
More Kiwis Oppose Than Support Government's Pay Equity Changes, New Poll Shows
The latest RNZ Reid Research survey found 43.2 percent of respondents were against the overhaul, compared to just 25.5 percent in favour. Nearly a third - 31.3 percent - remained unsure.
On the question of consultation, 68 percent said the government should have first sought feedback, with only 18.6 percent saying no. The remainder - 13.4 percent - were undecided.
That opinion carried through to voters' party preferences, with even a slim majority of ACT voters agreeing that there should have been consultation, despite the changes being championed by Workplace Relations Minister and ACT deputy leader Brooke van Velden.
The poll also indicated limited public comprehension: just 49.7 percent said they understood the changes, 38.2 percent admitted they did not, and a further 12.1 percent were unsure.
More than half of those who claimed a lacked of understanding still expressed an opinion about the policy: 38 percent said they opposed it and 13 percent said they supported it.
Respondents were surveyed from 23 May through to 30 May, capturing the immediate reaction to last month's Budget and the $12.8 billion of savings made from the coalition's pay equity pivot.
Van Velden had announced the overhaul several weeks earlier, before passing legislation through all stages under urgency.
Among the key changes: a new merit test was introduced, as well as a greater focus on whether employers could afford higher wages. The threshold to lodge a claim was lifted, and job comparisons across different industries were restricted.
Along with the changes, the coalition also extinguished the 33 claims already being considered under the previous scheme.
The government argues the regime had expanded beyond its remit, becoming too costly and confusing. The opposition parties and unions says the changes will make it harder for those in female-dominated sectors to achieve fair pay.
The RNZ Reid Research result follows a similar question asked in the latest 1News Verian Poll, released on Tuesday. It found 45 percent opposed the pay equity changes, compared to 39 percent in support, and 16 percent who did not know or wouldn't say.
Speaking to RNZ, van Velden said she had received mixed feedback but believed the community now recognised that the changes were necessary.
"It's always going to be a difficult conversation," she said. "We have fixed resources, we have to make those difficult decisions on behalf of New Zealanders."
And Prime Minister Christopher Luxon told RNZ he would not do anything differently if given the chance again.
"We made some pretty tough decisions to go through under urgency. But we had to fix a very unworkable and unaffordable law. It had got completely out of whack."
Finance Minister Nicola Willis suggested some of the public opposition or lack of understanding could have been driven by Labour promoting "misinformation".
"Labour have had a very confused position, and their hyperbole in claiming that we were ending equal pay has ultimately done a disservice to them and the people they're seeking to represent, because it's basically untrue."
But Labour leader Chris Hipkins said that was sheer desperation.
"Women up and down the country have a right to feel angry," Hipkins said.
"The government cut billions of dollars that was otherwise going to be going into low paid women's pay packets, and now they're just desperately trying to deflect attention away from that."
The latest RNZ Reid Research poll showed National and ACT losing support, and without the numbers - even with NZ First - to form a government.
ACT leader David Seymour said he did not put much stock in any one poll but acknowledged the recent pay equity changes could be on some voters' minds.
"Doing what is right is what is politically popular in the long term, and even if I'm wrong about that, good policy is worth it anyway.
"We have left New Zealand with a more sensible pay equity regime focused on actual gender-based discrimination, and I think that's worth it."
