logo
In Claremont, a plan to accept demolition waste at recycling plant is met with fierce resistance

In Claremont, a plan to accept demolition waste at recycling plant is met with fierce resistance

Yahoo10-03-2025
Around the corner from the facility site in Claremont stands a sign against the permit modification request. (Claire Sullivan | New Hampshire Bulletin)
Kipp Ryan was born and raised in Claremont, a western New Hampshire city of about 13,000. He describes himself as a proud resident, and stayed there to raise his children.
But that might change, he said, if the state agrees to let Massachusetts-based Acuity Management modify a 1987 permit for a small recycling facility to accept up to 500 tons a day of construction and demolition debris near a local elementary school and some 400 homes.
Residents have fought hard to break the stigma that Claremont is a dumping ground, and this project would undermine those efforts, Ryan said.
'If we allow stuff like this, we're out,' Ryan said of himself and his family. 'We're not going to stick around. There's not going to be a future here.'
How to submit public comments to DES
The public can submit comments on the permit modification request from now until 4 p.m. on March 27, a weeklong extension from the original date.
Comments may be submitted via email to swpublic.comment@des.nh.gov; by postage to NHDES-SWMB Attn: Jason Evancic, PO Box 95, Concord, NH, 03302; or submitted in person to the agency's office at 29 Hazen Drive in Concord.
More information on the proposal, including links to the modification request, can be found online here.
He was one of dozens of residents who turned out to the Claremont Opera House Thursday evening for a three-hour public hearing hosted by the Department of Environmental Services. The agency is accepting public comment on the permit modification request until 4 p.m. on March 27, after which it has 30 days to make a decision on the company's request.
Like Ryan, many local residents feared what the project would do to a city that has fought hard to build itself up. They worry about harmful environmental contaminants like heavy metals and PFAS ending up in a nearby brook that feeds into the Connecticut River, as well as an aquifer that abuts the facility. They wonder how Claremont's roads — which in many places are already crumbling or littered with potholes — could withstand dozens of more trucks a day, and fear their taxes would rise to fund repairs.
They're also concerned about how the traffic and noise pollution could impact students at Maple Avenue Elementary School, less than a mile drive from the facility and even closer on foot. And for the hundreds who live in proximity to the lot, they worry the development would cause property values to plummet.
Some questioned why DES had deemed the application complete in the fall, the first step in the agency's permit review process, pointing to what they felt were scant details in the company's proposal. They also felt the 1.5-acre lot was far too small to accommodate the proposed activities, and pointed to facilities doing similar work that are many times larger.
But most of all, it seemed, residents wondered how many times they would have to tell the company 'no' after spending years fighting one iteration of the proposal or another. The opposition to the project was overwhelming; in the public comment portion of the hearing, 48 people spoke in opposition, while two voiced support. Beneath the ornate decor of the dim theater, residents applauded, cheered, and waved pink, homemade paper hearts as opponents enumerated their critiques of the company's proposal.
'I am very concerned that Acuity, who has heard 'no' again and again over these last six years, seems to not understand,' said Judith Koester, who lives near the facility. 'Which is it that you don't understand — the 'n' or the 'o'?'
The Claremont Conservation Commission, a representative of the school board, and several lawmakers spoke against the project. Executive Councilor Karen Liot Hill, a Democrat whose constituency includes Claremont, said she was there to observe.
Naomi Praul, a civil engineer who gave a presentation on behalf of the company, said the current permit allows the facility to accept 'paper, cardboard, metal, glass, plastics, automotive batteries, and tires.' The permit modification, if approved, would continue to allow the acceptance of those materials, as well as construction and demolition debris — also called C&D debris – which 'may be comprised of materials such as concrete, drywall, wood, roofing shingles – essentially, materials that could be generated during the home renovation project,' Praul said.
The company would take out recyclable materials, such as asphalt, wood, and metal, which would prevent them from ending up in a landfill, Praul argued. Nonrecyclable materials would be transported out of the state to be disposed of, she said.
'To be clear, C&D does not include asbestos or other hazardous waste,' Praul said, a point that faced questioning from residents, who feared that such hazardous material would not be discovered until it is sorted through at the Claremont facility.
Francesco Finocchiaro, vice president of Recycling Services Inc., of which Acuity is the parent company, said in an email to the Bulletin that 'there are many laws in place that prevent contaminants from entering our waste streams.'
'First, demolition permits are required by local building departments to contractors, prior to demolishing structures. This is our first line of defense,' he said. 'When contaminants are found, specialists are required and hired to remove the hazardous waste products. The materials are then taken (to) facilities that are permitted to accept them. We will not be one of them.' He said that incoming loads would be manually inspected for hazardous materials, and if found, the load would be rejected.
