
Rolls-Royce CEO: Only Sustainable Aviation Fuel Can Decarbonize Long-Haul Flights
As the global aviation industry races toward a 2050 net-zero emissions goal, Rolls-Royce is placing a firm bet on sustainable aviation fuel (SAF).
Rolls-Royce CEO Tufan Erginbilgiç dismissed the idea that other technologies will meaningfully cut emissions for larger aircraft anytime soon: 'In the next 20 years, [sustainable aviation fuel] is the only technology that's going to decarbonize commercial aviation,' he said Wednesday at a Wall Street Journal event in London.
Erginbilgiç's assessment reflects not only the company's strategic priorities but also mounting industry-wide pressure to cut carbon emissions in the short and medium term – well before alternative technologies become viable at scale.
'We are the only company who can actually say that all of our aerospace engines are 100% SAF compatible,' Erginbilgiç said. 'That's important because you can make small planes hydrogen or electric, but when we're talking about narrowbody, widebody, overseas commercial airlines, SAF is the only solution.'
He touted the UltraFan, a next-generation engine in development, as a sign Rolls-Royce is also focused on improving fuel efficiency. It's described in the company's marketing materials as 'the sustainable solution for decades to come,' and promises to be 10% more efficient than those currently on the market.
However, the UltraFan won't power aircraft until the 2030s. Rolls-Royce says some of the learnings from this new-generation tech could be applied to existing engines, but it hasn't said exactly when or how.
Rolls-Royce's current range of engines help power many of the world's most popular long-haul aircraft, including the Boeing 777 and Airbus A350.
A Narrow Window for Progress
Erginbilgiç's remarks come as airlines face growing scrutiny over their climate impact.
The International Air Transport Association (IATA) – the global airline trade body – has committed to achieving net-zero emissions by 2050. Many industry watchers agree that this target requires both short-term action and long-term technological transformation.
While emerging technologies like hydrogen and electric propulsion may reshape aviation in the second half of the century, the next two decades represent a critical window for emissions reductions, but where commercial-scale alternatives remain elusive.
Erginbilgiç's comments reaffirm that these solutions are at least two decades away for practical application in large commercial aircraft. That leaves SAF, a lower-carbon alternative to conventional jet fuel made from sources like waste oils and agricultural residues, as the most viable bridge technology.
However, SAF currently accounts for less than 1% of global aviation fuel use, hampered by limited supply and high prices. SAF can cost up to three times more than traditional jet fuel.
Industry Frustration Grows
Speaking to Skift last month, Willie Walsh, IATA director general, criticized the slow roll-out of SAF.
"The lack of progress, particularly in relation to the production of SAF, demonstrates that it's not going to be done by airlines alone. The OEMs [plane and engine makers] are not delivering to the commitments that they make," said Walsh.
"Everybody is out there saying we're committed to net-zero in 2050. But all of the players [in] the airline community are walking away from tangible action that would demonstrate that they're committed. We're not seeing what we would expect from them."
Is Sustainable Aviation Fuel the Solution or a Harmful Distraction?
Sustainable Aviation Fuel is being pushed as the main decarbonization pathway for the aviation industry. But a growing number of airline executives are pushing back on it as a waste of time when better solutions exist. Read More
Erginbilgiç and Walsh's comments reflect growing realism among aviation leaders: that innovation timelines don't always match regulatory deadlines.
In March, the chief executives of four of Europe's biggest airline groups urged the EU to delay rules requiring the use of SAF because of concerns around supply. The EU already requires all airlines operating in the region to use 2% SAF in their fuel mix. This will ramp up to at least 6% by 2030. The UK has a similar mandate that will rise to 10% in 2030.
What Do the Airlines Say?
Speaking on Skift's climate podcast GreenShift, Amelia DeLuca, Delta's chief sustainability officer, acknowledged the tension between business expansion and climate goals.
'Sustainable aviation fuel is the biggest lever,' she said. 'It's the only thing that gets us to net zero. We're in a race against time.'
DeLuca called on the sector to continue investing in new technologies such as carbon capture, capturing gasses out of the atmosphere using renewable energy and turning it back into fuel. 'These are unlimited feedstocks. And that cost profile of that product, if you have unlimited feedstocks, is actually lower than conventional jet fuel today. But that is a long way off. This is going to take all of us. Airlines alone can't solve climate change.'
Meanwhile, Yvonne Moynihan, corporate & ESG officer at European low-cost carrier Wizz Air said in April: 'Radical change needs to happen. Subsidies have to be redirected into renewable energy.'
She told Skift that some airlines have included hydrogen in their roadmaps, but that Wizz Air excluded it and instead focuses on "realistic levers.'
'We understand that the most realistic decarbonization levers are ones that we already have, which are improvements in current aircraft and engine technology and SAF. We need to kick start the production of SAF, this is the best chance for airlines to decarbonize,' she added.
Additional reporting by Darin Graham
What am I looking at? The performance of airline sector stocks within the ST200. The index includes companies publicly traded across global markets including network carriers, low-cost carriers, and other related companies.
The Skift Travel 200 (ST200) combines the financial performance of nearly 200 travel companies worth more than a trillion dollars into a single number. See more airlines sector financial performance.
Read the full methodology behind the Skift Travel 200.
