logo
Country Life: Devcich Farm Shines A Light On Dalmatian Pioneers

Country Life: Devcich Farm Shines A Light On Dalmatian Pioneers

Scoop11-05-2025

Article – RNZ
The story of a pioneering family of Dalmatian immigrants has been kept alive through a cluster of old sheds on the Devcich farm near Thames.
, for Country Life
Old pack horse saddles slung over beams, a sack of ancient kauri gum and a well-thumbed Ready Reckoner on the counter tell just one chapter of the Devcich Farm story.
The items are in the farm's old trading post where, early last century, gum diggers and loggers came to buy stores for their camps up the Kauaeranga Valley on the Coromandel Peninsula.
There's also an old blacksmith's forge, a timber mill with sawpit and a winery complete with antique wine-making tools and a pungent aroma of sherry.
The Devcich family, originally from Dalmatia, now part of Croatia, farmed here last century. Their legacy, the Devcich Farmstead, is listed as a place of special significance with Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga, for 'reflecting significant developments in Dalmatian settlement in early twentieth-century New Zealand'.
The sheds, now clustered under a Croatian flag, also reveal their industriousness and range of skills.
Simun Devcich arrived in New Zealand from Podgora with his two brothers, Marion Anton and Nicola just after the turn of the 20th century. They worked their way up through gum digging and trading and into farming, buying the block, much bigger then, in 1915.
Simun had married another immigrant from Dalmatia, Matija Mercep, in 1913 and eventually took on the farm from his brothers, going from dairy to sheep farming, with his three sons working alongside.
Commercial farming has stopped now but Simun's granddaughter, Lorenza Devcich, has restored the buildings and runs a menagerie of coloured sheep, llamas, Highland cattle, emus and assorted exotic birds on the land which remains, with tourists often staying in the old homestead.
'My grandfather and his two brothers, they came from Yugoslavia to escape the army.
'Even for years after, the young men would leave because as soon as they got of age … they would get thrown into the army.'
'My grandfather had about 11 pack horses that he and his boys, my uncles and father, used to pack supplies right up into all the camps at the top end of the valley.
'When they'd first come here, a lot of [the gum diggers followed by loggers] had no money, so a lot of it was on credit.
'He also bought gum and sold it. So, they'd come back here with the gum, and that's how he'd get paid.'
Dalmatian immigrants were among New Zealand's wine making pioneers and the Devcich family was producing wine on a small scale from the late 1920s, under their Golden Valley label.
Lorenza remembers helping her father Ivan in the wine shed which still houses a wooden fermenting vat and other wine-making tools.
'And there's probably the last standing bottle of sherry up there, still with some sherry in it. It hasn't been touched. And maybe it could even be one of the ones that I bottled, because my job here was the dog's body.'
Lorenza still tends to the 80-year-old grape vines today, using 'the worst talkback radio station' she can find to blare out and scare away the birds.
'The sherry and the wine were all made from grapes grown on the property. All the beautiful, big black Albany Surprise, I think it's called, … is still there producing.
While the saw mill now stands quiet and the trading post has shut its doors, the farm courtyard is now home to a strutting peacock, brightly coloured pheasants and guinea fowl.
Lorenza stores their feed in a shed once used to stable Simun's beloved racehorses, an interest he took up in later life.
'They got fed all the lovely, cooked barley and everything. You'd go into the house, and you'd smell it cooking on the old coal range … all the old farm horses, the pack horses and everything else, just lucky if they got thrown some hay.'
She has somewhat sad memories of Simun.
'He got kicked in the stomach by a racehorse and ruptured his stomach, and he survived that, but then not long after, he had a stroke.
'I used to love sitting down talking to him, but when I'd start talking to him, get him to tell me the history, he'd get upset and start crying.'
He died in 1971, once a strong active man and very much the 'boss' in his day, and one of the pioneers of the valley, Lorenza said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Principals Warn Education Ministry Instruction On School Opening Hours 'Not Feasible'
Principals Warn Education Ministry Instruction On School Opening Hours 'Not Feasible'

