All smiles in the Kremlin as Putin sits down with Trump's deal-maker
"It's so good to see you," gushed Steve Witkoff as he shook the hand of the Russian president.
From his broad smile you could tell that Donald Trump's special envoy was indeed delighted to see Vladimir Putin.
In fact, he's been seeing rather a lot of him.
This was their fourth meeting in just over two months.
In that period Witkoff has surely had more face time with Russia's president than any other American.
The Kremlin released 27 seconds of video from the meeting. What caught my attention wasn't so much the body language or the greetings - it was the table.
On one side sat the combined might of the Russian delegation: President Putin, flanked by his veteran foreign policy aide Yuri Ushakov, his envoy on foreign investment Kirill Dmitriev, plus an interpreter.
On the other side, clearly outnumbered: Witkoff and a translator.
This is not traditional diplomacy - but then again, Witkoff is not a traditional diplomat.
He is a billionaire New York real estate developer and long-time confidant of Trump - who himself is not a traditional president.
Like Trump, Witkoff has made a career in doing deals.
This is how high-level US-Russian diplomacy is being conducted now in the Trump era.
It's how crucial decisions with potential implications for the global order are being debated.
Following this round of talks, Ushakov held a conference call for reporters. He insisted that the negotiations with Witkoff had been "constructive and very useful".
"May I ask a question?" I began. "What are the main sticking points, the obstacles to peace in Ukraine?"
"Thank you," Ushakov said. "We'll end it there." Conference call over.
From the various alleged peace proposals that have been leaked to the press, there seem to be plenty of "sticking points". There are differences over the territorial concessions Ukraine would be required to make, security guarantees, sanctions relief for Russia and the sequencing - that is, the order in which obligations undertaken be carried out.
The day Witkoff flew to Moscow, on the edge of the city, peace was shattered.
A car bomb killed a senior Russian general.
Yaroslav Moskalik was deputy head of the Main Operations Directorate of the Russian General Staff. The Kremlin accused Kyiv of assassinating him.
If that's true, it's a sign of how Russia's war in Ukraine has come much closer to home.
There is no guarantee that talks between Putin and Witkoff will bring peace. And there will be concern in Kyiv and in Europe that they were not at the table.
What is clear is that Putin and Trump are determined to bring their countries closer - whatever happens with the Ukraine peace process.
For Moscow and Washington, now their watchword is co-operation.
On Friday, I attended a ceremony at a Moscow military park symbolising this.
It marked the moment, 80 years ago, when American and Soviet soldiers met on the Elbe River in the dying days of World War Two. That was a time when Russia and America were allies.
A military band played as people lined up to lay flowers at a memorial to the Meeting on the Elbe.
Putin's invasion of Ukraine put the US and Russia on opposite sides, but times are changing again.
The White House and the Kremlin are trying to repair relations. Could they secure a peace deal, one that's acceptable to Ukraine?
"We are just re-establishing contact," Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova told me at the ceremony.
"We are just trying to find a way out of this terrible crisis which was created by the previous American administration. They ruined many things."
Moscow presents itself as peacekeeper. It blames Kyiv and the "collective West" for the fighting.
And yet in February 2022, it was President Putin who ordered Russian troops to invade a sovereign neighbouring country, to force it back into Moscow's orbit.
So much has changed, not least the attitude of the White House.
President Biden had promised to support Ukraine "for as long as we can".
Earlier this month, Trump blamed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky for starting the war.
"You don't start a war against someone 20 times your size and then hope that people give you some missiles," Trump said.
