
BBC granted time to consider appeal in Gerry Adams case before paying all costs
On Friday, a jury at the High Court in Dublin found in his favour and awarded him 100,000 euros (£84,000) after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article.
The BBC will also have to pay Mr Adams's legal costs.
However, the broadcaster was granted a stay on paying out the full costs and damages to allow it time to consider whether to lodge an appeal.
The stay was subject to paying half the damages (50,000 euros or £42,000) and 250,000 euros (£210,000) towards solicitors' fees.
Eoin McCullough SC, for the broadcaster, told trial judge Mr Justice Alexander Owens on Tuesday that he was applying for a stay pending a decision on whether to take an appeal.
He said his client had not determined if it would appeal, but added that he was seeking a stay until the end of the appeal period.
In making its decision, the jury also found the BBC's actions were not in good faith and the corporation had not acted in a fair and reasonable way.
When asked by the judge for what grounds an appeal could be taken, Mr McCullough said the court had rejected applications by the defence on matters put to the jury relating to Section 26 of the Defamation Act.
In particular, he questioned the decision to reject an application to withdraw the question of 'good faith' to the jury – and the order in which that question was asked of the members.
The jury was asked the good faith question before making a decision on whether the publication was fair and reasonable.
Mr McCullough said it was inevitable that the jury would find against him on the matter of fair and reasonable action once it had already found against him on good faith.
Mr Justice Alexander Owens agreed with counsel that there may be grounds for an appeal on the fact that the jury was first asked to consider whether the actions were in good faith before considering whether the actions were fair and reasonable.
Tom Hogan SC, for Mr Adams, said that if the court was going to grant a stay, it should be on the basis of something being paid towards the award.
Mr Justice Alexander Owens granted the stay subject to the conditions that 50,000 euros be paid towards damages and 250,000 euros towards the solicitors' fees.
However, this can also be appealed against.
Mr McCullough had raised other potential grounds for appeal, including the court's decision not to allow Mr Donaldson's daughter to give another 'version' of matters given in evidence by the family's former solicitor Ciaran Shiels.
He also said an appeal may be grounded on the exclusion of the evidence of Austin Stack and historian Eunan O'Halpin.
He said an appeal could further be grounded on the defendants being excluded from taking on the issue of whether Mr Adams was in the IRA, arguing that this could be put forward as significant acts of misconduct which would speak towards reputation.
Mr Adams denies being a member of the IRA.
Mr McCullough also raised comments by the judge which referred to newspaper reports about Mr Adams that were called upon during cross-examination as 'rot' and 'blather'.
He said that based on all of these issues, the jury determination of a 100,000 euro quantum for damages was itself unsustainable, further stating that the circulation of the programme and article was 'very small' and combined with a 'very damaged reputation'.
Mr Hogan said he could not say that there were not some points that were arguable, but added he did not want to 'fight the appeal now'.
He said there was a 'very significant inequality of arms in this case' and questioned whether the application was strategic.
He said an appeal had to be brought on a bona fide basis.
Mr McCullough said it was 'surprising' if not a 'little frustrating' to hear a suggestion that he was acting short of good faith.
He said all he had said was that his client had not made up its mind and that any appeal should be allowed to proceed in the usual way.
He had argued that it may be difficult and complicated to get the amounts paid out back should he prevail on appeal.
Mr Justice Alexander Owens said he was 'not really persuaded' on the grounds of the appeal, other than the order of the questions on 'good faith' and 'fair and reasonable'.
He made the order of the payment of partial damages and costs.
It is open to the BBC to seek a further stay against that payment at the Court of Appeal.
Last week, the director of BBC Northern Ireland Adam Smyth said the broadcaster has insurance and 'makes financial provision for ongoing and anticipated legal claims'.
Separately, the counsel discussed whether the article – which remains online – could be geoblocked in the Republic of Ireland.
On the issue of seeking an injunction, Mr Hogan said he had been discussing the matter with Mr McCullough and that it may be technologically possible.
He added that there had been a lot of talk over the weekend over BBC services being blocked in the Republic of Ireland.
Mr Justice Alexander Owens replied: 'I heard that, I don't imagine that will happen.'
The judge questioned what jurisdiction he had to make an order on the BBC, which is abroad.
He added that it had been put to the jurors that he would not be able to make such an order and that their award of damages was the remedy on the matter.
Mr Hogan agreed that it was not a matter to be decided on Tuesday.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
12 minutes ago
- BBC News
Manslaughter arrest over woman's death at Thornaby home
A woman has been arrested on suspicion of manslaughter after a body was found at a Police said offices were called to Cornfield Road in Thornaby, Stockton-on-Tees, at about 16:45 BST on Friday following the death of a woman, aged 53, at the property. The force said a 25-year-old woman had been arrested on suspicion of manslaughter and was currently in custody for questioning.A scene is currently in place as part of the investigation and anyone with information is asked to contact the police. Follow BBC Tees on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.


