logo
Millennial women were told to chase our dreams. That's left us burnt out, broke and dreaming of a rich patron

Millennial women were told to chase our dreams. That's left us burnt out, broke and dreaming of a rich patron

The Guardian5 days ago
A couple of weeks ago, I came across an Amy Poehler joke in which she sums up the different generational experiences of money: 'Boomers are all about money. Gen X is like: 'Is it all about money?' Millennials ask: 'Where is the money?' And gen Z is like: 'What is money?''
It made me laugh – but it also hit a nerve. It felt painfully accurate and oddly comforting. Maybe it's not just me. I'm a millennial, and financial insecurity has been a theme in my life for a while. But recently, it's grown louder, and I literally can't stop asking: 'WHERE IS THE GODDAMN MONEY?'
I used to ask nicely. After all, I was raised to be a grateful, polite millennial – the kind who believed that magic always happens outside your comfort zone and therefore did unpaid internships in her 20s and sent thank-you emails after being underpaid. But no more. Hence the capital letters. I'm raging.
Maybe it's because I'm approaching 40. Maybe it's because I keep comparing myself with my parents, who by this age had two kids, a car, a house, a garden and three holidays a year.
I'm not just raging. After 15 years of working non-stop, I'm exhausted. And there are days when I ask myself: is it really meant to be this way – or am I just failing? Am I simply not grownup enough when it comes to money?
I know the answer isn't that simple – or that harsh. Because usually, after days spent examining my shortcomings, I also think: no, this can't just be personal failure. Maybe the odds were never in my favour.
Millennial women like myself were told to work hard and follow our passion. Because if you work hard and find something you're good at, it'll pay off. It doesn't, though. The path I've chosen – creative, independent – offers very little in the way of long-term security and when I look around, a pattern emerges.
Over dinner recently with three friends – two men and one woman, all about my age – we started talking about money worries. The woman, a talented sculptor, said she had been feeling deeply anxious. She thought it was partly hormones, but more than that, it was existential. She was considering retraining, maybe going into teaching – anything to build a more stable life. At one point, she turned to me and asked: 'How do you do it?' I said: 'I juggle three things at once.'
Meanwhile, the two men nodded sympathetically. They work in the arts – but both have full-time jobs and permanent contracts. One just bought a plot of land. The other has tenure. The women are freelancers. The men are secure. Is it our fault? Couldn't we just do what they did?
I don't think so. Our economic system doesn't just undervalue women's work. It depends on it. It relies on our flexibility, our unpaid labour, our creative output, our willingness to 'make it work'. It assumes women will absorb the risk, subsidise culture and care with their own time, energy and savings. In creative industries, this is especially stark: women are expected to be grateful to be there at all. To work 'for exposure', for the opportunity – not the paycheque. And that gratitude has kept us quiet, compliant – and broke.
This is no accident – it's systemic. In Germany, women across all age groups earn less, save less and live longer. If you're single and self-employed, you're automatically walking a financial tightrope with no net and you'll likely belong to the 70% of working women today who are at risk of poverty in old age. (Recent data from the German Federal Statistical Office reports that the gender gap in retirement income amounts to 29.9%.)
I can't believe I'm saying this out loud, but it feels like the only safety net is a rich spouse.
When I told my friend a few days ago that I prefer dating artists, she threw up her hands: 'No! You need to find a hedge fund manager!' I thought of that meme – 'I'm looking for a man in finance' – and rolled my eyes. But she wasn't wrong. A wealthy and steady partner is the most reliable pension plan for many women.
I don't want a husband, though. What I secretly long for is a patron. The 18th-century kind. Someone who says: 'I believe in your work. Go write. Don't worry about anything.' Or, more realistically: universal basic income. And a proper educational system for the next generation of women. One that teaches them how to handle money, so they don't fall into the same trap.
Seriously: can someone explain to me why we didn't learn about compound interest, mortgages, tax brackets and pensions in school? Isn't financial literacy a basic part of education, if the goal is to raise well-equipped adults?
Sign up to This is Europe
The most pressing stories and debates for Europeans – from identity to economics to the environment
after newsletter promotion
I've worked my heart out for more than a decade. I've built a body of work I'm proud of. And yet, I still get nervous opening my banking app. Still avoid deep financial talk. Still don't fully understand the German tax system.
I fell for the silly belief that talking about money is obscene.
Sometimes I want to slap myself for not having made smarter choices. For not having planned, protected myself by investing or talking to experts. Instead, I kept dreaming about a life filled with interesting encounters, stories, intellectually stimulating conversations.
And honestly, there's still a part of me that cherishes that softness. To be a European millennial now – in our late 30s – means witnessing the erosion of the ideals we grew up with, yet still holding on to something tender. Maybe naive. Maybe vital. We were promised a lot and trained for little. And perhaps this vulnerability – this capacity to imagine a different, less materialistic world – is not only a weakness. It might be a strength, of a playful sort.
In Istanbul, my current place of residence, people buy gold. I own some gold jewellery – some pieces were gifts, others inherited. I don't like most of them and rarely wear them. But with gold prices soaring, I've been looking at them differently. Gold is finite, after all, which means it keeps its value. Unlike stocks.
My plan: take these items to a friend in the Grand Bazaar who deals in gold. There's something almost magical about the idea of turning my few rings and necklaces into gold plaques – a quiet stash I can cash in quickly, to be kept in a velvet pouch that would look like a fairytale treasure chest. A reminder of how much I'm still clinging to a world of fantasy.
And maybe that's the whole trick. Keep going. Keep improvising. Because our boomer parents told us to follow our passion. And now? We're melting down our jewellery.
Carolin Würfel is a writer, screenwriter and journalist who lives in Berlin and Istanbul. She is the author of Three Women Dreamed of Socialism
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Apple... cinemas? Tech giant sues movie theater chain
Apple... cinemas? Tech giant sues movie theater chain

