More than 70 arrested at UK protests in support of banned group Palestine Action
In London, the Metropolitan Police said 42 people had been arrested by late afternoon. All but one of the arrests were for showing support for a proscribed organization, which police have said includes chanting, wearing clothing or displaying articles such as flags, signs or logos. Another person was arrested for common assault. A further 16 arrests were made in Manchester, according to Greater Manchester Police, while South Wales Police said 13 people were also held in Cardiff.
In London, it was the second straight week that protesters gathered to support the pro-Palestinian activist group. Its outlawing has meant that support for the organization is deemed a criminal offense. Police arrested 29 people at a similar protest last weekend.
Two groups gathered underneath both the statues of Indian independence leader Mahatma Gandhi and South Africa's first post-apartheid president, Nelson Mandela, in Parliament Square. Signs with the wording 'I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action,' were held aloft in silence as the protesters were surrounded by police officers and members of the media. Some demonstrators could be seen lying on top of each other on the ground as police searched their bags and took away signs. Officers could then be seen carrying away a number of protesters who were lying down, lifting them off the ground and into waiting police vans parked around the square.
The official designation earlier this month of Palestine Action as a proscribed group under the Terrorism Act 2000 means that membership in the group and support for its actions are punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Some 81 organizations are already proscribed under the UK Act, including the militant groups Hamas and al-Qaida.
The government moved to ban Palestine Action after activists broke into a Royal Air Force base in Brize Norton in Oxfordshire, England, on June 20, damaging two planes using red paint and crowbars in protest at the British government's ongoing military support for Israel in its war in Gaza. Police said that the incident caused around 7 million pounds ($9.4 million) of damage.
Four people between 22 and 35 years old were charged with conspiracy to commit criminal damage and conspiracy to enter a prohibited place for purposes prejudicial to the interests of the UK. The four are scheduled to appear on July 18 at the Central Criminal Court in London, better known as the Old Bailey.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
3 hours ago
- LeMonde
Trump tariffs: The British have not fared so badly after all
On May 8, during a hastily arranged press conference, Donald Trump, in the Oval Office, and Keir Starmer, via video link from a Jaguar Land Rover factory in the Midlands, United Kingdom, hailed a "historic" agreement. It was the first US trade negotiation to be finalized since the American president's "Liberation Day" on April 2. "This historic deal delivers for British business and British workers protecting thousands of British jobs in key sectors including car manufacturing and steel," the British prime minister said, adding, "The UK has no greater ally than the United States." The agreement was nothing like a classic trade treaty, which typically covers a wide range of products and results from years of negotiation. It was essentially about the UK avoiding punitive tariffs on exports of cars, steel and aluminum to the US. The US tariff on British vehicles was set to be reduced from 27.5% to 10% for an annual quota of 100,000 cars shipped to the US (the original rate would apply to any additional imported cars). The 25% tariff on aluminum and steel imports was, for its part, slated for cancellation. However, the basic 10% customs duty would remain in place for all other British manufactured imports, as maintained by Washington. In return, the White House welcomed the opening of new British markets worth $5 billion (about €4.5 billion), including $700 million for ethanol exports and $250 million for agricultural products, such as American beef.
