Reconciliation Is Best
The Quran describes a particular natural law in the following words: 'reconciliation is best' (4:128). In the event of a conflict between two parties, they can engage in violent confrontation. But there is another method they can choose: to immediately come to an agreement and end their conflict. This is what
reconciliation
is about.
It is very rare for this sort of reconciliation to be equally in accordance with the desires of both parties. In most cases, this reconciliation happens on a unilateral basis. That is to say, one of the two parties sets aside its desires and agrees to settle the dispute according to the desires of the other party.
Why is this sort of
unilateral reconciliation
taken to be 'best'? The reason for this is because a situation of conflict calls a halt to constructive activity. The benefit of agreeing to reconciliation is that one is thereby spared the need to waste one's time, strength and resources on useless confrontation and so can focus on constructive efforts instead. A course of action that is opposed to reconciliation is always and inevitably a course leading to destruction. The method of reconciliation is always, and in every case, a beneficial one.
History is witness to the fact that whenever anyone has attained any success, it has only been after adopting the method of reconciliation. Not a single person has ever achieved any real success through confrontation and fighting. The importance of reconciliation lies in the fact that it provides an opportunity to fully exercise one's right to use the available opportunities. On the other hand, the path of confrontation leads one to waste one's energies in trying to destroy others, as a result of which one can engage in no constructive work whatsoever. The secret of success lies in stabilising oneself and building oneself up, and definitely not in the destruction of hypothetical enemies.
Authored by:
Maulana Wahiduddin Khan
Why Arjun Was Chosen: The Untold Secret of Bhagavad Gita Chapter 4, Verse 3
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
16 hours ago
- Time of India
Nimisha Priya death sentence case: How Blood Money payment works under Sharia Law?
File photo: Nimisha Priya Yemen has stayed the execution of nurse Nimisha Priya in a murder case, with hope resting on the kin of the deceased agreeing to settle for indemnity The Centre has told the Supreme Court that payment of blood money is the only option left for saving Kerala-origin nurse Nimisha Priya from the death row in Yemen. Such payments are permitted under Sharia law, the system of jurisprudence practised in many Islamic countries. Here's how it works: What is Sharia? Sharia is an Arabic term meaning "the way" or "the correct path". It embodies rules and principles derived from the Quran, the Islamic holy book that is regarded as the direct word of God, and the Hadith, which represent the sayings and actions of Prophet Muhammad. Sharia, thus, is taken to lay down how Muslims should conduct themselves in their personal lives, social and commercial dealings, and spiritual pursuits. The legal dimension of Sharia is based on interpretations by Islamic jurists through a process known as 'fiqh'. These interpretations ensure the adaptability of precepts of the Sharia to evolving practical realities. So, while Sharia is not synonymous with Islamic law, the latter is derived from the Sharia based on fiqh. Given that interpretations stretch across time and geographies, there can be varying reckoning of Islamic laws based on the Sharia. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like DNA Discovery Reveals Truth About Native Americans Daily Sport X Undo What is Blood Money? The concept of retaliation is recognised in Sharia law based on 'qisas', or the principle of 'an eye for an eye'. In the case of murder, it means that the kin of the victim can demand death as punishment for the culprit. However, Sharia also allows for payment of 'diya', that is, compensation or indemnity, to the kin of the victim. Diya is permitted in cases where the kin of the victim waive their right to qisas and agree to settle for blood money. It is a right reserved for the victim's kin and can't be exercised by the state or govt on their behalf. That's why the campaign to save Nimisha Priya is appealing to the kin of the man she has been convicted of killing in Yemen. Their reported insistence on death for her is the hurdle to her being spared the death penalty. Different countries and jurisdictions can prescribe varying quanta of diya depending on the case and the victim. Do the guilty walk free after payment of Blood Money? While it spares a culprit death as punishment for taking a life, it is debatable whether acceptance of diya by the victim's family amounts to an official pardon. Some experts say that Islamic jurisprudence has not clearly addressed this point. However, there are instances where a culprit has been taken off death row but kept in prison after the payment of diya. A notable example is the case of Abdul Rahim of Kerala. Convicted in Saudi Arabia for causing the death of his employer's son, Rahim obtained a pardon from the victim's family following the payment of a hefty ransom raised through a massive fundraising effort. However, the case was not closed after this and he was sentenced to 20 years in jail. The verdict took into account time spent in jail. So, while the crime occurred in 2006, and the pardon received in 2018, he is expected to be released only next year. How many countries follow Sharia Law? There are about 50 Muslim-majority countries in the world and most are deemed to incorporate elements of Sharia law in their legal systems. Even when such a country has opted for a secular jurisprudence, there can be aspects - like family or personal laws - that are based on the Sharia. But the degree to which Sharia informs legal principles can vary widely. Further, not all Muslim-majority countries may carry out the form of extreme punishments, known as hudud, handed down for crimes such as adultery, rape, homosexuality, theft and murder.
