NHS must adapt to work better in heatwaves
Demand for healthcare will rise as a result of extreme temperatures. It is not only people's health at risk, but our ability to care for patients too. About 90% of hospitals in England alone are at risk of overheating, making it harder to keep services running safely. We need to get serious about adapting the NHS to cope with changing conditions.
The climate crisis is a health crisis. Preventing disruption in the NHS, by investing in building upgrades, workforce preparedness and adequate resilience planning, is no longer optional – it is essential, so the NHS can continue to provide healthcare when needed.Dr Mark HarberSpecial adviser on healthcare sustainability and climate change, Royal College of Physicians
Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
X Factor star Ella Henderson shares 'devastating' diagnosis after years of suffering
Former X Factor star Ella Henderson has taken to social media to reveal a diagnosis which she says has changed her life and 'validated' her years of suffering Ella Henderson has revealed her diagnosis with endometriosis, calling it both 'devastating' and 'validating' after years of unexplained pain. The 29-year-old X Factor alum shared the news on Instagram, opening up about the emotional and physical toll of the condition that left her doubting her own reality. The NHS defines Endometriosis as "a condition where tissue similar to the lining of the womb grows outside of it, most commonly in the pelvis, around the ovaries, fallopian tubes, and lining of the pelvis. This misplaced tissue can cause inflammation, pain, and potentially fertility issue." In a video announcing her diagnosis, the Ghost singer admitted: 'The last few years have been a bit of a rollercoaster to say the least, behind the scenes and I've really really been struggling… with not only stomach bloating and physical pain and mental health, because at one point I thought all this pain was in my head and I wasn't really believed." She detailed years of appointments and unanswered symptoms before finally receiving a diagnosis in January: 'After years of struggling with confusing and challenging health problems including stomach bloating, bowel pain and heavy periods. "Plus countless GP appointments leading to scans, tests and the feeling that maybe the pain was all in my head, I was officially diagnosed with Endometriosis in January this year.' A laparoscopy revealed severe endometriosis and scarring behind her uterus, affecting both bladder and bowel. Ella continued: 'For those who are unfamiliar with this condition (just like I was only months ago) – endometriosis occurs when cells similar to the ones in the lining of the womb are found elsewhere in the body.' Despite the difficulty of hearing the diagnosis, Henderson found relief in knowing the cause of her suffering: 'The diagnosis was a difficult one to swallow but on the other hand it feels validating and empowering. It meant I wasn't imagining things after all, and I could finally find a way forward and take control of my body.' She also highlighted the broader issue, noting how long many endure before getting answers: 'My long journey to an endometriosis diagnosis is not unique. It takes on average up to 9 years in the UK, which for many like me, can put an immense mental and physical toll on you.' Ella spoke candidly about the psychological impact: 'Living in chronic pain, not being believed, and constant misdiagnosis led to periods of depression, isolation and anxiety. If health practitioners had recognised my endometriosis symptoms sooner, I might all that have been spared.' Surgery has already improved her symptoms significantly. However, she emphasised that management is not a cure and that her treatment will be ongoing. 'Although it took a long time (like many women out there) to finally get a definitive diagnosis, it has allowed me to receive appropriate and life-changing support. "Which, in my case, was surgery, that so far helped to significantly reduce my symptoms. Unfortunately, there is no actual cure for endometriosis,' she added, 'so ongoing management will likely be part of my life, whether that's through lifestyle changes, pain management, or other treatments." Ella's post drew an outpouring of support from fans and fellow celebrities alike as they labelled her as 'brave' for sharing her diagnosis.
