logo
BBC granted time to consider appeal in Gerry Adams case before paying all costs

BBC granted time to consider appeal in Gerry Adams case before paying all costs

Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, which he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Fein official Denis Donaldson, for which he denies any involvement.
On Friday, a jury at the High Court in Dublin found in his favour and awarded him 100,000 euros (£84,000) after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article.
The BBC will also have to pay Mr Adams's legal costs.
However, the broadcaster was granted a stay on paying out the full costs and damages to allow it time to consider whether to lodge an appeal.
The stay was subject to paying half the damages (50,000 euros or £42,000) and 250,000 euros (£210,000) towards solicitors' fees.
Eoin McCullough SC, for the broadcaster, told trial judge Mr Justice Alexander Owens on Tuesday that he was applying for a stay pending a decision on whether to take an appeal.
He said his client had not determined if it would appeal, but added that he was seeking a stay until the end of the appeal period.
In making its decision, the jury also found the BBC's actions were not in good faith and the corporation had not acted in a fair and reasonable way.
When asked by the judge for what grounds an appeal could be taken, Mr McCullough said the court had rejected applications by the defence on matters put to the jury relating to Section 26 of the Defamation Act.
In particular, he questioned the decision to reject an application to withdraw the question of 'good faith' to the jury – and the order in which that question was asked of the members.
The jury was asked the good faith question before making a decision on whether the publication was fair and reasonable.
Mr McCullough said it was inevitable that the jury would find against him on the matter of fair and reasonable action once it had already found against him on good faith.
Mr Justice Alexander Owens agreed with counsel that there may be grounds for an appeal on the fact that the jury was first asked to consider whether the actions were in good faith before considering whether the actions were fair and reasonable.
Tom Hogan SC, for Mr Adams, said that if the court was going to grant a stay, it should be on the basis of something being paid towards the award.
Mr Justice Alexander Owens granted the stay subject to the conditions that 50,000 euros be paid towards damages and 250,000 euros towards the solicitors' fees.
However, this can also be appealed against.
Mr McCullough had raised other potential grounds for appeal, including the court's decision not to allow Mr Donaldson's daughter to give another 'version' of matters given in evidence by the family's former solicitor Ciaran Shiels.
He also said an appeal may be grounded on the exclusion of the evidence of Austin Stack and historian Eunan O'Halpin.
He said an appeal could further be grounded on the defendants being excluded from taking on the issue of whether Mr Adams was in the IRA, arguing that this could be put forward as significant acts of misconduct which would speak towards reputation.
Mr Adams denies being a member of the IRA.
Mr McCullough also raised comments by the judge which referred to newspaper reports about Mr Adams that were called upon during cross-examination as 'rot' and 'blather'.
He said that based on all of these issues, the jury determination of a 100,000 euro quantum for damages was itself unsustainable, further stating that the circulation of the programme and article was 'very small' and combined with a 'very damaged reputation'.
Mr Hogan said he could not say that there were not some points that were arguable, but added he did not want to 'fight the appeal now'.
He said there was a 'very significant inequality of arms in this case' and questioned whether the application was strategic.
He said an appeal had to be brought on a bona fide basis.
Mr McCullough said it was 'surprising' if not a 'little frustrating' to hear a suggestion that he was acting short of good faith.
He said all he had said was that his client had not made up its mind and that any appeal should be allowed to proceed in the usual way.
He had argued that it may be difficult and complicated to get the amounts paid out back should he prevail on appeal.
Mr Justice Alexander Owens said he was 'not really persuaded' on the grounds of the appeal, other than the order of the questions on 'good faith' and 'fair and reasonable'.
He made the order of the payment of partial damages and costs.
It is open to the BBC to seek a further stay against that payment at the Court of Appeal.
Last week, the director of BBC Northern Ireland Adam Smyth said the broadcaster has insurance and 'makes financial provision for ongoing and anticipated legal claims'.
Separately, the counsel discussed whether the article – which remains online – could be geoblocked in the Republic of Ireland.
On the issue of seeking an injunction, Mr Hogan said he had been discussing the matter with Mr McCullough and that it may be technologically possible.
He added that there had been a lot of talk over the weekend over BBC services being blocked in the Republic of Ireland.
Mr Justice Alexander Owens replied: 'I heard that, I don't imagine that will happen.'
The judge questioned what jurisdiction he had to make an order on the BBC, which is abroad.
He added that it had been put to the jurors that he would not be able to make such an order and that their award of damages was the remedy on the matter.
Mr Hogan agreed that it was not a matter to be decided on Tuesday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

First Minister disappointed to not attend Belfast Pride this year
First Minister disappointed to not attend Belfast Pride this year

