Lawmakers advance plan to expand tax exemption for homeowners
After hearing a litany of proposals to expand the state's tax exemption for homeowners, the Legislature's Taxation Committee moved forward with one amended plan that would increase the exemption for all people incrementally.
In a unanimous vote among those present on Tuesday, the committee voted to advance a plan that would increase the Homestead Property Tax Exemption by $5,000 per year until it reaches a total value of $50,000 from the just value of a home over the course of five years.
This plan, which is in LD 140, now heads to the Maine Senate and House of Representatives for approval.
Currently, the Homestead Property Tax Exemption provides a reduction for property tax purposes of up to $25,000 from the value of a home. In order to qualify, a homeowner must be a permanent resident of Maine, the home must be their permanent residence and they have to have owned a home in the state for at least one year before applying.
As originally proposed by Sen. Joseph Baldacci (D-Penobscot), LD 140 would have increased the tax exemption by $10,000 per year until the total exemption reached $95,000. Baldacci argued that incrementally increasing the tax exemption would be the most fiscally responsible method because it will be more feasible for the general fund to absorb costs.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
The committee agreed, though opted for smaller increments and a smaller overall increase.
The smaller increments would now cost the state roughly $14 million per year, compared to double that with the initial proposal, which Rep. Shelley Rudnicki (R-Fairfield) characterized as more reasonable.
The amended bill also removes adjustments for inflation after the cap, which lawmakers argued felt less pertinent due to the gradual adjustments.
'It seems like it just makes it extremely complex for everyone and I'm not sure that most taxpayers would even notice that,' said Rep. Gary Friedman (D-Bar Harbor), who proposed the tweaks.
Gov. Janet Mills' administration testified against LD 140, and the several other proposed reforms to the homestead exemption, arguing it will shift the property tax burden to other taxpayers and result in an increase in property tax mill rates over time.
'LD 140 would provide broad property tax relief to resident homeowners, regardless of their ability to pay the tax, at a very high cost, when more focused tax relief could be provided at a much lower cost using the Property Tax Fairness Credit or other programs,' Michael Allen, associate commissioner for tax policy in the Department of Administrative and Financial Services, told the committee earlier this month.
Last year, lawmakers expanded eligibility to the Property Tax Fairness Credit — which provides refunds for property taxes or rent paid — and created a Property Tax Deferral Program, specifically to soften the blow from the short-lived Property Tax Stabilization Program that allowed older Mainers to freeze their property taxes.
The Legislature repealed that program after just one year in effect, following skyrocketing cost projections, concern about wealthy property owners taking advantage due to a lack of income restrictions and the administrative burden it left on municipalities.
The Taxation Committee is hearing other proposals aimed at controlling property taxes on Wednesday, including legislation to reinstate the Property Tax Stabilization Program and amend the state constitution to require greater state reimbursement for residential property tax exemptions and increase the minimum homestead exemption to $50,000.
Bipartisan efforts to expand property tax exemptions face pushback from Mills administration
While advancing Baldacci's proposal, the committee voted Tuesday against four other proposals to expand the homestead exemption in other ways, including through one lump increase or only for particular groups.
These rejected proposals included LD 658, sponsored by House Minority Leader Billy Bob Faulkingham (R-Winter Harbor), which would double the exemption from $25,000 to $50,000 of the just value of a home.
Two had focused specifically on residents who are 65 years old or older. LD 7, sponsored by Sen. Rick Bennett (R-Oxford), proposes increasing the exemption to $75,000 for that group, while LD 934, sponsored by Rep. Stephen Wood (R-Greene), proposed a greater exemption amount for that group, as well as veterans.
LD 570, sponsored by Sen. Cameron Reny (D-Lincoln), would provide an additional tax exemption of $75,000 to families and individuals who make below a certain income, bringing the total tax exemption available for those eligible up to $100,000.
The votes against these other plans were also unanimous among those present.
