We must always remember the Holocaust and not make it a political issue
My wife, Joan, and I were fortunate to live in Washington, D.C., in 1980 when the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum was created. A council was established to oversee the mission of the museum, which is 'to promote the memory of the Holocaust, to advance knowledge about it, and inspire action to prevent genocide and to promote human dignity.' The museum encourages its visitors to reflect upon the moral and spiritual questions raised by the events of the Holocaust, as well as their own responsibilities, living in a democracy rich with people of diverse backgrounds, beliefs and lived experiences.
The council consists of 68 members — 55 chosen by the president of the United States, five members from the Senate and five members from the House of Representatives, and three members from the Cabinet. They serve five-year terms.
The Committee of Conscious was established by the council and plays a crucial role in fulfilling this mission by alerting a national conscious, influencing policy makers and stimulating worldwide action to halt genocide and related crimes against humanity.
I was also honored and privileged, in the mid 1980s, to be selected to serve on the Second-Generation Advisory Committee to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum by Nobel Peace Prize winner, Holocaust survivor and author Elie Wiesel. Over the years, I have known and worked with many of the council members. There are members from both major U.S. political parties, and vacant seats are filled by the sitting U.S. president. But one thing they all have had in common is that they all believed in fulfilling the mission of the museum.
More: Rabbi: 'I am deeply offended' by the Legislature's resolution proclaiming 'Christ is King'
The museum was dedicated on April 22, 1993. On that date, I was sitting four rows back from where President Bill Clinton and Wiesel were standing on the podium giving remarks. One of the last things that Wiesel said, because of the genocide that was taking place in Bosnia, was:
'Mr. President, I cannot not tell you something. I have been in the former Yugoslavia last fall. I cannot sleep since for what I have seen. As a Jew, I am saying that we must do something to stop the bloodshed in that country!'
At that time, there was no partisanship on the council. Until recently that was the case. And then on April 30, 2025, President Donald Trump fired at least eight of President Joe Biden's appointees to the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum's board of trustees, with no cause.
After that firing, Sen. Richard Blumenthal made the following statement: 'By turning Holocaust remembrance into a political loyalty test, you are doing precisely what the museum warns against — using institutional power to punish dissent, erase opposing views, and recast history through the lens of political expediency. In short, you are politicizing an institution created to guard against the political abuses that led to the Holocaust in the first place.'
I could not agree with Sen. Blumenthal more. Holocaust remembrance and education should never be politicized.
While the president has the right to appoint and fire members of various institutions, what Trump did was unprecedented. His act was petty, reprehensible and vindictive. Forgive me if I missed it, but I would like to know why those Republican senators and representatives who represent me in the state of Oklahoma have not spoken out about this repugnant situation. These are not only my feelings; I've heard from many Jewish leaders, survivors and children of survivors who feel the same way.
We recently had our annual Yom HaShoah program here in Oklahoma City commemorating the Holocaust, as did most Jewish communities across the country. It was a very powerful program teaching about the importance of remembrance. Our community helped fulfil the mission of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum.
As Wiesel stated: 'Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.'
We must never stay silent in the face of injustice. We must always speak out!
"Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter."
―The Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.
Michael Korenblit is co-founder of the Respect Diversity Foundation.
