Labour defends net-zero policies after Blair criticism
It comes as a highly critical report by the independent Climate Change Committee says Labour has made very little progress in preparing the UK for the growing threats posed by rising temperatures since coming to power.Environment Secretary Steve Reed told Times Radio that Sir Tony had made "a valid and important contribution" to the climate change debate."I agree with much of what he said, but not absolutely every word and dot and comma of it," he added."But this government is moving to clean energy because it's best for Britain. It's more energy security for Britain."He said the government's plan to replace nearly all fossil fuels for electricity generation with wind, solar and wave energy by 2030 was aimed at breaking the UK's "dependency" on "fossil fuel dictators" like Vladimir Putin and it would lead to lower energy bills.In a report by the Tony Blair Institute, Sir Tony argues that the expected global rise in fossil fuel use and the doubling of airline travel over the next 20 years undermines current climate policies."These are the inconvenient facts, which mean that any strategy based on either 'phasing out' fossil fuels in the short term or limiting consumption is a strategy doomed to fail," he wrote.The report says existing carbon targets should be kept in place to give certainty to business but a rethink of how they are achieved was urgently needed.It says the focus should instead be on emerging technologies such as carbon capture and storage and nuclear fusion - and new international effort to persuade the world's biggest economies, such as China and India, to cut their emissions.
Conservative shadow environment secretary Victoria Atkins said it sent a "clear message" to the government that it needs to "rethink" its approach to net zero.Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch recently ditched her party's support for net zero by 2050, which the party had pursued in government.Atkins said there was "consensus across the board" on the need to protect the environment, but that "we have to take the public with us".Sir Tony's intervention has highlighted divisions in Labour over net zero.Some on the right of the party argue that the government is not doing enough to support workers and save jobs in the oil and gas sector in the transition to clean power.But Labour-supporting environmental campaigners have accused Sir Tony of handing ammunition to the Conservatives and Reform UK.One told the BBC the publication of his report on the eve of local elections was a sign that Sir Tony was losing influence over Sir Keir Starmer."This is an oddly public and oddly-timed intervention that would usually be made by someone struggling for access," he added.
Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Fears mounting over free speech as Labour plans to define Islamophobia
Fears are mounting that Labour 's moves to create an official definition of Islamophobia will have a 'chilling effect' on free speech. The Tories have warned that introducing a government-backed definition will lead to a clampdown on freedom of expression. Housing and local government spokesman Kevin Hollinrake also said the committee – made up almost entirely of Muslims – set up by Labour to devise the definition would lead to a 'predetermined and biased' conclusion. And a cross-party group of peers has written to Labour's working group, whose chairman is former Tory Dominic Grieve, expressing concerns. They claim the move could lead to public sector workers, as well as university staff or students, facing disciplinary action if accused of doing or saying 'something that falls foul of the definition'. Mr Hollinrake asked Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner in the Commons yesterday: 'Does the Secretary of State not share our concerns that their report and recommendations will be seen as predetermined and biased?' He said 'freedom of speech is on the line' and expressed concerns about the definition being drawn up in secret by the Anti-Muslim Hate/Islamophobia Definition Working Group. Ms Rayner accused Mr Hollinrake of using 'incendiary language', insisting: 'We will always protect free speech, including the right to criticise religions. 'The independent working group will submit its findings... We will then consider its recommendations and set out the next steps.' Former Tory co-chairman Baroness Warsi also accused Mr Hollinrake of 'unbefitting gutter politics'. Labour commissioned the work to devise a 'non-statutory' definition of Islamophobia in a what it says is a move to combat anti-Muslim abuse. But there are fears it could lead to a blasphemy law by the back door and stifle legitimate criticism of Islam. More than 30 peers said in their letter: 'Our principal concern is that if your working group comes up with a definition and it is taken up by the Government it will have a chilling effect on free speech and exacerbate community tensions. 'It would have 'wide-ranging implications for what people in public life, and those who work for public bodies or attend schools or universities, are able to say about Muslims and Islam. This presumably would mean any member of a university that says or does something that falls foul of the definition would face potential penalties.' The Policy Exchange think-tank has said Labour's working group should be suspended, warning an official definition of Islamophobia would 'almost certainly turbocharge cancel culture'. After a review by Whitehall troubleshooter Baroness Casey found public bodies covered up evidence about Asian grooming gangs 'for fear of appearing racist', Policy Exchange said Labour's measures 'would have made exposing the grooming scandal even harder and slower'. Ms Rayner's department said 'any proposed definition must be compatible with the right to freedom of speech and expression'.