The committee has yet to take action on LD 559, sponsored by Sen. Donna Bailey (D-York), which would allow municipalities to adopt a property tax stabilization program for their senior residents approved by local ordinance.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
5 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
California's top prosecutor floats pathway to boost Democrats in Congress
California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta said Tuesday that he believes there is a 'legal pathway' for Democrats to present new congressional district maps directly to voters on a statewide ballot, without input from the state's independent redistricting commission. Such a move, he suggested, would allow the state to counter Republican efforts to tilt next year's midterm election by pushing redistricting measures that favor the GOP in conservative states such as Texas. If successful, Republicans would have a better chance of holding their slim majority in the U.S. House of Representatives and protecting President Trump's ability to enact his agenda. 'I think the governor could call a special election that the voters of the state of California would participate in, and present to them a pathway forward that's different than the independent redistricting commission, that has maps presented to them ready [and] tangible and specific, and then the people vote,' Bonta said, adding that his staff had been discussing the matter with Gov. Gavin Newsom's team. Republicans, who probably would lose seats if such a ballot measure was approved, were dubious of Bonta's claim and argued that it is harmful to democracy. GOP Assembly Leader James Gallagher criticized Bonta's proposal as a 'strange legal theory to undermine CA voters.' 'It's undemocratic, it's wrong, and it needs to be stopped,' Gallagher said in a social media post Tuesday evening. 'If they move forward in this fashion they will rip the state and this nation apart.' Bonta provided few details about a potential ballot measure aside from saying that new district boundaries could be drawn by the state Legislature and presented to voters in a special election. The measure would ask voters to rescind the power they granted to an independent redistricting commission, at least temporarily. Presenting maps directly to voters is viewed as an effort to sway Californians who may be leery of letting the Legislature redraw the districts after they vote, according to redistricting experts. The governor's office declined to say whether Newsom intends to ask the Legislature to put a map of the proposed districts on the ballot. His team said it is continuing to explore the two pathways he previously outlined — either having state lawmakers redraw the maps, which probably would face legal challenges, or placing the matter on the statewide ballot for California voters to decide. Redistricting — the esoteric process of redrawing political boundaries — typically occurs once a decade, after the U.S. Census tallies population shifts across the nation. But it's in the news because Trump — potentially facing the loss of the slim GOP majority in the House — urged Texas to redraw its congressional districts middecade to elect more Republicans in the 2026 midterm election so he can press his agenda during his final two years in office. California lawmakers, like those in most states, used to gerrymander political boundaries to favor political parties and protect incumbents, often leading to bizarrely shaped districts with voters who sometimes had little in common. But in 2010, voters overwhelmingly passed a ballot measure to create an independent redistricting commission that focused on drawing congressional districts that consolidated communities of interest, respected minority voting rights and geographically made sense. The state Republican and Democratic parties opposed the effort because it eroded their power. Now, after the Trump administration is urging GOP states to redraw district lines in a manner that would shore up their party's control of Congress, Democrats are fighting back. In California, a partisan redrawing of the districts could net their party a half-dozen seats in the state's 52-member delegation, which currently has nine Republicans. Several steps would have to occur before any such potential change could be presented to the electorate, notably that the Legislature would have to approve placing the matter before voters in a special election and draw new maps in a compressed schedule. Legal challenges are likely. 'Generally, when the people vote on something, if it's going to be changed in a significant way and not have additional steps taken by the Legislature in furtherance of what the people voted for, then the people need to vote for that change,' Bonta said, after being asked about the matter during a news conference. His office was working to 'have confidence and assurance that there is a legal pathway for California to take action in response to any action that Texas takes. ... We want to be confident that it was done lawfully originally, and that we can defend it appropriately in court.'
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Marjorie Taylor Greene to introduce 'Making American Elections Great Again Act'
The Brief Greene's bill proposes a new U.S. census counting only citizens, excluding noncitizens from congressional apportionment and redistricting. The legislation mandates proof of citizenship and government-issued photo ID for voting in federal elections, along with criminalizing ballot distribution to noncitizens. The bill aims to ensure fair representation and national security by preventing noncitizens from influencing congressional seats and voting in elections. WASHINGTON - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia on Tuesday introduced a bill that would require a new U.S. census counting only citizens, overhaul the timeline for future counts, and mandate proof of citizenship and government-issued photo ID to vote in federal elections. The legislation, titled the "Making American Elections Great Again Act," seeks to end the practice of counting noncitizens for the purposes of congressional apportionment and redistricting. Rep. Greene on proposed voting act What they're saying "For years, Democrats have flooded our country with millions of illegal aliens and used them to rig our political system—now they're saying the quiet part out loud," Greene said in a statement. "They want illegals for redistricting. That's not democracy, it's foreign interference." "This bill is about fair representation, national security, and protecting the vote of every single American citizen," Greene said. "Illegal aliens should never be counted for congressional seats or allowed to vote in our elections—period. That's not controversial, it's common sense." Greene cited a recent comment by Democratic Rep. Yvette Clarke, who reportedly suggested bringing more undocumented immigrants into her district "just for redistricting purposes," as evidence of political manipulation. "Democrats are importing voters and stealing districts," Greene said. "My bill ends the scam once and for all." 