3.5% Excise Tax on transfers: What Trump's bill means for global Indians, Poonam Mirchandani decodes
President Trump and the Republican Government introduced a new bill 'The One, Big, Beautiful Bill', on May 12th 2025, which was approved by the House of Representatives by a 215-214 vote on May 22nd 2025 and is expected to be placed before the Senate later this month.
ADVERTISEMENT Amongst the many changes proposed by the Government, one key change is introduction of Excise Tax of 3.5% (originally proposed as 5%) which shall be levied on any remittance amount transferred from United States of America ('Remittance Transfers')
This change is applicable for all senders of such Remittance Transfers. The only exception being US Citizens or Nationals, subject to such remittance being undertaken by them through a 'qualified remittance transfer provider'.
The Bill introduces parameters for qualified remittance transfer provider, which is an entity who enters into compliance agreement with the government agreeing to verify the status of remitter as citizen or national of US ('verified United States sender')If the sender is an individual, credit shall be available for aforesaid taxes paid subject to the verified United States sender mentioning his/her social security number as well as that of spouse (if sender is married) in return of tax for the taxable yearWhat this means simplistically, is that when any person who does not qualify as a verified United States sender, makes a Remittance Transfer, the remittance transfer provider will deduct a sum of 3.5% on the amount of transfer before completing the transaction.
ADVERTISEMENT The interesting part is that the Government has also introduced a secondary liability on the remittance transfer provider if they fail to make such deduction and deposit it with the authorities every quarter, they will be liable to pay the unpaid taxes personallyTherefore, every immigrant including Green card holders, immigrants on visas like H1B, L1, L2 etc. all will be impacted by this Remittance Transfer Excise Tax. In fact, even US Citizens if they don't make remittance through a qualified remittance transfer provider will have to pay this tax
ADVERTISEMENT What the bill does not clarify is the definition of 'sender' for the purpose of this proposed Remittance Transfer excise tax. Though the anti-conduit rules have been extended to remittance transfers, there is no clear provisions on whether corporates, entities, who hold accounts in US and make Remittance Transfers will have to pay this tax
ADVERTISEMENT The proposed Bill also does not clarify on how inter correspondent banking transfers be treated especially for international investors who are not US citizen or resident or Green Card holders or any other category of resident alien, but own investments through US brokers and US banks. Though industry insiders are of the view that the tax will be only applicable for remitters who are resident in the US at time of transfer, how the qualified remittance transfer provider will distinguish such an international investor will be a key point of deliberation.
ADVERTISEMENT It will be interesting to see how the law will shape up soon, as Senators work on developing changes to the Bill prior to placing it before the Senate later this month for approvalThe Bill does mention the Effective Date for this new Remittance Transfer Excise Tax as being with respect to transfers made after December 31, 2025. Similarly, tax credits, if available, shall apply to taxable years ending after December 31, 2025
NRIs historically have remitted funds earned in the US either back to India or invest them outside the US. In both scenarios, they will now have to pay 3.5% Remittance Transfer Excise Tax on any amounts which they remit after December 31, 2025 This may activate a stream of outflow of money from US accounts by NRIs and other immigrants to their home countries or locations outside US to sidestep trigger of aforesaid tax. We anticipate families initiating planning for historical funds prior to the changes being implemented as well as restructuring their present account holdings outside US. However, post December 31, 2025 this window gets closed especially for individuals who generate regular income in US, who will have no choice but to pay this taxOn a separate note, the Bill puts at rest a constant debate on the sunset clause for US Estate and Gift Tax Exemption amount. Under the proposed Bill, the original exemption amount of USD 5,000,000 has been substituted with USD 15,000,000 making it effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025. This will be a relief for many US Persons who are concerned that the current limits of USD 13.99 million will stand reduced to the original number of USD 5 million. With the introduction of the revised provisions this fear will lay at rest as the government now has proposed scaling up the base limit to USD 15 million with future adjustments for inflation
Given the constantly evolving cross border legal and tax landscape, Indian HNIs and family businesses need to reassess their global financial planning. As cross-border tax regimes tighten, having structured, compliant platforms becomes critical. The US will continue to be a desired location for Indians while the UK remains a viable wealth gateway, particularly with recent Free Trade Agreement (FTA) gains, but each jurisdiction now carries unique tax implications that must be managed prudently and in a compliant manner with proper planning and advice.
