Millions of Brits on DWP Universal Credit warned over important new rule change
Millions of Universal Credit claimants have been issued with a warning over a rule change being forced "through". National disability charity Sense has raised concerns ahead of the Universal Credit Bill passing through the House of Lords and all remaining stages of the legislation later today.
Sense remains deeply worried about the Universal Credit alterations this bill aims to implement, which will result in some disabled people assessed as facing the greatest employment barriers being £47 a week worse off if they make claims after these modifications take effect.
James Watson-O'Neill, chief executive at the national disability charity Sense, said: "We're grateful to everyone who campaigned to secure important concessions on this bill, but we remain deeply concerned about the impact these changes will have on disabled people who claim Universal Credit in the future.
"When over half of disabled people with complex needs who rely on benefits can't afford essential bills, cutting support should never have been on the table.
"We want the government to scrap its proposal to remove the health-related element of Universal Credit for disabled people under 22. This would leave thousands of young disabled people with complex needs £100 a week worse off – an unacceptable blow to those who already face significant barriers and extra costs. Any future benefits reforms must be co-produced with disabled people.
"We have the ideas and expertise as disabled people, and as organisations working alongside disabled people, to make the benefits system fairer and more effective – now it's time for the government to listen."
Birmingham Live reports that James continued: "The government has promised to tackle the barriers preventing disabled people from entering employment – such as negative attitudes from employers, the lack of assistive technology in JobCentres, and the unlawful denial of reasonable adjustments.
"We welcome this commitment, but we will hold the government to account to ensure these changes are delivered effectively and in genuine collaboration with disabled people."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Dying James Whale shares emotional update in terminal cancer battle as he reveals he is struggling to breathe and talk
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) PRESENTER James Whale MBE has broken hearts with a tear-jerking glimpse into his terminal health battle. Star James, 74 - who has been courageously battling stage 4 kidney cancer since 2020 - was told he has twelve weeks to live. Sign up for the Entertainment newsletter Sign up 4 James Whale has opened up about his terminal 4 battle with cancer Credit: Instagram/@jameswhaleradio 4 The TalkTV presenter - who starred on Celeb BB - shared an emotional health update on his podcast Credit: Getty - Contributor He is now up to week seven - but says, 'I'm not me anymore'. Speaking on his podcast Tales of the Whales alongside his co-host wife Nadine, they spoke about his conditions. The much-loved TV personality said he is struggling to breathe, talk and think - and can't hear very well. He also admitted his speech has become very slow and he is forgetful, while suffering with painful pressure sores. On the emotional recording, he said: "I can't breathe, I can't think, I can't talk. "Anyway. Good morning. Welcome to Tales of the Whales, our weekly podcast. I have terminal 5 cancer. Can you get 5?" A confused James continued: "Could I thank everybody for getting in touch and wanting to meet up. "I'm not being rude when I make it difficult to get touched up. I mean... in touch." Nadine explained: 'You're getting quite tired, so from next week, we're restricting visitors to just very close friends and family.' He added: 'The most tiring thing I found… I still can't hear very well, which is more frustrating than anything else. James Whale reveals he's got weeks to live in emotional update on cancer battle, saying 'I spend a lot of time crying' "I've become very slow in my speech and then forgetful and everything else." Talking about his pressure sores he said: 'I'm tootling along, which is all you can do really, trying to get my breathing sorted and the mark on my bum.' He humbly asked: "People have to go through a lot worse, don't they? Do they?" The poignant conversation concluded: "Anyway. I don't feel I can go on much more... "The other thing is, my energy levels have gone completely. "So I wish everybody well, and let us hope we go through these phases as quickly as we can." The star recently celebrated his 'last birthday' surrounded by loved ones after stopping his cancer treatment. Back in May, the TALK show host revealed his long-running programme could be coming to an end as he reached the final stage of his battle. One of the country's most revered radio personalities, James has been in the business for no less than 50 years and, in 2023, received the first ever TRIC Recognition Award for his outstanding work. He's helped countless others too, having launched the James Whale Fund for Kidney Cancer in 2006 - now known as Kidney Cancer UK - the nation's leading specialist charity of its kind. James, who first defeated kidney cancer 20 years ago, had been receiving the aggressive treatment since a second cancer detection in 2020. Nadine, who he affectionately calls Lady W, has cared for him throughout his health battle and meticulously keeps on top of his hospital appointments and prescriptions. 4 The presenter and his wife speak candidly on their podcast Tales of the Whales Credit: @jameswhaleradio/Instagram
