logo
You won't know when a recession starts: 5 key facts about downturns

You won't know when a recession starts: 5 key facts about downturns

Yahoo30-05-2025
The looming threat of recession has hung over American consumers for what seems like forever, an ongoing economic drama that stretches back to the early pandemic years.
The chances of a recession in 2025 currently stand at about 40%, according to a May 27 report from J.P. Morgan. A month ago, many forecasters put the odds higher than 50%.
If a recession comes, how will we know? When will it end? What will be the fallout on Wall Street?
Here are some answers, drawn from experts at Investopedia, Motley Fool, Fidelity, NerdWallet and other sources.
Economic downturns might seem to last forever: Endless months of corporate layoffs, shaky stock prices and general financial malaise.
Yet, going back to the Civil War era, the average recession has lasted only about 17 months. Since World War II, the typical recession has lasted about 10 months.
'The reason they've been getting shorter is that policymakers and the Federal Reserve and the Treasury have been getting more creative about how to deal with them,' said Caleb Silver, editor in chief of Investopedia. 'That could mean flooring interest rates. That could mean stimulating the economy by giving stimulus payments to households.'
Recessions feel interminable because of their impact on the job market, stock market and household budgets. The actual downturn might end in 10 months, but it 'may take us longer to bounce back,' said Niv Persaud, a certified financial planner in Atlanta.
Recessions are part of America's boom and bust cycle. And here's the good news: Boom times tend to be longer. In the post-WWII era, the average economic expansion has lasted for nearly five years.
The National Bureau of Economic Research defines a recession as 'a significant decline in economic activity spread across the economy, lasting more than a few months.'
By that definition, a recession isn't a recession until the downturn has persisted for at least a few months. Theoretically, we could be in a recession right now.
'You don't usually find out that you're in a recession until six months after you've been in one,' said Denise Chisholm, director of quantitative market strategy at Fidelity.
The economic bureau decides when a recession has started, Fidelity reports, measuring signs of sustained decline in purchasing power, employment data, industrial production, retail sales and gross domestic product, among other factors.
Typically, those metrics must fall for several months before the economic bureau invokes the "R" word. But not always: The COVID-19 recession of 2020 lasted only two months.
How convenient it would be for wary investors, searching for clues to the market's direction, if stock prices began marching steadily down on the day the economists announced a recession.
But the market doesn't work that way.
'The stock market is a leading indicator,' said Robert Brokamp, a senior adviser at The Motley Fool. The market anticipates economic trends, including recessions, months before they arrive.
'It starts to go down, generally speaking, six months before a recession,' Brokamp said. 'And it starts to recover six months before the recession is over, very broadly speaking.'
When you consider that we don't know a recession is happening until months after it starts, you begin to understand how hard it can be to make investment decisions in a recession.
'Stocks usually bottom out about halfway through,' said Chisholm of Fidelity. 'So, by the time you have learned you are in a recession, stocks, more often than not, have bottomed.'
The stock market and economy don't move in lockstep. Sometimes they seem to move in opposite directions.
'If we go into a recession,' said Silver of Investopedia, 'you might notice that the stock market didn't dip that much at all.'
However much investors might fret about the stock market in a downturn, history suggests the market will eventually recover. The S&P 500 took back all of its losses in the Great Recession of 2008, although not until 2013.
If you're retired and spending down your savings, then a recession can bring fiscal disaster. For just about anyone else, there's time to rebound.
The bigger danger, said Brokamp of Motley Fool, is losing your job.
Unemployment hit 10% in the Great Recession, the jobless rate peaking after the actual recession was over. Unemployment reached 14.7% in the brief COVID-19 downturn.
People lose jobs in recessions because companies are making fewer goods and selling fewer services, and thus, they need fewer employees.
'If you're still working, and you're not close to retirement, the big issue is job security,' Brokamp said.
To buy low and sell high is a mantra of investing. But timing those transactions can be tricky.
When to sell stocks is a particularly tough call, for the simple reason that stock prices tend to rise. You could sell your stocks on a day when the S&P 500 hits a record high, only to wake up the next day and watch the market climb higher.
Cashing out of the stock market in a recession is generally a mistake, experts say, because of the market's notorious volatility. It's hard to predict when stock prices will slide, how low they will go, or when they will recover.
'Selling stocks to try to protect your portfolio from a recession is going to be an almost impossible enterprise,' said Sam Taube, a lead investing writer at NerdWallet.
But buying stocks in a recession, experts say, can be a comparatively safe move.
The 'buy low' directive instructs that investors should purchase stocks when the market is down. In a downturn, stock indexes can fall 10% or 20% (or more) below their historic highs. Buying stocks at those times is a relatively easy call.
'History has shown us that the stock market recovers,' said Brokamp of Motley Fool. 'So, if you have the opportunity to buy stocks at a discount, you'll always be happy you did it.'
Remember, though, that months or years might pass before the stock market recovers completely from a recessionary swoon. Buying stocks in a downturn makes the most sense for investors who won't need the money for the holidays.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: 5 facts about economic recessions: You won't know when one's coming
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Moderna Cuts Forecast, Stock Wobbles Despite Beat
Moderna Cuts Forecast, Stock Wobbles Despite Beat