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Apple... cinemas? Tech giant sues movie theater chain

Apple is suing another fruit-named company — Apple Cinemas — in an attempt to get the small theater company to change its name. Apple Cinemas has reportedly signed a lease to take over a historic cinema and a retail space in San Francisco that had previously been operated by AMC Theaters and CGV Cinemas. The purchase is part of Apple Cinema's overall goal of expanding to 100 locations across the country over the next 10 years. Apple entered a lawsuit on Friday in Massachusetts alleging that the theater company is infringing on its trademark and using its brand to trick consumers into thinking they're attending a cinema operated by the tech company. Apple does have a cinema division — Apple Studios — which it began in 2019, but Apple has been offering movie-adjacent entertainment since 1999 via its QuickTime Movie Trailers. The tech company also held cinema events, including some in connection with the Tribeca Film Festival. The cinema company began its operations in 2013 when it opened its first theater in Massachusetts. The company says its name is from it's initial plans to open its first theater in the Apple Valley Mall in New England, according to the Hollywood Reporter. The company primarily operated in the northeast until it laid out its plans to expand to San Francisco and other parts of the country in 2024. Sand Media — Apple Cinema's parent company — filed an application for the name "Apple Cinematic Experience" but was denied. A trademark examiner ruled that the name might cause confusion between Apple Cinemas and the tech company. Apple responded to that branding attempt by sending Sand Media a cease and desist letter. It further claims that Apple Cinemas began using a stylized apple for its logo and began focusing its expansion on malls and shopping centers where Apple Stores were already present. According to the lawsuit, the similar names resulted in landlords at these locations assuming that Apple Cinemas was affiliated with the tech brand. Apple alleges that Apple Cinemas was given favorable deals to open in some areas as a result of the presumed connection. Further driving the tech giant's lawsuit are claims that some customers have had negative experiences with Apple Cinemas. Some customers have complained that the theaters are "greasy," "dirty" and "grungy" and are at times beset by technical issues. 'Consumers should not go to an 'Apple Cinemas' theater thinking it is connected to the famous Apple brand, with all its goodwill and brand equity,' Miranda Means, an attorney representing Apple, stated in the lawsuit. Apple's goals with its lawsuit are to force the theater chain to stop using the word "Apple" in its name. It is also seeking damages, though the amount was unspecified.

