Reynolds Wrap maker must face lawsuit over 'Made in USA' claim
NEW YORK (Reuters) -The maker of Reynolds Wrap aluminum foil must face a proposed class action claiming it misled consumers who wanted to "buy American," by falsely claiming that its foil was "Made in USA," a U.S. judge ruled on Monday.
U.S. District Judge Andrew Carter in Manhattan said consumers can try to prove that Reynolds Consumer Products violated New York state consumer protection laws by using false and misleading packaging for its namesake foil.
Reynolds and its lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
According to the complaint filed last March, substantially all bauxite in Reynolds' foil comes from outside the United States, where little of the ore is produced, and much of it is eventually transformed into aluminum outside the United States.
This made Reynolds' "Foil Made in USA" claim false and misleading to reasonable consumers, because they would spend more on products "made in America," the complaint said
The plaintiff, Anaya Washington of Bronx, New York, said she bought Reynolds Wrap at Target and other stores, believing the brand as trustworthy and familiar as Kleenex and Vaseline, and wouldn't have bought the foil had she knows where it came from.
In seeking a dismissal, Reynolds said Washington relied on generic "overpayment" accusations rather than show harm.
It also called the case "another lawyer-driven class action seeking to profit from a truthful 'Made in the USA' statement."
But the judge said Washington plausibly alleged she paid more than she would have but for the "Foil Made in USA" label. The lawsuit seeks at least $5 million of damages.
Many lawsuits accuse companies of using imprecise labeling that induces shoppers to pay more, including through appeals to their patriotism.
In 2021, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission adopted a "Made in USA Labeling Rule" to protect businesses and consumers from being misled over product origins.
U.S. President Donald Trump, meanwhile, is encouraging global businesses to manufacture more products in the United States.
Washington's lawyer did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The case is Washington v Reynolds Consumer Products LLC, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 24-02327.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
35 minutes ago
- New York Post
Cincinnati police chief under scrutiny for mass brawl was accused by cops of anti-white discrimination, using ‘race-based quota system': suit
Embattled Cincinnati Police Chief Teresa Theetge was being sued by four high-ranking officers claiming she discriminated against white lieutenants while doling out promotions and assignments using a 'race-based quota system.' The lawsuit, filed in May, resurfaced as Theetge faces scrutiny amid her department's investigation into the high-profile vicious street beatdown of a defenseless white woman in the Ohio city last weekend. Capt. Robert Wilson and Lieutenants Patrick Caton, Gerald Hodges and Andrew Mitchell claimed in the suit that the police chief bypassed them for positions they deserved — and instead gave minority and female lieutenants preferential treatment, Newsweek reported. 'These assignments, which offer significant professional and financial benefits, have been disproportionately awarded to non-white and/or female officers, often disregarding merit, qualifications, or legitimate business needs,' the lawsuit claimed, local Fox19 reported. Cincinnati Police Chief Teresa Theetge is accused in a lawsuit of discriminating against white male officers. City of Cincinnati 'The public deserves a police department that upholds equal treatment under the law, and we trust the judicial process will deliver a just outcome.' Theetge was allegedly 'personally involved in the assignment decisions' and used a 'race-based quota system' to promote minorities and women to career-enhancing positions, the suit states. Coveted 'preferred-assignments' were doled out to 79% of minority lieutenants and 89% of female lieutenants in 2023 — but just 44% of white male Lieutenants were given the assignment, the lawsuit claimed. The officers are seeking compensatory damages, punitive damages, and injunctive relief in the ongoing civil case that names Theetge and the city of Cincinnati as defendants. Theetge is currently embroiled in another racially-tinged controversy as cops in the Queen City continue their investigation into the wild brawl — which went viral when footage emerged showing a group of black suspects beating two white victims. Theetge at a press conference addressing the racially tinged brawl on Cincinnati streets last week. FOX19 NOW | Cincinnati Critics have called out the police department for not moving quickly enough to arrest the suspects, with Vice President JD Vance, a former Ohio senator, urging cops to 'throw their asses in prison.' 'The cops in Cincinnati, the law enforcement, you gotta prosecute people. We've had way too much lawlessness on the streets of great American cities,' Vance said during a speech on July 28, two days after the beatdown. 'The only way to destroy that street violence is to take the thugs who engaged in that violence and throw their ass in prison.' He further stated that police officers in Ohio needed to be more emboldened to address crime. A Russian woman identified as 'Holly' was sucker-punched by a man in the disturbing attack that elicited 'ooos' from a crowd of onlookers, some of whom filmed on their phones instead of coming to her aid. When one man did come to her aid, he was savagely beaten, too. Only one person at the scene called 911 during the brutal episode. A fourth person, Dominique Kittle, 37, was arrested in connection to the attack on Friday, nearly a week after the shocking incident. Three other alleged attackers — Jermaine Matthews, 39; Montianez Merriweather, 34; and Dekyra Vernon, 24 — were arrested earlier last week. Two more suspects, who have not been publicly identified, are being tracked down by a fugitive task force, authorities said.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The Best Traders in Congress: How to Track Politicians' Stock Trades