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
Ian Murray to visit Faslane to announce £250m investment in nuclear base
SCOTTISH Secretary Ian Murray is to launch a £250 million investment at the base housing Scotland's nuclear weapons. The funding for HMNB Clyde at Faslane was announced in the spending review last month and will be spent over the next three years to improve infrastructure at the site. The upgrade will ensure the base can house the next generation of nuclear submarines. UK Government ministers Murray and Maria Eagle will visit the site on Wednesday, meeting with senior military officials, the leaders of Inverclyde and Argyll and Bute councils, and local MPs. Scottish Secretary Murray described the spending as a 'defence dividend' as he continued to talk up the economic impact of investing in the sector in Scotland, including through the Clyde 2070 programme, which will see billions pumped into the industry in the coming decades. READ MORE: Explosive new poll puts Corbyn-Sultana party level with Labour 'With Faslane home to the nation's first and final line of defence – the UK's nuclear deterrent, it's only right that Clyde 2070 represents one of the most significant UK Government investments over the coming decades,' he said. 'It will ensure the Royal Navy can deliver the continuous at sea deterrent from a modern, efficient base which will result in a better environment for our hero submariners to live, work and train in. 'Crucially it will also create skilled jobs – including for small and medium-size firms – boost the economy and help tackle the critical skills gaps facing the country in sectors such as nuclear, construction, maritime and project management, by bringing together government, Scottish communities, industry, supply chains and academia to address the challenges.' Defence procurement minister Eagle said Scotland plays a 'crucial role' in the country's Trident nuclear deterrent. She added: 'We are today re-affirming that unshakeable commitment by launching this multibillion-pound investment to His Majesty's Naval Base Clyde, which is vital to our deterrence capability. 'The initial £250 million of funding over three years will support jobs, skills and growth across the west of Scotland. 'This Government will keep the UK safe for generations to come while delivering on the Plan for Change and making defence an engine for growth.' The SNP have been contacted for comment.
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
This was too little, too late from the ‘iron' Chancellor
There will be a round of deregulation. Lending rules will be relaxed. And new listings will be accelerated. Rachel Reeves did everything she could in her Mansion House speech this evening to win back the City. From any other Chancellor it might have been greeted with loud applause. From this one, however, it will be dead on arrival. The relationship with finance is irretrievably broken – and is too late to win it back now. The bankers and brokers listening to Reeves this evening will like much of what she had to say. The relaxation of lending rules will be welcomed, even if it is questionable whether the British housing market needs yet more debt instead of more supply. Easing some red tape is always helpful, and something needs to be done to encourage more new listings. In reality, however, Labour's relationship with business is now broken beyond repair. When Reeves took office there was plenty of goodwill. Business was ready for a change of 14 years of a Conservative government that seemed more and more chaotic with every year that passed. She even had one or two ideas that sounded good, even if they were thin on detail. By now, however, the City feels completely betrayed. The assault on non-doms has driven wealthy clients out of the country, and many successful entrepreneurs as well, with nothing to replace them. The steep rise in employers' National Insurance has drained money out of companies, and hit profits and dividends. Her changes to inheritance tax have hammered not just farmers but every privately owned business, and many of those are still crucial to the economy. The extra employment rights might please the unions but they could be ruinous for the City. The list goes on and on. Business was told that Reeves was a pro-growth, pro-enterprise Chancellor. Instead she has led an assault on the private sector with no parallel in recent British history. It looks as if it will only get worse over the next year. We all know that there will be another huge round of tax rises in the autumn, and business may well bear the brunt of that. It could be higher business rates, a windfall tax on the banks or utilities, or even a 'temporary' surcharge on corporation tax, similar to the levy imposed in France earlier this year. Likewise, the plutocrats of the Square Mile are likely to be squeezed for extra tax revenue. We may well see a return of the 50 per cent top rate of tax. Or, even worse, a wealth tax, catastrophic for the City where £10 million is regarded as a respectable annual bonus, and not an obscene fortune to be taxed away. Sure, a few reforms are worth having. And it is good that Reeves recognises how crucial the City and financial services are to the British economy, even if many of the Left-wingers on her backbenchers won't agree with her. Finance has always been one of the key drivers of growth, as well as generating huge tax revenues. But the blunt truth is this. Reeves has lost the trust of the City. And no matter how hard she tries, it's surely gone forever.