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
My Dad had a stroke on a Sunday. On a weekday, he might have lived
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... On a quiet Sunday afternoon in June 2023, my Dad, Anthony James Bundy, collapsed whilst out shopping at Costco in Glasgow. He was 53. One moment, he was fine. The next, he couldn't stand. He was vomiting, sweating, his eyes struggling to focus. His brain was shutting down in real time. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad At first, stroke wasn't suspected due to the lack of the 'Fast' – face, arms, speech and time – symptoms. An ambulance wasn't initially dispatched. My Dad didn't improve. Finally, an ambulance was sent. Again, stroke was not suspected. Though my family raised concerns, the system, focusing on Fast signs, did not respond as it should have. My Dad spent five-and-a-half hours in Glasgow Royal Infirmary. Then a full-blown stroke struck, this time with clear Fast symptoms. When a scan confirmed a stroke caused by a blood clot, my Dad had to be transferred to the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital. Why? Because, as the Significant Adverse Event Report (Saer) confirmed, thrombolysis at Glasgow Royal is only available between 9am and 5pm, Monday to Friday. READ MORE: New research shows strokes are on the rise in young people James Bundy, left, with his late father Anthony Bundy, his mother Selena Bundy, and sister, Anthea Bundy, right | Photograph courtesy of James Bundy Blood clot did not fully dissolve Thrombolysis has been described by the NHS as the 'clot-busting drug'. It 'dissolves the clot, restoring blood supply to that part of the brain and reduces the amount of damage caused'. The NHS then explains that it 'must be given within four-and-a-half hours of the onset of symptoms, and the sooner it is given, the more effective it is likely to be'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It's deeply concerning that this vital treatment remains unavailable at weekends in one of Scotland's major hospitals, something I believe can and should be addressed. Thankfully, it is available on a 24/7 basis at the Queen Elizabeth. My Dad finally received thrombolysis, but the blood clot did not fully dissolve. The next step in such a scenario is a thrombectomy: a surgical procedure where doctors physically remove the clot using a tiny device. A 17-hour wait But when my Dad arrived at the Queen Elizabeth, a thrombectomy was not available. The Saer report stated that, on the date he had his stroke, 'thrombectomies were only available to patients on the Hospital 2 site [the Queen Elizabeth], Monday to Friday 9am-5pm'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad My Dad waited 17 hours from the first 999 call to receive a thrombectomy because care wasn't available 24/7. The NHS states that thrombectomy is 'most effective when performed within six hours after stroke symptoms begin'. This, therefore, begs the questions: Why is thrombectomy not available everywhere in Scotland on a 24/7 basis? Why is thrombolysis not available at one of Scotland's major hospitals at the weekend? Sadly, my Dad passed away. We will never know if he would have survived if he got the emergency stroke care on time. Whilst the pain of losing your Dad is always immeasurable, the 'what if' question adds extra weight, like an anchor, to the grief. It's hard to move on when this simple, penetrating question keeps circling your mind. Hard to justify Knowing this pain, I don't want others to go through it. That's why I am campaigning to improve emergency stroke care in Scotland. If my Dad's death can result in Scots having 24/7 access to life-saving treatment, then some good will come from the pain my family continues to experience. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Since my Dad's death, thrombectomy services in Scotland have expanded slightly . In the best-equipped parts of Scotland, thrombectomy is only available between 8am and 8pm, with provision at the weekend still limited. It's hard to justify a situation where this lifesaving, time-sensitive treatment is simply unavailable for 12 hours each day, regardless of need. This doesn't reflect what we expect from an emergency service. Stroke care must be available whenever it's needed, not just part-time. Last year, Scotland's stroke charities highlighted that 'Scotland trails Ukraine in thrombectomy procedures', pointing to data showing that although around 1,000 people in Scotland qualified for a thrombectomy in 2023, just 153 received the treatment, meaning only one-in-seven stroke patients who needed it got it. Let's think about that. Imagine seven people in a waiting room, all needing the same life-saving treatment. Six of them will leave without it. If 1,000 Scots a year had a heart attack and only one in seven received the life-saving treatment in time, the front pages would be screaming. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad If 1,000 Scots needed emergency surgery and only one in seven got it, parliament would demand action. So why hasn't this changed yet for stroke patients? The NHS was founded on the principle of care at the point of need. Yet for many stroke victims in Scotland, that principle isn't being met. Cross-party support This campaign isn't about party politics. It's about patients. It's about fairness. It's about life and death. Over the past year, our campaign for 24/7 thrombectomy has gained cross-party support, from Labour, the Conservatives, the Liberal Democrats, and the Greens. There is a rare political consensus. A chance for Scotland to lead, not fall further behind. Now is the time for the Scottish Government to act, and with cross-party backing, I believe real progress is possible. I understand that 24/7 delivery can't happen overnight. It will take more trained specialists, interventional radiologists, and better coordination across services. But the first step is political will. I'm not asking for full delivery tomorrow. I'm asking for a commitment: that by the end of the next parliament, every Scot who needs a thrombectomy can get one: no matter the day or time. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In parts of England, 24/7 thrombectomy is already becoming the standard. Services are expanding in Wales and Northern Ireland. Scotland must not lag behind. Your chances of surviving a stroke shouldn't depend on where you live or what time it is.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
