Judicial crisis should be nation's top priority, says Rafizi
Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli - Photo by Bernama
SUBANG JAYA – Pandan MP Rafizi Ramli has called for urgent attention to be given to the ongoing controversy surrounding Malaysia's judicial institution, describing it as the country's most pressing issue.
Speaking on behalf of PKR backbenchers, Rafizi expressed disappointment over the lack of a clear response or direction from the administration of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim regarding the judiciary's leadership vacuum and rising allegations of interference.
"As Members of Parliament (MPs), it is our duty to defend the independence of the judiciary and the separation of powers between the three branches of government - the legislature, executive and judiciary," Rafizi said in a press conference, today.
He stressed that defending judicial independence was a core value of both PKR and the Pakatan Harapan coalition. Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli and Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad. - BERNAMA FILE PIX
What began as a controversy over vacant top judicial positions, Rafizi said, has escalated into a full-blown crisis following the emergence of more troubling information in the public domain.
"These revelations risk damaging the government's credibility and eroding public confidence in the independence of our judiciary," he warned.
Among the claims requiring official clarification, Rafizi listed: That judicial nominations submitted by the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) for the High Court, Court of Appeal and Federal Court have not been acted upon promptly, worsening the current vacancies. That nominations for the posts of Chief Justice and President of the Court of Appeal were submitted to the Prime Minister before the retirement of Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, but appointments were not made in time. That a JAC meeting was recently convened without the required 10-day notice to re-nominate candidates for the vacant posts. That a Federal Court judge was summoned to a JAC meeting to explain allegations of attempting to influence a court decision and judge reassignment.
Rafizi revealed that a police report has already been lodged by an officer to the said judge, making the matter public knowledge.
He drew parallels between the current situation and the 2007 VK Lingam scandal, which also involved alleged manipulation of judicial appointments and decisions.
"The Federal Court judge involved in the current allegations was reportedly once a special officer to former Chief Justice Tun Ahmad Fairuz Sheikh Abdul Halim, who was at the centre of the VK Lingam case," Rafizi said.
Calling for concrete action, Rafizi proposed the following: The establishment of a Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) to investigate the allegations outlined;
A formal request for the Parliamentary Special Select Committee on Human Rights, Election and Institutional Reform to investigate the matter, including summoning the Prime Minister to testify;
A halt to any new nominations for top judicial posts until the investigations by the RCI and Parliament are concluded;
A bipartisan campaign among MPs to rally support for the proposed actions;
A series of nationwide public forums to raise awareness and engage citizens, starting in Kuala Lumpur and Selangor on July 13;
A national online petition to gather public support in defending the judiciary's independence.
This issue, he said although it may seem minor compared to other issues, carried profound implications for the future of our democracy. He urged the people to remain vigilant and involved.
Rafizi was speaking on behalf of eight others which included Setiawangsa MP Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad, Subang MP Wong Chen, Ampang MP Rodziah Ismail, Wangsa Maju MP Zahir Hassan, Balik Pulau MP Datuk Muhammad Bakhtiar Wan Chik, Ledang MP Syed Ibrahim Syed Noh, Sungai Siput MP S Kesavan and Batu Pahat MP Onn Abu Bakar.
At the same press conference, Nik Nazmi echoed Rafizi's call, stressing that judicial integrity has always been central to PKR's mission.
"If we don't raise this issue, I feel we are not fulfilling our duty as MPs.
"Some ask why this isn't handled internally, but this is a national issue of significant magnitude. As government backbenchers, we have the right and a responsibility to speak up," he said.
He added that they had always maintained that backbenchers must be given room to voice their opinions.
He said if the party could tolerate differing views on other matters, then surely on an issue as serious and substantive as this, there should be room for open expression.
He believed the public appreciated such honesty.
Nik Nazmi affirmed that both he and Rafizi were not bound by Cabinet collective responsibility, as they speak in their capacities as MPs.