'We have spoken to people in the community who are not against these changes, but they are hesitant to speak publicly on our behalf,' Finocchiaro wrote. 'We are part of this community, and we value the trust we have been given. We believe we can effectively reduce landfill waste by increasing our recycling capacity.'
Some residents said they were excited when they first heard of the project, as they are supportive of more recycling. But as they dug into the proposal, they changed their mind.
For many, that was because of what they felt was simply a bad location for the project, due to traffic concerns, the lot size, and its proximity to the local elementary school and hundreds of homes.
Rep. Judy Aron, a South Acworth Republican and chair of the House Environment and Agriculture Committee, said she came to the meeting Thursday to listen and learn.
'Based on what I've heard tonight from members of this community, I absolutely agree that this particular site is inappropriate,' Aron said to loud applause. 'It may be a very good project, but it's absolutely the inappropriate site for it.'
Eric Peabody, a lifelong Claremont resident and father of two children at the local elementary school, said he came to the hearing in his capacity as a licensed land surveyor with 19 years of experience. He said the 1.5-acre lot was simply too small to handle processing seven times the material it is currently permitted for, drawing a comparison to a facility that does similar work in Epping that operates on 30 acres of a 75-acre property.
'If an airport doesn't meet the requirements to land a 747, you don't try to land it there anyway,' Peabody said. 'You keep flying until a suitable place to land is found. Acuity needs to find a different piece of land that properly meets the requirements for a C&D facility of this magnitude.'
Praul said a study from a traffic engineer had 'confirmed the adequacy of the intersections closest to the recycling facility,' and that 'truck circulation patterns through and around the facility have been evaluated to ensure queuing of trucks will not occur in Industrial Boulevard or interfere with surrounding traffic.'
However, residents expressed serious doubts about the ability of their roadways to handle the increased truck loads. Rep. John Cloutier, a Claremont Democrat, said he hears from his constituents constantly that 'roads are in bad shape.'
'Frankly, the city doesn't have the resources now to adequately maintain the road infrastructure, not even close,' said Rep. Hope Damon, a Croydon Democrat. '... This is an extremely unreasonable burden for the city of Claremont.'
For two local teenagers, the project felt like a threat to their future in Claremont and the environmental and public health of their community.
Connor Fullmer, a 17-year-old who heard about the public hearing in science class at Stevens High School, fears how potential pollution could impact local wildlife.
'When does this end? We've been saying 'no' for forever. Why won't they answer us? Why won't they take 'no' as an answer?' Fullmer said, choked with emotion. 'Why do they think they can come here and do all of this to us?'
Another Claremont teen, Gabriel Brown, expressed fears the project could spread environmental contaminants linked to a host of negative health effects.
'I am currently 16 years old, and this is my future,' Brown said. 'I can't live here if this is going to happen … in our city.'
Marilla Harris-Vincent, a Claremont resident and the New Hampshire river steward at the Connecticut River Conservancy, said the organization strongly opposes the modification request because of concerns it could lead to the contamination of Meadow Brook (a tributary of the Connecticut River), surrounding wetlands, and an adjacent aquifer.
Hayley Jones, the Vermont and New Hampshire state director of Slingshot, an organization that works with communities impacted by environmental health threats, said the project posed the risk of spreading PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, a class of synthetic chemicals linked to numerous negative health outcomes.
'They are used to make thousands of products, including common construction materials, such as roofing glass, interior finishes, exterior coatings and sealants to make these all nonstick and waterproof,' Jones said. 'Hundreds of studies link PFAS exposure to health harms, including testicular, kidney, liver and pancreatic cancer, to reproductive problems, to weakened childhood immunity, low birth weight, endocrine disruption, increased cholesterol, and weight gain in children and adults.'
For Ken Burke, who has lived in Claremont since 2007, the health concerns feel especially personal.
Burke and his wife ran a small electronics recycling company in Claremont for about 15 years. Along the way, he developed leukemia that he still lives with today; he has been in remission for years, but there is no cure. He has wondered if his exposure to the electronics — working with them at his business and tearing them apart — contributed to his cancer. Toxins in electronic waste have been linked to health effects such as cancer.
Now, he fears for his neighbors and worries about what could be in the debris that would be trucked into his city under the proposal.
'Will it be your kids? Will it be your grandkids? Will it be you getting exposed? It only takes a tiny bit,' Burke said. 'The next thing you know, you live with — or you die with — what was dropped off in your neighborhood, and we can't have that. This can't happen.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why top NYC restaurants are bringing in famed chefs from around the world
Why top NYC restaurants are bringing in famed chefs from around the world