Scoop

time3 days ago

  • Scoop

Principals Warn Education Ministry Instruction On School Opening Hours 'Not Feasible'

Secondary principals warn they cannot work with new Education Ministry guidelines that set a higher bar for deciding if schools are "open for instruction". The ministry recently told schools they would not be considered "open for instruction" if only some year groups were present, or they were only providing supervision. Secondary principals told RNZ it was a serious problem because many secondary schools had a staggered start to the school year, bringing different year groups back on different days, and most allowed their senior students to study from home during secondary school exams at the end of the year. Secondary Principals Association Louise Anaru said if those days were not counted as "open for instruction", schools would not be able to find enough days in the year to operate. The ministry had told schools to continue with their usual practices this year but the new interpretation would apply next year. Asked by RNZ why the change was required it said: "While the regulations have not changed, the guidance has been developed to support consistent teaching and learning across the school system, making sure all students receive the minimum guaranteed time they are entitled to each year. "Further guidance is being developed to provide clarity for secondary schools around end-of-year arrangements and exam-related closures." The ministry did not say whether schools had been misinterpreting the rules and opening for too few days each year. The rules around school opening were based on half-days - periods of two hours or more in which the school was open. Schools had to be open for one half-day before noon and one half-day after noon each day of the school term. Primary schools must be open for at least 382 half-days and secondaries for at least 376 half-days, and no schools could be open for more than 402 half-days. Anaru said the ministry's guidelines would have a big impact on secondary schools. "We have sought legal opinion on it which also concurred that it just wouldn't be possible for secondary schools to comply with these new guidelines. "There's not enough days in the year to be open for instruction using these new guidelines and really it would just create a very confused situation for schools." She said the association's legal advice was that the ministry's interpretation was wrong. "The ministry's guidelines do not comply with the open for instruction requirements as part of the Education Act. It's an interpretation which is just not feasible for schools to implement," she said. Anaru said the association had not discussed whether to take legal action. Burnside High School principal Scott Haines said the new directive would have a huge effect on every secondary school in the country. "The new interpretation will have a seismic impact on both how this school, Burnside High School, operates and on how I think probably just about every other secondary school in New Zealand will operate because it represents a very different position and interpretation than has been the custom and practice for as long as I've been in education, which is now 25 years." Haines said a staggered start to the year was essential for a big school like Burnside. Under the new rules that would have to stop, or count as days outside the normal school year - but that would mean using some of the 10 days a year that teachers could be called back to schools when they were not open for instruction. "We're already leaning on those days with events such as parent interviews in the evenings, open evenings... so there's already a significant call on that resource. If the sense is that we need to rely more heavily on that then we're going to need more days in the collective agreement," he said. The guidance to schools also said teachers' collective agreements required unions to work with school boards to ensure schools remained open for instruction during paid union meetings. NZEI national secretary Stephanie Mills said its members recognised closing primary schools had a significant effect so it arranged its paid meetings accordingly. "We don't believe the situation with paid union meetings is even relevant to that guidance that the ministry's issued about 'open for instruction'. There's no change to the legislation in terms of their rights under the Employment Relations Act to paid union meetings and so we're just going to continue with business as usual," she said.

Principals warn Education Ministry instruction on school opening hours 'not feasible'
Principals warn Education Ministry instruction on school opening hours 'not feasible'

RNZ News

time4 days ago

  • RNZ News

Principals warn Education Ministry instruction on school opening hours 'not feasible'

