South Africa's Organic Products Sector Primed for Global Success
"The organic and natural products industry is no longer just a niche market – it's becoming a substantial economic driver with tremendous growth potential," says Qaanitah Dollie, Head of Provincial Enterprise Banking at Standard Bank.
"We're seeing local entrepreneurs successfully building businesses that not only respond to changing consumer preferences but also create sustainable supply chains that benefit entire communities. To ensure that we show up at key moments in the growth journey of businesses in this area, Standard Bank Business and Commercial Banking boasts human-led but digitally enabled Relationship Manager capabilities, digital and digitised banking, a targeted suite of offerings for business, entrenching us as more than a bank."
The natural and organic sector in South Africa is currently valued at approximately R1 billion annually and continues to expand as consumers increasingly prioritise health, sustainability, and locally produced goods. International export opportunities, particularly to the American and Chinese markets, further enhance the sector's growth prospects.
"What makes this sector particularly exciting from a banking perspective is the diversity of business models emerging," adds Dollie. From farm-to-table organic food producers to innovative natural cosmetics manufacturers, these businesses are creating new value chains while addressing growing consumer demand for products that are both environmentally and socially responsible.
Standard Bank has been actively supporting businesses across the organic products spectrum, including companies like Haylur Organics, which specialises in premium organic skincare; The Nuttery, offering ethically sourced natural snacks; XenithAfriXher, promoting indigenous African beauty ingredients; and French Confectionery, which focuses on organic baked goods.
Akhona Mdawe, founder of Xenith AfriXher, a brand dedicated to sustainable innovation and reproductive health, notes: "The organic products sector requires specialised knowledge and often different financing approaches compared to conventional businesses. Having a financial partner that understands the unique challenges and opportunities in this space has been crucial to our growth journey."
Research indicates that South African organic products have particular advantages in international markets due to the country's biodiversity, growing seasons that complement Northern Hemisphere markets, and increasing reputation for quality standards.
Standard Bank continues to be committed to supporting sustainable business practices and helping South African SMEs access both domestic and international markets: "We see our role as going beyond traditional banking services," explains Dollie. "We're helping to build an ecosystem where businesses can start, manage and grow. This sector represents not just economic opportunity but also aligns with global sustainability goals – making it vital for South Africa's future economic landscape."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
26 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump sharpens the axe for the Education Department. Swing away, Mr. President.
Despite the Department of Education's massive budget, students in the U.S. far too often lag behind peers in other industrialized countries. The largest employer in the United States isn't a Fortune 100 company like Alphabet, Amazon or Apple. It's the federal government − and that's a problem. Thankfully, President Donald Trump continues to slash bureaucratic bloat. On July 11, the administration sent layoff notices to more than 1,300 State Department workers, and three days later, the Supreme Court allowed Trump to move forward with plans to gut the Department of Education. That's bad news for government employees, but great for taxpayers, especially given the Education Department's expense − $268 billion in the last fiscal year − and its lack of effectiveness. Despite the department's massive budget, students in the U.S. far too often lag behind peers in other industrialized countries. In 2022, for example, American high school students scored behind teens from 25 other countries on an international math test. And we're losing ground. Math and reading scores on the National Assessment of Educational Progress continue to decline. Part of the drop can be attributed to pandemic-related learning loss, but reading scores in the U.S. began to decline in 2019 − before Americans had even heard of COVID-19. But how will pulling the federal government out of K-12 education help? It's important to note that more than 90% of public school funding comes from state and local governments along with foundations and other private sources. Much of the federal education budget is used to feed the bureaucracy, which generates rules and regulations that local administrators and teachers must obey. If all of that bureaucratic oversight consistently produced better results, there might be a case for keeping it. But the data clearly shows it doesn't. Removing federal bureaucrats from our schools should give states and local school districts more flexibility to set education policy, and that should improve choices for parents like me. Returning more control to the states also should improve efficiency and enable schools to better meet students' needs. Opinion: Our schools are struggling because teachers unions don't put kids first Government efficiency is vital for the American people Trump isn't cutting jobs only at the Education Department, of course. The State Department layoffs follow reductions at other federal agencies this spring. The cuts are driven by necessity: our national debt is now more than $37 trillion and the annual budget deficit will