Putin: OPEC+ projects rising oil demand, especially in summer
MOSCOW, June 27 (Reuters) - Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Friday the OPEC+ group of leading oil producers including Russia projects rising global demand especially in the summer months, in comments suggesting the bloc may continue with large output hikes.
The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies, led by Russia, shocked oil markets in April by agreeing a bigger-than-expected output rise for May despite weak prices and slowing demand.
OPEC+ has since decided to continue with hikes above what was planned.
"The volumes of crude oil and oil products consumed in the world are rising due to the growth of the economy itself," Putin said at a televised meeting with reporters.
"Production is increasing only in the volume that we agreed upon within the framework of OPEC+, and it is designed for increasing demand, especially in the summer," he said.
Putin also addressed Europe's plans to tighten sanctions against Russia, including cutting the price cap for Russian oil to $45 per barrel from $60 per barrel.
"The more the sanctions, the worse for those who introduce the sanctions," Putin said, adding it was impossible to "shut down" Russia's oil and that the sanctions will not have a significant impact on Russia.
A group of eight OPEC+ countries which include Saudi Arabia, Russia, Kuwait, Iraq, the UAE, Kazakhstan, Oman and Algeria will meet online on July 6 to discuss their production policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Business Secretary meeting Lotus after reports of plans to scrap UK carmaking
The Business Secretary will hold talks with Lotus after the carmaker appeared to shelve plans to shut its UK operations. After reports that Chinese owner Geely was planning to stop manufacturing at the Hethel plant in Norfolk, putting 1,300 jobs at risk, Lotus issued a statement saying it had 'no plans' to close the factory. Jonathan Reynolds will speak to the company on Sunday, the PA news agency understands. The British sportscar brand has been majority-owned by Chinese multinational Geely since 2017. The Financial Times had reported it was considering shutting up shop in the UK and in favour of a new plant in the US. On Saturday, Lotus sought to assuage concerns with a statement that it remains 'committed' to the UK, which it called its largest commercial market in Europe and the 'heart' of the brand. 'Lotus Cars is continuing normal operations, and there are no plans to close the factory,' it said. 'We are actively exploring strategic options to enhance efficiency and ensure global competitiveness in the evolving market. 'We have invested significantly in R&D and operations in the UK, over the past six years. Lotus remains committed to the UK, and its customers, employees, dealers, suppliers, as well as its proud British heritage.'
Daily Mail
32 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
As the BBC airs punk band's shocking chants, STEVE POLLARD asks: Has baiting Jews become the new national pastime?
The Glastonbury music festival bills itself as a celebration of all that is good in the world, with great artists communing with a crowd of 200,000 self-styled progressives, for whom the festival is a chance to wallow in their own goodness and smug sense of superiority. But nothing better illustrates the darkness that has entered the soul of today's progressives than the crowd's response yesterday to punk duo Bob Vylan, whose screams of 'Free, free Palestine ' and 'Death, death to the IDF' were chanted back with such fervour that the scene was like a 2025 version of Hitler's Nuremberg Rallies. The chant was 'Death, death to the IDF', but what they meant – because the IDF is the army of the world's only Jewish state – was 'Death, death to the Jews'. Imagine being a Jew at Glastonbury, knowing that you are hated by almost everyone around you. In Sasha Baron Cohen's satirical film, Borat, the character describes a game, 'Hunt the Jew'. Everyone laughed at that when the film came out in 2006. But yesterday's Glastonbury chanting showed that its satire is all too pointed. Imagine, I ask you, being a Jew in Britain. In the 20 months since 1,200 Jews were massacred by Hamas in Israel, the UK has seen a leap in anti-Semitic incidents. Between January and June last year there was a 41 per cent increase in assaults on Jews. But that is almost the least of it. The biggest impact in Britain of the October 7 attack has been the unleashing of this torrent of Jew-hate – the likes of which we saw yesterday. Every other week there are hate marches in London and elsewhere with chants to ' globalise the intifada' – to kill Jews, in other words. There is open support for Hamas and Hezbollah, not least by Kneecap, another band performing at Glastonbury. There is pure hatred and poison. But for Jews in Britain, the real point about all this is the double standard. Can you imagine if someone had stood on that stage and screamed 'Death to Muslims'? There would certainly – and quite rightly – have been anger from the crowd. But when it is Jews who are the target, they cheer. And where are the police? Whatever your views of Lucy Connolly's imprisonment after her Southport riot tweets, the double standard is shocking. The lead singer of Bob Vylan incited a mob. Will he be arrested, charged and prosecuted? There is, I suggest, not the slightest chance if the past 20 months of open anti-Semitism is anything to go by. For those who make a regular pilgrimage to Glastonbury, it is more than just a music festival – is a carnival of light and peace. Not for Jews. Palestinian flags fly everywhere. Leaders of Palestine Action – shortly and rightly to be proscribed as a terrorist organisation – are given a platform to spread their bile. The now infamous Kneecap rapper J J O Dochartaigh wore a 'We are all Palestine Action' T-shirt on stage and led a Free Palestine chant. Glastonbury, in reality, reflects the state of modern progressivism – a poisonous cocktail of anti-Israeli prejudice, support for Islamist terror and a moral calculus so warped that Nazi-style chanting is seen as upstanding and worthy.
