From Laos to Brazil, Trump's tariffs leave a lot of losers. But even the winners will pay a price
The closest thing to winners may be the countries that caved to Trump's demands — and avoided even more pain. But it's unclear whether anyone will be able to claim victory in the long run — even the United States, the intended beneficiary of Trump's protectionist policies.
'In many respects, everybody's a loser here,'' said Barry Appleton, co-director of the Center for International Law at the New York Law School.
Barely six months after he returned to the White House, Trump has demolished the old global economic order. Gone is one built on agreed-upon rules. In its place is a system in which Trump himself sets the rules, using America's enormous economic power to punish countries that won't agree to one-sided trade deals and extracting huge concessions from the ones that do.
'The biggest winner is Trump,' said Alan Wolff, a former U.S. trade official and deputy director-general at the World Trade Organization. 'He bet that he could get other countries to the table on the basis of threats, and he succeeded – dramatically.''
Everything goes back to what Trump calls 'Liberation Day'' – April 2 – when the president announced 'reciprocal'' taxes of up to 50% on imports from countries with which the United States ran trade deficits and 10% 'baseline'' taxes on almost everyone else.
He invoked a 1977 law to declare the trade deficit a national emergency that justified his sweeping import taxes. That allowed him to bypass Congress, which traditionally has had authority over taxes, including tariffs — all of which is now being challenged in court.
Winners will still pay higher tariffs than before Trump took office
Trump retreated temporarily after his Liberation Day announcement triggered a rout in financial markets and suspended the reciprocal tariffs for 90 days to give countries a chance to negotiate.
Eventually, some of them did, caving to Trump's demands to pay what four months ago would have seemed unthinkably high tariffs for the privilege of continuing to sell into the vast American market.
The United Kingdom agreed to 10% tariffs on its exports to the United States — up from 1.3% before Trump amped up his trade war with the world. The U.S. demanded concessions even though it had run a trade surplus, not a deficit, with the UK for 19 straight years.
The European Union and Japan accepted U.S. tariffs of 15%. Those are much higher than the low single-digit rates they paid last year — but lower than the tariffs he was threatening (30% on the EU and 25% on Japan).
Also cutting deals with Trump and agreeing to hefty tariffs were Pakistan, South Korea, Vietnam, Indonesia and the Philippines.
Even countries that saw their tariffs lowered from April without reaching a deal are still paying much higher tariffs than before Trump took office. Angola's tariff, for instance, dropped to 15% from 32% in April, but in 2022 it was less than 1.5%. And while Trump administration cut Taiwan's tariff to 20% from 32% in April, the pain will still be felt.
'20% from the beginning has not been our goal, we hope that in further negotiations we will get a more beneficial and more reasonable tax rate,' Taiwan's president Lai Ching-te told reporters in Taipei Friday.
Trump also agreed to reduce the tariff on the tiny southern African kingdom of Lesotho to 15% from the 50% he'd announced in April, but the damage may already have been done there.
Bashing Brazil, clobbering Canada, shellacking the Swiss
Countries that didn't knuckle under — and those that found other ways to incur Trump's wrath — got hit harder.
Even some of the poor were not spared. Laos' annual economic output comes to $2,100 per person and Algeria's $5,600 — versus America's $75,000. Nonetheless, Laos got rocked with a 40% tariff and Algeria with a 30% levy.
Trump slammed Brazil with a 50% import tax largely because he didn't like the way it was treating former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, who is facing trial for trying to lose his electoral defeat in 2022. Never mind that the U.S. has exported more to Brazil than it's imported every year since 2007.
Trump's decision to plaster a 35% tariff on longstanding U.S. ally Canada was partly designed to threaten Ottawa for saying it would recognize a Palestinian state. Trump is a staunch supporter of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Switzerland was clobbered with a 39% import tax — even higher than the 31% Trump originally announced on April 2.
'The Swiss probably wish that they had camped in Washington'' to make a deal, said Wolff, now senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. 'They're clearly not at all happy.''
Fortunes may change if Trump's tariffs are upended in court. Five American businesses and 12 states are suing the president, arguing that his Liberation Day tariffs exceeded his authority under the 1977 law.
In May, the U.S. Court of International Trade, a specialized court in New York, agreed and blocked the tariffs, although the government was allowed to continue collecting them while its appeal wend its way through the legal system, and may likely end up at the U.S. Supreme Court. In a hearing Thursday, the judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit sounded skeptical about Trump's justifications for the tariffs.
