logo
'Pee-wee as Himself' director reveals what happened after Paul Reubens backed out of documentar

'Pee-wee as Himself' director reveals what happened after Paul Reubens backed out of documentar

Yahoo25-05-2025
The two-part HBO documentary Pee-wee as Himself (on Crave in Canada), directed by Matt Wolf, is an incredibly fascinating exploration of the life of Paul Reubens, who created the infamous character Pee-wee Herman, and died in 2023. But part of the alluring aspect of the documentary is questioning how much Reubens will actually open up to Wolf.
As Reubens states in Pee-wee as Himself, he wanted to make his own film about himself. "Turns out that you're not really supposed to direct your own documentary," he says. While identifying that the belief is that you don't have "perspective" on your own self.
In the interviews with Wolf, you get the sense that Reubens is never actually sure that he wants anyone telling his story for him, creating a complex dynamic between Wolf and his documentary subject.
"My first meeting with Paul, it was clear that there could be a power struggle with this subject, because Paul said when I met him, 'I want to direct a documentary about myself, but everybody's advising me against it, and I don't understand, why,'" Wolf shared with reporters ahead of the documentary's premiere. "It was a lot of talking and processing to get Paul to sit into that interview chair."
"When Paul sat down he was very rebellious and slippery. He wouldn't follow my lead with any questions. He wanted snacks, pretzels, lollipops. He would make funny facial expressions and it was a competitive dynamic. I remember before the shoot I said, ... 'Typically when we do these interviews, people sort of get tired around five hours.' And he said, 'I'm not going to get tired, you're going to get tired.' ... So it was kind of like game on from the beginning. But he was sort of rebelling, procrastinating, giving me a hard time."
At one point Wolf actually said to producer Emma Tillinger Koskoff, "I don't know if this is going to work."
"It occurred to me then that this is who Paul is, this is portraiture. We're seeing in real time him, in theory, rebelling against me, but he's really kind of grappling within himself about how much he's willing to share," Wolf said.
Pee-wee As Himself is quite a comprehensive journey through Reubens life, from his upbringing and connection to the circus, to avant-garde performance theatre, joining the Groundlings and the development of Pee-wee Herman.
"Paul had just an extraordinary recall for details from his childhood. Like the colour of the wallpaper in his childhood bedroom, he could talk about that for like an hour," Wolf said.
Reubens also had an impressive archive that he kept throughout his life, from things he filmed himself to significant artifacts from moments in his life.
"He saved most of these tapes ... in a temperature controlled bedroom, and he had recordings of almost every public appearance and media appearance he ever did," Wolf said.
"I think some of the most revelatory material is the Super 8 that Paul shot from the 1970s. The Groundlings was hardly documented. He has some of the only stuff we were able to find, and boy did we search. And his early relationship with his boyfriend Guy, beautifully rendered on Super 8, and that's all shot by Paul. So to my knowledge, there was no material that was off limits."
Wolf identified that the most powerful connection he had with Reubens was when they spoke about him coming out and the discussion about his early relationship, and the decision that followed to go back in the closet.
"My career absolutely would have suffered if I was openly gay," Reubens says in the documentary.
"That was, I would say, the most powerful connection I ever felt to a subject," Wolf said. "Paul went into this process wanting to come out. That was a decision he had made. He was aware that I was a gay filmmaker. ... I wanted, as a younger person, to support him in that process, but he also was intensely sensitive that the film would overly emphasize that, or focus entirely from the lens of sexuality when looking at his story."
"I do think that the level to which Paul discusses his, I wouldn't say sexuality, but his relationships and intimacy and vulnerability, and the poignant decision he made to go back into the closet, I do have to believe to some extent he shared that because of our connection."
Nearing the end of the second part of the documentary, Reubens and those who were close to him talk about his arrest on charges of child pornography, connected to his collection of vintage gay erotica. The charges were later dropped.
But then we find out that after a year Reubens stopped cooperating and never completed the final interview about his arrest.
"I had been promised final cut and Paul was given meaningful consultation," Wolf explained. "It's a dance that we do to figure out how to include somebody, both for fact-checking and to take the temperature of how they feel about the representation of their story, and Paul and I were at odds about that."
"I wanted to do for Paul what I said I would do, which is to create a nuanced and complicated portrait of an artist, and to reappraise the significance of his work so that people would stop looking at his arrests as the first point of entry into Paul Reubens. But I didn't feel that I could accomplish that with the level of control that Paul wanted. And we were going back and forth trying to make an agreement on very specific terms as to how involved he would be in post-production. I held the line on that and that went on for over a year, and I was prepared to move on, go on to different projects, and then suddenly we heard that Paul was ready to finish his interview, to sign his release, and that it needed to happen within two weeks."
When Wolf spoke to Reubens to discuss how the final interview would go, the filmmaker could tell that something was "off."
"A week later, I'm en route to Los Angeles to proceed with filming this final interview and I got a text from my executive at HBO with a post from Instagram saying, 'Is this real?' And it was a post that announced that Paul Reubens had passed away. And I was just in total shock," Wolf said. "And then I got a call from Kelly Bush Novak who was Paul's publicist, but also a very close friend, and she was like, 'I tried to get to you before the news broke, I couldn't, but Paul recorded something for you, for the documentary. And he had things to say, but he ran out of time.'"
"I went into Kelly's office and she played the audio for me and it was devastating. But he wanted it to be said, what he had to say in the documentary, and I had to figure out a way to use that not in a sensational manner."
As we hear Reubens say in a voiceover in the documentary, he wanted to show people who is really is, and how "painful" it was to be labelled a pedophile.
"I wanted to talk about what it's like and have some understanding of what it's like to be labeled a pariah, to have people scared of you, or unsure of you, or untrusting, or to look at what your intentions are through some kind of filter that's not true," we hear Reubens say. "I wanted people to understand that occasionally, where there is smoke there isn't always fire."
"I wanted somehow for people to understand that my whole career, everything I did and wrote, was based in love and my desire to entertain, and bring glee and creativity to young people, and to everyone."
With 40 hours of interview footage, Wolf identified how unique the process of creating Pee-wee as Himself was as a filmmaker.
"It was thrilling to go this deep. I've never been able, or I don't know if I ever will go this deep with another human being," Wolf said. "I revered Paul as an artist and had come to know him in complex ways as himself. And it was ... thrilling to be able to excavate this much material from him and really to collaborate."
"I think people often overlook the sense that documentary filmmakers, unlike journalists, have a much more collaborative relationship with our subjects. We need lots of things from them, we have to invade their home with our cameras, and to gather all of their archive and scan it."
The filmmaker said that the "intensity" of the project changed him, specifically has made him feel more confident.
"It made me confident that I can rise to the occasion under really extraordinary circumstances," he said. "I came to understand how scary I am as a documentary filmmaker approaching a subject."
"Obviously, the power dynamics I had with Paul were unique. He's a celebrity. He [was] a different generation. We also had a lot of stuff in common. But through his eyes and how extreme he felt in this process, I understood better how it feels, not just for him, but for anybody I approach to be the subject of a documentary."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Victoria's Whitney Gardner explores fame, phantoms and free (not haunted) pianos in new graphic novel
Victoria's Whitney Gardner explores fame, phantoms and free (not haunted) pianos in new graphic novel