top $1 trillion again this year. So, I was surprised to see news reports paint the laid off State Department workers as heroic. Cameras caught teary goodbyes and applause for well-liked employees. I don't recall the same concern when President Joe Biden halted construction of the Keystone Pipeline, which cost 1,500 workers their jobs and eliminated plans to create thousands more. Opinion: PBS, NPR push liberal propaganda. Trump is right to cut their funding. Companies often restructure. So should the federal government. While job loss is certainly scary, and I don't wish it on anyone, federal job cuts should be put in the context of the overall jobs market. Microsoft announced this month it would eliminate 9,000 jobs, not because the company is failing but because it's retooling as the market changes. Other companies, including Intel and Meta, have announced plans to restructure this year as the emergence of artificial intelligence and other technology changes how Americans work. The federal government should be as flexible as our top companies in adapting to a changing world. Yet, progressives have criticized the Trump administration's efforts to restructure the federal bureaucracy as cruel. The president's job, however, isn't to employ as many bureaucrats as possible. It's to deliver effective services as efficiently as possible to taxpayers. Dismantling ineffective and inefficient bureaucracies like the Education Department is a long overdue step toward achieving that goal. Nicole Russell is a columnist at USA TODAY and a mother of four who lives in Texas. Contact her at nrussell@ and follow her on X, formerly Twitter: @russell_nm. Sign up for her weekly newsletter, The Right Track, here.
Business Wire
an hour ago
- Business Wire
Omdia Forecasts Large-Area Display Shipments to Grow 2.9% YoY in 2025 Despite Economic Uncertainty
LONDON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--According to the latest analysis from Omdia 's Large-area display market tracker – 2Q25 with 1Q25 results, large-area display (above 9-inch) unit shipments are forecast to increase by 2.9% year-over-year (YoY) in 2025. While growth in 2025 is expected to be smaller than that of 2024, this increase comes in the face of global economic uncertainty and US tariff concerns. Notably, TV and monitor applications are projected to experience negative growth in 2025. Chinese panel makers, who are expected to take 67.9% of total TV display shipments in 2025 are adopting a conservative approach to increasing LCD TV display shipments to manage panel prices. Similarly, panel makers outside of China are cautious about expanding their monitor display businesses due to poor finance performance. Figure1. Large-area display shipment latest forecast in 2025 (millions of units) Large-area LCD unit shipments are expected to increase by 2.4% YoY, reaching 875.5 million in 2025. Pulled-forward demand in 1Q25 has helped to boost the shipment forecast for the year. However, panel makers have little incentive to expand their monitor LCD businesses in 2025 due to financial losses, particularly among non-Chinese manufacturers. Chinese panel makers are projected to increase monitor LCD shipments by 4.8% YoY while panel makers from other regions will decrease shipments by 12.6% YoY in 2025. Chinese panel makers are also maintaining their production-to-order policy to prevent LCD TV display price erosion starting in 2Q25. 'Interestingly, while LCD TV display unit shipments are expected to decline by 2.1% YoY, shipment area is forecast to grow by 4.9% YoY in 2025 driven by ongoing size migration trends,' said Peter Su, Principal Analyst of Omdia. Su added, "Large-area OLED unit shipments and shipment area are forecast to grow by 15.5% YoY and 10.4% YoY, respectively, in 2025. However, these figures are lower than the previous forecast (unit shipments up by 20.3% YoY and shipment area up by 12.9% YoY) from our 1Q25 report. This indicates that large-area OLED demand is slowing more than expected due to global economic uncertainty and concerns about potential impacts from the new US tariff policy.' Regional Market Share LCD shipments: China is forecast to account for 66.7% of total large-area LCD shipments in 2025, followed by Taiwan with 21.9% and Korea with 8.0%. Key players: BOE is expected to lead with 36.3% of total large-area LCD shipments, followed by China Star with 16.5% and Innolux with 11.6%. OLED shipments: Korea is projected to dominate with 85.2% of total large-area OLED shipments, followed by China with 14.8%. Key players: Samsung Display is expected to lead with 55.1%, followed by LG Display with 30.1% and EDO with 12.0%. 'Tablet PC OLED shipments are forecast to decline by 0.4% YoY in 2025 – an improvement from the previous forecast of -1.9% YoY - but still reflecting negative growth due to slower demand from Chinese PC brands and OEMs," explained Su. 'TV and monitor display shipments are expected to decline in 2025 as panel makers work to protect panel prices and avoid further losses. However, panel makers — particularly those in China — have set aggressive shipment targets for mobile PC displays, where panel makers from other regions still hold a 42.8% market share (as of 2024). This push is aimed at capturing greater market share and is expected to contribute to an overall increase in large-area display shipments during the same period,' concluded Su. ABOUT OMDIA Omdia, part of Informa TechTarget, Inc. (Nasdaq: TTGT), is a technology research and advisory group. Our deep knowledge of tech markets grounded in real conversations with industry leaders and hundreds of thousands of data points, make our market intelligence our clients' strategic advantage. From R&D to ROI, we identify the greatest opportunities and move the industry forward.