New York Post

time11 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Why top NYC restaurants are bringing in famed chefs from around the world

Top New York City restaurants are increasingly turning to collaborations with renowned chefs from around the globe to boost business and stand out from high-end rivals, Side Dish has learned. The collabs, while not a new phenomenon, have taken on added importance as President Trump's tariffs create challenges for chefs to source some of their favorite ingredients. However, importing talent from all corners of the globe – which at popular Tribeca haunt l'abeille means bringing in chefs from England, France, Belgium, Japan, Hong Kong and Thailand – remains tax-free. 7 l'abeille in Tribeca is importing talent from all corners of the globe. Eric Vitale Photography 'Global residences help everyone grow and learn — from the guests to the staff. They keep the restaurant interesting,' said Howard Chang, co-owner of Kuma Hospitality Group's l'abeille with partners Rahul Saito and executive chef Mitsunobu Nagae. The dinners these top chefs serve up at ticketed events aren't cheap. At a recent, prix-fixe collab dinner at l'abeille, Nagae worked with London-based chef Chet Sharma, who studied physics at Oxford and now helms the standout Indian-themed restaurant BiBi in London's swanky Mayfair neighborhood. The meal cost $325, with an additional $295 for wine pairings. The exclusive events, however, often don't bring in more money than regular a la carte dinners, restaurateurs told Side Dish. That's because the higher prices are offset by the cost of flying in the foreign-based chefs, along with some of their team members, and putting them all up in hotels. 7 Chet Sharma, left, and Mitsunobu Nagae collaborated on a prix-fixe dinner. Eric Vitale Photography 7 The collabs, while not a new phenomenon, have taken on added importance as President Trump's tariffs create challenges for chefs to source some of their favorite ingredients. Eric Vitale Photography The upside, they say, is that global collabs raise the restaurants' profiles, bring in new diners and offer educational benefits for staff. On the Upper East Side, Sushi Noz's executive chef Nozomu Abe is bringing in Michelin-starred Chef Endo Kazutoshi, a third-generation sushi master who trained in Japan before opening his namesake restaurant, Endo, at the Rotunda in London. 7 At Sushi Noz on the Upper East Side, executive chef Nozomu Abe, left, is bringing in Michelin-starred Chef Endo Kazutoshi. Hannah Wyatt Last week, the pair offered a rare collaborative omakase where they presented their culinary visions through the use of local fish and other influences. 'We started the Japan series in 2019,' said Hannah Wyatt, Sushi Noz's operations manager. 'Our goal was to showcase top chefs from Japan through collaborative dinners with chef Noz, with a focus on sushi and kaiseki chefs at the top of their respective fields.' In Williamsburg, Brooklyn, the owners of Layla's began bringing in chefs during COVID and continue to have pop-ups for 'brand exposure.' 7 The dinners these top chefs serve up at ticketed events aren't cheap. Eric Vitale Photography 7 The exclusive events, however, often don't bring in more money than regular a la carte dinners, restaurateurs told Side Dish. Eric Vitale Photography The most recent international collab involved chef Kyle Garry and chef Whyte Rushen of Whyte's in London, who is now on a 'worldwide' tour. 'We did it once, and it was really successful and fun and now it's something we try to do as often as we can,' Samuel Lynch, one of Layla's co-owners along with Stefano D'Orsogna and David Lacey, told Side Dish. The trend has even extended to the Hamptons, where Mavericks Montauk will welcome the crew from Michelin-starred Parisian restaurant Contraste on July 31. 7 The upside, they say, is that global collabs raise the restaurants' profiles, bring in new diners and offer educational benefits for staff. Interior of l'abeille, above. Eric Vitale Photography The collaboration was made possible by the deep-rooted friendship between Mavericks' pastry chef Remy Ertaud and Contraste's Louis De Vicari. We hear … that celeb chef Scott Conant is opening a posh new Italian restaurant, Leola, in the Bahamas at Baha Mar this fall. Leola will be on the casino level of Grand Hyatt Baha Mar, joining hotspots including Jon Batiste's Jazz Club, Marcus Samuelsson's Marcus at Baha Mar Fish + Chop House, Daniel Boulud's Cafe Boulud, and Dario Cecchini's Carna. The 8,800 square foot space comes with 106 seats in the main dining room and 130 seats outside. 'Bringing Leola to life at Baha Mar is something I've dreamed about for a long time,' Conant said. 'I've always been inspired by the beauty and spirit of the Bahamas, and it felt like the perfect place to create a restaurant that's both personal and inviting. With Leola, we're blending the kind of food and hospitality I love—warm, soulful, and rooted in connection.' Conant will also participate in the Fourth Annual Bahamas Culinary & Arts Festival, which runs from Oct. 22-26.

