Armenia PM Says Foiled 'Sinister' Coup Plot By Senior Cleric
Armenia's Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan on Wednesday said security forces had foiled a coup plot involving a senior cleric, amid his escalating standoff with the leadership of the powerful Apostolic Church.
Pashinyan has been at loggerheads with senior clerics since 2020, when Catholicos Garegin II began calling for his resignation following Armenia's disastrous military defeat to arch-foe Azerbaijan over the then-disputed Karabakh region.
"Law enforcement officers have foiled a large-scale and sinister plan by the 'criminal-oligarchic clergy' to destabilise the situation in the Republic of Armenia and seize power," Pashinyan wrote on his Telegram channel.
Armenia's Investigative Committee said Archbishop Bagrat Galstanyan had "since November 2024 set himself the goal of changing power by means not permitted by the Constitution of the Republic of Armenia".
Armenia -- the first nation to adopt Christianity as a state religion in the 4th century -- grants the Apostolic Church special constitutional status and the church wields considerable influence in Armenian society.
Last year, Galstanyan -- the leader of opposition movement Sacred Struggle -- accused Pashinyan of ceding territory to Azerbaijan and led mass protests that ultimately failed to topple the prime minister.
The Investigative Committee said that Galstanyan "with the prior consent of several members of the movement, acquired the necessary means and tools to carry out terrorist acts and seize power".
"Searches are currently underway at the homes of Archbishop Bagrat and around 30 of his associates," it added.
The News.am website published footage showing Galstanyan leaving his house accompanied by masked police officers, who escorted him into a car and drove him away.
"Evil, listen carefully -- whatever you do, you have very little time left. Hold on, we are coming," he said, apparently addressing Pashinyan, as a crowd outside shouted "Nikol is a traitor!"
A close associate of the archbishop, MP Garnik Danielyan, told journalists that "these are actions of a dictatorial regime" and called the accusations against the cleric fabricated.
Another opposition figure, Ishkhan Saghatelyan of the nationalist Dashnaktsutyun party, said police raided the homes of members of his party as well.
Last week, rights groups and opposition parties said police detained dozens of activists as Pashinyan travelled to Turkey in a landmark bid to improve ties with Armenia's historical rival.
The loss of the Karabakh region after Azerbaijan's lightning offensive in 2023 has divided Armenia, as its neighbour demands sweeping concessions in exchange for lasting peace.
Earlier this month, Pashinyan launched an unprecedented challenge to Garegin II, urging believers to remove him from office.
The prime minister called on Armenians to join a "coordination group" to organise the "liberation" of the Church and elect a new spiritual leader.
He has alleged that Catholicos Garegin II has a child, in a blazing row that prompted fierce criticism from the opposition and has called for Pashinyan to be excommunicated.
Galstanyan catapulted to the forefront of Armenian politics in 2024, galvanising mass popular protests and seeking to launch an impeachment process against Pashinyan.
The charismatic cleric even temporarily stepped down from his religious post to run for prime minister.
But as a dual Armenian-Canadian citizen, he is not eligible to hold the office under Armenian law.
Pashinyan's grip on power, boosted by unpopular opposition parties and strong support in parliament, has so far remained unshaken.
A former journalist and opposition lawmaker, he came to power after leading street protests that escalated into a peaceful revolution in 2018.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
an hour ago
- DW
Ukraine loses F-16 and pilot during massive Russian strike – DW – 06/29/2025
Russia launched a fresh wave of large-scale drone and missile strikes across Ukraine overnight. Kyiv lost a pilot and fighter jet during the effort to repel the attack. DW has more updates. Below, you can read a roundup of events regarding Russia's war in Ukraine from Sunday, June 29, 2025. A Ukrainian pilot has been killed and his F-16 fighter jet lost as Ukraine's military forces worked to repel a large-scale Russian drone and missile attack. Ukraine's military confirmed the loss on Sunday morning. This is the third such loss of an F-16 fighter jet since Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, the military said. "The pilot used all of his onboard weapons and shot down seven air targets. While shooting down the last one, his aircraft was damaged and began to lose altitude," Ukraine's air force said on the Telegram messaging app. The pilot flew the jet away from civilian settlements and did not have time to eject to save himself, the message read. Russia launched a fresh wave attack on Ukraine overnight, targeting the country's central, southern and western region. Some 500 aerial weapons were deployed including drones, cruise missiles and ballistic missiles, Ukraine's military said. At least three people were injured and there were reports of damaged houses and other infrastructure. Air raid sirens sounded across the coutnry, including the western region which is considerably far from the Russian front lines. "To repel the massive attack, all available means of the defence forces that can operate on enemy air assets were deployed," Ukraine's military said. Reports cited the operational command of the Polish Armed Forces saying they scrambled fighter jets and activated ground-based air defenses in response to the raids in Ukraine which were close to Poland's border. This comes after Ukraine's air force had warned of an attack involving Russian bombers and drones, on Saturday evening. RBK-Ukraine, a local news agency, reported explosions in Kyiv overnight. Ukraine's military said Russia had launched some 477 drones and 60 missiles but 211 of the drone and 38 of the missiles had been intercepted and destroyed. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video We are following the latest developments concerning Russia's war in Ukraine. Russian President Vladimir Putin, once again, said that he was ready for a round of peace talks with Ukraine. This would be the third such round of talks , should they materialize. Meanwhile, Russia continued to strike parts of Ukraine with drones and missiles. US President Donald Trump said he believed something could soon happen that could bring Russia's war in Ukraine to an end, referencing a recent phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin but providing no further details.