(The author is MD, Wealth Planning & Family Solutions, LGT Wealth India)
(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of Economic Times)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
21 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
What's in the latest version of Trump's big bill now before US Senate
At some 940-pages, the legislation is a sprawling collection of tax breaks, spending cuts and other Republican priorities, including new money for national defense and deportations. Now it's up to Congress to decide whether President Donald Trump's signature's domestic policy package will become law. US Senators were working through the weekend to pass the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' and send it back to the House for a final vote. (Getty Images via AFP) Trump told Republicans, who hold majority power in the House and Senate, to skip their holiday vacations and deliver the bill by the Fourth of July. Senators were working through the weekend to pass the bill and send it back to the House for a final vote. Democrats are united against it. Here's the latest on what's in the bill. There could be changes as lawmakers negotiate. Tax cuts are the priority Republicans say the bill is crucial because there would be a massive tax increase after December when tax breaks from Trump's first term expire. The legislation contains roughly $3.8 trillion in tax cuts. The existing tax rates and brackets would become permanent under the bill. It temporarily would add new tax breaks that Trump campaigned on: no taxes on tips, overtime pay or some automotive loans, along with a bigger $6,000 deduction in the Senate draft for older adults who earn no more than $75,000 a year. It would boost the $2,000 child tax credit to $2,200 under the Senate proposal. Families at lower income levels would not see the full amount. A cap on state and local deductions, called SALT, would quadruple to $40,000 for five years. It's a provision important to New York and other high tax states, though the House wanted it to last for 10 years. There are scores of business-related tax cuts. The wealthiest households would see a $12,000 increase from the legislation, which would cost the poorest people $1,600 a year, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office analysis of the House's version. Middle-income taxpayers would see a tax break of $500 to $1,500, the CBO said. Money for deportations, a border wall and the Golden Dome The bill would provide some $350 billion for Trump's border and national security agenda, including $46 billion for the U.S.-Mexico border wall and $45 billion for 100,000 migrant detention facility beds, as he aims to fulfill his promise of the largest mass deportation operation in U.S. history. Money would go for hiring 10,000 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers, with $10,000 signing bonuses and a surge of Border Patrol officers, as well. The goal is to deport some 1 million people per year. The homeland security secretary would have a new $10 billion fund for grants for states that help with federal immigration enforcement and deportation actions. The attorney general would have $3.5 billion for a similar fund, known as Bridging Immigration-related Deficits Experienced Nationwide, or BIDEN, referring to former Democratic President Joe Biden. To help pay for it all, immigrants would face various new fees, including when seeking asylum protections. For the Pentagon, the bill would provide billions for ship building, munitions systems, and quality of life measures for servicemen and women, as well as $25 billion for the development of the Golden Dome missile defense system. The Defense Department would have $1 billion for border security. How to pay for it? Cuts to Medicaid and other programs To help partly offset the lost tax revenue and new spending, Republicans aim to cut back some long-running government programs: Medicaid, food stamps, green energy incentives and others. It's essentially unraveling the accomplishments of the past two Democratic presidents, Biden and Barack Obama. Republicans argue they are trying to rightsize the safety net programs for the population they were initially designed to serve, mainly pregnant women, the disabled and children, and root out what they describe as waste, fraud and abuse. The package includes new 80-hour-a-month work requirements for many adults receiving Medicaid and food stamps, including older people up to age 65. Parents of children 14 and older would have to meet the program's work requirements. There's also a proposed new $35 co-payment that can be charged to patients using Medicaid services. Some 80 million people rely on Medicaid, which expanded under Obama's Affordable Care Act, and 40 million use the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program. Most already work, according to analysts. All told, the CBO estimates that under the House-passed bill, at least 10.9 million more people would go without health coverage and 3 million more would not qualify for food stamps. The Senate proposes a $25 billion Rural Hospital Transformation Program to help offset reduced Medicaid dollars. It's a new addition, intended to win over holdout GOP senators and a coalition of House Republicans warning that the proposed Medicaid provider tax cuts would hurt rural hospitals. Both the House and Senate bills propose a dramatic rollback of the Biden-era green energy tax breaks for electric vehicles. They also would phase out or terminate the various production and investment tax credits companies use to stand up wind, solar and other renewable energy projects. In total, cuts to Medicaid, food stamps and green energy programs would be expected to produce at least $1.5 trillion in savings. Trump savings accounts and so, so much more A number of extra provisions reflect other GOP priorities. The House and Senate both have a new children's savings program, called Trump Accounts, with a potential $1,000 deposit from the Treasury. The Senate provided $40 million to establish Trump's long-sought 'National Garden of American Heroes.' There's a new excise tax on university endowments. A $200 tax on gun silencers and short-barreled rifles and shotguns was eliminated. One provision bars money to family planning providers, namely Planned Parenthood, while $88 million is earmarked for a pandemic response accountability committee. Another section expands the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act, a hard-fought provision from Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri, for those impacted by nuclear development and testing. Billions would go for the Artemis moon mission and for exploration to Mars. The bill would deter states from regulating artificial intelligence by linking certain federal AI infrastructure money to maintaining a freeze. Seventeen Republican governors asked GOP leaders to drop the provision. Also, the interior secretary would be directed to sell certain Bureau of Land Management acreage to provide for housing, but senators said that measure could be stripped out during the amendment process. Additionally, a provision would increase the nation's debt limit, by $5 trillion, to allow continued borrowing to pay already accrued bills. What's the final cost? Altogether, keeping the existing tax breaks and adding the new ones is expected to cost $3.8 trillion over the decade, the CBO says in its analysis of the House bill. An analysis of the Senate draft is pending. The CBO estimates the House-passed package would add $2.4 trillion to the nation's deficits over the decade. Or not, depending on how one does the math. Senate Republicans are proposing a unique strategy of not counting the existing tax breaks as a new cost because those breaks are already 'current policy.' Senators say the Senate Budget Committee chairman has the authority to set the baseline for the preferred approach. Under the Senate GOP view, the tax provisions cost $441 billion, according to the congressional Joint Committee on Taxation. Democrats and others say this is 'magic math' that obscures the true costs of the GOP tax breaks. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget puts the Senate tally at $4.2 trillion over the decade.