Principals said secondary schools would struggle to find enough days in a year to operate under the new guidelines. (File photo) Photo: 123RF Secondary principals warn they cannot work with new Education Ministry guidelines that set a higher bar for deciding if schools are "open for instruction" . The ministry recently told schools they would not be considered "open for instruction" if only some year groups were present, or they were only providing supervision. Secondary principals told RNZ it was a serious problem because many secondary schools had a staggered start to the school year, bringing different year groups back on different days, and most allowed their senior students to study from home during secondary school exams at the end of the year. Secondary Principals Association Louise Anaru said if those days were not counted as "open for instruction", schools would not be able to find enough days in the year to operate. The ministry had told schools to continue with their usual practices this year but the new interpretation would apply next year. Asked by RNZ why the change was required it said: "While the regulations have not changed, the guidance has been developed to support consistent teaching and learning across the school system, making sure all students receive the minimum guaranteed time they are entitled to each year. "Further guidance is being developed to provide clarity for secondary schools around end-of-year arrangements and exam-related closures." The ministry did not say whether schools had been misinterpreting the rules and opening for too few days each year. The rules around school opening were based on half-days - periods of two hours or more in which the school was open. Schools had to be open for one half-day before noon and one half-day after noon each day of the school term. Primary schools must be open for at least 382 half-days and secondaries for at least 376 half-days, and no schools could be open for more than 402 half-days. Anaru said the ministry's guidelines would have a big impact on secondary schools. "We have sought legal opinion on it which also concurred that it just wouldn't be possible for secondary schools to comply with these new guidelines. "There's not enough days in the year to be open for instruction using these new guidelines and really it would just create a very confused situation for schools." She said the association's legal advice was that the ministry's interpretation was wrong. "The ministry's guidelines do not comply with the open for instruction requirements as part of the Education Act. It's an interpretation which is just not feasible for schools to implement," she said. Anaru said the association had not discussed whether to take legal action. Burnside High School principal Scott Haines said the new directive would have a huge effect on every secondary school in the country. "The new interpretation will have a seismic impact on both how this school, Burnside High School, operates and on how I think probably just about every other secondary school in New Zealand will operate because it represents a very different position and interpretation than has been the custom and practice for as long as I've been in education, which is now 25 years." Haines said a staggered start to the year was essential for a big school like Burnside. Under the new rules that would have to stop, or count as days outside the normal school year - but that would mean using some of the 10 days a year that teachers could be called back to schools when they were not open for instruction. "We're already leaning on those days with events such as parent interviews in the evenings, open evenings... so there's already a significant call on that resource. If the sense is that we need to rely more heavily on that then we're going to need more days in the collective agreement," he said. The guidance to schools also said teachers' collective agreements required unions to work with school boards to ensure schools remained open for instruction during paid union meetings. NZEI national secretary Stephanie Mills said its members recognised closing primary schools had a significant effect so it arranged its paid meetings accordingly. "We don't believe the situation with paid union meetings is even relevant to that guidance that the ministry's issued about 'open for instruction'. There's no change to the legislation in terms of their rights under the Employment Relations Act to paid union meetings and so we're just going to continue with business as usual," she said. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

What does the government consider a couple, anyway?
What does the government consider a couple, anyway?

RNZ News

time21-06-2025

  • RNZ News

What does the government consider a couple, anyway?

RNZ's money correspondent Susan Edmunds answers your questions. Photo: RNZ Send your questions to How is a couple relationship determined? If two people are in a relationship but physically and financially remain independent can they remain as solo rather than as a couple? I've had lots of questions over the years about how government departments define a relationship. It can be quite tricky. From what I've seen, sometimes people who don't necessarily think of themselves as being a couple can sometimes be classified as one if they seek help from the Ministry of Social Development (MSD), or other agencies. MSD says people who are married, in a civil union or de facto are counted as in a relationship. There are few things that contribute to being considered "de facto". They include being emotionally committed to each other, financially interdependent, sharing responsibilities, holidaying and socialising together, sharing bills, having a sexual relationship, supporting each other and other people thinking of them as a couple. Even if you don't live together, you could be captured, if you're apart for health reasons, financial reasons or work reasons, or because one of you needs rest home care. If you're determined to be in a relationship, the government expects you to be willing to financially support each other. My partner and I have a contracting out relationship property agreement and for practical reasons share only our living costs. In that situation, if one of us is in need of care, does the government still include both sets of assets and money? If the answer is 'yes', surely this is yet another example of how making one's own arrangements and plans again is undermined by the state for older people. In our situation it is actually not an issue in reality, but I can imagine how it might be for many others. And related to that, relationship property rules don't really kick in until a three year or so mark. Again, is that how MSD define a relationship? There is not a relationship duration test, and your contracting out agreement will not make a difference unless you have actually separated and are no longer a couple. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store