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Victoria's Whitney Gardner explores fame, phantoms and free (not haunted) pianos in new graphic novel

When Whitney Gardner came across an ad for a free piano, advertised as "not haunted," she knew there was a story there. "That piano is obviously very haunted," she told CBC's North by Northwest host Margaret Gallagher. And while she never learned the story of that particular piano, the Victoria-based author and illustrator felt moved to write her own story that includes a haunted instrument. The book, a young adult graphic novel, is centred around a pre-teen girl searching for fame. It begins in 1980 and then jumps forward to the present day. "When I sat down to write the book, I first thought that it would be like this big wooden stand up piano haunted by a Victorian ghost," Gardner said. "I kept hitting roadblocks and hitting the wall and not wanting to write this sad dreary piano music book. And then I realized, wait, I'm in charge. I can write whatever I want." So, she chose a haunted synthesizer, one just like the model John Carpenter used to compose the soundtracks for the Halloween horror films. In Gardner's book, the synthesizer is haunted by a ghost from the 80s, named Vision. The ghost is based on the American pop star Tiffany, who rose to fame with her cover of I Think We're Alone Now in 1987. While writing the book Gardner watched the music video for I Think We're Alone Now every day. "Just to put myself in the mindset of this superstar and also to see all of the backgrounds and the antics of the 80s," Gardner said. The book's main character, Margot, has a lot in common with her creator, Gardner. For one, they both have fathers who spent much of their lives in search of fame, which left Margot and Gardner feeling that they had to compete for attention with their father's fans. Second, Margot and Gardner both tend to write light-hearted pieces. "There's a lot of myself in Margot, probably more so than any of the other books I've written." LISTEN | The story behind Whitney Gardner's latest book: In the story, Vision and Margot share a commonality: by making music that makes them popular, they're giving up making music for themselves. Gardner is both the author and illustrator of this book as well as her previous works, Fake Blood and Long Distance. While art and drawing are her first loves, writing stories for younger audiences has become her passion. "These books, comic books, have more pictures than any kind of book. This is where my heart is now. I sort of fell in love with telling stories through words and pictures together. And now it's like all I want to do." Free Piano (Not Haunted) is available now.