"This is our duty," he said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Focus Malaysia
4 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
PSM hails Rafizi's team of 9 PKR MPs who break rank by calling for RCI to avert judiciary crisis
PARTI Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) has applauded former PKR deputy president and Pandan MP and Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli for having opened the door to the notion that every elected MP is entitled to his/her own conscience vote of not to toeing their party's line if the situation warrants it. Such action of breaking rank from the party whip is an important democratic right of an elected MPs which is hardly practiced in the Malaysian democracy as party reps are bound by party discipline, according to PSM deputy chairman S. Arutchelvan 'Currently it seems thatr only (Pasir Gudang MP) Hassan Karim leverages his conscience vote,' observed Arutchelvan in a reaction to the Rafizi-led nine PKR MPs (including himself) calling for a royal commission of inquiry (RCI) to probe allege irregularities in the appointment of senior judges, including the Chief Justice. 'While I concur that party discipline is essential for a party yet on serious issues of public interest such as the freedom of judiciary, it is essential for MPs to vote according to their conscience or have a mechanism in their own parliamentary set-up to seek feedback from their electorate.' The nine PKR MPs also formally requested that proceedings and an inquiry be conducted by the Parliamentary Special Select Committee on Human Rights, Elections and Institutional Reform, including top government officials to testify. They are Rafizi; Setiawangsa MP Nik Nazmi Kik Ahmad; Subang MP Wong Chen; Ampang MP Rodziah Ismail; Wangsa Maju MP Zahir Hassan; Balik Pulau MP Datuk Bakhtiar Wan Chik; Ledang MP Syed Ibrahim Syed Noh; Sungai Siput MP S. Kesavan; and Batu Pahat MP Onn Abu Bakar. Stressing as to why it is essential and critical that the Malaysian judiciary is independent and robust, Arutchelvan added: 'We also need to have the long overdue separation of the Attorney-General (AG) and the Public Prosecutor which is said to be sitting in the cabinet but not put to parliament yet. 'With all these matters pending, we hope all MPs in the Parliament vote with their conscience to safeguard our pillars of democracy. We have walked this path before and we hope the current PM will adhere to these aspirations.' – July 7, 2025 Main image credit: Malay Mail


Malaysian Reserve
5 hours ago
- Malaysian Reserve
CJ Tengku Maimun retires. What's next?
THE departure of Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat as Malaysia's chief justice (CJ) has been in the news for months now, though not necessarily for the reasons one might expect. The six-month extension that never materialised is hardly an issue. Historically, such extensions for superior court judges — comprising the High Court, Court of Appeal and Federal Court — have been rare. When granted, they were typically limited to enabling judges to clear pending paperwork from their chambers, not to hear new cases. Extensions only became more common in recent years. Nor is the interest in her retirement tied solely to her historic status as the first woman to hold the post since her appointment in 2019. She shattered the glass ceiling in style. She shattered the glass ceiling in style. Her exit has drawn widespread admiration — well deserved, given her legacy. During her tenure on the bench, Tengku Maimun was praised for her perseverance, unshakable integrity and unwavering commit- ment to justice. A former colleague described her as possessing 'a sharp intellect, meticulous attention to detail and a resolute determination to approach every challenge with poise and precision.' But what truly set her apart, according to Tan Sri Zainun Ali — a former Federal Court judge — was her humanity. Speaking at the recent launch of Behind the Gavel in Kuala Lumpur — one of Tengku Maimun's first public appearances after her retirement on July 1 — Zainun reflected: 'Her leadership demonstrated an extraordinary ability to listen not only to the facts of the case but to the human experiences behind them. Her capacity to understand the lives affected by law set her apart. She viewed justice not just as an intellectual exercise, but as a moral and human endeavour.' Echoing this sentiment, Singa- pore Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon wrote in the book's fore- word: 'What stands out promi- nently from her jurisprudence is her courage — the strength of character and deep conviction to uphold the rule of law, safeguard judicial independence and simply do right by all manner of people. This