This article originally appeared on Oklahoman: Delegation should speak out against museum trustees' firings | Opinion
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
26 minutes ago
- The Hill
Two Israeli rights groups say their country is committing genocide in Gaza
TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — Two prominent Israeli rights groups on Monday said their country is committing genocide in Gaza, the first time that local Jewish-led organizations have made such accusations against Israel during nearly 22 months of war. The claims by B'Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights-Israel add to an explosive debate over whether Israel's military offensive in Gaza — launched in response to Hamas' deadly Oct. 7, 2023, attack — amounts to genocide. The Palestinians, their supporters and international human rights groups make that claim, and the International Court of Justice is hearing a genocide case filed by South Africa against Israel. But in Israel, founded in the wake of the Holocaust, even the government's strongest critics have largely refrained from making such accusations. That's because of the deep sensitivities and strong memories of the Nazi genocide of Europe's Jews, and because many in Israel view the war in Gaza as a justified response to the deadliest attack in the country's history and not an attempt at extermination. Shattering a taboo in Israel The rights groups, while prominent and respected internationally, are considered in Israel to be on the political fringe, and their views are not representative of the vast majority of Israelis. But having the allegation of genocide come from Israeli voices shatters a taboo in a society that has been reticent to criticize Israel's conduct in Gaza. Guy Shalev, director of Physicians for Human Rights-Israel, said the Jewish-Israeli public often dismisses accusations of genocide as antisemitic or biased against Israel. 'Perhaps human rights groups based in Israel, and coming to this conclusion, is a way to confront that accusation and get people to acknowledge the reality,' he said. Israel asserts that it is fighting an existential war and abides by international law. It has rejected genocide allegations as antisemitic. It is challenging such allegations at the International Court of Justice, and it has rejected the International Criminal Court's allegations that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant committed war crimes in Gaza. Both face international arrest warrants. Israel's government on Monday didn't immediately comment on the reports by B'Tselem and PHRI. Israeli officials largely blame civilian deaths in Gaza on Hamas, saying it uses civilians as shields by embedding militants in residential areas. The reports echo international claims The rights groups, in separate reports released jointly, said Israel's policies in Gaza, statements by senior officials about its goals there and the systematic dismantling of the territory's health system contributed to their conclusion of genocide. Their claims echoed those of previous reports from international rights groups like Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International. Like other rights groups, B'Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights-Israel have not been allowed into Gaza during the war. Their reports are based on testimonies, documents, eyewitnesses and consultations with legal experts. Hamas' attack on Israel that started the war sparked a shift in the country's policy toward Palestinians in Gaza from 'repression and control to destruction and annihilation,' B'Tselem said. The group has long been outspoken about Israel's treatment of Palestinians. It halted cooperation with the military nearly a decade ago, saying the army's investigations into wrongdoing weren't serious, and it has accused Israel of being an apartheid state. The PHRI report was a detailed, legal-medical analysis focusing on what it called the step-by-step dismantling of Gaza's health and life-sustaining systems including electricity, clean water and access to food. Its report says Israel has committed three of the acts of genocide defined by international law, including 'deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.' The Israeli rights groups said repeated statements by Israeli officials and the military endorsing the total destruction, starvation and permanent displacement of Palestinians in Gaza, combined with policies on the ground, have demonstrated that Israel is intentionally trying to destroy Palestinian society. A 'painful' conclusion The term 'genocide' strikes a chord in Israel, where Israelis grow up learning about the Holocaust and hearing survivors' harrowing stories, while promising it would never happen again. The 1948 Convention of the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide was drawn up in the aftermath of World War II and the murder by Nazi Germany of 6 million Jews. It defines genocide as acts 'committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group.' 'As the grandson of a Holocaust survivor, it's very painful for me to be reaching this conclusion,' said Shalev from PHRI. But after growing up in a society where the Holocaust was so important, it demands some kind of responsibility, he said. Until now, Israeli criticism of the war in Gaza has been focused on Netanyahu and whether his wartime decision-making has been politically motivated and delayed the return of hostages — 50 of them still in Gaza. Broader scrutiny of Israel's conduct in Gaza has been limited for multiple reasons. Despite the vast destruction and death in the territory and Israel's growing international isolation, most Israelis have believed for much of the war in its righteousness. And with most Jewish Israelis serving in the army, it's difficult for most people to fathom that their relatives in uniform could be carrying out genocide. Some soldiers, however, have refused to fight in the war. Jeffrey Herf, a historian who has published much on antisemitism, said the allegation of genocide doesn't take into account that there is a war between two parties. He said it ignores Hamas as a military force and Israel's right to defend itself. Israelis' focus is on the hostages, not Palestinians After groups like B'Tselem in recent years accused Israel of apartheid, more mainstream voices in Israel also picked up the claim, although in less sweeping ways. Israeli historian Tom Segev said he's not sure the new reports and their allegations will have an impact on the public. 'The major thing for Israelis is a question of the hostages, not necessarily the fate of the population in Gaza,' he said. But he said what's happening in Gaza is undermining the ideological and moral justification for the existence of Israel. The rights groups said the international community hasn't done enough to protect Palestinians and are calling on the world, including Israelis who have stayed silent, to speak up. 'We have an obligation to do everything we can to speak the truth about this, to stand by the victims,' said Sarit Michaeli, the international director for B'Tselem.