Why Zelensky can't and won't give up Crimea
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Former Jobs Data Chief Decries Firing of Successor
(Bloomberg) -- President Donald Trump's firing of the chief labor statistician was criticized by her predecessor, who called it an unfounded move that will undermine confidence in a key data set on the US economy. We Should All Be Biking Along the Beach Seeking Relief From Heat and Smog, Cities Follow the Wind Chicago Curbs Hiring, Travel to Tackle $1 Billion Budget Hole NYC Mayor Adams Gives Bally's Bronx Casino Plan a Second Chance 'This is damaging,' William Beach, whom Trump picked in his first term to head the Bureau of Labor Statistics, said on CNN's State of the Union on Sunday. Trump on Friday fired Erika McEntarfer hours after labor market data showed weak jobs growth based in part on steep downward revisions for May and June. The move by Trump, who claimed the latest monthly report was 'phony,' prompted an outcry from economists and lawmakers. 'I don't know that there's any grounds at all for this firing,' said Beach, whom McEntarfer replaced in January 2024. 'And it really hurts the statistical system. It undermines credibility in BLS.' Studies indicate that the agency's data is more accurate than 20 or 30 years ago, including any revisions of the initial data, Beach said. Even so, he said he'll trust future BLS data because people working for the agency are 'some of the most loyal Americans you can imagine,' making the bureau 'the finest statistical agency in the entire world.' Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan, speaking Sunday on CBS's Face the Nation, urged the US government to improve its data collection to avoid revisions that engender distrust. 'We watch what consumers really do. We watch what businesses really do,' Moynihan said, while not addressing the politics of the firing. 'They can get this data, I think, other ways, and I think that's where the focus would be.' He noted the revision for May and June data, while not unusual, was one of the largest in seven years. 'That creates doubt around it,' he said. 'Let's spend some money. Let's bring the information together. Let's find where else in the government money is reported.' McEntarfer was confirmed by the Senate in a bipartisan 86-8 vote. Vice President JD Vance, then a senator, voted to approve her nomination. Kevin Hassett, Trump's chief economic adviser at the White House, alleged that the large jobs data revisions were poorly explained and were evidence enough for a 'fresh set of eyes' at BLS. He sought to contradict Beach's portrayal of the agency as politically neutral. 'The bottom line is that there were people involved in creating these numbers,' Hassett said on NBC's Meet the Press. Pressed on whether Trump would fire anyone offering data he disagreed with, Hassett, who heads the National Economic Council, disagreed. 'No, absolutely not,' he said. 'The president wants his own people there so that when we see the numbers, they're more transparent and more reliable.' (Updates with Moynihan comments beginning in sixth paragraph.) How Podcast-Obsessed Tech Investors Made a New Media Industry Everyone Loves to Hate Wind Power. Scotland Found a Way to Make It Pay Off Russia Builds a New Web Around Kremlin's Handpicked Super App Cage-Free Eggs Are Booming in the US, Despite Cost and Trump's Efforts What's Really Behind Those Rosy GDP Numbers? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US trade advisor says Trump tariff rates unlikely to change
New US tariff rates are "pretty much set" with little immediate room for negotiation, Donald Trump's trade advisor said in remarks aired Sunday, also defending the president's politically driven levies against Brazil. Trump, who has wielded tariffs as a tool of American economic might, has set tariff rates for dozens of economies including the European Union at between 10 and 41 percent come August 7, his new hard deadline for the duties. In a pre-taped interview broadcast Sunday on CBS's "Face the Nation," US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said "the coming days" are not likely to see changes in the tariff rates. "A lot of these are set rates pursuant to deals. Some of these deals are announced, some are not, others depend on the level of the trade deficit or surplus we may have with the country," Greer said. "These tariff rates are pretty much set." Undoubtedly some trade ministers "want to talk more and see how they can work in a different way with the United States," he added. But "we're seeing truly the contours of the president's tariff plan right now with these rates." Last Thursday, the former real estate developer announced hiked tariff rates on dozens of US trade partners. They will kick in on August 7 instead of August 1, which had previously been touted as a hard deadline. Among the countries facing steep new levies is Brazil. South America's largest economy is being hit with 50 percent tariffs on exports to the United States -- albeit with significant exemptions for key products such as aircraft and orange juice. Trump has openly admitted he is punishing Brazil for prosecuting his political ally Jair Bolsonaro, the ex-president