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
VCs use this 'power law' to decide whether to invest in startups: We want 'outsized-outcome potential'
As pitches from founders come flooding in, one investor has revealed how VCs use a historic "law" to identify the best investments. "The power law in venture capital basically means that a small number of investments generate the vast majority of returns. So essentially, one or two massive winners outweigh all other investments combined," Peter Specht, general partner at European VC firm Creandum, told CNBC Make It in an interview. He described it as "significant in decision-making for VCs." The power law originates from the work of late-19th-century Italian economist Vilfredo Pareto. He noticed that 20% of the pea pods in his garden produced 80% of the peas, and applied this observation to economic conditions and wealth disparity. Specht explained that, as VCs often finance ideas that are risky and innovative, they know that some of these startups will fail. But the returns from the companies that succeed can become "massive winners," which "outweigh all other losses or smaller exits," he said. "From a return perspective, you want to really hit the outliers. We want the Spotifys, the Revoluts, the Klarnas," he said. "Outcomes at that size, or that scale, return more capital to investors and founders than five, billion-dollar exits. A $50 billion exit is way bigger than five $1 billion exits." Although the route to securing venture capital in Europe is improving, there's still some way to go, according to Atomico's State of European Tech Report 2024. In fact, the average seed round — the first official round of fundraising — in Europe was $1.4 million last year, compared to $3 million in the U.S., Atomico found. It's even harder at the growth stage, with American startups twice as likely to raise funding rounds of more than $15 million. Some 60% of respondents told Atomico in 2024 that it was harder to raise external finance compared to the previous year. Specht said one key way to convince VCs that you're building the next Spotify or Revolut is to show that your company has "outsized-outcome potential." "You need to pitch why it can become so big, why it can become a category-defining company," he said. This includes explaining how you're tackling the market and how the product can expand over time. At the seed stage, having an early product or pilot users with positive feedback can help. If you don't have the product yet, there needs to be evidence that the product is filling a gap in the market and is offering a genuine solution to customers. VCs also look for "exceptionally strong and ambitious founders," Specht said, adding that he wants to understand their motivation and drive. "One thing we obviously ... like to see is if founders have a spike in a particular area, or a skill, and shown excellence in that," he said. This could be work-related, such as having technical or leadership capabilities, or even excelling in sports or studies. Given the gap between fundraising in Europe and the U.S., Harry Stebbings, the founder of 20VC, identified a difference in the way founders pitch. American founders tend to be more bold and ambitious, Stebbings said, compared to their counterparts across the Atlantic. "I don't think Europeans are as good fundraisers [as Americans]. We need to tell better stories. We need to market ourselves better. We are too self-deprecating," he told CNBC Make It. Some founders have even been "badly" advised to include "exit slides" in their pitches, Stebbings added. "That makes me feel sick, like I'm planning my divorce when I get married." While Specht disagrees that European founders lack ambition, he thinks that startups in the region could tell better stories. "We have people and founders that dream really big and want to build massive companies," he said. "In the general culture between Europe and the U.S., I think U.S. founders and Americans are pretty good in storytelling and also pretty good salespeople." "There, we can focus on being even more bold, having an even more refined and visionary storytelling," Specht added.