This poll of 1008 people was conducted by Reid Research, using quota sampling and weighting to ensure representative cross section by age, gender and geography. The poll was conducted through online interviews between 23-30 May 2025 and has a maximum margin of error of +/- 3.1 percent at a 95 percent confidence level. The report is available here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
28 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Submissions for bill criminalising migrant exploitation set to close
Several high-profile cases of migrant exploitation have been uncovered in Auckland in recent years. Photo: RNZ / Blessen Tom Public submissions for a bill that seeks to criminalise migrant exploitation close on Monday. Immigration Minister Erica Stanford introduced the Immigration (Fiscal Sustainability and System Integrity) Amendment Bill on 7 April, proposing several amendments relating to offences, penalties and proceedings, among others. The bill passed its first reading on 24 June and was referred to the Education and Workforce Select Committee. Introducing the bill in Parliament, Stanford outlined 10 amendments the bill sought to make in the Immigration Act 2009, noting its focus on tackling migrant exploitation. "The bill addresses a gap in New Zealand's migrant exploitation settings by creating a new offence, which is to knowingly seek or receive a monetary premium for an offer of employment," Stanford said. "Charging premiums for employment is an increasing form of migrant exploitation and it causes real harm. Often premiums are in the realm of tens of thousands of dollars," she said. "Currently, the legislation does not cover premiums that are paid before the employment commences, premiums that are made offshore, or situations where a premium is sought or received by someone other than the employer," she said. "This change makes it even clearer that this behaviour is not tolerated in New Zealand. It will enable us to prosecute more instances of migrant exploitation and hold exploitative behaviour to account." The bill proposes inserting a new section in the Immigration Act 2009 that creates a new offence. "It will be an offence for an employment-related person to knowingly seek or receive a premium in respect of the employment or potential employment in New Zealand of a victim," the draft bill reads. "New section 351A(1) applies before the victim starts work in New Zealand and whether or not they actually start work in New Zealand." Under the proposed section, a person is defined as a victim if they are domiciled in New Zealand or based overseas and fall within the category of an unlawful worker, a temporary entry class visa holder, a potential temporary entry class visa holder or a potential residence class visa holder. If approved, section 351A would make it an offence to charge premiums for employment, irrespective of whether a worker has started employment. At present, the offence only captures situations in which people are actively working in New Zealand and where the employer is the one charging the premium. The proposed bill widens the scope to include a potential employer, agent or any person involved in the recruitment of a victim. The penalty for the new offence will be imprisonment for a term not exceeding seven years, a fine not exceeding $100,000 or both. Arunjeev Singh, general secretary of the New Zealand Forum for Immigration Professionals, criticised some of the bill's content, arguing it gave "unfettered power" to immigration officers and went beyond the relationship of an employer and employee. Other immigration advisors told RNZ they questioned whether such legislation could be enforced in another jurisdiction if passed into law.


Otago Daily Times
28 minutes ago
- Otago Daily Times
NZers 'lucky' to have premium butter
Miles Hurrell. PHOTO: ODT FILES Federated Farmers' dairy group chair says New Zealanders are lucky to have premium butter, but he hopes prices drop at the checkout as soon as the cost of milk solids do. The price of butter rose nearly 50 percent to the year ended May, Stats NZ data showed. Dairy giant Fonterra's boss Miles Hurrell sympathised with households feeling the pinch but said price increases were a reflection of supply not being able to keep up with demand. Fonterra could not offer cheaper prices to local customers, he said. Federated Farmers Dairy Industry Group chairperson Karl Dean said New Zealanders had to pay the market rate. "We are lucky we get a premium product as our only option... the rest of the world would love to have grass-fed butter all the time," he said. "So it is good that we have that option, but all that we ask is that when the prices come down - which they will, they always do - that flows on through the supply chain." Dean believed Fonterra, wholesalers and supermarkets were doing their best to keep prices down. But they needed to react quickly when contract milk prices changed, he said.


Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
Overseas Investment Bill Could Undermine Public Access
'New Zealanders must retain their right to enjoy the places that define who we are,' says FMC Executive Board Member Raymond Ford, in response to the government's proposed changes to overseas investment rules. The Overseas Investment Amendment Bill, introduced to encourage foreign investment by simplifying the current regime, adopts a narrow economic focus and overlooks wider social, environmental, and public access considerations. While FMC supports overseas investment in principle, the organisation is concerned that the Bill's focus on economic opportunity and national security will sideline important factors — including public access, environmental protection, and community wellbeing. The Bill seeks to replace the existing multifaceted testing framework with a single 'National Interest' test. This change would remove longstanding requirements to assess impacts on heritage, the environment, and access to public lands. FMC recommends replacing the narrow test with a broader one that includes environmental, heritage, and public access considerations. It also calls for mandatory consultation between the Overseas Investment Office and Te Herenga ā Nuku / Outdoor Access Commission before land purchases are approved, ensuring existing public access arrangements are carried over when land changes ownership, and requiring ministers to consider the full range of national benefits, not just economic outcomes. The Bill should be withdrawn and the entire Act redrafted, setting out a clear process for foreign investment proposals with the relevant tests to assess whether they would generally benefit New Zealand. 'The future of public access depends on balanced, transparent decision-making that values more than just profit,' Ford said.