Int'l Business Times
2 days ago
- Int'l Business Times
Trump Mocked for Not Knowing When the Civil War Ended: 'The US President Couldn't Pass the Citizenship Test'
President Donald Trump was mocked online for seemingly not knowing when the Civil War ended, causing users to claim their own president "couldn't pass the citizenship test." The berating began after the White House held a press conference Friday following the Supreme Court's siding with the Trump administration, saying that there could be exceptions to birthright citizenship. "They used birthright citizenship, some of the worst people, some of the cartels, to get people into our country, just so you know," Trump told reporters. Trump: "If you look at the end of the Civil War -- the 1800s, it was a very turbulent time. If you take the end day -- was it 1869? Or whatever." — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) June 27, 2025 "Again, I say if you look at the end of the Civil War — the 1800s, it was a very turbulent time. If you take the end day — was it 1869? Or whatever — but you take that exact date and that's when that case was filed," he continued. Although the president meant to use that statement to help his argument of ending birthright citizenship, dozens of users instead zoned in on the date Trump mentioned. The Civil War lasted from 1861 to 1865, meaning it was over years before Trump's guess. This prompted immediate jokes and mockery online, with many users accusing the president of not knowing "basic American history." "This isn't some trivial gaffe, it's a president of the United States mangling basic American history while trying to push a dangerous, unconstitutional agenda on birthright citizenship," one user commented . This isn't some trivial gaffe it's a president of the United States mangling basic American history while trying to push a dangerous, unconstitutional agenda on birthright citizenship. — 𝕄𝕒𝕣𝕘𝕒𝕣𝕖𝕥🌴Siegien 🐦📷 (@margaretsiegien) June 27, 2025 "This moron has no clue about American history!" one user chided . Another wrote , "There's just no way he could pass a 5th grade history test." Others tied their jabs back into Trump's bid for undoing birthright citizenship, noting that those applying for citizenship have to know American history. The US President couldn't pass the citizenship test — Don Draper (@DonDraperMadMen) June 27, 2025 "The US President couldn't pass the citizenship test," one user declared . Another mocked , "Those are things that you need to know if you want to pass an immigration test [by the way]." Birthright citizenship was enshrined into the Constitution under the 14th Amendment in 1868, which some users noted was one year off of the year Trump named. However, the Supreme Court's recent ruling could mean that babies born in the U.S. to undocumented parents or visitors could no longer be eligible for automatic citizenship. Originally published on Latin Times Donald trump Supreme court
Int'l Business Times
2 days ago
- Int'l Business Times
US Supreme Court Curtails Power Of Individual Judges To Block Trump
A divided US Supreme Court handed President Donald Trump a major victory on Friday by curbing the power of lone federal judges to block executive actions. In a 6-3 ruling stemming from Trump's bid to end birthright citizenship, the court said nationwide injunctions issued by district court judges "likely exceed the equitable authority that Congress has granted to federal courts." The top court did not rule on the constitutionality of Trump's executive order seeking to end automatic citizenship for children born on American soil. But the broader decision on the scope of judicial rulings removes a big roadblock to Trump's often highly controversial policy agenda and has far-reaching ramifications for the ability of the judiciary to rein in Trump or future American presidents. Trump celebrated by telling reporters he had "a whole list" of policies he could now proceed on without opposition in the courts. Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship is just one of a number of his moves that have been blocked by judges around the country -- both Democratic and Republican appointees - since he took office in January. Courts have, for example, blocked or slowed down his hardline immigration crackdown, firing of federal employees, efforts to end diversity programs and punitive actions against law firms and universities. Past presidents have also complained about national injunctions shackling their agenda, but such orders have sharply risen under Trump, who saw more in his first two months than Democrat Joe Biden did during his first three years in office. Justice Amy Coney Barrett, a Trump appointee who authored the majority opinion joined by the other five conservative justices, said "the universal injunction was conspicuously nonexistent for most of our Nation's history." "Federal courts do not exercise general oversight of the Executive Branch," Barrett wrote. "When a court concludes that the Executive Branch has acted unlawfully, the answer is not for the court to exceed its power, too," she said. The three liberal justices dissented with Justice Sonia Sotomayor saying "no right is safe in the new legal regime the Court creates." "The Court's decision is nothing less than an open invitation for the Government to bypass the Constitution," Sotomayor said. "The Executive Branch can now enforce policies that flout settled law and violate countless individuals' constitutional rights, and the federal courts will be hamstrung to stop its actions fully," she said. Trump, in a post on Truth Social, welcomed the ruling as a "GIANT WIN." The case was ostensibly about Trump's executive order ending birthright citizenship, which was deemed unconstitutional by courts in Maryland, Massachusetts and Washington state. But it actually focused on whether a single federal district court judge has the right to issue a nationwide block to a presidential decree with a universal injunction. The issue has become a rallying cry for Trump and his Republican allies, who accuse the judiciary of impeding his agenda against the will of voters. Steven Schwinn, a law professor at the University of Illinois Chicago, said the court's ruling "sharply undermines the power of federal courts to rein-in lawless actions by the government." "The ruling will likely create a patchwork of birthright citizenship rights," Schwinn told AFP, where it is recognized in some locations for people who have successfully sued and not recognized for people who have not sued. "This patchwork approach to individual rights is inconsistent with our history and tradition of federal rights in the United States and is inconsistent with the rule of law," he said. The Trump administration had asked the Supreme Court to restrict the application of a district court's injunction solely to the parties who brought the case and the district where the judge presides. Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship decrees that children born to parents in the United States illegally or on temporary visas would not automatically become citizens. The three lower courts ruled that to be a violation of the 14th Amendment, which states: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States."