'If (the tariffs) get struck down, then maybe Brazil's a winner and not a loser,'' Appleton said.
Paying more for knapsacks and video games
Trump portrays his tariffs as a tax on foreign countries. But they are actually paid by import companies in the U.S. who try to pass along the cost to their customers via higher prices. True, tariffs can hurt other countries by forcing their exporters to cut prices and sacrifice profits — or risk losing market share in the United States.
But economists at Goldman Sachs estimate that overseas exporters have absorbed just one-fifth of the rising costs from tariffs, while Americans and U.S. businesses have picked up the most of the tab.
Walmart, Procter & Gamble, Ford, Best Buy, Adidas, Nike, Mattel and Stanley Black & Decker, have all hiked prices due to U.S. tariffs
'This is a consumption tax, so it disproportionately affects those who have lower incomes,'' Appleton said. 'Sneakers, knapsacks ... your appliances are going to go up. Your TV and electronics are going to go up. Your video game devices, consoles are going to up because none of those are made in America.''
Trump's trade war has pushed the average U.S. tariff from 2.5% at the start of 2025 to 18.3% now, the highest since 1934, according to the Budget Lab at Yale University. And that will impose a $2,400 cost on the average household, the lab estimates.
'The U.S. consumer's a big loser,″ Wolff said.
____
AP Economics Writer Christopher Rugaber contributed to this story.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
First Merchants Second Quarter 2025 Earnings: EPS Beats Expectations, Revenues Lag
First Merchants (NASDAQ:FRME) Second Quarter 2025 Results Key Financial Results Revenue: US$158.7m (up 17% from 2Q 2024). Net income: US$56.4m (up 43% from 2Q 2024). Profit margin: 36% (up from 29% in 2Q 2024). The increase in margin was driven by higher revenue. EPS: US$0.98 (up from US$0.68 in 2Q 2024). AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period First Merchants EPS Beats Expectations, Revenues Fall Short Revenue missed analyst estimates by 1.1%. Earnings per share (EPS) exceeded analyst estimates by 3.7%. Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 6.6% p.a. on average during the next 2 years, compared to a 7.6% growth forecast for the Banks industry in the US. Performance of the American Banks industry. The company's shares are down 6.8% from a week ago. Risk Analysis Before we wrap up, we've discovered 1 warning sign for First Merchants that you should be aware of. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bunge Global SA Just Beat EPS By 134%: Here's What Analysts Think Will Happen Next
Bunge Global SA (NYSE:BG) just released its latest quarterly results and things are looking bullish. It was overall a positive result, with revenues beating expectations by 2.8% to hit US$13b. Bunge Global also reported a statutory profit of US$2.61, which was an impressive 134% above what the analysts had forecast. The analysts typically update their forecasts at each earnings report, and we can judge from their estimates whether their view of the company has changed or if there are any new concerns to be aware of. With this in mind, we've gathered the latest statutory forecasts to see what the analysts are expecting for next year. AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. After the latest results, the twin analysts covering Bunge Global are now predicting revenues of US$64.1b in 2025. If met, this would reflect a substantial 26% improvement in revenue compared to the last 12 months. Statutory earnings per share are predicted to rise 6.4% to US$7.33. Before this earnings report, the analysts had been forecasting revenues of US$52.7b and earnings per share (EPS) of US$7.70 in 2025. Although revenue sentiment looks to be improving, the analysts have made a small dip in per-share earnings estimates, perhaps acknowledging the investment required to grow the business. View our latest analysis for Bunge Global The consensus price target was unchanged at US$88.00, suggesting the business is performing roughly in line with expectations, despite some adjustments to profit and revenue forecasts. One way to get more context on these forecasts is to look at how they compare to both past performance, and how other companies in the same industry are performing. The analysts are definitely expecting Bunge Global's growth to accelerate, with the forecast 59% annualised growth to the end of 2025 ranking favourably alongside historical growth of 3.9% per annum over the past five years. By contrast, our data suggests that other companies (with analyst coverage) in a similar industry are forecast to grow their revenue at 3.2% per year. Factoring in the forecast acceleration in revenue, it's pretty clear that Bunge Global is expected to grow much faster than its industry. The Bottom Line The biggest concern is that the analysts reduced their earnings per share estimates, suggesting business headwinds could lay ahead for Bunge Global. Happily, they also upgraded their revenue estimates, and are forecasting them to grow faster than the wider industry. There was no real change to the consensus price target, suggesting that the intrinsic value of the business has not undergone any major changes with the latest estimates. With that in mind, we wouldn't be too quick to come to a conclusion on Bunge Global. Long-term earnings power is much more important than next year's profits. We have analyst estimates for Bunge Global going out as far as 2026, and you can see them free on our platform here. You still need to take note of risks, for example - Bunge Global has 4 warning signs (and 2 which can't be ignored) we think you should know about. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Starbucks must start delivering big-time
