logo
All is not lost for Britain's stock market

All is not lost for Britain's stock market

Yahoo23-06-2025
Donald Trump's 'liberation day' tariffs may have sent global stock markets into free fall but since then all seems to have been forgiven by investors – especially those who ply their trade investing in British companies.
This month, America's main stock market, the S&P 500, came within 2pc of surpassing its record highs set in February, accompanied by much fanfare on Wall Street after the period of sharp turbulence.
But while the US was celebrating playing catch-up after the president's tariffs onslaught, UK stock markets have been quietly steaming ahead.
Steven Fine, the chief executive of City stockbroker Peel Hunt, says investors from outside the UK are starting to take note of London's markets again after the Trump tariff turmoil.
He acknowledges that you might not notice the shift amid the 'relentless' wave of companies leaving UK stock markets for the deeper pockets of US investors, including British semiconductor company Alphawave and payments group Wise.
'We have got a bit of a lack of self-esteem here,' says Fine. 'Why do overseas markets think we're more interesting than we do?'
Here are five closely watched charts to show why all is not lost for Britain's stock market.
The main UK stock index, the FTSE 100, closed at a record high earlier this month and has climbed more than 8pc so far this year, vastly outperforming the S&P 500, which is up by less than 2pc over the same period.
Yet this year's performance on the FTSE 100 is in stark contrast to previous years, where the City lagged European and US peers.
UK equity markets have 'not been an easy hunting ground', according to Tom Peberdy, of investment manager Ninety One. He says Brexit, the pandemic and an inflation crisis had made it 'pretty tough' to be a UK-focused fund manager at the firm, which targets wealthy individuals and institutional investors.
'But it does feel like the tide is turning,' he says after years of watching outsized gains on Wall Street, primarily powered by the 'magnificent seven' group of technology giants such as Apple and Amazon.
'Investors ultimately will gravitate towards where the opportunity is.'
The tide of money ebbing out of UK companies in recent years has depressed their share prices – but also made them cheaper to buy.
Ninety One is positioning itself for a surge in London markets, putting it at odds with the ever-increasing flow of money out of UK businesses over the past three years.
In comparison, companies on the S&P 500 have grown in value by about 32pc over that time, while the Nasdaq Composite, popular with technology investors, has gained 38pc.
The FTSE 100 has gained more than 16pc since April 2022. However, Fine, of Peel Hunt, sees this as a sign of resilience during a period when investors contended with the Liz Truss mini-Budget crisis and the surge in inflation triggered by the Ukraine war.
'We seem to deal with these things,' he says. 'The resilience of the UK economy is something we don't really recognise because it's always about what's going to happen next and how bad it's going to be in the future.
'So can that buffer become a bit more of a springboard?'
Fund managers at Ninety One are convinced there are a series of arguments stacking up in favour of investing in British companies.
'We do think the UK gets mischaracterised still as energy and banks,' says fund manager Anna Farmbrough, who employs a strategy aimed at investing in 'quality' companies.
'We think it is worth pointing out that capital goods is the largest sector in the UK. That is full of exceptional businesses operating in very niche industries. We really do have incredible innovation and technology being produced over here. They are often mission-critical products.'
She pointed to the industrial group Spectris, which saw shares surge by 65pc this month after attracting takeover bids from US private equity firms Advent and KKR.
Those bids were at an 80pc premium to its share price at the time, which Farmbrough says 'gives some reassurance around where the valuations for some of these businesses are, and that they are worth a lot more'.
Aside from offering the chance to buy stocks cheaply, the comparatively low valuations of companies on London's markets also offers the opportunity for better returns.
'One thing that people don't quite appreciate is what a big component dividends are in the forward returns of your buying a stock,' says Alessandro Dicorrado, who looks after value investing strategy at Ninety One.
'If you're making an investment with a long-term return ... most of that is dividend increases.'
Compared with the US S&P 500 and the Stoxx 600, the main stock market benchmark in Europe, the FTSE 100 is relatively cheap to buy.
Dicorrado highlights the higher dividends and buyback yields offered by companies across the FTSE compared to the S&P 500 and the rest of the world.
One of the ironies of this is that if UK companies remain cheap, they will offer greater returns as it will be cheaper for them to buy back their own stock, increasing the dividend returns and value of the stocks owned by their current shareholders.
'The cheaper a company can buy back its own stock, the more durable income compounds over time,' says Dicorrado.
'Actually, what you want is for the stocks to stay cheap but we also don't want the market to die. So let's try to find a middle ground.'
Look under the bonnet and British companies are also humming along more efficiently than some of their global rivals, deploying their capital more effectively.
For Farmbrough, the 'real watershed moment' for London's stock market came during the pandemic.
Faced with the huge challenges of lockdown, working from home and disrupted supply chains, companies were forced to 'allocate capital much better'.
This is illustrated by the improvement in return on invested capital, known as Roic, of FTSE All Share companies over the last 10 years. The metric measures how effectively a company uses the money it has invested to generate profits.
Farmborough says: 'There was a real watershed moment in the pandemic particularly amongst the more commoditised industries, where they really woke up to allocating capital in a more accretive way.
'So we think this has been a structural and quite permanent change to the UK market and it has not been reflected in valuations whatsoever.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fabrizio Romano confirms Liverpool have sent message to Alexander Isak
Fabrizio Romano confirms Liverpool have sent message to Alexander Isak