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
'R*pist': Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce's photo with MAGA-linked NFL stars is sparking Swiftie outrage online
Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce faced backlash after posing with Will Compton and Taylor Lewan (Getty Images) Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce are no strangers to the limelight, but their recent photo with controversial podcast hosts Will Compton and Taylor Lewan—known for their MAGA connections—has ignited backlash across social media. What was meant to be a lighthearted moment at Kelce's 'Tight End University' turned into a flashpoint for political tensions between Swift's fanbase and the couple's new associations. Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce's flex photo with right-wing podcasters raises eyebrows among loyal fans The now-viral image, posted by the hosts of the "Bussin' With The Boys" podcast, shows Swift and Kelce posing arm-in-arm with the former NFL players. The caption read: 'Confirmed: Taylor Swift is FOR THE BOYS,' a statement that didn't land well with her liberal-leaning Swiftie fanbase. Will Compton and Taylor Lewan, who run the podcast, previously interviewed Donald Trump ahead of the last U.S. presidential election. UFC boss Dana White even credited the podcast with boosting Trump's campaign momentum, noting it helped "propel Trump to victory over Kamala Harris." That endorsement, combined with the duo's public MAGA affiliations—including a photo-op with Trump at a UFC event in 2023—has made them polarizing figures. Fans were quick to express their disappointment. A fan @callsmybluff wrote, 'and taylor swift the so called '#1 enemy of republicans' is hanging out with republicans cause her little boyfriend is friends with them and even imitating trump's pose. So now what?' Another user @beloved_hhost wrote, 'how many photos is it gonna take for swifties to realize that she's actively choosing to take photos & associate with these kinds of people? these are the people travis associates with & support the chiefs 'sHe DoEsN't GeT a SaY' fucking save it bc yes she does.' Another user @Cinnemafill wrote, 'Taylor swift hanging out with her maga boyfriend and his rxpist friend but sure Joe alwyn is the evil guy here. ' Taylor Swift & Travis Kelce faces heavy backlash (SS via Twitter) A deep contradiction between Taylor Swift's past activism and her recent company What makes this controversy more explosive is Swift's past political stance. In 2024, she publicly endorsed Kamala Harris in her bid for re-election. At the time, Trump fired back on Truth Social: 'I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT!' He later doubled down with another insult, asking, 'Has anyone noticed that, since I said 'I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT,' she's no longer 'HOT'?' Many fans see her recent association with Trump-linked personalities as a betrayal. One Swiftie commented, 'Imagine being rich enough to make the world a slightly better place... then actively choosing to surround yourself with these thugs instead.' Also Read: Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce's NFL flex pose sparks political controversy over Donald Trump comparison Swift and Kelce have yet to address the backlash directly. But with her image so tied to progressive ideals, the optics of this moment could cast a long shadow on the public's perception of her—and their seemingly storybook romance. Game On Season 1 continues with Mirabai Chanu's inspiring story. Watch Episode 2 here.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Whither America?
Quo Vadis? While we were growing up, America was the El Dorado, where every dream could turn into a reality with effort and enthusiasm. Those who left for those pastures came home to tell us that the country was one of immense promise for the young and inspired. They spoke of the universities with their libraries, research facilities, state-of-the-art laboratories, and wide campuses with students streaming in from all parts of the world in search of knowledge. A veritable repository of learning and opportunity. America has been the land of the immigrant from the moment the first immigrants stepped off the Mayflower on to American shores. With imagination and creativity, grit and struggle, with encouragement and opportunity they carved out lives for themselves and contributed to the idea of America, and its ideals of freedom and diligence. Today, owing to the exclusionary vision of the powers-that-be, international students are barred from the universities, Green Card holders are under threat, and migrants are treated without humanity. So many individuals of different origins have made the country great in all fields of learning and culture and it is not worthwhile to go back to the drawing board. The country can only become greater with greater cooperation from all countries and more humane, inclusive policies. All progress rises out of mutual interdependence and the immigrant heritage is truly what makes America exceptional. It is disappointing that the very ideals of freedom of expression and fairness of opportunity that America stood guardian for since the founding fathers should be under siege now. What the celebrated writer Toni Morrison said, 'In this country American means white. Everybody else has to hyphenate,' seems to ring true today. It would do well for America to hark back to the voice of Benjamin Franklin who said, 'God grant that not only the love of liberty but a thorough knowledge of the Rights of Man may pervade all the nations of the Earth so that a philosopher may set his foot anywhere on its surface and say, 'This is my country.'' While we are far away from this idealised world today where every country is zealously guarding its turf, it would be right to realise the world would be more liveable if we can think in terms of mutual respect and dependence. sudhadevi_nayak@