I have had a checkered history with Starbucks (SBUX). As an analyst during the Howard Schultz CEO era, I would camp out in stores for days studying everything the chain was doing wrong (and right). The stock was always priced for perfection, and I was trying to ensure that clients wouldn't be left holding the bag. My ensuing critical research reports weren't well-received by Starbucks. I still remember Schultz telling me to f*** off at an analyst day. I wasn't amused in the moment by a billionaire's lack of verbal control, but the next morning, I was back to my chipper self. You can't take this stuff personally. More than a decade later, I'm now a journalist with no bones to pick with Starbucks — just one providing context on this important stock. Current Starbucks CEO Brian Niccol is hard to root against. I originally met him at a Taco Bell investor day in New York City, maybe nine years ago. He was a good leader then and a better one today with a successful Chipotle (CMG) turnaround under his belt. The problem is that Starbucks' business isn't yet showing the Niccol magic. You can see the seeds he planted beginning to sprout — service times improving, sales not falling off a cliff, menus streamlining. In the quarter announced this week, the company teased a "wave" of innovation such as protein cold foam coffee, shorter mobile order pickup times, and a potential sale of part of the struggling China business. But again, Niccol's magic beans have barely sprouted green shoots, with Niccol almost one full year into the job. What Starbucks delivered in the quarter: Operating profit margins crashed in every business segment year over year. Overall operating margins plunged 660 basis points from a year ago. US same-store sales fell 2% on the back of a 4% traffic drop. Earnings per share tanked 46% from a year ago. No guidance provided. "Unfortunately, I think there were some choices made before me that really set us back on our ability to create that great customer connection between our barista and customer and provide the type of customer service that the Starbucks brand, frankly, is known for," Niccol told me on Yahoo Finance's Opening Bid (watch above). Some investors are clinging to the positives Niccol noted during the earnings call. They include low double-digit percentage same-store sales growth at college locations, improved transaction trends in the US toward the end of the quarter, and the aforementioned "wave" of menu innovation. Starbucks will also spend $500 million during the next year on increased labor investments — shy of Street whispers of about $1 billion. The company even teased the potential to reach peak operating margins again. But at this point, investors should be questioning when the inflection moment is in Starbucks' business, and what that inflection actually looks like. The turnaround wasn't in the just-completed quarter. It is unlikely to be the current quarter. Then, mix in high tariffs on coffee beans (including a 50% rate on Brazilian imports) and cautious US consumers. The stock has dropped 9% over the past week. But the valuation may still be too caffeinated. Shares trade on a price-to-earnings multiple of 31x forward earnings estimates as investors price in a Niccol-led comeback. That's asking a lot in the economic climate and against the backdrop of competitors like Dutch Bros. (BROS), Luckin (LKNCY), and countless others serving premium coffee. "More questions than answers ahead as investments into the biz stacking up and only some early signs of progress being made so far; we think downside risk is under-appreciated and rate the stock Underperform," Jefferies analyst Andy Barish wrote in a note. I worry Niccol has set the bar too high for short-term results, risking a letdown for hopeful investors if there isn't a clear inflection next quarter. Yahoo Finance's Invest Conference is coming up! Join me and the Yahoo Finance newsroom for our annual Invest conference, taking place in New York City, November 12-13. We just added a couple of new speakers to an already awesome lineup, with more on the way. Learn more about the conference and register today! Trust me, you will want to be in this room ahead of 2026. Brian Sozzi is Yahoo Finance's Executive Editor and a member of Yahoo Finance's editorial leadership team. Follow Sozzi on X @BrianSozzi, Instagram, and LinkedIn. Tips on stories? Email