US tariffs: Trump negotiated in bad faith
Image: GCIS
THE South African government has accused the Donald Trump administration of negotiating in bad faith in their engagements to strike a deal that will avert the impending 30 percent tariffs on local products.
Trade and industry Minister Parks Tau and his international relations counterpart, Ronald Lamola said the US failed to honour an agreement to sign a confidentiality agreement that had been agreed upon.
As a result, South Africa is now looking to expand its trade relations with Asia and the Middle East, whilst continuing to engage with Trump's administration over the hikes set for later this week.
Minister Ronald Lamola says the SA government is still engaging with the US about the tariffs that are set to come into effect for the country later this month.
Image: GCIS
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
'We waited for the US to sign the confidentiality agreement after we had signed our agreement. We got to a point where there was an agreement to unlock the discussions. However, we did not get a signed confidentiality agreement from the US. We then went back almost on the eve of the tariffs and said we have been waiting for the confidentiality agreement, what do we do now, as we have two days, and the feedback was that at this point, let us look at the template as a response,' he stated.
Addressing the media, Lamola echoed Tau's sentiments, saying South Africa had done all it could to ensure that the negotiations with Trump's administration bear fruit, adding that despite all these efforts, Trump decided to continue with the 30 percent retaliatory tariffs against some of the country's key export industries, which include motor and the agricultural sectors.
"Since the beginning of the 7th Administration, South Africa has embarked on a process to stabilise and enhance mutually beneficial trade and investment relations with the US. The aim has been to address long-standing bilateral issues of concern for both sides in ways that move the trade relations forward... However, even with these efforts, the US decided to impose a 30 percent unilateral tariff on South Africa."
Lamola said the government's efforts in resetting the relationship with the US have been undermined by some actors within South African society.
"The unilateral tariffs have been implemented notwithstanding South Africa's submission of a comprehensive and ambitious Framework Deal in May 2025 aimed at addressing the US trade deficit, addressing tariffs, promoting digital trade, and eliminating non-tariff barriers to enhance mutually beneficial trade relations with the United States," he said.
Reacting to the impending tariff hikes, economic expert Johann Els said the tariffs on SA exports will result in a loss of volume because of the higher pricing.
'There will be some employment losses. But it is also important to see the bigger picture as the tariffs will impact less than 5% of the country's total exports, as some industries are not affected, and they will not collapse to zero overnight."
On Monday, via his weekly newsletter, President Cyril Ramaphosa stated that the decision by the United States to impose a 30% tariff on South African imports highlights the urgency with which the country has to adapt to increasingly turbulent headwinds in international trade.
"The US is South Africa's second largest trading partner by country and these measures will have a considerable impact on industries that rely heavily on exports to that country and on the workers they employ, as well as on our fiscus. Domestic sectors such as agriculture, automotive, and textiles have historically benefited from duty-free access to the US market under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA). Our trade relations have historically been complementary. South African exports do not compete with US producers and do not pose a threat to US industry," Ramaphosa said.
Ryan Smith, DA spokesperson on international relations and cooperation said the country would not be in this position had Lamola pursued economic diplomacy in any meaningful and non-aligned manner.
'The interventions announced by Ministers Parks Tau and Ronald Lamola demonstrate that neither will take accountability for the 30% tariff imposed on South African exports to the United States of America in the absence of a solid trade deal.
"Whereas our Southern African Development Community (SADC) neighbours have managed to negotiate their tariffs down to 15%, Ministers Tau and Lamola have left South African businesses and exporters vulnerable and exposed to the ongoing trade war. This diplomatic negligence and trade paralysis on South Africa's part demands an urgent shift in attitude and approach on both accounts.'
Cape Times
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
10 minutes ago
- The Citizen
SA ‘deeply concerned' by Eswatini to house dangerous criminals
Last month, the US announced a flight carrying five of the country's most dangerous criminals in its prisons landed in Eswatini. The South African government has raised deep concerns over the Kingdom of Eswatini's decision to house a group of 'dangerous criminals' of various nationalities whose countries have refused to take back. Department of International Relations and Cooperation (Dirco) spokesperson Chrispin Phiri said they received confirmation from the Eswatini government spokesperson Thabile Mdluli that a group of criminals from various countries landed in Eswatini after being transported from the United States of America on a special flight. 'More criminals' Phiri said there was a potential of more criminals with these profiles to follow. 'Their arrival was also followed by an announcement from the United States department of Homeland Security indicating that this group of individuals from several countries, and some of whom have been convicted of serious offences and crimes, have been deported from the United States of America and have arrived in the Kingdom of Eswatini.' ALSO READ: Dirco slams old travel advisory about terrorism in South Africa Deportation Last month, the US Department of Homeland Security announced that a flight carrying five of the country's most dangerous criminals in its prisons were deported from the US had landed in eSwatini. 'Today, DHS conducted a third-country deportation flight to eSwatini. These criminal illegal aliens are so uniquely barbaric that their home countries refused to take them back. 'Under the leadership of President Donald Trump, we are removing these convicted criminals from our soil so they can never hurt another American victim,' the department said. The department deported five men from Vietnam, Jamaica, Laos, Cuba and Yemen. They were convicted of child rape, murder, robbery, second-degree homicide and assault, among other crimes. Not wanted Phiri said Dirco had also taken note that Eswatini and the USA indicated that they would collaborate with the International Organisation for Migration (IOM) to facilitate the transit of the prisoner to their countries of origin. 'Dirco also noted that the countries of origin of these deportees are unlikely to receive them. 'Whilst respecting the sovereign decision of the Government of Eswatini, the Government of the Republic of South Africa is deeply concerned about the profile of these individuals and the potential adverse impact on South Africa's national security and immigration policy, given the geographical proximity between the two sisterly countries,' Phiri said. ALSO READ: SA man trying to jump fence into Swaziland nabbed with over R400K