Shark Week 2025: How to watch the annual summer series, full streaming schedule and more
Shark Week 2025: How to watch the annual summer series, full streaming schedule and more

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Shark Week 2025: How to watch the annual summer series, full streaming schedule and more

What to know about 'Dancing with Sharks' and more fin-tastic Shark Week specials. Have you noticed the sharks are late this year? Shark Week 2025 finally splashes onto our screens Sunday, July 20, just in time for the hottest days of the year — the perfect time to sit inside with the AC blasting while you watch hours of new shark content every night, or go take a dip in the water yourself (if you're brave enough). This year's week of shark-centric content, courtesy of Discovery Channel, includes the upcoming Shark Week special Dancing with Sharks, an "unprecedented" underwater dance competition between divers and their finned dance partners. Dancing with the Stars alum Tom Bergeron will host. Are you ready to dive into Shark Week? Here's everything you need to know, including where to stream Shark Week, the full Shark Week TV schedule and more. How to watch Shark Week 2025: Dates: July 20-26 Time: 8 p.m. nightly TV channel: Discovery Streaming: HBO Max, Discovery+ When is Shark Week 2025? This year's Shark Week falls a little later than usual, kicking off this Sunday, July 20, and running through Saturday, July 26. Shark Week channel: Shark Week content airs on the Discovery Channel and will be available to stream on Discovery+ and HBO Max. Where to stream Shark Week: Shark Week 2025 host: There's been no announcement of a Shark Week host or "master of ceremonies," a concept that was introduced in 2022. Past celebrity hosts of Shark Week include Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson, Jason Momoa and, most recently, John Cena. Shark Week 2025 schedule: All times Eastern Sunday, July 20: 8 p.m.: Dancing With Sharks 9 p.m.: Air Jaws: The Hunt for Colossus 10 p.m.: Great White Assassins Monday, July 21: 8 p.m.: Great White Sex Battle 9 p.m.: Jaws vs Mega Croc 10 p.m.: In the Eye of the Storm: Shark Storm Tuesday, July 22: 8 p.m.: Great White North Invasion 9 p.m.: How to Survive a Shark Attack 10 p.m.: Black Mako of the Abyss Wednesday, July 23: 8 p.m.: Expedition Unknown: Shark Files 9 p.m.: Expedition X: Malpelo Monster Shark 10 p.m.: Alien Sharks: Death Down Under Thursday, July 24: 8 p.m.: Surviving Jaws 9 p.m.: Caught! Sharks Strike Back 10 p.m.: Frankenshark Friday, July 25: 8 p.m.: Great White Reign of Terror 9 p.m.: Florida's Death Beach 10 p.m.: Bull Shark Showdown Saturday, July 26: 8 p.m.: Attack Of The Devil Shark 9 p.m.: Battle for Shark Mountain

How AI, robotics and late artist Morrisseau are helping fight art fraud
How AI, robotics and late artist Morrisseau are helping fight art fraud

