Australia should continue engaging with China on its own terms
six-day visit to China cannot be overstated. It was not only his first visit to China after his re-election, but also the fourth meeting with Chinese President
Xi Jinping
Advertisement
Bilateral ties had previously been marred by bitter trade disputes and mutual recriminations, which have improved since Albanese took office in 2022. While Albanese's visit was a continuation of his efforts to strengthen ties with China and secure economic gains, it came amid growing geopolitical unease.
The Aukus agreement between Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States is considered a central pillar of Australia's long-term security architecture. However, doubts about the fate of the pact – under which the US was to sell Australia at least three nuclear-powered submarines – emerged after Trump's election, given the views of members of his administration, such as Elbridge Colby, undersecretary of defence for policy. Last month, it became clear that the Trump administration had launched a review of the agreement.
Potentially costing Australia up to US$368 billion, the pact was already facing domestic criticism due to its heavy price tag. There are now fears that the Trump administration may demand that Australia not only pay more for its nuclear-powered submarines but also guarantee support for the US in a potential
conflict over Taiwan
Advertisement
Australia is still committed to its
one-China policy , and some believe that the Trump administration is not united behind Colby's thinking. The British special adviser on Aukus, Sir Stephen Lovegrove, also dismissed fears over the Aukus review. Nevertheless, given the unpredictable nature of US foreign policy, Aukus is a thorny issue in the context of Australia-China relations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Why force of law is world's best hope for beating climate change
The law has emerged as a powerful weapon in the war on global warming, with a series of landmark judgments seeking to make governments legally responsible for limiting greenhouse gas emissions arising from the use of fossil fuels. This move is one of the strongest yet in the fight against the existential threat of climate change , but it raises the question of who will pay for necessary remedial actions. Until now, the world's approach to battling global warming has been largely passive. It has mainly relied on peer-pressure approaches such as the 2015 Paris Agreement , whereby governments submit voluntary pledges to reduce carbon emissions. With legal authorities now entering the fray at a higher level, there is hope that reliance on voluntary action can be supplemented and reinforced by the law – provided that law enforcement itself is supported by financial system reforms designed to aid cost-burden sharing. That burden will be heavy. Industrial installations ranging from power stations to steel and cement plants will need expensive conversion to clean energy, and equally expensive infrastructure will need to be replaced and producers compensated. These actions are of particular concern to Asian nations with previous or ongoing large-scale industrial revolutions and whose carbon emissions have risen accordingly . They will be among those having to abide by stricter laws on emissions in the future. The International Court of Justice, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea have all made recent rulings on the obligations of governments with regard to climate change. These rulings come at a time when questions around how the public and private sectors will share the burden of the clean energy transition are in the spotlight, potentially leading to friction between consumers and investors as well as governments and financial markets. Legislating is one thing, but enforcement is another. There will be concerns that fossil fuel-producing nations deem the rulings unenforceable and thus of no consequence. This is true up to a point, but rulings by multiple international courts at least provide a sound legal basis upon which to challenge polluters.
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
New head of scandal-hit Shaolin Temple avoids commercial activities, does manual work himself
The successor to the disgraced abbot of the internationally famous Shaolin Temple has shunned the lifestyle that got his predecessor into trouble. Advertisement Two days after Shi Yongxin, the former head of Shaolin Temple in central China's Henan province for more than two decades, was placed under investigation for financial and sex scandals, the temple announced that Shi Yinle, the abbot of The White Horse Temple, would replace him. Both holy places are located in Henan and are regarded as among the most significant Buddhist monasteries in China. Shi Yinle has been photographed driving a bulldozer as a mark of his commitment to honest work. Photo: Baidu The White Horse Temple is the first Buddhist temple in China and was established about 2,000 years ago. Shi Yinle, 59, has served as its abbot for 20 years. But, unlike his high-profile counterpart at the Shaolin Temple, Shi Yinle rarely appears in public, the Xinmin Weekly reported. Dubbed the 'CEO monk', Shi Yongxin transformed the Shaolin Temple into a multibillion-dollar cash cow. Advertisement Not only did all the items inside the temple, like bottled water and incense, come at a price, but monks frequently took part in commercial kung fu performances around the world.
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Working in Hong Kong, living in Shenzhen: why people are making move to mainland city
At 8.30am on Monday, 24-year-old Lisa Sun leaves her flat in Shenzhen and begins her long commute to work. It starts with an e-bike ride through her neighbourhood, followed by a packed Metro journey, a border crossing intermission, and a similarly packed MTR trip. Ninety minutes later, she steps out into the bustle of Causeway Bay in Hong Kong – ready to start her day at the office. She repeats the same journey in reverse after work, finally getting home close to 9pm. Sun, born in the southwestern province of Sichuan, is one of a growing number of people commuting between Shenzhen and Hong Kong, trading time on the cities' subway systems for more space and lower costs. There has been a flood of posts on China's RedNote social media platform from cross-border commuters – and those considering the move – sharing tips on the best Shenzhen neighbourhoods to find a place to rent, and which checkpoints and transport options to choose. 'I decided to commute between Shenzhen and Hong Kong the day I got the job, because I wanted to live alone, but renting a flat in Hong Kong on my own would be way too expensive,' Sun said.