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Moderna Cuts Forecast, Stock Wobbles Despite Beat

Moderna's (NASDAQ:MRNA) quarter was okay on the numbers, but the stock slid because the company pulled back its full-year revenue outlook after delaying some U.K. vaccine shipments into early 2026. Q2 revenue was $142Million, down 41% from a year ago, with COVID shot sales at $114Million and its RSV vaccine barely registering. That pushed the 2025 revenue range to $1.5Billion$2.2Billion, about $300Million less than before. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 2 Warning Sign with MRNA. The good part is they've been cutting costs aggressively. OpEx is now guided to $5.9Billion$6.1Billion roughly $400Million lighter than prior expectationsand that helped trim the loss to about $800Million. Moderna still has a strong cash cushion: $7.5Billion at the end of June and roughly $6Billion expected at year-end, so the balance sheet isn't stressed. The delayed shipments rattled sentiment, but the company isn't burning cash. Now it comes down to executionU.K. deliveries must land as rescheduled and new revenue drivers need to show up before investors lose patience. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

The next normal in housing: 3 trends that will define real estate through 2028
The next normal in housing: 3 trends that will define real estate through 2028

Business Journals

time22 minutes ago

  • Business Journals

The next normal in housing: 3 trends that will define real estate through 2028

Seismic shifts are changing the housing landscape. The AI boom is reshaping real estate workflows. Experience-driven living is emerging as a new standard for luxury buyers. And the largest wealth transfer in U.S. history is underway, altering who buys and what they value. These aren't passing trends, and Atlanta is poised to evolve with them. Here's how the market will look different in three years: 1. AI will be deeply embedded in both home design and transaction management. Artificial intelligence is rapidly restructuring how homes are bought, sold, built and lived in. For developers and brokerages, AI tools are optimizing everything from site selection to pricing and lead generation. For buyers, AI streamlines financing and forecasts long-term value. The result will be faster, more informed transactions in an increasingly competitive market, especially in the high-net-worth space. A study released by the Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies noted, 'AI could also play a big role in improving home automation products and features, better managing home energy and predicting when major home components and systems are likely to fail.' 2. Generational shifts will redefine what 'home' means. As boomers downsize, millennials gain buying power and Generation X enters peak earning years, real estate preferences are poised to evolve in deeply personal ways. Once dubbed the 'renter generation,' millennials are actively purchasing homes but seeking things like smart technology, wellness-centric features and homes that double as personal sanctuaries. Meanwhile, Gen X buyers want homes that serve multigenerational needs, balancing aging parents and grown children under one roof. Many boomers are choosing to age in place or purchase second homes near their adult children, which keeps inventory tight in addition to reshaping what retirement looks like. According to the National Association of REALTORS, 17 percent of all homebuyers in 2023 purchased multigenerational homes (the highest since NAR began recording this in 2013). For Atlanta developers and agents, responding to this generational complexity will be key to capturing long-term demand. 3. Heirs and high-earning early buyers will skip the 'starter' phase entirely. The largest wealth transfer in American history is already changing the face of real estate. Cerulli Associates estimates that millennials and Gen Xers will inherit somewhere in the neighborhood of $84 trillion by 2045. As these heirs enter the housing market, many of them are bypassing the traditional 'starter home' in favor of going straight to second homes, investment properties or branded residences. In Atlanta, where luxury real estate still offers comparative value versus coastal hubs, this generational wealth shift is likely to accelerate demand for properties that combine values with smart financial positioning. The new luxury market will be intentional, not just impressive. As these trends converge, opportunity will lie in anticipating demand; and capitalizing on it will require storytelling, intelligent positioning and elevated service. Atlanta's edge lies in its ability to evolve quickly with a growing luxury inventory, a pipeline of innovative builders and developers and a consumer base that spans generations and geographies. The next normal will belong to the most adaptable players, not just the biggest ones. Atlanta Fine Homes Sotheby's International Realty was founded in 2007 and serves as the exclusive Sotheby's International Realty affiliate in Metro Atlanta, building upon the 280-year foundation and heritage of Sotheby's auction house. The company has offices in Buckhead, Cobb, Intown and North Atlanta. As President and CEO of Atlanta Fine Homes Sotheby's International Realty, David Boehmig touches every aspect of the company. His 26 years of experience in residential real estate is complemented by 10 additional years in commercial banking where he focused on real estate and small business financing.

What Corp. for Public Broadcasting Shutdown Means For NPR, PBS
What Corp. for Public Broadcasting Shutdown Means For NPR, PBS

