like so many Telegraph readers, and it pains and motivates me. The record high taxes, government spending, and debt interest payments. The highest industrial energy costs in the world. The 7 million people on the NHS waiting list. Or one in five students actually earning less for having gone to university. That's not to mention the record shoplifting and court backlogs, broken borders and the endemic, so-called 'petty' lawbreaking. Our present malaise is explicable. In recent decades, those in charge have traded out the fair, decent and efficient instincts of the British people as the guiding force behind our policy for their own supposed 'rationality.' All too often they disparage public opinion as 'populism', choosing instead to work against the grain of sentiment of the British people. At times our political and bureaucratic class would even say one thing in public to placate the public, but do another in practice. We're confronted with manifestations of this madness on a daily basis. A foreign terrorist's right to stay here trumps the public's right to walk safe streets. We won't drill in the North Sea and instead we will import oil and gas from Norway – who drill from the exact same sea. We'll trade a car made in Sunderland, for one made in China. We're for free speech, but Islam should get its own blasphemy law. We must give-away the strategically important Chagos Islands to Mauritius to preserve our reputation at international law conferences. Those are the results of the so-called rationality of those in charge of our country. It's a joke – and the joke is on us. But – and this is the crucial thing – we're not a patient who's ill and the doctors can't understand why. We're not a patient whose treatment requires the invention of some complex new drug. We are poorly, but the medicine we need is clear. Most of our challenges stem from a relatively small number of very big things we are getting wrong which are compounding each other. If we start to get them right – like we have for so much of our history – we can turn things around. We have built homes and infrastructure quickly and cheaply before. We have harnessed cheap and reliable energy to power forward British industry before. We have operated a lean and efficient state before which attracted the very best and took pride in our country. Before the turn of this century we mostly had sensible, controlled migration. The answers have not changed: we have proved before they are possible and within reach. The times are changing. The old order is collapsing – and its architects like Tony Blair are yesterday's men and women. Keir Starmer doubled down on our failed consensus, tinkering here and there, and his political honeymoon has ended faster than ever. After a wasted year he is in office, but increasingly not in power. The public's patience has snapped and they will no longer tolerate politicians and parties that fail to act on the frustrations voters feel. We live in a political interregnum, the period of stasis between two orders. What follows is often reinvigorating as latent, suppressed creativity, entrepreneurship and innovation suddenly flowers and lifts the whole nation. In the words of George Orwell, 'nothing ever stands still. We must add to our heritage, or lose it. We must grow greater or grow less. We must go forward or backward.' We have no choice but to advance.