Skift's in-depth reporting on climate issues is made possible through the financial support of Intrepid Travel. This backing allows Skift to bring you high-quality journalism on one of the most important topics facing our planet today. Intrepid is not involved in any decisions made by Skift's editorial team.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
Ex-Intel CEO backs Trump's sovereign wealth fund plan — and says it can help the US keep up with China in the tech race
The US is falling behind in the global tech race, and former Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger said a sovereign wealth fund could be the country's best shot at catching up. In a Wall Street Journal op-ed published Tuesday, Gelsinger endorsed President Donald Trump's proposal to create a US sovereign wealth fund, calling it "the country's best tool" to secure American leadership in critical technologies like semiconductors, artificial intelligence, and quantum computing. "Washington's haphazard approach to fueling national competitiveness and strategic industries isn't cutting it," he wrote. "Trump's proposed sovereign wealth fund could secure American leadership." Gelsinger, now a general partner at Playground Global, argued that while American companies are making "significant breakthroughs," scaling those technologies needs "patient, long-term capital typically unavailable from Wall Street or traditional venture funds." A sovereign wealth fund, he said, could support "early-stage quantum companies, help national laboratories commercialize technologies, and ensure US breakthroughs remain domestically controlled." In February, Trump signed an executive order directing the Treasury and Commerce departments to develop a sovereign wealth fund plan to promote "fiscal sustainability," reduce the tax burden, and "promote United States economic and strategic leadership internationally." The agencies had until May to deliver recommendations on structure, governance, funding, and investment strategy. Other nations, including Norway, Singapore, and the UAE, have used sovereign funds to fuel their strategic ambitions and increase global influence. Gelsinger framed a US version of the fund as a strategic response to China's vast state-backed tech investment. "American firms have to grapple with difficult market distortions thanks to Chinese state investment," he wrote, pointing to Beijing's National Venture Capital Guidance Fund, which he said channels "tens of billions of dollars of central, provincial, and private capital into key technologies." He rebutted concerns that such a fund amounts to industrial policy, writing: "This isn't an attempt to surmount market forces. It's about the innovative startups already accessing global sovereign-wealth funds like China's, which may not be aligned with American interests." Not so simple, experts say Nicolai Tangen, CEO of Norway's $1.7 trillion fund — the largest in the world — said that what works in Oslo may not translate easily to Washington. "You need to allocate capital to it, right?" he told Yahoo Finance's "Opening Bid Unfiltered" earlier this month. "What has worked for us in Norway is to have a very long-term view on what we do. It has broad political anchoring." Tangen said that the fund's stability comes from strict rules and transparency. "We are the most transparent fund in the world," he said, adding that "when you have a change in parliament or in government, you do not change the way we invest." Critics have also said that, unlike Norway, the US doesn't run a budget surplus — it runs multi-trillion-dollar deficits. While Trump's executive order references $5.7 trillion in federal assets, monetizing those assets would require political consensus and complex legal maneuvering. Still, Gelsinger believes the stakes are too high to delay. "America needs this fund now more than ever," he wrote. The White House didn't immediately respond to a request for comment from Business Insider.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Democracies around world must form new alliance to counter China, says Sunak
Democracies must band together with closer security, trade and technology ties to counter the rise of China, Rishi Sunak said. In his first major intervention on global affairs since leaving 10 Downing Street, he said existing alliances such as Nato and traditional free-trade arrangements were not sufficient to respond to Beijing. He suggested a grouping of democratic market economies could work together to reduce reliance on China for manufacturing and technology and have the combined industrial might to rival the Asian superpower's capacity to build military equipment. 'In an era of full-spectrum competition, we can't trade with rivals the same way we do with friends,' he said. Writing in the Wall Street Journal, he said democracies should band together or risk letting 'an authoritarian axis shape a new world order where might makes right, where technology bolsters authoritarianism and curtails individual liberty, and where trade is a weapon of coercion'. The former prime minister said: 'The next decade will be one of the most dangerous yet most transformational periods the world has ever seen. Democratic market states must seize this moment and shape it. 'If they don't, it will be the axis of authoritarian states — China, Russia, Iran and North Korea — that takes advantage of this opportunity.' He said 'old-fashioned great power competition' is returning in the form of China presenting the US with a 'credible economic, technological and military rival for the first time in 40 years'. In a message to Donald Trump, he said: 'The US must realise that no country on its own can face down the axis of authoritarian states. 'But together, democratic market economies can outcompete any rival coalition and deliver peace and prosperity for their people.' He said a broader alliance than Nato was needed, spanning the Indo-Pacific as well as the the Euro-Atlantic. Mr Sunak said Jiangnan in China has more capacity than 'every US shipyard put together', but a combined allied production strategy with South Korea and Japan would allow competition with China on building up naval fleets. The economic strength of a democratic alliance could also persuade 'key global swing states' to back the US and its allies rather than China and Russia. Greater trade among allies would also reduce the 'economic pain' from breaking away from China in strategically important areas. Countries that fail to restrict technology transfer to China or leave themselves dependent on Chinese technology 'should be excluded from reciprocal free trade'. 'If China overtakes us in artificial intelligence, it will gain not only economic but strategic primacy, given its potential military applications,' he warned.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
EU's buying of 'green' fuel from outside to meet its targets is not making sense, IATA says
SINGAPORE (Reuters) -The European Union's buying of sustainable aviation fuel from outside of its region to meet its carbon emission targets is not making "an awful lot of sense", said IATA International Air Transport Association Director-General Willie Walsh. "The idea that you're buying sustainable fuel and then transporting it to use in Europe isn't the right way to do it, because you're clearly increasing the carbon footprint of that fuel as a result of the transportation costs," Walsh said at a media roundtable in Singapore on Wednesday. Sustainable aviation fuel is considered as a green replacement for traditional jet fuel. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data