Meet the teen duo that won this year's Earth Prize Europe with their groundbreaking clean water tech
Two teenagers have been named as the European winners of The Earth Prize 2025 for their groundbreaking innovation that promises safer drinking water for all.
18-year-old Tomáš Čermák from Czechia and 19-year-old Anna Podmanická from Slovakia developed a unique filtration device they call PURA.
They are the first from either Czechia or Slovakia to win the Earth Prize.
'I couldn't believe it,' Tomáš tells Euronews Green. 'I'm still processing that out of all those thousands of proposals, ours was picked as the best in Europe.'
Since 2021,
The Earth Prize
has been empowering the next generation with the tools they need to make a difference. As well as funding of $100,000 (€90,600) to scale up their project, winners also receive one-to-one mentoring and learning resources.
How does the winning clean drinking water innovation work?
Tomáš had been working extensively with cold plasma (AC corona) to destroy pollutants and
antibiotic-resistant bacteria
. Anna was researching water purification through photocatalysis - using light energy to fuel a chemical reaction. By bringing these two specialisms together, they were able to create PURA.
PURA uses a unique combination of plasma and light energy to remove contaminants from water.
The Earth Foundation
Plasma is already proven to be effective in water purification. When it interacts with water, plasma generates various small reactions that combine to break down organic
pollutants
and effectively inactivate bacteria, viruses and other pathogens.
Photocatalysis also has potential for purification. Using light energy like sunlight, reactions are stimulated that break down harmful organic pollutants and damage the cell walls of microorganisms like bacteria.
Anna and Tomáš are the first to bring these two schools of research together into one product. Their prototypes are proving effective at purifying water on a small, household scale.
With the help of the Earth Prize, the team is working to develop a much larger prototype, capable of filtering more water.
How polluted is Europe's drinking water?
The
European Environment Agency
reported last year that less than 40 per cent of Europe's groundwaters are currently healthy. One in four groundwater bodies are chemically contaminated, despite providing two-thirds of Europe's drinking water.
Among the pollutants are some long-lived heavy metals like mercury, as well as so-called
'forever chemicals'
collectively known as PFAS, and various
pharmaceuticals
.
While most water treatment plants are capable of filtering out heavy metals, they are ineffective at removing drugs and 'forever chemicals'.
Perhaps the most worrying persistent pollutants are antibiotics. Sulfonamides, tetracyclines, and quinolones have all been detected in European drinking water.
Resistant bacteria enter wastewater systems through discharge from pharmaceutical companies, healthcare facilities, and even human waste. Hospital wastewater is also a significant source of antibiotic contamination.
ADVERTISEMENT
In aquatic ecosystems, antibiotic residues cause the spread of
antibiotic-resistant
genes by selectively favouring the bacteria that survive. As they reproduce, they spread these genes to other bacteria, leading to the emergence of 'superbugs' that antibiotics struggle to tackle.
Conventional wastewater treatment processes are designed to remove larger particles, pathogens, and organic matter, but they are not designed to target and remove antibiotics.
Antibiotic resistance
is projected to cause 10 million deaths annually by 2050, and is considered one of the most pressing challenges facing global healthcare.
Related
Rivers polluted with antibiotics could cause the 'next pandemic', warn scientists
European rivers and lakes are chemically polluted, water security in danger
Water pollution: How the EU is working to restore our rivers, lakes and seas
What's next for the water purifying invention?
As the European winners of the Earth Prize, Tomáš and Anna will receive $12,500 (€11,332) to scale up their idea into a larger prototype.
ADVERTISEMENT
'At the moment, we're able to process milliliters and litres of water,' Tomáš explains. 'We want to get to the stage where we can handle dozens of litres.'
Ultimately, the goal is to scale the technology so it can be used in
wastewater
treatment plants, tackling pollution at its source.
The young scientists will be put forward for a chance at the global prize.
The Earth Foundation
While that's going to take time, the next big event for the young scientists will come later this month, when the global winners of The Earth Prize are announced. Timed to coincide with
Earth Day
, the big reveal will come on 22 April.
'My hopes are high,' says Tomáš of the international competition. 'I'm trying to mobilise everyone and to really communicate and explain our solution. It's not an easy concept to explain in simple terms, but I want to continue to convey the idea.
ADVERTISEMENT
'I'm very hopeful. I think we can do this.'
