Israel investigates use of Palestinians as human shields by its forces in Gaza
'The use of Palestinians as human shields, or otherwise coercing them to participate in military operations, is strictly prohibited in IDF [Israel Defense Forces] orders,' the Israeli army said in a statement.
'Allegations of conduct that does not comply with these directives and procedures are examined. In several cases, investigations by MPCID [Israeli military police criminal division] were opened following suspicions of involving Palestinians in military missions.'
Earlier on Saturday, the Associated Press reported that several Palestinians and Israeli soldiers had said troops were systematically forcing Palestinians to act as human shields in Gaza . They said the practice had 'become ubiquitous during 19 months of war', AP reported.
Seven Palestinians described being used as shields in Gaza and the occupied West Bank, and two members of Israel's military said they had engaged in the practice, which is prohibited by international law.
Rights groups expressed alarm, saying it had become standard procedure and used increasingly in the war.
'These are not isolated accounts; they point to a systemic failure and a horrifying moral collapse,' said Nadav Weiman, the executive director of Breaking the Silence, a whistleblower group of former Israeli soldiers who have collected testimonies about the practice from within the military. 'Israel rightly condemns Hamas for using civilians as human shields, but our own soldiers describe doing the very same,' Weiman told AP.
One alleged victim, Abu Hamadan, said he was detained in August after being separated from his family, and soldiers told him he had help with a 'special mission'. For 17 days he was forced to help search houses and inspect every hole in the ground for tunnels, he said.
Soldiers stood behind him and, once it was clear, entered the buildings to damage or destroy them, he said.
The two Israeli soldiers who spoke to the AP – and a third who provided testimony to Breaking the Silence – said commanders were aware of the use of human shields and tolerated it, with some giving orders to do so. Some said it was referred to as the 'mosquito protocol' and that Palestinians were also referred to as 'wasps' and other dehumanising terms.
The soldiers, who said they were no longer serving in Gaza, claimed the practice sped up operations, saved ammunition and spared combat dogs from injury or death.
In October, the Guardian collected testimonies from former Palestinian detainees which were largely consistent with the reporting by AP. The IDF said the investigations were ongoing but provided no more details.
The forcible use of Palestinian detainees to enter houses and tunnels in Gaza first became public in footage broadcast by Al Jazeera television in June and July 2024. An investigation by the Israeli newspaper Haaretz in August gathered testimony from Israeli soldiers who said the Palestinians used as shields were known as ' shawish ', a word of Turkish origin meaning 'sergeant'. The soldiers suggested it was an institutionalised tactic approved by senior officers.
In 2002, Israel's high court issued an injunction prohibiting the IDF from using what was known as the 'neighbour procedure', detaining a Palestinian in an area of unrest and ordering the detainee to knock on the doors of their neighbours and oversee the clearance of their houses.
The use of human shields continued, however. In 2010, two IDF staff sergeants were demoted for forcing a nine-year-old Palestinian boy to open a number of bags suspected of containing explosives.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
8 minutes ago
UCLA set to lose some of its federal research funding: Officials
UCLA has been notified that it will be losing some of its federal research funding over claims of 'antisemitism and bias,' according to the school's chancellor. 'UCLA received a notice that the federal government, through its control of the National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and other agencies, is suspending certain research funding to UCLA,' said UCLA's chancellor Julio Frenk in a statement released on Thursday. 'This is not only a loss to the researchers who rely on critical grants. It is a loss for Americans across the nation whose work, health, and future depend on the groundbreaking work we do.' Frenk said 'hundreds of grants' may be lost due to the decision. 'The news we received is so deeply disappointing. With this decision, hundreds of grants may be lost, adversely affecting the lives and life-changing work of UCLA researchers, faculty and staff,' the chancellor said. 'In its notice to us, the federal government claims antisemitism and bias as the reasons. This far-reaching penalty of defunding life-saving research does nothing to address any alleged discrimination.' Just earlier this week, UCLA reached a $6 million settlement with Jewish students to resolve a lawsuit alleging it allowed pro-Palestinian demonstrators to prevent Jewish students and faculty from accessing parts of campus. 'We share the goal of eradicating antisemitism across society. Antisemitism has no place on our campus, nor does any form of discrimination. We recognize that we can improve, and I am committed to doing so,' Frenk said in his statement on Thursday. 'Confronting the scourge of antisemitism effectively calls for thoughtfulness, commitment, and sustained effort -- and UCLA has taken robust actions to make our campus a safe and welcoming environment for all students.' UCLA said it is 'actively evaluating our best course of action' following the announcement that it is set to lose some of its federal research funding. 'For the past several months, our leadership team has been preparing for this situation and have developed comprehensive contingency plans. We will do everything we can to protect the interests of faculty, students and staff -- and to defend our values and principles,' Frenk said. 'Federal research grants are not handouts. Our researchers compete fiercely for these grants, proposing work that the government itself deems vital to the country's health, safety and economic future,' the chancellor continued. 'Grants lead to medical breakthroughs, economic advancement, improved national security and global competitiveness -- these are national priorities.'