accused of plotting a coup in a bid to cling to power. The US president has described the case as a "witch hunt." Greer said it was not unusual for Trump to use tariff tools for geopolitical purposes. "The president has seen in Brazil, like he's seen in other countries, a misuse of law, a misuse of democracy," Greer told CBS. "It is normal to use these tools for geopolitical issues." Trump was "elected to assess the foreign affairs situation... and take appropriate action," he added. Meanwhile White House economic advisor Kevin Hassett said that while talks are expected to continue over the next week with some US trade partners, he concurred with Greer's tariffs assessment in that the bulk of the rates "are more or less locked in." Asked by the host of NBC's Sunday talk show "Meet the Press with Kristen Welker" if Trump could change tariff rates should financial markets react negatively, Hassett said: "I would rule it out, because these are the final deals." Legal challenges have been filed against some of Trump's tariffs arguing he overstepped his authority. An appeals court panel on Thursday appeared skeptical of the government's arguments, though the case may be ultimately decided at the Supreme Court. mlm/des
New York Post
10 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump's EU trade deal win: Letters to the Editor — Aug. 4, 2025
The Issue: President Trump strikes a landmark EU trade deal before his new tariffs take effect. President Trump and his team keep on striking massive deals ('EU got a deal!,' July 28). How long can the biased media and Democrats not give credit where credit is due? Advertisement Now it's time for Federal Reserve chief Jerome Powell to cut interest rates and really get the economy moving. Bob Robustelli Stamford, Conn. Advertisement This is what happens when you elect a businessman as president, instead of a politician. Democrats lambasted Trump on the tariffs, but look how wrong they were. Robert Berk Manhattan Advertisement Saying the tariff deal with the EU is a lopsided win for the United States doesn't consider the whole picture. Sure, tariffs for EU products are 15% versus zero tariffs on US products to the EU, but this doesn't take into consideration the European Value Added Tax. VATs (somewhat similar to sales taxes in the United States) are on average 21.8%, compared to the US sales tax average of 7.25%. Add the US sales tax average to the new 15% EU tariff, and the US total average 'sales tax' is 22%. One can certainly argue this is not good for the EU or US consumers who foot that tax bill, but at least the revenue percentages for each government are similar. Advertisement Brice Russell Naples, Fla. Powell says he's against cutting interest rates because he wants to see how Trump's tariff policies and trade deals play out. That's not the absolute worst position to take. However, with each trade deal Trump inks, particularly the European Union one touted as 'the biggest deal ever made,' the United States becomes even more of an economic powerhouse. How much greater could we be doing if the US economy was turbo charged with an interest-rate cut to 3%? After the Fed stalling for months on a rate cut, Trump's mammoth EU deal has more than made his case for a stable and vibrant US economy. It's time that Powell abandons his cautious position and allows Trump to take full ownership of the US economy, which he is so far doing a spectacular job of managing. Eugene R. Dunn Advertisement Medford Touché, Miranda Devine ('Don deal proves all wrong — again!,' July 31). I guess the screams from those leftist idiots that the sky is falling shouldn't have been taken so literally. Hysteria was spewed by the media and their political minions, but they'll do whatever it takes to undermine Trump. Even many on the left, as hard as it is for them, cannot deny that Trump has a magical power that has the world coming around to even up the playing field. As Trump said, 'Victory is its own reward!' Advertisement Shame on the Democrats for trying to undermine what is best for everyone in this country. Kevin Judge Naples, Fla. Here's how I would deal with the tariff dilemma: Make tariff-free zones with some countries, let's say all Caribbean Community nations. Impose a basic minimum tariff, let's say 10%, with the opportunity to negotiate at a later date. Advertisement Then have conversations with like-minded nations to negotiate the tariff rates. Finally, call for a world conference, and I am sure it will be well-attended with solid suggestions from experts. Anant Nagpur Ottowa, Canada It didn't take Trump long to get the wheels in motion, and now our economy is like a well-oiled machine. Advertisement The naysayer Democrats were hoping that his tariffs would cause pandemonium and utter gloom, but take a good look — that didn't happen. Although prices haven't fallen (especially when dining out), what was once unaffordable has all of the sudden become within your budget simply because of consumer confidence. That's a good feeling that was absent for the last four long years. Ron Zajicek Cortlandt Want to weigh in on today's stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@ Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.
