LVMH sales weaker than expected as luxury sector awaits US trade deal
France-based LVMH, which owns over 70 brands ranging from handbags, high-end fashion and watches to spirits and hotels, has traditionally drawn on its size and geographical footprint to maximise profits and withstand headwinds. Yet the group is struggling to shake off consumer fatigue and reignite desire for luxury items.
Sales for the second quarter to the end of June were down 4% to 19.5 billion euros (22.95 billion dollars), falling short of a consensus forecast for a 3% decline compiled by Visible Alpha, cited by UBS. Sales at the group's fashion and leather division, accounting for the bulk of profits, were down 9%, below expectations for a 6% drop.
Chief Financial Officer Cecile Cabanis said on a call she was still "rather confident" about the rest of the year as the group expected trade talks between the EU and the Trump administration to deliver good news soon.
Asked how LVMH would view a potential general tariff rate of 15% anticipated for exports to the United States, Cabanis said that would be an "overall good outcome for the general mood of our clients".
With the exception of wines and spirits, some of LVMH's labels still have room to draw on their pricing power to mitigate the tariff impact, she said.
In China, where a real estate crisis has dampened appetite for luxury goods, the group saw some improvement, Cabanis said, adding that the success of Louis Vuitton 's new ship-shaped store in Shanghai demonstrated the brand still had the clout to attract worldwide attention.
Most luxury sector analysts still view the extended downturn that followed a post-pandemic boom as cyclical, induced in part by the prolonged slump in China, bouts of inflation and a yet unresolved trade dispute with the United States. But after two years of slowing sales following a post-pandemic boom, unease about the health of the industry is growing and high-end labels are scrambling to revitalise their offer.
Consultancy Bain expects sales of luxury goods worldwide to fall between 2% and 5% this year after a 1% drop last year.
LVMH has recently changed designers at Dior, Celine, Givenchy and Loewe, but they will need time to make their mark.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
On defence, France and Germany are inching closer but remain far apart
Germany is becoming more French - and vice versa - when it comes to defence but big differences in the state of their public finances and strategic thinking mean the so-called Franco-German engine is unlikely to be able to power a big shift in the way the EU as a whole does defence. "From a longer historical point of view, the degree of convergence (between the two countries) is arguably higher than it has been for, I would say, decades," Jacob F. Kirkegaard, a senior fellow at the Brussels-based Bruegel think tank, told Euronews. Both capitals see Russia as their biggest long-term threat, and both have pledged to pour hundreds of billions of euros into their military and defence industrial base. In Berlin, this has been dubbed a "Zeitenwende" (or historical turning point) while Paris said its latest military programmation law is "the ultimate strategic move". This convergence was driven by Russia's ongoing full-scale invasion of Ukraine, which brought back conventional war to European soil, Donald Trump's return to the White House, which has put in doubt continued long-term US commitment to Europe's security, and a change of leadership in Germany. The new chancellor, Friedrich Merz, "basically took what I can only describe as a Gaullist stance", Kirkegaard said, by saying that "Europe needs to prepare for a future without a US security guarantee". 'France is converging with Germany' Yet one example of how this rapprochement in defence remains a laborious process came last week when France's Emmanuel Macron and Merz sought to diffuse tensions over a joint €100 billion project to develop a sixth-generation fighter jet. At the core of the dispute is the demand by France to secure 80% of the workshare for the new Future Combat Air System (FCAS), negating previous agreements that it would be split equally between the two countries and Spain, which is also part of the project. The French demand, however, "should not be as surprising as it seems", Rafael Loss, a policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR), told Euronews, given that one of the major differences between France and Germany is how differently they view their military and the purpose they serve. The armed forces in France are part of the national foreign policy - as recent deployments in the Sahel attest - with the country's overseas territories and its possession of the nuclear weapon adding to its global perspective. "That's why the French military is much more comfortable with acting unilaterally or outside of EU, NATO contexts (than Germany's), and this then extends to the kinds of capabilities that the French armed forces prefer acquiring," Loss said. "Everything that relates to the French nuclear deterrent has to work when France is alone. And that means that FCAS, which is supposed to replace the Rafale fighter bombers going forward in carrying French nuclear weapons, French military and political leadership will not accept a situation where they're dependent to produce this capability because the nuclear deterrent depends on that capability." "French industry will need to be able to produce this aircraft by themselves if push comes to shove. They're willing to cooperate when strategic orientations align, but ultimately they have to produce everything independently of others. And again, that's something that many in Germany and across Europe haven't quite realised," he added. Still, Loss continued, "France is converging with Germany" with the "realisation that for the sake of European security, it needs to show that it invests in its partnerships and relationships with Europeans, especially those on the eastern flank". 