North Wales Chronicle

time42 minutes ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

First Minister disappointed to not attend Belfast Pride this year

It comes after the Belfast Pride organisers asked political parties to not attend the parade this year in an official capacity, after Stormont backed a ban on puberty blockers. The parade started in 1991 and over the last 30 years has grown to be the largest single parade in Northern Ireland. The theme for this year's event is No Going Back, as organisers said there must be 'no turning back from the advances made in visibility, legal protections and societal recognition'. Alliance MLA and Stormont Agriculture and Environment Minister Andrew Muir, who is gay, has said he will be attending the Pride parade in a personal capacity, describing it as an important event. First Minister Michelle O'Neill said she will mark Pride in her own way, and hopes to be able to return to Belfast Pride next year. 'For me, Pride has always been about love and friendship, about celebrating people's identity and promoting inclusivity, and I have always been an advocate for equality and human rights, so it does make me sad that they have taken the decision that they have taken,' she told the BBC. 'However, I will continue to work with the organisers, I'll continue to work with all the organisations out there that represent the whole LGBTQIA+ community, and I would say to them all that whilst they celebrate Pride on Saturday, I hope that next year I also will be celebrating Pride with them. 'I will do so this Saturday in my own way, and I'll send them all, all the members of the LGBTQIA+ community that I, as your First Minister, am your ally, I will continue to be your ally and Sinn Fein as my party will also continue to be an ally.' Meanwhile, earlier this week it was reported that the head of the Northern Ireland Civil Service, Jayne Brady, was told they would be 'open to the charge of acting politically' by taking part in Belfast Pride. Ms O'Neill said she felt that as a major employer in Northern Ireland, the civil service should be represented, however TUV MLA Timothy Gaston said there was 'deep unease' among Christian civil servants. The First Minister said: 'We are an inclusive employer and I think it is absolutely appropriate that the head of that service should be there and walk in the celebration that is Pride on Saturday. 'We can't promote inclusivity and employ that many people, and not actually turn up on the day of celebration, so I commend that as the right approach to take. 'The civil service is an employer, and they're an employer of over 24,000 staff, many of those staff will be members of the LGBTQIA+ community so therefore, I think it is appropriate that the head of the civil service will be there and actually celebrate on Pride with many of the staff.' Mr Muir said: 'I came out just under 30 years ago and, at that time as a young gay man struggling with my sexuality, I was looking to my employer, and my employer was saying, 'we're going to take part in Pride, we're going to show our support for our fellow LGBTQIA+ employees'. 'I'd be thinking, 'that's somewhere I want to work, that's somewhere I want to feel included', and I think that is really, really good, and I want to commend the leadership of the Northern Ireland Civil Service. Mr Gaston said he has written to Ms Brady to voice his concern after being contacted by Christian civil servants. 'Their concerns are not rooted in prejudice but in a principled belief that the Civil Service, as a publicly funded and supposedly apolitical body, should not be endorsing what is an overtly political and highly divisive campaign,' he said. 'Belfast Pride is not a neutral celebration. It is a platform for contentious political demands, including positions on gender ideology, family, education, and religious freedom, that are strongly contested. 'When the Civil Service appears to publicly align itself with such a movement, it sends a clear and troubling message: that one worldview is officially sanctioned, and others are to be marginalised or silenced. 'The Civil Service must be impartial, not just in its public actions but in the culture it cultivates within.'

Seven men convicted of murder following shooting of Greenock man on his doorstep
Seven men convicted of murder following shooting of Greenock man on his doorstep

Scotsman

time42 minutes ago

  • Scotsman

Seven men convicted of murder following shooting of Greenock man on his doorstep

The men will be sentenced at a later date Sign up to the daily Crime UK newsletter. All the latest crime news and trials from across the UK. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Seven men have been convicted of murder over the shooting of a man on his doorstep in Greenock two years ago. Neil Canney was rushed to hospital after being shot on Nairn Road on February 28 2023. He died shortly after. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad On Friday, seven men were convicted of murder following a trial at the High Court in Glasgow. Jack Benson, 24, Dale Russell, 31, Martin McCusker, 41, Brendan Balloch, 25, Kieran Hendry, 26, and Michael Munro, 28, were found guilty. They were also found guilty of attempted murder. Kieran Meechan, 29, previously pleaded guilty to murder at an earlier hearing. Four of the men convicted. Top: Brendan Balloch, Dale Russell. Bottom: Jack Benson, Martin McCusker | Police Scotland They are due to be sentenced at the High Court in Glasgow on Friday September 12. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Detective Chief Inspector Graham McCreadie said: "This was a shocking and traumatic attack that took place in the community and many people who knew Mr Canney witnessed the attack. "I hope that this sentence brings some degree of closure to his family and friends and our thoughts remain with them at this difficult time. "Thankfully violent crimes like these in public places are rare. When such incidents take place, we will use all resources necessary to carry out thorough, rigorous inquiries to ensure we track down those responsible to bring them to justice, no matter your part in a crime.

University of Hull targeted by email scam demanding money
University of Hull targeted by email scam demanding money

BBC News

time42 minutes ago

  • BBC News

University of Hull targeted by email scam demanding money

University students and staff have been targeted by an email scam demanding money, a spokesperson has emails, known as phishing, compromised 196 accounts at the University of Hull on Wednesday, before requesting emails claimed university accounts were being closed and asked recipients to log in to confirm their details. The accounts were then used to send fraudulent emails requesting money spokesperson said an investigation is being carried out and the university, alongside their cybersecurity partner, took immediate action to block the compromised accounts. "Our initial investigations have not identified that any data was accessed or exported," they said."We take the security of our community very seriously and are working to investigate what happened to prevent future occurrences." Listen to highlights from Hull and East Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here. Download the BBC News app from the App Store for iPhone and iPad or Google Play for Android devices

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store