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Canada's shifting stance on Palestinian statehood, explained
OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney announced Wednesday his government intends to recognize a Palestinian state. Here's a closer look at why that's happening and what it all means. Is Palestine a country? The name Palestine has been attached to an area of the Middle East for centuries. Britain took control of the region after the collapse of the Ottoman Empire. The U.K. endorsed calls by Jewish organizations to populate the area based on Jews' ancestral ties to the Middle East. The Zionist movement emerged as a response to centuries of violent persecution of Jews in Europe, up to and including the Holocaust. After Israel established itself as a country in 1948 in a war that displaced many Palestinians, it fought a series of battles with Arab nations over decades. At the end of the 1967 Six-Day War, Israel occupied three territories claimed by Palestinians. Canada and other nations consider that to be an illegal occupation. Israel has control over East Jerusalem, which the Palestinians claim as the capital of a future state. In 1947, the UN called for the city to become a neutral, international city. The Palestinian Authority controls large parts of the West Bank through the Fatah party. Hamas, which Canada has listed as a terrorist group, has full control of Gaza. Neither territory has held an election since 2006 and polls by the anticorruption Aman Coalition think tank have found widespread concerns about corruption in both governments. Most of the UN's member states — 147 of 193 — recognize a Palestinian state, despite the split leadership. What is the two-state solution? Canada has for decades called for a "two-state" solution — a Palestinian state existing in peace alongside Israel. Many countries support this idea as the best way to stop the cycle of violence and occupation. But some countries, including Iran, have said Israel should cease to exist and have funded groups like Hamas and Hezbollah to attack Israel. Israel says the Palestinian Authority has supported terrorists and has not clearly affirmed Israel's right to exist. It says Hamas poses an existential threat to the country. Those concerns intensified after the gruesome Hamas attack on Israel of Oct. 7, 2023, which saw the terror group and its affiliates kill 1,200 people. Israel's offensive in Gaza has killed 60,000 people, according to the Hamas-controlled health ministry. Israel says its aim is to rout Hamas and force it to return the hostages it took in the Oct. 7 attack. Many family members of the hostages have argued that the Israeli government has other motives. Canada says Hamas can have no role in governing a State of Palestine. Canada and other nations have decried the spread of illegal settlements in the West Bank, where Israeli settlers have violently routed Palestinians from their homes — often with the support of the Israeli government. Why hasn't Canada recognized a Palestinian state already? For years, Ottawa suggested recognition would only come at the end of peace talks between Palestinian and Israeli leaders. But last November, the Liberals said Canada's recognition might come sooner because of the spread of Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, and the high death toll of Israel's bombardment in Gaza. In his announcement Wednesday, Carney said those factors, along with Hamas terrorism, have "steadily and gravely eroded" the path toward a two-state solution. France vowed to recognize a Palestinian state last week, while the U.K. said it would be open to doing the same if Israel does not change its policies in Gaza. Ireland, Spain and Norway recognized Palestine in spring 2024. What did Carney announce? Prime Minister Carney said Wednesday that Canada intends to recognize a Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly in September. That would mean Palestine would go from having a special representative office in Ottawa, as Taiwan does, to a full embassy. Carney said Canada's move is "predicated on the Palestinian Authority's commitment to much-needed reforms, including … general elections in 2026 in which Hamas can play no part, and to demilitarize the Palestinian state." University of Ottawa international affairs professor Thomas Juneau said it's not clear how Canada is assessing whether the Palestinian Authority has done enough. "That's the right approach, but the progress that Prime Minister Carney mentioned is extremely ambitious, and it's also fairly vague," he said. "What kind of indications of progress in that direction does Canada want to see?" Does that mean an election in Gaza? Canada is only asking the Palestinian Authority for an election, which would take place in the West Bank. Ottawa's aim is for the Palestinian Authority to eventually have the