'A big wasted opportunity' But the other major hurdle for the two to advance a common defence agenda at the EU level is the stark difference in their respective fiscal space. Germany's debt-to-Gross Domestic Product (GDP) ratio stood at 62.3% in the first quarter of the year. France's was at 114.1%, well above what the bloc's rules mandate (60%). This structural divergence means that as European countries aim to significantly ramp up their defence spending and military capabilities to deter a possible Russian attack towards the turn of the decade, Germany can afford to invest heavily in defence, while France cannot. For instance, Germany has asked to make use of a proposal by Brussels to loosen fiscal rules for defence spending, something France, which is targeted by an excessive deficit procedure, cannot do. France, which has consistently invested in defence over the last few decades, has less ground to cover, so to speak, but the sums advanced by the German government (including a €500 billion fund to boost the military and the country's infrastructure) should mean it catches up quickly. But their public finances also "fundamentally place them on different sides of negotiating tables" at the EU level, Kirkegaard said. The European Commission has put forward a plan to rearm Europe that it hopes will prompt member states to invest up to €800 billion before 2030. But most of that money is expected to come from member states' coffers, which in the case of France, are quite depleted. Given the scale of the task ahead, the Commission has been asked to come up with "innovative" financing options for defence. Macron has called for one of those options to be joint EU borrowing, something Germany has flat-out rejected. For Kirkegaard, this means that the crisis ushered in by Russia's war on Ukraine, is "a big wasted opportunity" for the bloc. "This crisis, the war in Ukraine, will not lead to materially more EU institutional or fiscal integration. It will lead to an expansion of the EU with Ukraine and maybe other countries but that's a different type of change to the EU and that's also very different than the last many big crises we've had," he said.
France 24
3 hours ago
- France 24
US tariff tussles stuff of nightmares for Bordeaux winemakers
In southwestern France, around the Bordeaux region's famed vineyards, months of talk on what US President Donald Trump will decide on tariffs have been the stuff of nightmares for producers as they look on helplessly. The United States is by far the top export market for Bordeaux's wine, accounting for 400 million euros ($470 million) worth of annual sales -- or about 20 percent of the total. China lags behind with 300 million euros ahead of the United Kingdom with 200 million. Sunday's announcement of a trade deal between the United States and the European Union did not clear up what tariffs European wine and spirits producers will face in the United States. While Trump said European exports face 15 percent tariffs across the board, both sides said there would be carve-outs for certain sectors. EU head Ursula Von der Leyen said the bloc still hoped to secure further so-called "zero-for-zero" agreements, notably for alcohol, which she hoped to be "sorted out" in the coming days. Philippe Tapie, chairman of regional traders' union Bordeaux Negoce, which represents more than 90 percent of the wine trade in the Bordeaux area, is worried by the uncertainty. "One day, it is white, the next it is black -- the US administration can change its mind from one day to the next and we have no visibility," he told AFP. In mid-March, Trump had threatened Brussels with 200 percent tariffs on alcohol in response to a proposed EU tax on US bourbon. Then in April he brandished a new threat of 20 percent across the board on EU products, a threat ultimately suspended. Since then, the level first held at ten percent but, in late May, the US leader threatened to revert to 50 percent before pivoting to 30 percent starting August 1st, the deadline for the negotiations with the EU that led to a preliminary accord after Trump and Von der Leyen met in Scotland on Sunday. In vino, veritas is unpredictability "At 10 percent or 15 percent, we'll find solutions. At 30 percent, no. End of story," Tapie warned just ahead of the announcement as he criticised a "totally unpredictable American administration". To export wine, "there's a minimum of 30 days by boat. If you go to California, it's 60 days. We can't think in terms of weeks," says Tapie, who says he has "never been confronted with such a situation" in 30 years of business. Twins Bordeaux, one of Bordeaux's leading wine merchants, also laments the tariffs' impact. "The American market represents about a third of our turnover, or around 30 million euros," explains Sebastien Moses, co-director and co-owner of Twins, which usually ships upwards of a million