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
DWP scrapping popular benefit with all claimants moved to something different
The Department for Work and Pensions says it will close Employment and Support Allowance by next March 2026 - with ALL claimants moved onto another benefit The Department for Work and Pensions has announced it will shut down Employment and Support Allowance by March 2026 - shifting all recipients onto a different benefit. The DWP delivered this bombshell update to Parliament ahead of the summer break. Managed migration is the term used when the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) transfers people from old-style benefits, such as Employment and Support Allowance (ESA), over to Universal Credit (UC). This shake-up forms part of the wider Universal Credit expansion, designed to merge several existing benefits into a single payment. So, what's going to happen now, and how is it going to affect people? Labour MP Amanda Martin, representing Portsmouth North, challenged ministers in the Commons "to ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, whether claimants with disabilities who are in receipt of the Personal Independence Payment and legacy work-related benefits will be treated as new claimants for the purposes of the proposed changes to the health element of Universal Credit when they are migrated onto Universal Credit through managed migration; and whether such claimants will see a reduction in their income as a result of these proposed changes." Sir Stephen Timms responded: "The Department plans to complete migration of ESA claimants to UC by March 2026. As part of this ESA claimants will be migrated to the UC Health Element. To protect any claimants who have not migrated by April 2026 we intend to mirror as closely as possible the changes made in UC in the ESA rates. "Changes to the "support component" and the two disability premia (severe and enhanced disability premium rates) will reflect changes to UC LCWRA rates for existing claimants." He continued: "Including these commensurate measures aims to give fair treatment for all customers moving onto UC from income related ESA, regardless of their point of migration." You'll be alerted when it's time to switch to Universal Credit through a postal letter known as a migration notice. The correspondence will be unmistakably identified as a migration notice with "Universal Credit Migration notice" displayed prominently within the document, reports Birmingham Live. The letter will specify an exact deadline for your UC transition (typically mentioned on two occasions throughout the correspondence). At the document's base, a footnote will read: "This is a migration notice issued under Regulation 44 of the Universal Credit (Transitional Provisions) Regulations 2014". Without securing an extension to your deadline, you must submit your UC application by the date outlined in your migration notice. Failure to comply means your existing benefits will cease - the transition to UC doesn't happen automatically.
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
How old is YOUR skin? Tool that tells you the real age of your face had some sobering truths for these brave volunteers
A tool that analyses the true age of your skin has been put to the test by a group of volunteers who were brave enough to find out how old they really look to the rest of the world. Novos, a New-York based company which specialises in anti-ageing and claims to be 'pioneers in consumer longevity', has put out a test which uses AI to analyse your skin's health. The software, which the company claims is expertly trained on over three million images and 'validated by dermatology specialists', gives a score based on facial age, eye age, eye bags, wrinkles, uniformity, pores and redness. The higher the score out of 100 for redness, pores, wrinkles and eye bags, the better, whereas skincare fanatics should aim for a lower score out of 100 for their facial uniformity. For some, the test was precise and got their age spot on. Video journalist James said he was 'very happy' and even recommended exfoliating once a week, followed by using a moisturiser. AI guessed that trainee reporter Ayaat was a year younger than her real age and she said it was 'clearly accurate'. However, others were told they looked 11 years older than their real age, which ended up 'ruining' their day, with one saying that the humbling test provides a 'sobering reminder that time waits for no man'. But do you think the results are correct? MailOnline reporters and editors put it to the test and were both pleasantly and unpleasantly surprised by the result... CLAIRE EYE BAGS: 73/100 FACE WRINKLES: 95/100 UNIFORMITY: 39/100 PORES: 36/100 REDNESS: 70/100 Reacting to the results, Claire said: 'I was looking haggard today (early mornings) and I was expecting my age to be higher, so I can't complain. 