moral courage has defined her tenure as leader of the Malaysian Judiciary.' As she made her final appearance at the Palace of Justice in Putrajaya, senior lawyer and former law professor Datuk Gurdial Singh Nijar paid tribute: 'Under your leadership, the judiciary's credibility was restored and reached to a level on par with the best in the Commonwealth.' Indeed, there is no question about the quality of Tengku Maimun's leadership or the impact of her judgments. They are sound, forceful and committed to delivering justice. Yet, beneath the surface of these tributes lies a growing unease within legal circles — not over her record, but over what comes next. A wave of retirements has left the judiciary facing a significant leadership vacuum. The day after Tengku Maimun stepped down, Court of Appeal President Tan Sri Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim — the second most senior member of the judiciary — also retired upon reaching the mandatory age limit of 66. Abang Iskandar, the first person from Sarawak to hold the position, previously served as chief judge of Sabah and Sarawak — the fourth-highest post in the judiciary after the Chief Judge of Malaya (CJM). Next in line, in terms of seniority of service in the Federal Court, is Tan Sri Nallini Pathmanathan, who will retire in August. None of these three senior judges received the six-month extension recently granted to some of their peers. This rapid succession of exits has created a temporary gap in leadership. In the interim, CJM Tan Sri Hasnah Mohammed Hashim has been appointed acting CJ while Federal Court judge Datuk Zabariah Mohd Yusof steps into Abang Iskandar's role on an acting basis. Even this vacuum does not rock the judiciary, in itself. There are plenty of qualified individuals ready to rise to the occasion. So why the anxiety? The real concern lies elsewhere — specifically, in the possibility that the Madani government already has its preferred candidate for the top judicial post. Rumours suggest that the administration may be positioning Tan Sri Ahmad Terrirudin Mohd Salleh as the next CJ. Ahmad Terrirudin has had a varied career, having served as a Sessions Court judge in Kuala Lumpur, chief registrar of the Federal Court, Solicitor-General, and, most recently, Attorney General (AG) — a post he held for 14 months before his elevation to the Federal Court in November 2024. He is widely seen as an establishment figure. Legal insiders whisper that a senior minister from UMNO played a key role in fast-tracking his rise through the ranks. How Prime Minister (PM) Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim handles this vacancy will be telling. There is no room for deflection here. The choice of the next CJ will send a powerful signal — not just about the direction of the judiciary, but about the government's commitment to upholding judicial independence and pushing its reform agenda. In the end, the transition must reflect more than political convenience. It must affirm the principles that Tengku Maimun championed throughout her tenure: Integrity, impartiality and above all, justice. Habhajan Singh is the corporate editor of The Malaysian Reserve. This article first appeared in The Malaysian Reserve weekly print edition

Malay Mail
7 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Citing VK Lingam and 1988 crisis, PKR lawmakers want RCI to end rumours of interference in Malaysia's top courts
PUCHONG, July 7 — Pandan MP Datuk Seri Rafizi Ramli and eight other PKR MPs today called for a Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) to investigate allegations of improper judicial appointments and interference in the judiciary. The MPs said the inquiry was crucial to address the allegations and prevent a repeat of the damage inflicted on public trust from the 2007 VK Lingam tape scandal and the 1988 constitutional crisis. Rafizi said an RCI is the best way to quell public speculation that was arising reasonably from circumstances such as the vacancies and successions within the judiciary. 'We can't stop the public from speculating. Speculation is not good; that's why the best way to do this is to have an RCI. Let the learned members of the RCI go through this; they will be able to ascertain what has transpired and present it to the public,' he said at a press conference at the Subang parliamentary service centre here. 'If that is done, it will affirm the government's commitment to defend judicial independence, and it will nip the problem and speculation in the bud.' Rafizi emphasised, however, that the call for an RCI was not an act against the current administration, adding that all nine PKR MPs continue to support the federal government and the ruling coalition. MORE TO COME