In 2024, Rep. Nancy Pelosi quietly posted a 54% return on her stock portfolio — outperforming the most sophisticated hedge funds on the planet. There was no press tour for this massive achievement, and no hedge fund title; just a government salary and a set of disclosures that, to the trained eye, look a lot like market timing. Pelosi's reported salary is around $223,000. But her net worth stands at over $264 million, making her the richest woman in Congress. And she's not the only one turning their political seat into a portfolio advantage. More News from Barchart Amazon Falls on Fears That AWS Is Losing Market Share: Should You Buy the AMZN Stock Dip Here? Amazon's Earnings Selloff Explained, and Why You Should Buy AMZN Stock Now Microsoft Stock Is Rallying on Earnings. Should You Buy MSFT Here? Stop Missing Market Moves: Get the FREE Barchart Brief – your midday dose of stock movers, trending sectors, and actionable trade ideas, delivered right to your inbox. Sign Up Now! While hedge funds spend billions hiring analysts and building next-gen AI models, members of Congress are making market-moving decisions — and trading on the same stocks affected by those policy changes. The Power of Timing, and the People in Power Take Rep. Ro Khanna, for example. He's a Silicon Valley congressman who has been outspoken about banning stock trading in Congress. However, Khanna and his family trusts have made over 300 trades this year. His explanation? Outside advisors handled the transactions. But the timing — not to mention the volume — raised eyebrows. Then there's Rep. Cleo Fields, who's now one of the most active and valuable traders in the House. Fields recently made a $3 million+ purchase of NVIDIA (NVDA) stock just days before a Trump-approved lift on the ban of AI chip exports to China sent shares surging. According to public filings, Fields has executed over $4 million in trades over the past few months, with heavy bets on Microsoft (MSFT) and NVIDIA. In fact, former top dog Rep. Michael McCaul — one of the wealthiest and most active traders in Congress — has been quietly overtaken by Fields in terms of value of trades. And politicians aren't just buying. In the days leading up to the controversial "One Big, Beautiful Bill" — a sweeping Trump-endorsed tax package that included major Medicaid cuts — multiple lawmakers dumped shares of Centene Corp (CNC), a company that handles Medicaid reimbursements. Among them was Rep. Robert Bresnahan, who sold CNC shares just days before voting to advance the bill that would gut Medicaid budgets and force work requirements. In response to the policy changes, CNC stock plummeted over 50%. Watch the Reel to See How Congress Beat the Market We break down the story in this short reel so you can watch it all unfold, from the key players to the big trades and timelines. The STOCK Act Makes These Trades Public, If You Know Where to Look In 2012, the STOCK Act was signed into law, requiring members of Congress to disclose their trades within 30 to 45 days. That means these transactions are fully public, but they aren't easy to track unless you know what to search for. Whether you're tracking Pelosi, Fields, Khanna, or any other 'high alpha' politician, Barchart lets you search, filter, and analyze their trades in just a few clicks. In other words: You don't need a hedge fund to follow the money. With Barchart's Political Insider Trading tool, available under the 'Investing' Tab, you can: Search trades by politician name See the dollar value of each transaction Filter by buys, sells, or ticker symbols Track trade activity over time On the date of publication, Barchart Insights did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Delta Air assures US lawmakers it will not personalize fares using AI
Delta Air Lines said on Friday it will not use artificial intelligence to set personalized ticket prices for passengers after facing sharp criticism from U.S. lawmakers and broad public concern. Last week, Democratic Senators Ruben Gallego, Mark Warner and Richard Blumenthal said they believed the Atlanta-based airline would use AI to set individual prices, which would "likely mean fare price increases up to each individual consumer's personal 'pain point.'" Delta said it has not used AI to set personalized prices but previously said it plans to deploy AI-based revenue management technology across 20% of its domestic network by the end of 2025 in partnership with Fetcherr, an AI pricing company. "There is no fare product Delta has ever used, is testing or plans to use that targets customers with individualized prices based on personal data," Delta told the senators in a letter on Friday, seen by Reuters. "Our ticket pricing never takes into account personal data." Senators praised Delta's commitment not to use AI for personal pricing but expressed many questions and want more details about what data Delta is collecting to set prices. "Delta is telling their investors one thing, and then turning around and telling the public another," Gallego said. "If Delta is in fact using aggregated instead of individualized data, that is welcome news." Delta declined comment on Gallego's statement. The senators cited a comment in December by Delta President Glen Hauenstein that the carrier's AI price-setting technology is capable of setting fares based on a prediction of "the amount people are willing to pay for the premium products related to the base fares." Last week, American Airlines CEO Robert Isom said using AI to set ticket prices could hurt consumer trust. "This is not about bait and switch. This is not about tricking," Isom said on an earnings call, adding "talk about using AI in that way, I don't think it's appropriate. And certainly from American, it's not something we will do." Democratic lawmakers Greg Casar and Rashida Tlaib last week introduced legislation to bar companies from using AI to set prices or wages based on Americans' personal data and would specifically ban airlines raising individual prices after seeing a search for a family obituary. They cited a Federal Trade Commission staff report in January that found "retailers frequently use people's personal information to set targeted, tailored prices for goods and services -- from a person's location and demographics, down to their mouse movements on a webpage." The FTC cited a hypothetical example of a consumer profiled as a new parent who could intentionally be shown higher-priced baby thermometers and collect behavioral details to forecast a customer's state of mind. Delta said airlines have used dynamic pricing for more than three decades, in which pricing fluctuates based on a variety of factors like overall customer demand, fuel prices and competition, but not a specific consumer's personal information. "Given the tens of millions of fares and hundreds of thousands of routes for sale at any given time, the use of new technology like AI promises to streamline the process by which we analyze existing data and the speed and scale at which we can respond to changing market dynamics," Delta's letter said.