NDTV
a day ago
- NDTV
Punjab's Anti-Sacrilege Bill Meets Roadblock, Sent To Select Committee
Chandigarh: The anti-sacrilege bill, meant to introduce stringent punishment for desecration of religious scriptures - be it Guru Granth Sahab, Gita, Quran or the Bible -- did not get passed in the Punjab assembly today despite there being a broad consensus on the need for tougher laws. The Punjab Prevention of Crimes Against Holy Scriptures Bill 2025 -- which proposed life imprisonment for culprits -- was sent to a select committee. The BJP had raised questions over the bill, asking why feedback from political and social parties was not sought. The Congress wanted more time to scrutinise it. The Select Committee will include assembly Speaker Kultar Singh Sandhwan and it would take the opinion of all stakeholders and submit its report within six months. The proposal related to this was passed unanimously in the Assembly. Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann told the assembly that unlike earlier, those who desecrate the holy scriptures will get exemplary punishment once the bill is passed. "Whenever incidents of desecration took place, our heart used to break. But till date there was no such concrete law in this matter. The culprits used to come out after serving the sentence after a short time. Therefore, it was very important that anyone who desecrates any religious text should get exemplary punishment," he said. Punjab has been trying to pass an anti-sacrilege bill since several instances of desecration of Guru Granth Sahib about a decade ago. Attempts were made in 2016 and 2018 to pass similar bills. In 2016, the Centre thumbs downed the IPC (Punjab Amendment) Bill, 2016 and CrPC (Punjab Amendment) Bill, 2016, saying all religions should be treated equally given the secular nature of the Constitution. In 2018, the Amarinder Singh government passed two similar bills which did not get the President's nod. The current bill has provisions for strict punishment including life imprisonment for the desecration of holy scriptures. Till now, cases involving desecration of religious texts were filed under IPC and later BNS Sections 298 (hurting religious sentiments, carrying a jail term of 3 years, fine or both), 299 (outraging religious feelings carrying a three-year jail term, a fine or both) and 300 (disturbing religious assemblies carrying a one-year jail term, a fine or both).
Hans India
a day ago
- Hans India
Congress, AAP politicising sensitive issue of sacrilege, says Akali Dal
Chandigarh: The Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) on Tuesday asserted both the Congress and the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) in Punjab are politicising the sensitive issue of sacrilege of Guru Granth Sahib for their political ambitions even as it asked Leader of Opposition Partap Bajwa to tell why the previous Congress government did nothing to either probe or punish the perpetrators responsible for this heinous crime. Reacting to Bajwa's statement in the Vidhan Sabha in which the former claimed that the AAP government had failed to charge sheet both former Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal and Deputy Chief Minister Sukhbir Singh Badal, who was the Home Minister, in the cases of sacrilege of 2015, Akali Dal Vice-President Parambans Romana condemned Bajwa for showing double standards on this sensitive issue. Reminding Bajwa that he had held protests along with Leader of the Opposition (LoP) in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi and demanded the sacrilege case be transferred to the CBI in a memorandum to the President, Romana said, 'Bajwa, however, changed colours once the Congress formed the government in the state in 2017.' He said Bajwa remained a mute spectator when the Congress government got the sacrilege cases transferred back to the state from the CBI and did not conduct any investigation on the basis of law or facts. The SAD leader said like the AAP government now, the Congress government also held special sessions of the Vidhan Sabha with the sole purpose of doing politics on this issue. Speaking about the party's stand, Romana said that then Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal had transferred the sacrilege cases to the CBI in the interest of justice. He said the conduct of both Congress and AAP governments revealed that they did not want any justice in the sacrilege cases. He also exposed Bajwa for praising AAP suspended legislator Kunwar Vijay Partap Singh. 'It is a matter of record that the Punjab and Haryana High Court snubbed the investigation carried out by Kunwar Vijay in his role as a police officer and held that it was a dangerous cocktail of politics, religion and police administration.' He said following this observation, Kunwar Vijay quit the police force and joined the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP). The Akali leader also asserted that the Congress was least qualified to speak on the issue of sacrilege. 'This is the party which attacked Sri Darbar Sahib with tanks and mortars and destroyed Sri Akal Takht Sahib.' He said the Congress was also responsible for the massacre of thousands of Sikhs in Delhi and other parts of the country. Romana said similarly, AAP legislator Naresh Yadav had been convicted for being responsible for the sacrilege of the holy Quran in Malerkotla. He said instead of showing Yadav the door, AAP had rewarded him with a party ticket in the recent Vidhan Sabha elections. 'The AAP government in Punjab has also done nothing to punish the sacrilege perpetrators and has been busy politicising this issue,' he added. After three hours of intense debate on allegations and counter-allegations, the Vidhan Sabha unanimously decided to refer the highly emotive Punjab Prevention of Offences Against Holy Scriptures Bill of 2025 to a select committee for consultation with all stakeholders. On the suggestion of both the treasury and the opposition benches, Speaker Kultar Singh Sandhwan said the select committee would gather public opinion on the Bill and return with recommendations within six months. Earlier, the Chief Minister proposed a four-month timeline. The Bill proposes stringent penalties for sacrilege-related offences, prescribing a minimum sentence of 10 years, extendable to life imprisonment, along with fines ranging from Rs 5 lakh to Rs 10 lakh. The holy scriptures referred to in the Bill are Guru Granth Sahib or extracts thereof, the Bhagavad Gita, the Quran and the Bible.