Telegraph
12 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Taliban fighters ‘brought to Britain' in ‘kill list' airlift
Former Taliban fighters are living in the UK after being airlifted from Afghanistan on British mercy flights, The Telegraph has been told. The jihadis were allegedly among thousands of people brought here for their own safety because they were on a leaked list of names of Afghans who had applied to come to the UK. Sex offenders, corrupt officials and people imprisoned under the US-led coalition are also among those who have been accepted for resettlement in the UK in an apparent failure of vetting procedures. The Telegraph has shared details with British authorities. Around 6,900 Afghans are being flown to the UK as part of Operation Rubific, the codename for the Government's response to the 2022 data breach. A British official wrongly shared the personal details of 25,000 Afghans who had applied to a relocation scheme for those who had fought with British forces during the war in Afghanistan, or worked as translators or in other support roles. Until this month, a High Court super-injunction had prevented the media from reporting anything about the leak or the airlift. As The Telegraph reported earlier this month, several Cabinet ministers raised serious concerns about Operation Rubific because they were worried about national security, and the latest disclosures appear to justify their stance. According to multiple senior sources in Afghanistan, the evacuation process was infiltrated by individuals with Taliban connections who exploited the system and got fighters to the UK, including by naming Taliban fighters as family members and dependents who needed to join them here. 'We had civilians in our office who had clear ties with the Taliban,' one Afghan official said. 'They were taken to Britain and then introduced fighters as family members and brought them to Britain…some people on the evacuation list named people with clear ties to the Taliban and introduced Taliban people as cousins, and they are in Britain.' Sources describe a pattern where corrupt Afghan officials, rather than genuine British allies, were facilitating the evacuation of Taliban-connected individuals. 'We had a lot of corrupt officials,' another Afghan official said. 'Those corrupt officials are now taking Taliban fighters to Britain rather than those who really worked for the UK. It's depressing.' The official claimed that UK personnel often seemed to rely on these corrupt individuals for consultation and recommendations, leading to the inclusion of Taliban-connected people on evacuation lists. 'When my friends see them there, they call and say, 'Wow, that guy is here', but that top commander is hiding in Kabul,' one Afghan official said. The Ministry of Defence has previously confirmed that some Afghans have brought more than 20 people with them as family members. The Telegraph has been given the names of four alleged Taliban sympathisers who are among those said to have come to the UK under resettlement schemes. One of them, who came to Britain before the fall of Kabul in 2021, is said to have arranged for several Taliban-linked family members to follow him to the UK. The Ministry of Defence confirmed the man was living in Britain. It did not confirm or deny that he had been followed by family members with alleged links to the Taliban. A second man, a logistics worker who spent four years in prison for stealing and selling Coalition weapons to the Taliban before being released in the Taliban takeover of Kabul, is currently living in Britain, the Ministry of Defence confirmed. 'They are not good for Britain' Another case involved an individual who allegedly sexually abused female workers. Defence sources said he has not moved to Britain yet and that his case is being worked through. The fourth name passed to the Telegraph was that of a British passport holder who allegedly facilitated the evacuation of Taliban-connected individuals by vouching for them under the resettlement scheme. A Ministry of Defence spokesman did not directly comment on the allegation that he had brought Taliban sympathisers to the UK, and said only that the vetting process includes biographic and document checks and not just personal recommendations. The Telegraph has previously reported that Robert Clark, a former soldier and reservist who worked on the relocation scheme, said he had been informed by Ministry of Defence personnel that full vetting of applicants secretly brought to the UK had not been completed. Mr Clark warned there would be significant national security implications for intelligence services and police if proper background checks had not been conducted to determine whether individuals had been radicalised or maintained terrorist connections. 'They are not good for Britain,' said one former senior Afghan official who spoke with The Telegraph. 'They were fighting against British forces and killed lots of Brits, but now are being fed by Brits in London. They have British blood on their hands.'


Daily Record
42 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Man charged over death of Shona Stevens in Irvine more than 30 years ago
The mum was found badly injured on a footpath in a wooded area in 1994. A man has been charged in connection with the death of Irvine mum Shona Stevens over 30 years ago. Shona Stevens, 31, was found with significant head injuries on a footpath in a wooded area near to the rear of Alder Green in the Bourtreehill Park area of Irvine on Thursday, November 10, 1994 and died later in hospital. A 67-year-old has been arrested and charged and is now due to appear at Kilmarnock Sheriff Court on Monday, July 28. The frenzied attack happened just 200 yards from the mum's Ayrshire home, as she walked to the Co-op shop in Bourtreehill shopping centre. Shona was last seen walking alone on Towerlands Road just 10 minutes before she was found. The police investigation was hampered after crucial evidence from the crime scene was feared to have been blown away by the downdraught of the helicopter airlifting Shona to hospital in Glasgow but she died three days later. Five weeks later, her body was laid to rest in her mum's hometown of Portree on Skye. It was the third murder recorded in the town in 1994, leaving many local residents in fear - especially as Shona's killer walked freely. Police Scotland announced last year that they were 'determined' that the killer would be caught. Her death was being re-investigated as part of a cold case review. At the time, officers were hopeful that advancements in science could lead to a break through. Shona's case was featured on BBC's Crimewatch Live in 2021. A £10,000 reward was offered for any information leading to the arrest of the killer. As part of the appeal, viewers were told about an unusual object which was recovered at the crime scene. A novelty keyring was recovered, despite other evidence potentially being destroyed. A Police Scotland statement read: "A 67-year-old man arrested in connection with the death of Shona Stevens has now been charged."