bottles a year to the United States. Since January, "our turnover must have fallen by 50 percent compared to last year," he says. "So far, we've managed to save the situation, because as soon as Donald Trump was elected we anticipated this and sent as much stock as possible to the US," explains Moses, though longer term he says this is not a "stable" strategy. Fly it out? As an attempted work around Twins Bordeaux even shipped cases of around 10,000 bottles by air in March. "But only very expensive wines, at no less than 150-200 euros per bottle, because by air it's at least two and a half times the price of shipping by sea," he said. For Bordeaux wine merchant Bouey, the US market represents less than 10 percent of its exports. "We have long since undertaken a geographical expansion. Faced with the global chaos, commercial strategies can no longer be based on a single- or dual-country strategy," Jacques Bouey, its CEO, told AFP in April. The tariffs come with the industry already struggling with declining consumption that has led to overproduction and a collapse in bulk prices. By early 2023, a third of Bordeaux's approximately 5,000 wine growers admitted to being in difficulty. © 2025 AFP
Fashion Network
6 hours ago
- Fashion Network
Stock investors expect rally as Europe clinches US trade deal
John Plassard, head of investment strategy at Cité Gestion, said the deal is 'good enough to unlock what equity markets needed most: visibility.' 'Tariff escalation risk is now off the table, and with that, a major macro overhang disappears. For investors, that's not just a sigh of relief, it's a green light,' he said. Euro Stoxx 50 futures will reopen for trading around 2 a.m. Paris time on Monday. Sectors most exposed to trade, including autos and consumer products, had outperformed Friday as investors were optimistic that an agreement would be reached before the Aug. 1 tariff deadline. European stocks have been range-bound since May due to jitters around the outlook for global trade. The benchmark Stoxx 600 is now 2.3% below its March record high. A UBS basket of stocks sensitive to tariffs has underperformed this year, suggesting there's room for the group to catch up to the broader regional benchmark. 'I do think there will be a relief rally as soon as the details are finalized, and this is a much needed shot in the arm for European stocks as earnings season is in full swing,' said Geoff Yu, a macro strategist for EMEA at BNY Mellon. Focus will be on carmakers, such as Stellantis NV, Volkswagen AG, Mercedes-Benz Group AG and BMW AG, as well as auto parts suppliers like Valeo SE, Forvia SE and Pirelli & C SpA. A gauge for the sector is flat on the year, missing out on Europe's broader rally. Investors will also be watching luxury goods makers including LVMH, Kering SA and Salvatore Ferragamo SpA, given North America is a significant market for the luxury sector. Drinks makers including Diageo Plc, Remy Cointreau and Pernod Ricard will be in focus, as well as shipping stocks such as A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S and Hapag-Lloyd AG, given freight's sensitivity to tariffs. Still, some investors warned that the rally could be short-lived until more details of the trade agreement are announced. 'There's a chance you see markets pick up in the morning and probably sell off again,' said Neil Birrell, chief investment officer at Premier Miton Investors. 'The devil will be in the detail, and it won't all be good for Europe and it won't all be good for the US.' Here's what other market participants are saying: Kallum Pickering, chief economist at Peel Hunt 'People want to bet that the US will strike a series of deals. They're not necessarily good deals, but uncertainty is worse. After we move up a little tomorrow in Europe, markets' attention will turn to Canada and Mexico. Any positive sign that they can strike deals like today's will be good enough for risk on.' Joachim Klement, strategist at Panmure Liberum 'Stock markets will likely rally on this news, but this can only be a sugar high. The fact is that Americans will pay higher tariffs from US imports and face an inflation surge and lower growth in the second half. The EU also faces higher tariffs than the UK, which gives UK exporters an advantage over their European competitors.' Michael Brown, senior research strategist at Pepperstone 'Stocks hardly need much of an excuse to rally right now, and the agreement not only removes a key left tail risk that the market had been concerned about, but also yet again reiterates that the direction of travel remains away from punchy rhetoric, and towards trade deals done. Rumours that the US-China trade truce will be extended for a further 90 days will also help on this front.' 'From a sectoral perspective, European automakers are one of the big winners here, with the 15% tariff also applying to auto imports into the States, a similar carve out to that achieved by Japan. Other obvious winners include US defense names given the EU's purchase commitments on that front, as well as US energy stocks, bearing in mind the almost $1 trillion of spend coming their way.' Mahmood Pradhan, global head of macro at Amundi Asset Management 'We'll probably get some sort of short-term relief rally in the morning, including more short covering. But given where we were pre-Liberation Day, this isn't good news for Europe. Longer-term, it will keep growth subdued in Europe.'