Telegraph
41 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour considers copying Macron's net zero housing laws
Ed Miliband and Angela Rayner are considering copying French laws that impose strict net zero limits on housebuilders. The Cabinet duo are exploring whether to adopt Emmanuel Macron's green approach, which has driven up construction costs by around a fifth. In 2022, France introduced a law setting limits for how much carbon buildings should produce over their lifetime, including their construction. It comes as Ms Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, faces an uphill battle to fulfil Labour's manifesto promise to build 1.5 million new homes by 2030. Kevin Hollinrake, the shadow housing secretary, said: 'Adopting French-style regulations would seriously undermine house-building efforts in the UK. 'Already, Labour's tax policies, reduction in housing starts and failure to control our borders are pricing British families out of the market. This latest proposal would only make things worse, leaving hard-working people with less chance of owning a home. 'Above all, it highlights once again the recklessness of Labour's unrealistic net zero targets. This must not go ahead.' Mr Macron's reforms have proven controversial, being blamed for driving up construction costs, thwarting development and causing house prices to stagnate. Under the scheme, the limits are gradually ratcheted down. They were toughened at the start of this year, with the next change scheduled for 2028. But amid mounting criticism, ministers in Paris are attempting to backtrack and have ordered a review of the planned level for three years time. Valérie Létard, the French housing minister, said there was a need to find a better 'balance of standards' that 'allow for faster projects', adding: 'Urban planning and housing must serve our citizens and not be a source of administrative bottlenecks or a drop in purchasing power.' In a note issued last year, BCG, a leading consulting firm, said the regulations had sparked 'a dramatic effect on construction costs and property values'. 'In new build, the rules require companies to use more energy-efficient materials and equipment,' experts from the company wrote. 'As a result, the cost of constructing a new building has risen by an estimated 10-20 per cent, significantly slowing demand.' The firm said the new regulations had also exacerbated concerns about a value gap opening up between new homes and older, less energy-efficient ones. Despite the criticisms, officials at both Mr Miliband's and Ms Rayner's departments confirmed they were looking at introducing similar rules in the UK. The net zero department, run by Mr Miliband, quietly revealed that it was looking at the French-style reforms in a paper published last week. A Government spokesman insisted no decision has been taken on whether to go ahead. Any changes would come on top of other controversial net zero reforms that have been driven through by Labour ministers. They include the planned introduction of a 'glass tax' that is set to push up the cost of a bottle of wine by 9p and beer by 4p. Mr Miliband is also considering proposals to shift green levies from electricity bills to gas ones, pushing up the cost of central heating. The Home Builders Federation, the trade association for housebuilders, said the UK industry was already building more energy-efficient homes and cautioned against extra regulation. Rhodri Williams, its technical director, said: 'As we look to increase housebuilding to address our chronic housing shortage, and address the failings in the planning system that have for too long resulted in endless delays and additional costs for construction projects generally, any moves to add further potentially significant restrictions on construction need to be carefully considered. 'Adding yet more costs into housebuilding, on top of the other recent major increases for, amongst other things, solar panels, biodiversity net gain, the building safety levy, and employee costs would make even more sites unviable to develop and potentially slash housebuilding across the country.' Ms Rayner, who has fronted the pledge, is under growing pressure amid a widespread expectation that she will not be able to deliver the target of 1.5 million new homes across the course of this Parliament. Despite sweeping changes to planning rules, housebuilding slowed down by 14 per cent last year, according to the British Property Federation. Asked about the prospect of the new net zero limits, a spokesman for the Ministry of Housing said: 'No decisions have been made on this. We are currently considering the right approach to embodied carbon in new buildings, and will ensure that our plans do not block development. 'We are taking decisive action to speed up the planning process and deliver our stretching target of 1.5 million homes through our Plan for Change, with work already being driven through our seismic planning reforms and landmark Planning and Infrastructure Bill.'