Local France
12 hours ago
- Local France
French deal on New Caledonia 'state' hits early criticism
Following deadly protests that rocked New Caledonia last year, Macron called for talks to break a deadlock between forces loyal to France and those seeking independence. After 10 days of negotiations near Paris, French officials and a delegation of 18 New Caledonian pro-independence and anti-independence representatives reached agreement on Saturday to create a "State of New Caledonia" within the French Republic. READ ALSO: New Caledonia politicians agree on statehood while remaining French The text, which still requires French parliamentary approval and to pass a referendum in the territory, provides for the creation of a Caledonian nationality and the sharing of powers. But it won few supporters in the archipelago. The signatories of the draft agreement admitted during a meeting with Macron on Saturday evening that they were struggling to win over opponents of the deal that will be submitted to a referendum in February 2026. Joel Kasarerhou, president of civil society group Construire Autrement (Build Differently), called the agreement "stillborn", describing it as a "poor" replica of previous agreements and "lacking ambition and vision". Kasarerhou said the youth at the heart of the May 2024 uprising had been "forgotten or barely mentioned". He feared another "May 13" -- the date the 2024 riots began. Advertisement Crossing a 'red line' Home to around 270,000 people and located nearly 17,000 kilometres (10,500 miles) from Paris, New Caledonia is one of several overseas territories that remain an integral part of France. It has been ruled from Paris since the 1800s but many indigenous Kanaks resent France's power over the islands and want more autonomy or independence. Unrest broke out in May 2024 after Paris planned to give voting rights to thousands of non-indigenous long-term residents. Kanaks feared this would watere down their influence, crushing any chance of securing independence. Philippe Blaise, the pro-France first vice-president of Southern Province government, distanced himself from the accord, saying on social media he had discovered the contents of the agreement "like all Caledonians" after it was signed. Blaise said the text "crossed a red line" with the recognition of a "Caledonian state" and a "distinct nationality" -- incompatible, in his view, with French unity. Advertisement 'Betrayal' Several pro-independence figures said the accord was signed without a clear mandate from their base. Several social media posts by pro-independence activists condemned their representatives' signing of the deal. Brenda Wanabo-Ipeze, a leader of the pro-independence group CCAT, currently incarcerated in France, said: "This text was signed without us. It does not bind us." Melanie Atapo, president of the pro-independence USTKE union, which represents Kanak people, told AFP she was "surprised" by the agreement and that the signatories should "come back to share with the bases before signing". Another pro-independence leader with links to the pro-independence FLNKS party, speaking on condition of anonymity, called it a "betrayal", saying pro-independence negotiators have "given in on essential points" without militant approval.
LeMonde
13 hours ago
- LeMonde
French deal on New Caledonian state criticized in archipelago
An accord between France and New Caledonia, creating a state within a state and hailed by French President Emmanuel Macron as "historic," hit immediate fierce criticism in the Pacific archipelago on Sunday, July 13. Following deadly protests that rocked New Caledonia last year, Macron called for talks to break a deadlock between forces loyal to France and those seeking independence. After 10 days of negotiations near Paris, French officials and a delegation of 18 New Caledonian pro-independence and anti-independence representatives reached agreement on Saturday to create a "State of New Caledonia" within the French Republic. The text, which still requires French parliamentary approval and to pass a referendum in the archipelago, provides for the creation of a New Caledonian nationality and the sharing of powers. But it won few supporters in the archipelago. The signatories of the draft agreement admitted during a meeting with Macron on Saturday evening that they were struggling to win over opponents of the deal, which will be submitted to a referendum in February 2026. Joel Kasarerhou, president of civil society group Construire Autrement ("Build Differently"), called the agreement "stillborn," describing it as a "poor" replica of previous agreements and "lacking ambition and vision." Kasarerhou said the youth at the heart of the May 2024 uprising had been "forgotten or barely mentioned." He feared another "May 13": the date the 2024 riots began. Crossing a 'red line' Home to around 270,000 people and located nearly 17,000 kilometres from Paris, New Caledonia, one of several overseas territories that remain an integral part of France, has been ruled from Paris since the 1800s. But many indigenous Kanaks resent France's power over the islands and want more autonomy or independence. Unrest broke out in May 2024 after Paris planned to give voting rights to thousands of non-indigenous long-term residents. Kanaks feared this would water down their influence, crushing any chance of securing independence. Philippe Blaise, the pro-France first vice president of the Southern Province government, distanced himself from the accord, saying on social media he had discovered the contents of the agreement "like all New Caledonians" after it was signed. Blaise said the text "crossed a red line" with the recognition of a "New Caledonian state" and a "distinct nationality": incompatible, in his view, with French unity. 'Betrayal' Several pro-independence figures said the accord was signed without a clear mandate from their base. Several social media posts by pro-independence activists condemned their representatives' signing of the deal. Brenda Wanabo-Ipeze, a leader of the pro-independence group CCAT, currently incarcerated in France, said: "This text was signed without us. It does not bind us." Melanie Atapo, president of the pro-independence USTKE union, which represents Kanak people, told AFP she was "surprised" by the agreement and that the signatories should "come back to share with the bases before signing". Another pro-independence leader with links to the pro-independence FLNKS party, speaking on condition of anonymity, called it a "betrayal," saying pro-independence negotiators have "given in on essential points" without militant approval.
