Preferred candidate for chairman of Climate Change Committee announced
The chairman plays a key role in the committee's work of advising ministers on climate targets and reporting to Parliament on progress made in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
The UK Government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Executive all agreed on Mr Topping as the preferred candidate for the CCC role, Mr Miliband said on Friday.
Before any formal appointment, Mr Topping will be questioned by MPs on the energy and environmental audit select committees on July 16.
Mr Topping is currently a member of the Climate Change Committee and previously held the position of the UK's high-level climate action champion.
Following an 18-year private sector career in emerging markets and manufacturing, he worked as executive director of the Carbon Disclosure Project and chief executive of the We Mean Business Coalition.
If approved, Mr Topping will replace interim chairman Piers Forster, a leading climate scientist who succeeded former environment secretary Lord Deben in the role in 2023.
Mr Miliband said: 'I am delighted to announce the preferred candidate for chair of the Climate Change Committee – Nigel Topping will bring his extensive experience to this role, having already served on the Climate Change Committee for more than two years and as a UN Climate Change High Level Champion for Cop26.
'The CCC plays a vital role advising the UK and devolved governments on our climate targets and this announcement comes at a crucial time, as we deliver our mission to make Britain a clean energy superpower with good jobs, energy security and growth for the British people.
'Net zero is the economic opportunity of the 21st century and Nigel's strong business background will help us drive growth on the transition to net zero, unlocking opportunities for Britain.
'I look forward to progressing the appointment in the coming weeks along with ministers in the devolved governments.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
A wealth tax will only make the Chancellor's problems worse
Rachel Reeves's tears during Prime Minister's Questions pushed up the 10-year UK gilt yield from 4.51pc to 4.66pc in a matter of minutes. Whatever the explanation for the Chancellor's House of Commons meltdown, global investors weren't impressed – imposing a £1bn-plus increase in the annual interest bill on the UK's £2.6 trillion stock of national debt Ahead of Wednesday's parliamentary snuffles, there had clearly been tensions between Reeves and Prime Minister Keir Starmer. The Chancellor and Welfare Secretary Liz Kendall have spent weeks trying to sell reforms to Labour MPs, designed to save around £5bn a year in sickness and disability welfare payments by 2030. No one was talking about actually cutting the welfare bill under this heading. Spending on sickness and disability benefits was set to rise from £65bn in 2023-24 to £101bn by 2029-30, according to the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR). This huge 55pc increase is driven by an expected surge in Personal Independence Payments (Pip) to some 4.2m working-age adults, around one in eight of the work force. The Labour leadership's attempts to tighten benefit eligibility rules were designed to lower that annual bill to £96bn by 2030 – still a huge 48pc increase from when Labour took office last July. But Starmer bottled even these feeble reforms. Faced with Labour backbenchers outraged at any slowdown in the growth of state largesse, the Prime Minister caved – blowing another £5bn hole in Reeves's budget. Labour insiders now admit the party's attempted welfare reform will save 'more or less no money'.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Labour-run council faces legal action over trans pedestrian crossing
A Labour-run London council is facing legal action after installing a set of controversial road crossings in the colours of the transgender pride flag. Camden council installed the painted blue, pink and white crossings nearly four years ago in Bloomsbury in a bid to 'help celebrate transgender awareness ' and to act 'as a reminder of the rich LGBT+ history in Camden.' But Camden resident Blessing Olubanjo is now threatening to bring a legal challenge to have the four crossings at Tavistock Place and Marchmont Street removed or redesigned, because she claims it 'constitutes unlawful political messaging.' The 57-year-old claims the installations, which cost £10,464 in taxpayers' money, constitute a violation of political neutrality laws under the Local Government Act 1986, as well as an infringement of freedom of belief and expression under the Human Rights Act 1998. The NHS administrator, who is an Evangelical Christian, told The Telegraph: 'I brought this case because I believe in fairness, freedom of belief, and the proper role of public institutions. 'As a Christian and a taxpayer, I should not be made to feel excluded or marginalised by political symbols in public spaces. 'This crossing sends a message that only one viewpoint is welcome, and that's not right in a truly democratic society. 'I'm standing up not just for myself, but for everyone who feels silenced or sidelined by discredited, harmful activism forced on the public by ideologically captured local authorities.' Andrea Williams, chief executive of the Christian Legal Centre, who is supporting Ms Olubanjo, added: 'Not only is this crossing a matter of public safety and Christian freedom, it's about the misuse of public resources for political campaigning. 