Anas Sarwar's silence as UK Government fails Gaza is deafening
ANAS Sarwar's silence over the past week on Gaza has been deafening.
It's an issue on which the Scottish Labour leader, on occasion, has taken a welcome stronger stance – at least compared with the majority of his party colleagues.
But he hasn't raised his head above the parapet when it has really mattered.
Already, in October 2023, he accused Israel of a "clear breach" of international law. David Lammy U-turned on that assertion in March – and he has said nothing on this.
READ MORE: Residents in Edinburgh suburb 'forced to pay £40k for retrofit scheme', report warns
When I spoke with Sarwar at the Labour conference in Liverpool last year, he urged the UK Government to help Palestinians with family in the UK resettle here via a bespoke visa scheme.
But when Keir Starmer explicitly ruled out a family visa scheme for Palestinians in February, he remained silent. He said nothing, again, when the Prime Minister closed down the legal loophole that allowed a Palestinian family to settle here.
Last month, he defied the central UK leadership and called for arms exports to Israel to end.
(Image: PA)
'To me, it is clear that the actions of the Israeli forces do not comply with international humanitarian law and therefore the sales of arms to Israel should stop,' Sarwar said in a speech to delegates at the Scottish Trades Union Congress annual summit.
But when asked about the issue last week amid the legal case against the UK Government, he instead said Labour should not allow the export of any "proactive arms' to Israel.
He added that there was a legal 'grey area' around whether parts for F-35 fighter jets, which have been documented being used in Gaza, counted as offensive or defensive.
And now, at a time when Israel has restated its ambition to ethnically cleanse Gaza and as the UN has warned that 14,000 children could die from famine, at a time Sarwar could be pushing UK Labour on all the points above – he has done none of the above, publicly at least.
Margaret Curran is back
In other news, Baroness Curran has been appointed a minister in the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero.
The 66-year-old, who lost her Glasgow seat in the Commons at the 2015 election, had previously served as shadow Scottish secretary.
Her son, Chris Murray, is Scottish Labour MP for Edinburgh East and Musselburgh.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Statesman
20 minutes ago
- New Statesman
Why Keir Starmer has purged Labour rebels again
Photo by Isabel Infantes - WPA Pool / Getty Images. Keir Starmer's premiership began with discord, not harmony. Just three weeks after Labour's landslide victory, seven MPs had the whip suspended for voting in favour of a SNP amendment backing the abolition of the two-child benefit cap (something Starmer has since described in private as his personal priority). Almost exactly a year on, and in the aftermath of the mass welfare revolt, Starmer has enacted new reprisals. Four Labour MPs – Neil Duncan-Jordan, Chris Hinchcliff, Brian Leishman and Rachael Maskell – have had the whip removed for 'repeated breaches of party discipline' while an additional three – Rosena Allin-Khan, Bell Ribeiro-Addy and Mohammad Yasin – have lost their trade envoy posts (all seven were among the 47 Labour MPs who voted against the welfare bill in its amended form). The latter move is unsurprising: trade envoys are appointed to support the government and, as such, are expected to follow collective responsibility. More contentious among MPs is the renewed targeting of backbenchers. But one Starmer ally was unrepentant: 'These people were openly and publicly organising against the government whose programme they were elected to deliver,' they said (three of the four whipless MPs were elected for the first time in 2024). 'Government doesn't work unless they feel the weight of rebelling against it in the flagrant way these guys did'. In language that enraged some inside Labour, Maskell wrote in the New Statesman: 'What happened last Tuesday, on 1 July, was more significant than a policy climb-down. Power shifted. Keir Starmer's government was forced to recognise that autocracy is no way to rule: power is given by consent and can equally be taken away.' By acting now, No 10 has sent a warning to would-be ringleaders of anticipated rebellions over special educational needs reform, the two-child limit and the forthcoming immigration bill. But the timing – a week before the summer recess – has stunned MPs who believed Starmer had entered a more conciliatory phase of his premiership – more carrot and less stick (Downing Street has spoken of 'the need to bring people with us'). And there are at least two unflattering historical comparisons that are being made among MPs. The first is with Tony Blair who endured numerous revolts but allowed rebels such as Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell to retain the whip even as they broke it hundreds of times. 'Both Blair and [Gordon] Brown were relaxed because they were always confident that they could win the argument and didn't need threats,' John McDonnell, who lost the Labour whip last July, told me. The second is with Dominic Cummings. It was Boris Johnson's strategist who in recent history pioneered the tactic of removing the whip from rebels – 21 Conservative MPs suffered this fate in September 2019 after seeking to thwart a no-deal Brexit. This was ruthlessness but for a clear purpose: removing all obstacles to the UK leaving the EU. The challenge for Starmer – after multiple U-turns – is that even sympathisers remain uncertain what his is. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Related
Telegraph
20 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Talking freely about Islam ‘feared more than any other religion'
People are more fearful of speaking freely about Islam than any other religion, a survey has found. Almost twice as many adults feel they have to hold back on expressing their views about the faith as they do for Christianity, according to research by the Commission for Countering Extremism (CCE), which advises the Government. The study, to be published on Thursday, also found that Islam was the only religion which more people felt was protected 'too much' rather than 'too little'. A quarter of those who held back on speaking out on religious topics said they did so because of fears about their safety. Some 46 per cent said they had done so to avoid causing offence or starting an argument. The study, based on interviews with 2,500 people, was conducted by Ipsos UK for the CCE.
BreakingNews.ie
20 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Taoiseach criticises US diplomat who told Irish Government to ‘sober up'
The Taioseach has rejected comments from an American diplomat who said the Irish Government needs to 'sober up'. US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee criticised the Irish Government over its plans to implement legislation that would ban the imports of goods originating in Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories. Advertisement Mr Huckabee wrote in a post on X: 'Did the Irish fall into a vat of Guinness and propose something so stupid that it would be attributed to act of diplomatic intoxication? 'It will harm Arabs as much as Israelis. 'Sober up Ireland! Call (the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Aiffairs) and say you're sorry!' Asked about the comments on Wednesday, Micheál Martin said: 'I reject the comments made by the ambassador. Advertisement 'The situation is very serious in Gaza including an appalling loss of human life. Terrible war crimes are being committed. 'Ireland has consistently condemned Hamas and we equally condemn Israeli breaches of international humanitarian law in Gaza. 'The slaughter of children must stop. The slaughter of innocent civilians queuing for food must stop. What is going on is beyond any moral compass. 'Ireland stands for peace and a political pathway forward.' Advertisement Criticism of the Occupied Territories Bill also came from figures in the Israeli government, which Mr Martin has levelled criticism at for the ongoing war in Gaza. Mr Martin said: 'I think Israel needs to focus on ending the war that is slaughtering innocent children and civilians. 'This kind of row is ridiculous, given the enormity of killing and the enormity of the death and destruction that's happening in Gaza – and the continuing shocking behaviour in the West Bank and the freedom that's given to extreme settlers to destroy settlements and housing belonging to Palestinians who've been there on that land for generations. 'The time for this war to end this has long passed.' Advertisement He added: 'There's a moral issue here, there's an ethical issue at this stage. 'People queuing for food have been slaughtered. Bombs are landing on houses and children have been slaughtered.'