Time​ Magazine

time23 minutes ago

  • Time​ Magazine

What Corp. for Public Broadcasting Shutdown Means For NPR, PBS

The Corporation for Public Broadcasting announced on Friday that it would begin winding down its operations after President Donald Trump rescinded $1.1 billion in funding for the nonprofit, which for decades has helped sustain NPR, PBS, and hundreds of local public media stations across the country. 'Despite the extraordinary efforts of millions of Americans who called, wrote, and petitioned Congress to preserve federal funding for CPB, we now face the difficult reality of closing our operations,' CPB President and CEO Patricia Harrison said in a statement. She added that the organization would work to support its partners during the transition 'with transparency and care.' The loss of federal support, enacted as part of a broader $9 billion rescissions package signed by Trump in July, will not bring an immediate end to national programming like PBS NewsHour or NPR's Morning Edition. But the decision is expected to pose serious challenges to the network of smaller, often rural public broadcasters that have long depended on CPB funding for their survival. The majority of the CPB's roughly 100 employees will be laid off when the federal fiscal year ends on September 30, according to a press release. A smaller team will remain through January to complete financial and legal obligations, including final disbursements and the expiration of system-wide music licenses. Harrison, who has led the CPB since 2005, called the decision to shut down 'difficult' but inevitable given the scale of the funding withdrawal. 'Public media has been one of the most trusted institutions in American life,' she said in her statement, 'providing educational opportunity, emergency alerts, civil discourse, and cultural connection to every corner of the country.' Here's what to know about the funding cuts. What is the Corporation for Public Broadcasting? Founded in 1967 under the Public Broadcasting Act, CPB was created as a nonpartisan nonprofit to channel federal appropriations to public television and radio stations across the United States, including affiliates of PBS and NPR. While national organizations like NPR and PBS generate their own revenue and receive only a small share of direct federal funding, their local member stations rely heavily on CPB grants. In many smaller and rural markets, federal money accounts for 25% or more of a station's total budget. In addition to distributing funding, the CPB also helped stations remain in legal compliance and negotiated system-wide rights, such as royalties for music and content use. Why did Republicans push to eliminate CPB funding? Trump and his allies have long accused NPR and PBS of leaning left politically and argued that taxpayer dollars should not support news organizations they see as ideologically biased. 'NO MORE FUNDING FOR NPR, A TOTAL SCAM!' Trump wrote on Truth Social on April 10, calling the organization 'A LIBERAL DISINFORMATION MACHINE.' After gaining unified control of Congress this year, Republicans pushed to eliminate CPB's funding through a process known as a rescission—a formal cancellation of previously approved federal spending. The Trump Administration proposed eliminating $1.1 billion that had already been appropriated for the CPB through fiscal year 2027. Congress approved the measure in July as part of a broader $9 billion package of rescinded funds, which also included cuts to foreign aid. Only four Republicans in both chambers of Congress broke with their party and voted with all Democrats against the package: Sens. Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania and Mike Turner of Ohio. 