Public voting for the global winner opened yesterday, Sunday 13 April, and closes on 22 April. Cast your vote for the most innovative idea at
The Earth Prize website.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
3 days ago
- Euronews
Bacteria strain that evades antibiotics is spreading in Europe
A new strain of bacteria that can cause serious infections in children but evades standard treatments is spreading in Europe. MRSA (meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) is a type of bacteria that has evolved to the point where first-choice antibiotics no longer work against it, making it harder to treat. It can cause serious health problems if it gets inside the body, causing more than 100,000 deaths worldwide in 2019. A new strain of MRSA was identified in Germany and the Netherlands nearly a decade ago – and it has since spread to at least nine other European countries, according to new research by Denmark's Statens Serum Institut (SSI). The scientists began to worry that the strain might be circulating in Denmark after 32 children and family members developed ulcers that were caused by a specific type of staph bacteria in summer 2023. A year later, they identified another outbreak from the same bacteria elsewhere in the country. They suspected Denmark was not the only place affected by the new strain, which they call a 'clone' of another type of MRSA because they have some genetic similarities. When they analysed samples across Europe, they found the bacteria in 11 countries: Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. 'This clone, which was first found in Germany and the Netherlands in 2014, is a new subtype' of the bacteria, Andreas Petersen, a MRSA researcher at SSI who led the study, said in a statement. The researchers published their findings in the journal Eurosurveillance. The strain is genetically similar to another form of MRSA that appears to cause impetigo, a bacterial skin infection that causes red sores to form and burst around the nose and mouth. Most common among children aged two to five, impetigo is highly contagious and can spread easily within families. Outbreaks usually occur in late summer and early autumn. Impetigo usually isn't dangerous, but rare complications include kidney damage and cellulitis, an infection that can be life-threatening if it spreads to the lymph nodes and bloodstream. Fusidic acid, an antibiotic cream, is commonly used to treat impetigo infections, but it does not work well against the MRSA strain. That is why doctors across Europe need to know if it may be spreading in their communities, the researchers said. 'We believe that it is a combination of these virulence factors [or genes] as well as the resistance to fusidin that has helped make this new type so successful,' Petersen said. MRSA is just one of many health threats emerging due to antibiotic resistance. Infections from so-called superbugs could kill more than 39 million people worldwide over the next 25 years, according to a landmark study published last year. Antibiotic resistance also takes a toll on the health system. Together, the 11 countries where the new MRSA strain has been identified spent nearly $13.3 billion (€11.4 billion) treating hospital patients with drug-resistant infections in 2022, according to recent estimates from the Center for Global Development. The Danish researchers believe the new strain may be spreading undetected in other parts of Europe as well. It has already been found outside of hospitals and nursing homes, which have strict protocols in place to contain MRSA, Petersen said. 'The spread of MRSA in the community is more difficult to monitor and combat,' he added.
Euronews
4 days ago
- Euronews
EU food safety officials set new limits on safe fluoride intake
Food safety officials have lowered the safe limit of fluoride in drinking water, though they say there is no evidence of serious health harms at levels commonly found in the European Union. Fluoride is a naturally occurring mineral that can help prevent tooth decay. Only a handful of EU countries, including Ireland and parts of Spain, add fluoride to drinking water, but it can be found in about 90 per cent of toothpastes. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that countries set a maximum fluoride limit at 1.5 milligrams per litre (mg/L) – the EU's legal limit – because higher levels can cause bone and teeth problems, particularly in children. But more recent studies have found that even below that level, fluoride intake may be linked to lower IQ in children. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) reassessed the possible risks from fluoride because of those concerns. The agency screened more than 20,000 scientific papers on fluoride's effect on the developing brain, thyroid, bones, and teeth, tracking people's exposure to fluoride in drinking water, food, fluoridated table salt, and toothpaste and other dental care products, when they are eaten or ingested. In the EU, fluoride in drinking water is usually under 0.3 mg/L, which is a safe level, EFSA said. 'We estimated that, in general, with the current concentrations of fluoride in European drinking water, total fluoride exposure … does not pose a health concern,' Susanne Hougaard Bennekou, a toxicologist and chair of EFSA's scientific committee, said in a press release. There was one exception among children ages four to eight – though the potential effects were not exactly severe. If these children regularly swallow their toothpaste, they could experience mild tooth discolouration, particularly in their developing molars. 'This is unlikely to occur if children spit the toothpaste out properly after brushing their teeth,' Bennekou said. New safety thresholds Because of this risk, EFSA set a new safe fluoride intake level at 1 milligram per day (mg/day) for babies under the age of one, 1.6 mg/day for toddlers aged one to three, and 2 mg/day for those aged four to eight. The agency said the safe limit for adults and children older than eight is 3.3 mg per day. For pregnant women, this limit would protect their developing babies against toxicity in the brain, as well as any risks of thyroid and bone problems. The new thresholds are part of a consumer risk assessment, but they could prompt a change in the EU's legal limits on fluoride in drinking water. EFSA officials said it is still not entirely clear whether fluoride poses a health threat at levels below 1.5mg/L, and called for more research on the issue. 'There is evidence that we can't ignore linking fluoride to possible effects on the developing nervous system of the foetus,' Thorhallur Halldorsson, a food science researcher and chair of EFSA's working group on fluoride, said in a statement. 'But the evidence is not sufficient to set a threshold'.