San Francisco Chronicle
26 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Project 2025 author Paul Dans will challenge Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham in South Carolina
WASHINGTON (AP) — A chief architect of Project 2025, Paul Dans, is launching a Republican primary challenge to Sen. Lindsey Graham in South Carolina, joining a crowded field that will test the loyalties of President Donald Trump and his MAGA movement in next year's midterm election. Dans told The Associated Press the Trump administration's federal workforce reductions and cuts to federal programs are what he had hoped for in drafting Project 2025. But he said there's 'more work to do,' particularly in the Senate. 'What we've done with Project 2025 is really change the game in terms of closing the door on the progressive era," Dans said in an AP interview. 'If you look at where the chokepoint is, it's the United States Senate. That's the headwaters of the swamp." Dans, who is set to formally announce his campaign at an event Wednesday in Charleston, said Graham has spent most of his career in Washington and 'it's time to show him the door.' Challenging the long-serving Graham, who has routinely batted back contenders over the years, is something of a political long shot in what is fast becoming a crowded field ahead of the November 2026 midterm election that will determine control of Congress. Trump early on gave his endorsement of Graham, a political confidant and regular golfing partner of the president, despite their on-again-off-again relationship. Graham, in announcing he would seek a fifth term in the Senate, also secured the state's leading Republicans, Sen. Tim Scott and Gov. Henry McMaster, to chair his 2026 run. He has amassed millions of dollars in his campaign account. Other candidates, including Republican former South Carolina Lt. Gov. André Bauer, a wealthy developer, and Democratic challenger Dr. Annie Andrews, have announced their campaigns for the Senate seat in an early start to the election season, more than a year away. Graham, in an appearance Sunday on NBC's 'Meet the Press,' did not discuss his reelection campaign but fielded questions on topics including his push to release 'as much as you can' from the case files on Jeffrey Epstein, something many of Trump's supporters want the government to do. Dans, an attorney who worked in the first Trump administration as White House liaison to the office of personnel management, said he expects to have support from Project 2025 allies, as well as the ranks of Trump's supporters in the state who have publicly tired of Graham. After Trump left the White House, Dans, now a father of four, went to work at the Heritage Foundation, often commuting on weekdays to Washington as he organized Project 2025. The nearly 1,000-page policy blueprint, with chapters written by leading conservative thinkers, calls for dismantling the federal government and downsizing the federal workforce, among other right-wing proposals for the next White House. 'To be clear, I believe that there is a 'deep state' out there, and I'm the single one who stepped forward at the end of the first term of Trump and really started to drain the swamp,' Dans said, noting he compiled much of the book from his kitchen table in Charleston. Among the goals, he said, was to 'deconstruct the administrative state,' which he said is what the Trump administration has been doing, pointing in particular to former Trump adviser Elon Musk's work at the Department of Government Efficiency shuttering federal offices. Dans and Heritage parted ways in July 2024 amid blowback over Project 2025. It catapulted into political culture that summer during the presidential campaign season, as Democrats and their allies showcased the hard-right policy proposals — from mass firings to budget cuts — as a dire warning of what could come in a second Trump term.


Politico
27 minutes ago
- Politico
Mike Collins launches Georgia Senate bid
Mike Collins participates in Georgia's 10th Congressional District republican primary election runoff debates on June 6, 2022, in Atlanta. | Brynn Anderson/AP Photo By Nicole Markus 07/28/2025 08:50 AM EDT Rep. Mike Collins (R-Ga.) on Monday announced his bid for the Senate in next year's midterms, joining a now-contested GOP primary of hopefuls attempting to unseat Democratic Sen. Jon Ossoff. 'We need a Senator who works for Georgia, not the California crazies or New York nutjobs,' Collins said in the announcement, posted to X . 'I don't know who Jon Ossoff really works for, but it sure as heck isn't Georgia.' Collins is the second Republican to hop in the party's primary, joining Rep. Buddy Carter. Both Carter and Collins are courting President Donald Trump's endorsement, with Collins including clips of Trump singing the representative's praises in his announcement.