'If you don't like what's going on within NPR, you think that there's too much bias there, we can address that,' Sen. Murkowski said in a floor speech ahead of the vote. 'But you don't need to gut the entire Corporation for Public Broadcasting.' In an op-ed for the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner, she warned that the loss of CPB's $12 million in funding for Alaska's public stations—which covers between 30 and 70% of each stations' budgets—would be 'devastating.' Sen. Collins expressed similar concerns: 'I share the frustration with the biased reporting by NPR, and I would support defunding it. Nevertheless, local TV and radio stations continue to provide important coverage. In Maine, this funding supports the emergency alert network, coverage of high school basketball championships, a locally produced high school quiz show, and classical music stations.' The Senate Appropriations Committee on Thursday advanced a bill that would eliminate future funding for CPB altogether—a move that Harrison said 'will cause irreparable harm, especially to small and rural public media stations.' 'The absence of future funding eliminates CPB's ability to fulfill our statutory mission—providing support to nearly 1,500 local public media stations and making needed investments that help stations serve their communities,' Harrison said before announcing the decision to wind down operations. Despite the push in Congress to eliminate funding for public broadcasting, most Americans still support public media. A Harris Poll conducted in July on behalf of NPR found that 66% of U.S. adults favor continued federal funding for public radio, including 58% of Republicans and 77% of Democrats. 66% of respondents said that federal funding for public radio is a good value for taxpayer dollars. What does this mean for NPR, PBS, and local stations? National programming like PBS NewsHour, All Things Considered, and children's shows will not disappear overnight. But the loss of CPB funding threatens the financial stability of the local stations that carry these shows—particularly those in rural or underserved regions that have long depended on federal support to stay on the air. Without CPB grants, some stations may be forced to reduce staff, cut programming, or shut down altogether. That could have a significant impact in smaller communities, where public media stations are often among the few remaining sources of local journalism. Researchers have classified many rural areas as 'news deserts' due to the decline of local newspapers and commercial outlets. Public broadcasters have filled that gap in many communities by providing access to local news coverage, educational content, and emergency alerts. Those stations may seek new funding from state governments or private donors, but these solutions are not likely to fully replace the funding CPB provided. The New York Times reported that roughly 120,000 new donors have contributed an estimated $20 million in annual value to public media over the last three months, according to the Contributor Development Partnership, a firm that analyzes fundraising data. Total donations this year are about $70 million ahead of last year's pace—a sharp uptick sparked in part by public concern over the loss of federal support. The day Congress approved the rescissions, member stations saw a spike in giving, the Times reported. Rocky Mountain Public Media in Colorado received more than 6,600 donations in one weekend, including a $500,000 gift. WUNC in North Carolina raised over $1 million. WMNF in Tampa brought in more than $280,000—unusually high numbers for both.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store