News Corp warns Trump AI is eviscerating sales of The Art of the Deal
News Corp warns Trump AI is eviscerating sales of The Art of the Deal

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

News Corp warns Trump AI is eviscerating sales of The Art of the Deal

News Corp is warning Donald Trump that AI is cannibalizing sales of his books, including The Art of the Deal. The company, owned by billionaire Rupert Murdoch, owns dozens of newspapers and TV channels around the world including the Wall Street Journal, the Times (in the UK), the Australian and the New York Post. News Corp also owns book publisher HarperCollins, which has published three of Trump's books, though his best-known title, The Art of the Deal, was published by Random House. Still, the company appeared keen to warn Trump about the impact AI is having on publishing. 'The AI age must cherish the value of intellectual property if we are collectively to realize our potential,' News Corp said in a statement with its fourth-quarter earnings report. 'Even the president of the United States is not immune to blatant theft. The president's books are still reporting healthy sales, but are being consumed by AI engines which profit from his thoughts by cannibalizing his concepts, thus undermining future sales of his books. 'Suddenly, The Art of the Deal has become The Art of the Steal.' Media outlets have sued AI companies, including OpenAI, operator of ChatGPT, for using their content to train AI models without permission. In May, a federal judge rejected OpenAI's request to dismiss a lawsuit from the New York Times over its usage of the newspaper's content. Dow Jones, which publishes the Wall Street Journal, and the New York Post sued Perplexity AI in October over similar copyright claims. News Corp's message to Trump also comes after the White House last month announced Trump's 'AI action plan' that would see the loosening of AI regulations that had been put in place under the Biden administration. In an earnings call Tuesday, News Corp CEO Robert Thomson said that the company is in the middle of 'advanced negotiations with several AI companies'. 'It's clear that many of them have come to recognize that the purchase of [intellectual property] is as important as the acquisition of semiconductors or the securing of stable energy sources,' he said, noting that it's a mix of 'wooing and suing'. 'We prefer the former, but we will never shy away from protecting our property rights,' he said. The warning comes at a tense moment between News Corp and the White House. Trump sued the Wall Street Journal after the newspaper published a report that the president had once sent Jeffrey Epstein an intimate birthday message that included a sexually suggestive drawing of a woman. Trump claimed that the report was false and amounted to libel. The newspaper has requested a judge dismiss the case. Murdoch, who also owns Fox News, was once friendly with Trump, though relations soured during the president's third presidential campaign. The company beat fourth-quarter expectations with Tuesday's earnings announcement, largely due to a rise in digital subscriptions from Dow Jones, which houses the company's business publications like the Wall Street Journal, Barron's and MarketWatch. On Monday, News Corp announced it will launch a sister tabloid to the New York Post in California, called the California Post, in early 2026.

News Corp beats quarterly revenue estimates on digital subscription growth
News Corp beats quarterly revenue estimates on digital subscription growth

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

News Corp beats quarterly revenue estimates on digital subscription growth

Aug 5 (Reuters) - Media conglomerate News Corp (NWSA.O), opens new tab beat expectations for fourth-quarter revenue on Tuesday, driven by a rise in digital subscriptions and strong performance at its Dow Jones unit. The company benefited from strong circulation and subscription revenues at its Dow Jones division, which includes brands such as The Wall Street Journal, Barron's, MarketWatch and Investor's Business Daily. Dow Jones reported a 6.7% increase in quarterly revenue, with total average subscriptions to its consumer products rising 7% to nearly 6.3 million from a year earlier. Finance chief Lavanya Chandrashekar said that digital circulation revenues grew by 10%, as more customers shifted from promotional to higher-priced packages. "Their fiscal Q4 earnings, particularly the performance at Dow Jones, underline how valuable premium sources of news and information still are," Emarketer analyst Max Willens said. Revenue at the news media segment, which includes UK's The Times and The Sun along with the New York Post, fell 3.7% due to soft advertising conditions. The company announced earlier this week it plans a West Coast expansion with the launch of The California Post in early 2026. News Corp chief executive Robert Thomson said that the company is not "seeing any particular negative trends" from new search formats and is in the "midst of advanced negotiations with several AI companies." The company's book publishing unit, which consists of HarperCollins, saw its revenue fall 3.5% due to slower consumer spending and a weaker slate of new titles. News Corp's digital real estate services unit, which includes its majority-owned REA Group ( opens new tab, posted strong results driven by price increases, with revenue rising 4% in the fourth quarter. Total revenue in the quarter came in at $2.11 billion, compared with analysts' estimates of $2.10 billion, according to data compiled by LSEG. Excluding items, the company earned 19 cents per share, compared with an estimate of 20 cents.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store