The five-day doctors' strike will only do harm
Between 7am on Friday 25 July and 7am on Wednesday 30 July, there will be a significant deterioration in healthcare in England and Wales. Whatever else may be claimed about patient safety protocols and safeguards, people in pain and distress will suffer more than they would if the resident doctors were working and not going on strike. After all, if the coming five days of industrial action were likely to go unnoticed, the strike would not be taking place. It is hard to see how, over the next week or so, lives will not be put at more risk than if the hospitals and clinics were working normally – and that is still, sadly, an unsatisfactory situation to start from. Indeed, there will be unwelcome extra pressure on the NHS for some time to come, because of the backlog of postponed procedures that will have to be cleared. These may not be as severe as after past disputes, because this time hospital managers are not prioritising emergency care to the same extent, and are protecting scheduled, 'elective' surgery to a greater extent. There is clearly a will on the part of management to ensure that those who cause this interruption in service do not then go on to receive generous overtime for reducing the backlogs they themselves have created. None of this is anything that the striking doctors desire, and there's no reason to doubt that many feel they are being forced into this position. Those on duty will still do their very best for their patients. Nonetheless, the doctors should ask themselves whether all of the misery, and worse, that will inevitably occur is necessary this time. There are strong reasons why this round of industrial action will not be worth it. First, no group of strikers can succeed without public support. In the past, under the Conservatives, the incessant NHS strikes by resident doctors, nurses, support staff and consultants were, in fact, solidly backed by the public, who sympathised with their cause even if it meant that the medical treatment they needed might be postponed. Now, the support is much softer, and a majority of the population opposes the strikes. There have been major changes, too, since the previous round of strikes, all connected to the election of a Labour government committed to the survival of the NHS. One of the first things the new chancellor, Rachel Reeves, did on arriving at the Treasury last July was to pay the salary increases recommended by the independent pay review body in full – a 22 per cent uplift over two years, a startling settlement by comparison with most other workers. Not long after that, Ms Reeves raised taxes to pay for an immediate programme to reduce waiting lists, recruit and train more staff, and invest for the longer term in the NHS. The new health and social care secretary, Wes Streeting, also announced his plan to abolish NHS England, and to implement radical reforms to improve productivity. Taken together, these developments should have signalled to NHS staff that this was a government that wanted the best for the service. In this context, at the start of the journey to a renewed NHS, and with that sizeable pay rise having been implemented, it feels very wrong that the doctors should undermine these efforts, and the progress that has already been recorded, by setting things back again for weeks, if not months, to come. Worse than that, to many it will seem as though the NHS is unfixable, and that it needs more fundamental change. If it appears that Labour can't do much better than the Conservatives at making the NHS work, people will wonder whether it is time for a more radical approach. If they cannot get the treatment they need, when they need it, then they will be more receptive to the siren calls from figures such as Nigel Farage for a French-style insurance system (but, he never adds, without French-style funding). The doctors, in other words, may or may not win a bigger pay award, but they are gambling with the future of the very thing they profess to love – the National Health Service itself, free at the point of use, and paid for by general taxation. The striking doctors should also examine once again the merits of their claim – for a 29.2 per cent award. To everyone else, this looks like an outlandish figure, even as a starting point for talks. It is not part of any pay review recommendation. It is based on a calculation of how much doctors' pay scales would have to change (on a disputed measurement of inflation) to bring them back in real terms to levels prevailing in 2008, before they were eroded. But how many groups of workers would like their pay restored in real terms to some advantageous point in the past, when times were better? The doctors reply that they'd love for everyone to get such a rise, but everyone knows that's not possible – and, given public sentiment, it's not realistic for them either. In short, the chances are that the doctors will not win their strike. Any improvements they do secure will be modest when set against their tarnished reputation and the damage they will do to the trust the public want to place in the NHS. If the doctors do force a pay increase that requires another hike in taxes and causes a reduction in NHS services, then it is not going to be sustainable – because the public will not tolerate it, and the NHS won't survive for the coming decade. The more this strike hurts, the more chance there is that it will, in the long run, fail. It is not worth it.