legitimacy and capacity it needs to govern both the West Bank and Gaza. Hamas violently ejected Fatah from Gaza in 2007 and said Thursday it "will not recognize Israel." Israeli government officials have discussed working with local clans as part of a possible governance structure in Gaza that excludes Hamas. Some of the clans have been implicated in gang activity in Gaza. What does Israel say? Israel says that recognizing a Palestinian state only rewards Hamas for its violence and will inspire further attacks. It argues its actions in Gaza have been distorted by the outside world, something it blames in part on propaganda from hostile states. While Israel insists it has met its obligations on humanitarian aid, U.S. President Donald Trump and most major global organizations say Israel has allowed starvation to take hold in Gaza. Israel says it's also concerned about the Palestinian Authority supporting those who have committed violent attacks against Israel. The Palestinian Authority's delegation in Ottawa has said it's up to Palestinians alone to decide how they are governed, and blames Israel for policies it says have driven people to take up arms. Why don't Palestinians move elsewhere? Many Palestinians use the word Nakba or "catastrophe" to refer to the establishment of Israel and their dispossession. Millions of Palestinians fled decades ago to refugee camps in Jordan, Lebanon, Syria and the Palestinian territories. Israel rejects calling these people refugees, saying they can integrate into other Arab societies. Many Palestinians say they refuse to be moved off their land, even if they face dire living conditions in the West Bank and Gaza. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is governing in a coalition that relies on Jewish supremacist parties that have called for the displacement of Palestinians to other countries and the full annexation of the Palestinian territories. Trump at one point endorsed vacating Gaza in order to make the area the "Riviera of the Middle East." Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz has called for placing the entire population of Gaza in one city — something former Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert described as "a concentration camp." Egypt has constructed a large barrier on its border with the Gaza Strip — in part because of concerns about the proximity of terror groups like Hamas and in part to keep Palestinians from being forcibly displaced into Egypt. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 31, 2025. Dylan Robertson, The Canadian Press
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Canada 'disappointed' by Trump boosting tariffs to 35%, says Carney
Prime Minister Mark Carney released a statement late Thursday night after U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order to increase a tariff on Canadian goods to 35 per cent. "While the Canadian government is disappointed by this action, we remain committed to [the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement], which is the world's second-largest free trade agreement by trading volume," the statement read. "The U.S. application of CUSMA means that the U.S. average tariff rate on Canadian goods remains one of its lowest for all of its trading partners. Other sectors of our economy — including lumber, steel, aluminum and automobiles — are, however, heavily impacted by U.S. duties and tariffs." He says the Canadian government will act to protect Canadian jobs, invest in industrial competitiveness, buy Canadian and diversify export markets. Even though the vast bulk of Canada's exports can still cross the border tariff-free, Trump's executive order increases the tariff rate, which had been set at 25 per cent since March, to 35 per cent starting Friday. WATCH | Trump speaks at the White House just hours before tariff deadline: The order cites "Canada's lack of co-operation in stemming the flood of fentanyl and other illicit drugs across our northern border" and the fact that Canada has retaliated against the United States for the president's actions. Border security improvements Carney's statement also outlined all the work Canada has been doing to crack down on fentanyl and increase border security. "Canada accounts for only one per cent of U.S. fentanyl imports and has been working intensively to further reduce these volumes," he said. "Canada's government is making historic investments in border security to arrest drug traffickers, take down transnational gangs and end migrant smuggling." This week, is asking: What challenges are you facing as you try to buy Canadian? Leave your comment here and we may read it or call you back for Sunday's show. Carney says they have hired thousands of new law enforcement and border security officers, implemented aerial surveillance and increased Canada's intelligence and security operations. Speaking