'Very happy with my eye age and it seemed to have scored in my favour in everything but pores but I'll take that hit for the 31 years eye age. 'I probably need a facial to rectify pore score but I will take a look at them tonight as I've never really thought about them, so maybe that is the problem.' Claire says she uses products from The Code skincare range by her friend, Rhianna Van Der Lugt. 'She has perfected all of the products so they work well on every age as my daughter is 21 and obsessed with the moisturiser,' she said. 'I use the skin cleansing cream (with water) and rub in firmly and then wipe off with a damp flannel. I usually do this two or three times before I add some serum and then the nourish and lift moisturiser which is absolutely brilliant. 'I do this morning and evening. I also try not to wear any make up at the weekend so that my skin can rest. There is also a SPF 50+ for the face which I use whenever I am in the sun and it doesn't react with my eyes and my face is really well protected.' SIOFRA FACE AGE: 36 EYE AGE: 29 ACTUAL AGE: 43 Reacting to the results, Siofra said: 'I must admit, I was dreading the results and was very much bracing myself to be told my skin looks a lot older than it should! I do go through phases where it gets some TLC, but this is very much not one of them. 'My current routine is washing my face at night and using some Lidl moisturiser twice a day. That coupled with a string of nights of broken sleep, I was preparing for the worst. So, to get a result of 36, seven years younger than my 43 years, was a great surprise. 'Even better was my eye age of 29. I fully expected that to be the worst bit due to the aforementioned restless nights, and I'd personally say that's usually my worst area when it comes to showing my age. 'However, my score was 78 out of 100 and Novos tells me that higher is better on this front. Readying the advice, it advises a lot of water, fruit and veg and I am good at ticking all these boxes - so maybe it's paid off. 'My overall facial wrinkle score wasn't so positive with a low 27, but it doesn't bother me too much. I've had deep lines on my forehead for as long as I can remember and if they start to bother me, I'll get a fringe. 'My scores for pores, redness and uniformity weren't great on paper but they don't look so bad to me. Perhaps I've gone face blind but overall I'm really happy and even tempted to try it again after I've caught up on some sleep.' KATE FACE AGE: 31 EYE AGE: 24 ACTUAL AGE: 33 EYE BAGS: 84/100. FACIAL WRINKLES: 84/100. UNIFORMITY: 51/100. PORES: 20/100. REDNESS: 48/100 Reacting to the results, Kate said: 'I had hoped my facial age results would be a little younger, out of pure vanity, but I'm also glad that I look around my age as I think age is something to be celebrated. 'My eye age being 24 was a pleasant surprise though, I have to say! My scores for Eye Bags and Facial Wrinkles is relatively high, which I'm told is a good thing and I won't be looking to have Botox any time soon. 'I wasn't too surprised by my poor Pore and Redness scores, as I struggle with oily combination skin and these have been lifelong issues for me anyway. 'Overall I'm quite pleased and plan to continue my usual skincare routine - although I might do a bit more research on reducing pore appearance and redness.' JACK FACE AGE: 36 EYE AGE: 25 ACTUAL AGE: 33 EYE BAGS: 53/100 FACE WRINKLES: 61/100 UNIFORMITY: 39/100 PORES: 39/100 REDNESS: 48/100 Reacting to the results, Jack said: 'As someone who takes pretty good care of their skin with daily SPF and retinol at night I'm pretty to shocked to have been aged up by three years. 'People usually remark that I'm babyfaced so this is a sobering reminder that time waits for no man. Maybe it's time to hit the Botox…' ED FACE AGE: 23 EYE AGE: 30 ACTUAL AGE: 25 EYE BAGS: 64/100 FACE WRINKLES: 72/100 UNIFORMITY: 33/100 PORES: 52/100 REDNESS: 45/100 Reacting to the results, Ed said: 'Well the younger facial age might explain why I keep getting ID'd while trying to buy alcohol at the supermarket. 'I'm pleasantly surprised with these results. I thought the bags under my eyes were more prominent than the AI appears to think. 'I think, my eye age, which five years older than my actual age, could be my fault due to one too many late nights followed early rises to get to work. 