Daily Maverick
7 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Lesotho faces major job losses unless Trump's US tariffs are cut even further
Lesotho's tariff has been cut from 50% to 15%, but its garments are still not competitive with those from Eswatini and Kenya, which have been hit with tariffs of 10%. Lesotho's tariff rate for exports to the US was substantially lowered last week from 50% to 15%. However, even at the much lower rate, the mountain kingdom still faces large job losses, mainly because of competition in garment exports from Kenya and Eswatini, which got an even lower US tariff rate of 10%. The Lesotho government will this week urgently lobby the Trump administration to lower its rate further to 10% before the 8 August deadline for the new rates to kick in, said David Chen, the chairperson of the Lesotho Textile Exporters Association. He said Trade and Industry Minister Mokhethi Shelile had assured him on Monday, 4 August that the government was working hard to convince the US to lower the tariff to 10%. The Trump administration slapped an astonishing rate of 50% on tiny Lesotho in its first announcement of 'reciprocal' tariffs in April, mainly because of the strange way it calculated the rates supposedly needed to correct the trade surpluses of other countries. If the government failed to bring down the tariff rate, about 14 garment factories — mainly exporting to the US — were likely to close, with job losses of 20,000 to 30,000, Chen told Daily Maverick. The garment industry is Lesotho's biggest source of private sector employment. Chen added that a 5% tariff disadvantage to his competitors might not seem a lot, but was in fact 'very big'. He noted that Lesotho had for many years been exporting garments to the US under the African Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa), which gave eligible countries like Lesotho duty-free access to the US market. That duty-free rate disappeared under the Trump administration's 'reciprocal 'tariff hikes. But if the Lesotho government could persuade the US to drop that to 10% — the same as other Agoa beneficiaries like Kenya and Eswatini which export garments to the US — Lesotho would remain viable, he said. Some garment factories, including his own TZICC Clothing, had suspended production for the last few weeks, putting workers on leave, because the uncertainty about tariffs had paused orders. 'Everyone is waiting for certainty about tariffs. Everything is at a standstill. Or at least 90% of business has stopped.' Chen said 28 Lesotho garment factories were dependent on US exports. They sell to major brands like Levi Strauss and Wrangler. He predicted about half of these factories would close if the US tariff rate remained at 15%. He said companies like his were seeking other markets, mainly in South Africa, as the orders from markets further away had been too small. Shelile has been quoted as saying that while several meetings with US trade representatives had led to the tariff reduction from 50% to 15%, more needed to be done to lower it further. DM
Daily Maverick
7 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
How exports can transform South Africa's agricultural landscape
We do not emphasise enough the critical role of exports in driving South Africa's agricultural growth. If one looks at the past three decades, this sector has more than doubled in value and volume. Indeed, the improvements in genetics and cultivars, among other interventions, are the primary catalysts that delivered this growth. But another critical catalyst is exports. I illustrated this point at length in my book, A Country of Two Agricultures. We now export roughly half of what we produce in South Africa's agriculture, which was nearly $14-billion in 2024. We are not even at capacity in terms of agricultural production, since we have roughly 2.5 million hectares of government-owned land that was previously commercially farmed but now suboptimally used. We also have capacity in the former homelands to increase agricultural output. When this land in the underused government farms and the former homelands is finally released to deserving black farmers, with title deeds, paired with affordable finance and partnerships from commodity associations, we will be able to drive the agricultural output to new heights. But we won't be in a position to absorb that output in the domestic market. We will need to look at export markets. These exports are also key in ensuring that the farming businesses remain financially viable and can sustain jobs and provide economic value to various communities. And yes, we don't just export without first taking care of the domestic food needs. The exports are primarily a surplus. (The poverty issues we all are aware of in South Africa are mainly an income poverty issue, not necessarily an agricultural question). It is this reality I have explained above that has always compelled me to speak more about the need to expand our export diversification efforts. I was encouraged yesterday (4 August 2025) when I heard the key policymakers in the trade and international relations space pushing this message strongly. In a joint media briefing by South Africa's ministers of international relations and cooperation and trade, industry and competition, the intent to rigorously pursue export diversification was made clear, with the ministers stating: 'We have been strengthening trade and investment partnerships with various trade partners. These efforts are bearing fruit, targeting markets across Africa, as well as in Asia, Europe, the Middle East and the Americas.' The ministers further stated: 'We are making significant inroads into new, high-growth markets across Asia and the Middle East, including the UAE, Qatar and Saudi Arabia. These efforts are not only opening doors to new opportunities but also reinforcing our commitment to retaining the vital markets we already have.' With this clarity on the importance of export diversification, the South African agricultural community must rally behind this message. The first step must be to support the government with insights that further help them in engaging with the new markets and their prioritisation. This may not be something that people have on their minds, especially in the fast-evolving world of global trade. Thus, supporting research efforts on trade to provide up-to-date key insights that guide us in decision-making is vital. Another aspect we will have to assess is capacity readiness in the various government departments that are directly engaged in trade matters, specifically the departments of International Relations and Cooperation and Trade, Industry and Competition. This also means that South Africa will have to adjust its approach on trade matters and be more open to free trade agreements, understanding that there are trade-offs they bring. You cannot win in all industries. There will be tough choices in trade-offs that policymakers will have to make. The countries we want to diversify to may also want to sell something from South Africa. This is particularly true today, where all countries are under pressure to expand their export markets given the disruption caused by the US trade policy. The senior officials in the trade department will also need to align with this new approach, which may be a slight shift in orientation from the established way of approaching trade policy matters.