to reporters at the White House, Trump was asked whether Carney's announcement that Canada plans to recognize a Palestinian state was a deal-breaker on trade. "I didn't like what they said, but you know, that's their opinion," Trump said. "Not a deal-breaker. But we haven't spoken to Canada today. He's called and we'll see." Negotiations ongoing Trump told NBC News Thursday evening that he was open to further discussions with Canada, adding that he may even speak with Carney later in the night. Carney's office would not confirm that a call was placed to the White House, and told CBC News it is not confirming any details about the ongoing negotiations. In a separate executive order on Thursday, Trump hit dozens of countries around the world with new across-the-board tariff rates ranging from 15 to 41 per cent. After speaking with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, Trump gave Mexico a 90-day extension of its current tariff regime, despite having previously threatened to raise the rate effective Friday. Canada's trade negotiating team is in Washington, but officials were tight-lipped Thursday about who they were meeting with — if anyone. WATCH | Canadians' boycott of U.S. booze draws attention south of the border: Tariffs remain 'unjustified,' says Poilievre Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre took to social media Thursday evening, calling the tariffs "unjustified" and saying his party continues to hold out hope for a deal to end all tariffs. "That means zero tariffs on our steel, aluminum, softwood, autos, energy, agriculture and everything else," he wrote on the social media platform X. "That is the deal Canada had before and the prime minister should accept nothing short of that." Earlier, Ontario Premier Doug Ford called the tariff increase concerning and said Ottawa should retaliate with 50 per cent tariffs on U.S. steel and aluminum. "Canada shouldn't settle for anything less than the right deal," Ford said on X. "Now is not the time to roll over. We need to stand our ground." Union wants to see action Unifor national president Lana Payne said she agrees with Ford. "This is the fight of our lives," said Payne, whose union represents some 40,000 autoparts and assembly workers in Canada. "And we need to use all our leverage to fight for Canadian workers and their jobs. The stakes are high but we can do this Canada!" For more than a week, Carney and other Canadian officials have been downplaying the likelihood of getting a deal by the deadline. They've also cast doubt on the urgency, given the exemption that allows roughly 90 per cent of Canadian exports to enter the U.S. tariff-free. David Paterson, Ontario's representative in Washington, told CBC's Power & Politics guest host David Common that Canadians should not be overreacting to the lack of a deal right now. WATCH | The latest from Washington: "The sun will shine in the morning and we will carry on," Paterson said Thursday from his office in Canada's embassy in Washington. "We really support the prime minister's approach. When the time is right for that agreement to come together, it will." Comments from U.S. officials White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt suggested earlier Thursday the threatened tariff increases would kick in unless Trump reached last-minute deals with trading partners. "Those countries that either do not have a deal or have a letter, they will be hearing from this administration by the midnight deadline tonight," Leavitt told reporters in a briefing. Trump's Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick criticized Canada for being one of the only countries to retaliate against Trump's tariffs. "I just don't see the president stepping off the gas," Lutnick said in an interview on Fox Business Network. Trump issued similar ultimatums with the same Aug. 1 deadline to 17 major trading partners across the globe, including the European Union, Japan and Taiwan. Each contained threats of tariffs in the range of 30 per cent. Last week, Trump announced deals with the EU and Japan with across-the-board tariffs of 15 per cent, as well as vague commitments for hundreds of billions of dollars of investment in the U.S. A pending legal challenge Separately, Trump has imposed a 50 per cent tariff on steel and aluminum imports from around the world. Canada is the top supplier of both products to the U.S. For the 35% tariff that specifically targets Canada, Trump used a law that allows the U.S. president to take emergency economic measures to "deal with any unusual and extraordinary threat" to national security. He cited the supposed flow of fentanyl across the country's northern border as that threat. That tariff is facing a legal challenge that has now reached a federal appeals court, putting it further along in the U.S. court system than any other tariff lawsuit.