'All the other results I was expecting I think, my eye age, which five years older than my actual age, could be my fault due to one too many late nights followed by early rises to get to work.' OLIVER FACE AGE: 35 EYE AGE: 30 ACTUAL AGE: 30 EYE BAGS: 74/100 FACIAL WRINKLES: 60/100 UNIFORMITY: 59/100 PORES: 8/100 REDNESS: 48/100 Reacting to the results, Oliver said: 'It's a bit worrying that my pores score is so poor (as higher is better), perhaps I should see a dermatologist about that, but it's good that my eye age, eye bags and wrinkles are pretty good, so maybe my skincare routine is paying off. I've even just started using glycolic acid! 'Overall I'm not surprised I look a bit older than I am, as I always have. The first time I bought alcohol on my 18th birthday, I wasn't even ID'd and on top of that working in a newsroom can age you (or so I'm told).' JAMES FACE AGE: 23 EYE AGE: 27 ACTUAL AGE: 23 EYE BAGS: 62/100 FACE WRINKLES: 74/100 UNIFORMITY: 37/100 PORES: 65/100 REDNESS: 49/100 Reacting to the results, James said: 'I'm very happy! It's good to know that my 'face age' is also my actual age - so that's healthy. 'As for the rest of my scores, well I have to say being the youngest on the team has it perks. 'As for advice to anyone out there who isn't happy with their skin scores, a weekly dose of exfoliating gel and some CeraVe moisturiser clearly works a treat.' ALEXIS FACE AGE: 38 EYE AGE: 40 ACTUAL AGE: 27 EYE BAGS: 72/100 FACE WRINKLES: 50/100 UNIFORMITY: 42/100 PORES: 13/100 REDNESS: 49/100 Reacting to the results, Alexis said: 'It ruined my day!' ROB FACE AGE: 36 EYE AGE: 35 ACTUAL AGE: 26 EYE BAGS: 64/100 FACE WRINKLES: 15/100 UNIFORMITY: 32/100 PORES: 46/100 REDNESS: 37/100 Reacting to the results, Rob said: 'It's not ideal that I've been aged 10 years, but I will blame it on the AI identifying the beard. It would be interesting to see the results if I had a shave. 'It looks like the only metric I've scored positively on is uniformity and eye bags, and then really poorly on the wrinkles, so clearly I need to up my game with the skin care routine. 'I'm also slightly dubious that the test is set up by a skin care company.' JON FACE AGE: 38 EYE AGE: 40 ACTUAL AGE: 34 EYE BAGS: 72/100 FACE WRINKLES: 50/100 UNIFORMITY: 42/100 PORES: 13/100 REDNESS: 49/100 Reacting to the results, Jon said: 'Oh, this is brutal. I've always been told I looked alright for my age - occasionally passing for under 30 - so for an AI to tell me I look 38 is harsh. 'I'll agree with the eye bags though - not enough sleep and too much coffee to blame for those. And I'm pinning the wrinkle score on all my laughter lines from being such a jolly guy. That's what I'm telling myself, anyway. 'Delighted my regular and expensive moisturising regime is getting results for my pores. Bit miffed to be told I have a red face - and what does it even mean to have a 'uniform' face anyway? It's not like my nose is above my eyes. 'But the cynic in me does wonder whether it's being a bit harsh on purpose. After all, this company is selling products they say make you look younger. 'Would it really say I look younger if I slapped a bit of 'longevity formulation' on my face for a month? I'm not sure it would.' STEPHEN FACE AGE: 36 EYE AGE: 25 ACTUAL AGE: 30 EYE BAGS: 53/100 FACE WRINKLES: 61/100 UNIFORMITY: 39/100 PORES: 39/100 REDNESS: 48/100 Reacting to the results, Stephen said: 'As much as I'd love to say I'm shocked, being told I look years older than I actually am isn't overly surprising. Maybe I should look at getting Botox. Stephen added that his skincare routine involves moisturising every day but 'that's it'. AMIE-BETH FACE AGE: 35 EYE AGE: 30 ACTUAL AGE: 29 EYE BAGS: 74/100 FACE WRINKLES: 60/100 UNIFORMITY: 59/100 PORES: 8/100 REDNESS: 48/100 Reacting to the results, Amie-Beth said: 'I wasn't too shocked at my facial age as I am due my next round of Botox. 'I was surprised with they eye bag score as I have just come off of night shifts so I thought that would be worse. 'I feel as I am approaching 30, I am noticing my wrinkles a lot more so the wrinkle score does make sense to me. 'The pore score has horrified me. I always pride myself in having good skin. Maybe I need to invest in a toner.' STELLA FACE AGE: 36 EYE AGE: 29 ACTUAL AGE: 28 EYE BAGS: 63/100 FACE WRINKLES: 9/100 UNIFORMITY: 60/100 PORES: 15/100 REDNESS: 44/100 Reacting to the results, Stella said: 'I am shocked! There's no way I look 36 - definitely not! 'The only spot-on result? My eye age. Because let's be real, eyes never lie. 'My eye bags results are giving me hope, but those facial wrinkle scores? I'm scratching my head wondering what I'm doing wrong. I spent so much money on skin care every month.' AYAAT FACE AGE: 22 EYE AGE: 22 ACTUAL AGE: 23 EYE BAGS: 52/100. FACIAL WRINKLES: 63/100. UNIFORMITY: 27/100 PORES: 65/100 REDNESS: 57/100 Reacting to the results, Ayaat said: 'I recently turned 23, so the eye and facial age is clearly accurate. But I was mildly surprised by the scores on wrinkles, eye bags and redness - not ever having registered those as potential 'problem areas' in skin. My skincare routine consists of cleansing in the evening with a face wash, toning morning and night, and using a thick moisturiser and SPF whenever there are high UV warnings. 'This summer, though, I have laid out in the sun more than I should have, which I know isn't great for wrinkles...'
