Expired joints, cracked pipes: new details emerge about leaky LRT tunnel at St-Laurent
According to engineering reports, some of those joints had not been replaced in nearly four decades — including in areas where concrete chunks fell onto the train tracks in January 2024.
CBC has also learned of an ongoing leak near another tunnel joint, which the city said it hopes to address next year.
The tunnel, which was built for buses in the 1980s before being repurposed into an LRT station, has been suffering from water leakage for decades.
Last spring, city officials couldn't say what was causing the persistent leaks, which are deteriorating the concrete by causing "delamination" and "spalling" — when concrete pieces break off the main slab.
During planned maintenance this month, the city plans to further inspect the tunnel, scale down more loose concrete and address other issues identified during the 2024 Ontario-mandated inspection — a regular checkup that was largely skipped in 2022 due to major construction at the bus station above the tunnel.
Leaky expansion joints
In 2018, a year before the LRT station opened, two engineering firms investigated and laid out multiple possible sources of the leaks. They also suggested potential temporary and permanent fixes, according to reports CBC obtained through a freedom of information request.
According to a report by engineering firm Morrison Hershfield, the tunnel's expansion joints appeared to be a hot spot for water infiltration, damaging the concrete and ceiling framing and corroding pipes.
Expansion joints connect concrete sections of the tunnel and contain flexible material such as a sealant, allowing the structure to contract and expand with temperature changes and other factors.
Without properly working joints, stress from those fluctuations can cause cracking and leaks, compromising the durability of the concrete.
"Joint intersections are common sources of water leakage due to the difficulty of manufacturing a continuous … seal," reads the report.
The estimated life expectancy of an expansion joint is 15 to 30 years, while the seals themselves are expected to last five to 15 years, according to the report, which cites a manual from Ontario's Ministry of Transportation.
While six joints in the St-Laurent tunnel were replaced in 2009, two others identified in the report as joints G and H hadn't been replaced since 1986. When the report was compiled in 2018, these two joints were already 32 years old.
"It is noted, however, that these joints are not leaking as severely as [others]," the report states, rating them in "fair operating condition."
But by 2020, an inspection found water had been actively leaking from Joint G.
"Majority of expansion joint seals are leaking," reads the provincially mandated inspection report obtained by CBC.
The city said joints G and H were finally replaced in 2023. By that time they were 37 years old, well past their life expectancy. Then, in January 2024, concrete chunks fell onto the tracks below joint G.
That May, concrete debris was found to have "disrupted" ceiling tiles above passenger platforms, and more loose concrete was discovered in October, once again halting LRT service at the station.
If it's performing, why take it out? - Susan Johns, director of asset management
After that May incident, an internal city email revealed staff had again "found extended delaminated area at expansion G over the track."
According to the city's director of asset management Susan Johns, replacing the joint didn't address the leakage problem.
"When the expansion joint work was completed, which should eliminate leaking, there was still leaking," Johns told CBC.
Crews then found a "new source of water," Johns said — drainpipes in the tunnel roof were cracked and leaking, including over Joint G. This has now been fixed, Johns told CBC.
Regarding the life expectancy of the joints, Johns said the city monitors its structures regularly and prioritizes replacement based on performance.
"If it's performing, why take it out?" she said.
'Permanent solution' recommended
In addition to replacing all the expansion joints at the St-Laurent station, engineering firm Paterson Group recommended in 2018 installing a new permanent membrane to waterproof the concrete slab above the tunnel.
"Once the permanent solution is in effect, it's expected that most of the leaks within the St. Laurent Station would be reduced significantly," the report concludes.
The city told CBC partial waterproofing of the roof slab was done during the 2023 repairs, as well as plugging some utility ducts and electrical boxes.
Remaining work to mitigate leakage, including more waterproofing and replacing outstanding sections of expansion joints, is scheduled for 2026 and 2027, the city said.
There's also an outstanding leak near expansion Joint D, the city added. It's now being investigated and will be fixed during the 2026 project.
Despite these ongoing issues, Johns said the tunnel is safe.
"It's in very good condition. It does not pose a risk to our passengers, to our staff or to our trains," she said.
Water 'to be avoided': engineer
"We need to avoid, as much as possible, water from concrete structures," said Leandro Sanchez, a concrete durability expert and engineering professor at the University of Ottawa.
Asked about the lifespan of expansion joints, Sanchez explained that if they're not properly maintained they can become more rigid, allowing water to seep through and cause further deterioration.
"Then you start having durability-related issues," he said, adding photos of the station published by CBC showed signs of that.
Sanchez agreed that performance, not age, is key to determining the viability of an expansion joint.
"But you know, all of the materials, they have some lifespan — all of them, including concrete. And the harsher the condition, the lower the life expectancy," he said.