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

How AI, robotics and late artist Morrisseau are helping fight art fraud

Famed Indigenous artist Norval Morrisseau was browsing a Vancouver gallery with his longtime friend Cory Dingle around 1993 when a painting stopped them in their tracks. The pair asked who created it. The answer? "Norval Morrisseau." The trouble? The artist had never seen the work, let alone painted it. "We had a little chuckle and we left," Dingle recalled. "Then, I said, 'What do you want to do about this?' He said, 'You know, you can't police the world.'" Morrisseau, who died in 2007, was a self-taught, trailblazing artist known for his pictographic style and membership in the Indian Group of Seven. He was the first Indigenous artist to have his work shown in a contemporary gallery in Canada and now his paintings sell for millions. But the incident Dingle remembers proved to be an omen. At least 6,000 fake paintings have since been uncovered, costing Morrisseau's estate $100 million in losses. The phenomenon amounts to what police have called the biggest art fraud in world history. Finding fakes is time consuming work. It requires co-operation from galleries and private collectors, a trained, critical eye cast on anything purporting to be made by the late artist and the patience to keep pursuing justice through the court system. But now a new tool has emerged to help the battle: artificial intelligence. Bogged down by the enormity of the task at hand, Morrisseau's estate, which is run by Dingle, partnered with two art-loving professors to build software nicknamed "Norval AI" about three years ago. It can analyze art pieces and determine the probability that they're a genuine Morrisseau. "Because the fakes were so terrible ... we got to a point with our AI that it was so good at picking them out," Dingle said. "There was no problem." Yet the estate knew fakes were still out there. They were just getting harder to detect because court hearings were revealing the tell-tale signs of a fake Morrisseau — thinner paint lines, for example — which allowed fraudsters to make their works even more convincing. Enter Chloë Ryan. The then-engineering student loved making large-scale abstract paintings. Even though such works could sell for a decent amount, they often take weeks or months to create, narrowing the odds that she could make artistry a viable career. She could make prints of her pieces, but they just weren't the same because they lacked the texture of a real painting. The conundrum became a source of inspiration for Ryan, leading her to start tinkering with robots and paint on her Montreal balcony. She eventually developed Acrylic Robotics, a company that uses technology to paint pieces at the behest of an artist. The process starts with an artist painting with a stylus on a drawing table, which acts like a massive tablet. Amazon Web Services software analyzes and logs every movement, detecting millions of details in the piece, including the strokes, brush pressure, pigment and speed. "We like to think of AI as a powerful magnifying glass," said Patricia Nielsen, AWS Canada's head of digital transformation and AI. "It can detect those patterns and the anomalies that might be invisible to the human eye ... so art experts, historians, can dig in further." With that data, Acrylic's robotic arm can then paint a replica so precise, Ryan says it's indistinguishable from an original — exactly what Dingle needed to put Norval AI to the test. A mutual connection put him in touch with Ryan last August. Shortly after, they got to work. Because Morrisseau isn't alive to paint images on Ryan's tablet, Acrylic's robot (Dingle affectionately calls it Dodo) had a more complicated feat to accomplish. Dingle would send Ryan a hi-resolution image of one of Morrisseau's works. Acrylic Robotics would then have an artist learn about eccentricities of his style and paint the piece before Acrylic's robot would give it a try. Everything the robot painted was analyzed by the estate and Norval AI. The two sides have been going back and forth for about a year, picking out errors in the robot's execution and poring over new works. Early editions had several spots where both the estate and Norval AI could tell the robot had stopped a long stroke to pick up more paint — something uncharacteristic of Morrisseau. "If you look at one of our works randomly on the street, you wouldn't be able to say that's made by a robot, but we can't yet do all art under the sun because there's a lot of techniques that we haven't yet built in," Ryan said. "We can't use every tool in an artist's arsenal yet. If an artist is out here finger painting, obviously we can't do stuff like that." Newer editions of the Morrisseaus are about 69 per cent accurate and expected to improve even more. But Dingle admits, "I have kind of been holding back on getting to 100 per cent." He's scared of developing anything too perfect before he and Acrylic Robotics have found a foolproof method for ensuring a Morrisseau recreation can't be passed off as the real thing. It's a concern Ryan shares. "The worst thing that could happen is that we release this without consultation with groups that have been harmed by art forgery and this technology is used against artists," she said. They're currently exploring markings or other features that can be embedded in pieces to denote they're not originals. Once they settle on an ideal method, they'll have an avenue to disseminate recreations of Morrisseau's work — responsibly. While some might think that's the last thing an estate plagued by forgeries would want to do, Dingle sees it as a way to bring Morrisseau's work to the people who would value it most. "There's two schools named after Norval. There are healing institutions. There are academic institutions. There are remote Indigenous communities," said Dingle, sitting in front of a rarely-shown Morrisseau. "They could never afford to buy this painting, to hang it in their halls, to have the healing and the lessons of it, so we need to be able to produce high level reproductions that bring the life of that painting to these places." This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 20, 2025. Tara Deschamps, The Canadian Press Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store