'Making American Elections Great Again Act' Dig deeper Currently, the U.S. Census counts all residents regardless of citizenship. Greene's proposal would require a new nationwide census conducted immediately upon enactment of the bill, counting only U.S. citizens. States would be required to redraw congressional maps based on that data, with the next decennial census scheduled 10 years after. The legislation also aims to impose sweeping new requirements for federal elections. It would: Require all voters in federal elections to show both proof of U.S. citizenship and government-issued photo ID Mandate inclusion of a citizenship checkbox on census forms Criminalize the distribution of ballots to noncitizens or individuals lacking verified identification Penalize anyone who provides assistance to noncitizens attempting to vote in federal elections What we don't know The bill has not yet been introduced or assigned a House Resolution number. What's next If passed, the bill would apply starting with the regularly scheduled federal elections in November 2026. The Source Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene's office provided the details, quotes, and a copy of the House Resolution for this article.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Chuck Gray polls his odds as Wyoming governor or U.S. representative
CHEYENNE — Wyoming Secretary of State Chuck Gray said he is 'exploring' the option to run for governor of Wyoming or for Wyoming's sole seat in the U.S. House of Representatives, saying he has been 'strongly encouraged' to run, though no official announcements have been made. It is unlikely Gray would challenge Harriet Hageman in the gubernatorial race, after an internal poll from Cygnal in January suggests she would have a strong run in Wyoming, or in the congressional race if she sought reelection for her House seat in Washington, D.C. The potential bid for a higher elected seat was highlighted Tuesday when Gray released his own internal polling, conducted by Fabrizio, Lee & Associates, weighing his odds in either of the two elections. Tony Fabrizio, the principal in Fabrizio, Lee & Associates, is a Republican pollster who has conducted polls for candidates over the past several decades, most notably including Donald Trump's 2016 and 2024 presidential campaigns, former Sen. Bob Dole's 1996 presidential campaign, U.S. Sen. Rand Paul's 2016 presidential campaign and former Texas Gov. Rick Perry's 2012 presidential campaign. As of 2023, Fabrizio was running the polling operations for the MAGA Inc. super PAC. Although the election for both races is not until late 2026, the polling Gray released shows potential leads in both elections. The poll was conducted by surveying 500 Wyoming voters registered as Republicans from July 15 to July 17 of this year across different demographic groups including race, age, location, education and a 50/50 split between male and female voters. The first question in the poll gauged name recognition. It included the names of six Wyoming politicians whose names are in the mix. The list includes Wyoming Sen. Eric Barlow, R-Gillette; Wyoming Senate President Bo Biteman, R-Ranchester; Wyoming Superintendent of Public Instruction Megan Degenfelder; Gray; Speaker of the Wyoming House of Representatives Chip Neiman, R-Hulett; and Sen. Cheri Steinmetz, R-Torrington. Fabrizio's poll found that Gray had the greatest name recognition at 73% who had heard of him, followed by Degenfelder at 46%. The rest of the names were in the 40% range, with Steinmetz on the bottom at 38%. Additionally, survey respondents were asked how favorably they feel about each candidate on the list. Of those who responded to this part of the question, Degenfelder topped the list with 62% of those who recognized her name feeling favorably about her, and Gray falling to fourth on the list at 55%. Biteman was the lowest at 45%. The following question concerned the gubernatorial race only, asking who voters would elect if they were to cast their vote that day. In addition to the previous six names, the names on the list also included Republican Brent Bien, who lost the Republican primary race for governor to sitting Gov. Mark Gordon by a significant margin in 2022; Wyoming Senate Majority Leader Tara Nethercott, R-Cheyenne; and Wyoming State Treasurer Curt Meier. A majority of respondents, 56%, said they were undecided. The same question for U.S. Congress also left a majority undecided, this time at 58%. However, Gray had the highest amount of support at 12% for governor and at 16% for Congress, with second place falling to 6% each for Barlow and Bien and 7% to Nethercott in each race, respectively. Next, the survey informed the respondents of Gray's support for President Donald Trump, noting he believes in Trump's political policies and has previously been endorsed by him in his bid for Secretary of State. This notice increased Gray's standing in the poll. Though he has not announced his bid for any races in Wyoming next year and Trump has not endorsed any candidates, it has proven to be a powerful endorsement in local and statewide elections across the country. This was showcased in Wyoming in 2022 when then-former President Trump endorsed Hageman over incumbent Liz Cheney for a seat in the House of Representatives, which ultimately became one of the large factors leading to Cheney's defeat by more than 30 points in the GOP primary. The poll does not include Cheyenne Republican Joseph Kibler, who has announced a bid for governor, or former U.S. Senate candidate Reid Rasner, who has filed a campaign finance account for governor but has yet to announce his candidacy. It also omits Hageman and Gordon. Both of their decisions going forward will be influential in determining whether potential candidates run and in which race they choose to run in. Though Gordon is concluding his second and final term in 2027, there are still options should he choose to seek reelection. In 2013, the Wyoming Supreme Court ruled that the term limits on the top elected positions in the state were unconstitutional but omitted the governor's terms from the ruling. This means Gordon could seek to amend the constitution in a court challenge if he wanted to seek a third term. It is unclear whether that challenge would be successful. A July report from Morning Consult, which conducts many surveys every day asking registered U.S. voters in all 50 states if they approve or disapprove of their governor's job performance, found that Gordon had the third-highest governor approval rating among all 50 governors. When contacted Tuesday, the governor's office told the WTE in a statement that 'at this time, the Governor's focus remains on this term, and the work Wyoming's people elected him to do.' Gray told the WTE in a text message Tuesday that the law is clear that Gordon could not seek a third term. 'It would be deeply troubling for Gordon to make another power play by trying to challenge a commonsense conservative term limits law that the people of Wyoming supported by large margins,' he wrote, referencing a 1992 ballot initiative implementing a new term limit law. In 2004, the Wyoming Supreme Court ruled this term limit law unconstitutional under the state constitution.