Sanchez stressed regular assessments, as well as early rehabilitation and maintenance, are "really, really crucial" when it comes to concrete tunnels like the one at St-Laurent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
44 minutes ago
- CTV News
B.C. reports offer ‘road map' for repatriation of Indigenous items, remains
A blessing and reawaken ceremony for the historical repatriation of the Nuxalk Nation totem pole carved by the late Louie Snow after years of effort to release the pole back to the nation from the Royal BC Museum during a ceremony in Victoria, B.C., on Feb. 13, 2023. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Chad Hipolito A pair of reports out of British Columbia are detailing the complex, expensive and under resourced process of repatriating Indigenous historical items or remains back to their homes. The studies, developed in partnership between the First Peoples' Cultural Council and K'yuu Enterprise Corporation, call for changes including the creation of a centralized body to facilitate the work, a repatriation accreditation program for museums and other institutions, and 'substantial' funding and support from the provincial and federal government. Gretchen Fox, an anthropologist and the council's acting heritage manager, said the growing interest in the moral and ethical requirement for repatriation shows resources are needed to set out steps that could be used in B.C. and in other provinces and territories. 'There was a need for a way forward, or a road map — what's involved in repatriation, what's the history of it,' she said. 'To have a really good understanding and documentation of what's been lost, where these ancestors and belongings are held today, and what kind of work specifically is involved in locating them.' Researchers with the K'yuu Enterprise Corporation did a survey and found more than 2,500 B.C. First Nation human remains and upwards of 100,000 belongings are known to be held in 229 institutions — including museums and universities — around the world. Fox said the survey had only a 50 per cent response rate. 'So, we know that the numbers are much higher, and those numbers are just for ancestors and belongings that are associated with B.C. First Nations,' she said. The main report breaks down repatriation into a four-step process starting with planning and research, followed by repatriation itself and the long-term caretaking of the items or remains. It says 60 per cent of B.C. First Nations surveyed have already spent more than $1 million on repatriation work to date. 'Since the Canadian government has yet to commit to dedicated repatriation legislation, policy and funding, many (B.C. First Nations) are reliant on grants and other mechanisms to support their repatriation work,' it says. The report says when applying for grant programs that aren't dedicated to repatriation, nations are forced to focus on strict funding criteria and narrow timelines rather than their own needs. In 2016, B.C. became the first province in Canada to offer a grant to help pay for repatriation. While the report calls that funding 'welcome,' it says the money has not kept pace with requests. It says repatriation in Canada is 'severely underfunded.' 'For decades, B.C. First Nations have funded this work through piecemeal grants and heavy reliance on volunteer labour,' it says. Fox said there are a range of costs, from paying personnel to the technology required to research where items are located or the cost to store them properly. A companion report offers what Fox calls a 'really high level' cost estimate It suggests that if all 204 B.C. First Nations were funded over five years to participate in repatriation at various stages it would cost an estimated $663 million. Fox said the number is not a request for funding, but rather an attempt to test the model and 'show the monumental, significant, costs of this.' The report says repatriation is also an economic and social driver with benefits like health and healing, jobs and community development. 'It has spiritual and cultural impacts of reconnecting with belongings and carrying out responsibilities to ancestors and It's so meaningful, even if it's engaged at a slower pace, or on a smaller scale,' Fox said. She said having a First Nation-led centralized organizing body and programming to facilitate repatriation would be helpful to provide the opportunity to pool experience and resources. 'First Nations in B.C. are really leading the way in repatriation, and quite a few have quite a bit of expertise and experience around doing the work and also insights into the kinds of supports, whether it's legislation (or) policy,' she said. Inviting museums and other holding institutions would also be beneficial, Fox said. In 2023, a totem pole that had been on display at the Royal B.C. Museum, was brought back to Bella Coola, located almost 1,000 kilometres northwest of Vancouver. It was taken in 1913 and became part of the museum's collection. Representatives of the Nuxalk Nation said at the time that they had been trying to get the totem and other artifacts back since 2019. Also in 2023, a memorial totem pole belonging to members of the Nisga'a Nation was returned from the National Museum of Scotland in Edinburgh, where it has been for nearly a century. Last year, the Heiltsuk Nation celebrated the return of a chief's seat that had been in the Royal BC Museum since 1911. Fox said an accreditation program for institutions that hold First Nations' remains and belongings could teach about repatriation and the practices and protocols needed. 'There's not a lot of formal training for folks who are doing the work, so it makes sense for those who are experts to have an arena, to share that,' she said. She said there is still work to be done, but over the last few decades more institutions are recognizing the 'moral and ethical imperative to make things right. That these belongings and ancestors were stolen or taken under duress from First Nations communities, and that the right thing to do is to facilitate their return.' 'At the same time, First Nations repatriation experts are training the next generations within their communities, and they're building relationships with institutions. And so we are seeing some significant movement and recognition that this is the right thing to do,' she said. This report by Ashley Joannou, The Canadian Press, was first published July 1, 2025.
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Library in Wheatley expected to reopen soon
The Wheatley Branch of Chatham-Kent Public Library. (Source: Municipality of Chatham-Kent) The Wheatley branch of the Chatham-Kent Public Library may reopen as early as Thursday. The library closed following a gas event last week at the rear of the property. The municipality says if all goes well, the library will reopen for regular hours at 4 p.m. on Thursday, July 3. A thorough investigation of the property must take place before any possible reopening.
CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
How a group of orcas were captured — and some freed — in B.C. waters over 50 years ago
Social Sharing March 1, 1970. It was a blustery, cold morning off the southern tip of Vancouver Island when four men on a boating trip spotted something unusual in the waves. A white dorsal fin. A white orca. Seeing the creatures is extremely rare; in 2020, Stephanie Hayes, a marine biology PhD candidate with the University of Alaska Fairbanks, told CBC News only about 10 white orcas had been recorded in history. This white orca and its pod, four black and white killer whales, became known as the Pedder Bay 5. Enter Bob Wright. The 40-year-old master angler was also the owner of Sealand of the Pacific, an aquarium in Oak Bay, B.C., just outside Victoria on Vancouver Island's southern tip. The aquarium was a major part of Wright's growing waterfront empire at the Oak Bay Marina, about a five kilometre drive from downtown Victoria. A pair of young whale trainers and budding conservationists happened to be accompanying Wright that day in 1970: 25-year-old Don White and 20-year-old Graham Ellis, who would go on to become one of the world's leading experts on orcas. The three men would soon find themselves on opposite sides of the killer whale capture and captivity debate. In his series Whale Tale, CBC's Grant Lawrence shares the story of the Pedder Bay 5, how they were herded and captured, and how two of them were released — a mystery on B.C.'s coast that remains to this day.