Mass.-based burger chain to shut down more than two-thirds of its locations
Mass.-based burger chain to shut down more than two-thirds of its locations

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Mass.-based burger chain to shut down more than two-thirds of its locations

It looks like Wahlbugers is hitting a wall. The nationwide burger chain, founded in Hingham by brothers Mark, Paul and Donnie Wahlberg, will close more than two-third of its locations, according to a report from Food Republic. The 79 locations that are shuttering belong to franchisee Hy-Vee Inc., a Midwestern supermarket chain that incorporated Wahlburgers kiosks in many of its stores as a replacement for its prior in-house dining option, Market Grille. Now, the chain plans to reintroduce Market Grille to its stores, according to Restaurant Business. The company's 2018 franchising deal with Hy-Vee was a significant component of its expansion. However, Wahlburgers CEO Randy Sharpe doesn't seem concerned about the development, as Hy-Vee comprised only a small portion of sales, according to Restaurant Business. 'We are growing restaurants,' Sharpe said in Restaurant Business' report. 'We're not going to be in the grocery business.' 'It's best that everyone stay in what their skill sets are and move on,' he added. The closures leave 34 locations, according to Food Republic, six of which are in Massachusetts: three in Boston (two within Boston Logan International Airport and one in the Fenway neighborhood), and one location each in Springfield, Plainville and Hingham. Outside of the United States, Wahlburgers has locations in Canada, New Zealand and Australia. The Wahlberg brothers founded Wahlburgers in 2011, and didn't expand to a second location – Toronto – until 2014. That same year, the family launched the reality TV program 'Wahlbugers,' which aired through 2019 and earned an Emmy nomination for 'Outstanding Unstructured Reality Program.' The latest from MassLive How Red Sox trade deadline strategy might be impacted by Marcelo Mayer's injury | Chris Cotillo Red Sox top draft pick (up to 99 mph) wants to make majors 'as fast as possible' Mookie Betts isn't in lineup vs. Red Sox on Friday, but here's when he'll be back Red Sox rookie still looking for answers on 'super annoying' wrist injury, return timeline Red Sox' Alex Cora explains promoting David Hamilton over Vaughn Grissom Read the original article on MassLive. Solve the daily Crossword

Exclusive: Embedded tax startup April raises $38M
Exclusive: Embedded tax startup April raises $38M

Axios

timean hour ago

  • Axios

Exclusive: Embedded tax startup April raises $38M

April, an embedded tax platform, has raised $38 million in a Series B round led by QED Investors, founder Ben Borodach tells Axios exclusively. Why it matters: Embedding tax tools directly into financial apps can improve financial decision-making and boost customer retention. Zoom in: Nyca Partners and Team8 also participated in the Series B round, bringing the total funding April has raised to date to $78 million. How it works: Fintech apps and financial institutions use April's APIs to integrate tax filing and planning directly into their platforms, enabling year-round, real-time tax management. April operates on a SaaS-based model, offering flat-rate pricing to fintech partners, who can choose to mark up services for their end customers. "Our vision is to embed tax in every financial decision," Borodach says. "Taxes should be happening where you're managing your money. They should be happening in real time, and they should be personalized to you." Context: New York-based April operates in a market dominated by legacy tax-preparation giants like Intuit, H&R Block, Thomson Reuters, and Wolters Kluwer. But it recently became the first new company in 15 years to achieve national e-file coverage in all 50 states, Borodach says. The company has also launched a series of new products over the past year, including pro-assisted and pro-led tax filing, quarterly estimate tools for small business owners, and paycheck withholding optimizers. As a result, it is seeing increased demand from wealth management platforms, including integrations with digital advisers catering to mass-affluent clients and an upcoming partnership with a trillion-dollar asset manager. By the numbers: April claims it can reduce the time it takes to prepare and file taxes from the IRS' reported 13‑hour average down to just 22 minutes. The company processed hundreds of thousands of returns through partnerships with over 50 fintech apps and financial institutions this past tax season. It has seen its business grow three times year-to-date and more than seven times over the past 12 months, Borodach says. What's next: The company is preparing to launch advanced tax planning tools around capital gains, retirement planning, and stock transactions.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store