Euronews
12-07-2025
- Euronews
Scientists debunk myths about ‘charismatic' raccoons in Germany
Once seen as endearing additions to European wildlife, North American raccoons have become a serious threat to Germany's ecosystem. Now, scientists are pushing back against popular myths that paint the invasive predator in a sympathetic light. A new paper from Frankfurt-based scientists, published in Ecological Indicators, calls for urgent action. The authors argue that raccoons are wreaking havoc on native flora and fauna, and that misinformation is fuelling the problem. Up to two million raccoons are now estimated to be in Germany, a population surge that has occurred despite animal control efforts. In urban areas like Kassel, which has one of the highest raccoon densities in Europe, there are more than 100 of the mostly nocturnal creatures per 100 hectares. That's roughly one per football pitch. Researchers say this explosion has triggered alarming losses among local species. Raccoons, they warn, are not opportunistic scavengers, as they are often portrayed, but rather effective predators. They raid nests, destroy clutches of eggs and young animals and exhibit what the scientists call a 'hunting frenzy' in sensitive habitats. Emotional myths hinder urgent action Led by researchers from Goethe University, the Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Center, the study set out to identify the different stages of the raccoon infestation in Germany in order to apply the finding to other invasive species in Europe. 'We are documenting a dramatic decline in sensitive species in areas with high raccoon densities,' says Dr Norbert Peter, who leads ZOWIAC (Zoonotic and Wildlife Ecological Impacts of Invasive Carnivores), the joint project that spearheaded this research. The raccoon's rapid spread, they found, has been accompanied by persistent misinformation, ranging from false claims that hunting makes them reproduce faster to unsupported ideas about their social structure. According to the authors, many of these narratives are rooted in outdated or misapplied studies. Many of them began in North America and followed the raccoons overseas. 'These myths have real-world consequences,' warns Dr Dorian Dörge, the project's scientific coordinator. 'They prevent necessary protective measures and thereby endanger already threatened native species.' Perceptions also play a powerful role. Research shows that raccoons' photogenic faces and playful behaviour contribute to a strong emotional bias among the public, one that can stifle science-based conservation efforts. And other approaches, such as sterilisation, are considered unfeasible, if not illegal under EU rules on managing invasive alien species. To reverse the damage, the researchers are calling for coordinated control plans, including increased hunting in sensitive areas, federal funding and improved public education. 'We must implement the legal requirements for species protection consistently,' says Professor Sven Klimpel, lead author of the study, 'and not let them be overridden by sympathy for charismatic animals.' Invasive species threaten biodiversity across Europe Germany's raccoons are not the continent's only invaders. The EU is facing a growing number of invasive alien species, fromalgae and poisonous fish that now populate the Mediterranean to so-called murder hornets. More than 12,000 alien species are present in Europe today, according to the European Commission. As many as 15 per cent are considered invasive. Nearly 90 of them are designated as 'of Union concern,' meaning member states are legally required to prevent their introduction, monitor their spread and control or eradicate them. In Europe, recent outbreaks include the Asian hornet, which has spread rapidly from France to as far away as Slovakia. Meanwhile, 900 invasive species pose threats to biodiversity in Mediterranean waters. Efforts to convert consumers intoculinary enthusiasts of species such as pufferfish have had halting success. These unwelcome creatures cost the EU an estimated €12 billion per year, according to the Commission. Globally, invasive species cost economies almost€400 billion. Much like the raccoons, some might not seem invasive, either. For example, theAfrican sacred ibis – a bird revered in ancient Egypt – is now setting off alarms among European officials. The bird has spread rapidly in northern Italy, preying on amphibians as well as the eggs and chicks of other species, such as tern and heron. As both cases show, combating invasive species requires a multi-pronged approach. One that can be as much about confronting misconceptions as managing ecosystems.