'The crossing is a visual endorsement of a contested ideology, installed by a public authority in breach of its legal duties. 'This is not the role of local government. Public spaces should be able to be used by everyone, not to advance divisive agendas that alienate people of faith and those who hold to biological reality. 'The Council needs to remove or redesign the crossing and apologise to its residents and local businesses.' At the time the plans were announced in Autumn 2021, the Royal National Institute for the Blind also told the council that colourful designs at crossings could cause confusion to the blind and pose safety risks to those with poor vision trying to cross the busy street. Transport for London's Independent Disability Advisory Group also said people with learning disabilities or dementia may struggle to identify the crossing. They also warned that people with sensory sensitivity could struggle with colourful crossings, which could cause anxiety, especially for people on the autistic spectrum. Helen Joyce, director of advocacy at human rights charity Sex Matters, said there was no 'conceivable justification' for the crossings to be in place after the Supreme Court ruled earlier this year that the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in the 2010 Equality Act 'refer to a biological woman and biological sex.' The women's rights campaigner added to The Telegraph: 'The trans flag crossings in Camden are not only a safety issue for the blind, disabled and elderly, but a costly exercise in celebrating a flag that represents unforgivable medical harms done to gender-distressed children in the name of 'progress'.' The crossing is also located in the same borough as the Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, which ran the UK's only gender identity development service for children. The youth gender clinic at the Tavistock and Portman centre closed early last year, ahead of plans to open regional hubs across England and Wales as part of recommendations made in the Cass Report. However, the council has insisted that the crossing had no relation to the gender clinic. Camden Council said they reject the claims in Ms Olubanjo's legal letter. A spokesman added: 'Camden is 'no place for hate' and we have a strong and continuing history of respect and support for everyone in our borough. We fight discrimination in all its forms, and this includes being an ally to our trans residents. 'These crossings are a visual statement to help celebrate transgender awareness and act as a reminder of the rich LGBTQ+ history and daily life in the Bloomsbury area and across Camden.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Islamic and right-wing extremism remain UK's ‘biggest threats', says Cooper
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper says Islamic and right-wing extremism remain Britain's 'biggest threats' ahead of the 20th anniversary of the July 7 bombings. On July 7 2005, four suicide bombers targeted the capital's transport network, killing 52 people and injuring more than 770 on three London Underground trains and a bus. A series of attempted bombings followed the attacks, and in the subsequent manhunt for suspects, police shot dead innocent man Jean Charles de Menezes, at a tube station. Writing in the Sunday Mirror, Ms Cooper recalled how news of the attacks had emerged as she headed to a local government conference in her then-role as a junior minister. 'The anti-radicalisation programme Prevent became more important than ever,' Ms Cooper said. 'And communities across the nation were determined that hatred would not win. 'The work done at that time has endured and evolved. Islamist extremist terrorism remains the greatest threat, followed by extreme right-wing terrorism. 'But we also face threats from hostile states, serious organised crime, cyber criminals, and a rise in individuals radicalised online.' Ms Cooper referenced how the approach to tackling terrorism had continued to evolve in the wake of the tragedy. In April, legislation providing greater protection to help prevent and reduce the harm of terror attacks at event venues officially became law. The Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Act 2025, known as Martyn's Law, compels all UK venues expecting 200 or more people to be on site to prepare for the event of a terror attack. Larger premises expected to host 800 people or more also have to take steps to reduce their vulnerability to an assault, such as CCTV, bag searches or vehicle checks. Figen Murray campaigned for the law change in memory of her 29-year-old son Martyn Hett, who was killed in the Manchester Arena bombing at the end of an Ariana Grande concert in May 2017. Speaking when the Bill was signed into law, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said: 'Today is a landmark moment for our security as my Government delivers on its promise to introduce Martyn's Law and better protect the public from terrorism. 'Figen's courage and determination in the face of such unimaginable loss is truly humbling, and it is thanks to her campaigning that Martyn's Law means her son's legacy will live on forever.'