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Fabrizio Romano confirms Liverpool have sent message to Alexander Isak

Liverpool have FAILED in their first official bid for Alexander Isak. A bid - reported to be in the region of £120m - was sent to Newcastle for the Swedish striker but was quickly knocked back. Isak is under contract at St. James' Park until 2028 but it would be surprising if he remains there beyond this summer. 🔴 Shop the LFC Store 🚨2025/26 LFC x adidas range🚨 LFC x adidas Shop the home range today! LFC x adidas Shop the goalkeeper range today LFC x adidas Shop the new adidas range today! his future is being sorted out. Liverpool are well aware that Isak wants the move - although it was reported on Friday that the club would indeed take Newcastle's first 'No' for an answer. Fabrizio Romano: Rejected bid is part of the game That stance contradicts what Fabrizio Romano has heard however. The Italian transfer supremo FULLY expects Liverpool to be back with another bid. There is ample time - both for Liverpool to complete a deal for Isak and Newcastle to sign a replacement. 'Liverpool know that this is part of the game,' Romano told his YouTube audience. 'It's still beginning of August. There's still plenty of time to go before the end of the transfer window.' Liverpool's bid a MESSAGE to Isak The bid was confirmation if it were needed that Liverpool consider Isak a priority target. It was, according to Romano, conceived as a MESSAGE to Isak. Liverpool wanted to show the Newcastle No14 that their interest was genuine - and that they were going to do whatever it takes to deliver this signing. 'Liverpool wanted to show to the player: 'Okay, we are really ready.' That's not just an informal conversation. That's not just a verbal proposal. It's an official bid,' Romano states.

Figma stock went to the moon after its IPO. Some Robinhood users say they could only buy 1 share
Figma stock went to the moon after its IPO. Some Robinhood users say they could only buy 1 share

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Figma stock went to the moon after its IPO. Some Robinhood users say they could only buy 1 share

Figma's initial public offering this week was a boon for investors. Well, some investors. Emotionally intelligent people use the 2-week rule to motivate themselves and reach their biggest goals Other countries are stepping up after Trump pulled the U.S. out of the climate fight Exclusive: Google is indexing ChatGPT conversations, potentially exposing sensitive user data When shares of the design software startup started trading on Thursday, they immediately went to the moon. After being priced at $33, the stock closed at $115.50 a share, an increase of around 250%. That meant some serious returns for investors, at least the ones who were able to get in on the action. But complaints and reports surfaced yesterday among some Robinhood users who say missed out, as they were not able to purchase as much Figma stock as they would've liked. Several users took to social media to air their grievances, claiming that they had tried to buy many Figma shares when they hit the market via Robinhood, but were only granted a single share. For instance, one user, posting on X, claimed to receive only one share after requesting 3,000. The issue sparked a number of memes throughout the day on Thursday as Figma's blockbuster IPO dominated financial headlines. It may have happened because Robinhood, like other trading platforms, only receives a certain number of shares when a company goes public. 'We receive a limited number of shares for each IPO,' reads an article from Robinhood's support team. 'We use the number of shares, customer demand, and other factors to determine how many shares you'll get. You may get the full number of shares you requested, a partial amount, or none at all.' So Robinhood does make it fairly clear that just because a user is requesting shares, it doesn't mean that they'll necessarily get them. In this case, as demand outstripped supply—likely exceedingly so—the company may have had to divvy the stock out accordingly, regardless of how many users actually requested. Fast Company has reached out to Robinhood for comment and clarification. A few days before Figma's listing on Thursday, Bloomberg reported that its IPO was approaching 40 times oversubscribed, reflecting what was largely expected to be enormous demand for the stock. Robinhood has drawn the ire of users in the past due to concerns around the limited trading of certain stocks. Notably, it happened in 2021, when the platform restricted purchases of GameStop and AMC shares (among others) during the so-called meme stock rally. But the Figma IPO is perhaps another example of how retail investors, relative to institutional investors, can end up getting the short end of the stick. There may not be much that investors can do about that, but for those who missed out on Figma's IPO price, it's a reminder that access to the markets—as a retail investor using a trading app or platform—may not be as unfettered or democratic as we'd like to think. Figma shares opened even higher on Friday, at one point hitting close to $143. This post originally appeared at to get the Fast Company newsletter: Sign in to access your portfolio

Who could lead Apple after Tim Cook
Who could lead Apple after Tim Cook

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Who could lead Apple after Tim Cook

There are no indications that Apple (AAPL) CEO Tim Cook is planning on leaving his role anytime soon. But the company's underwhelming AI developments have some questioning if it's time for new leadership. Yahoo Finance Tech Editor Dan Howley takes a closer look at some of the potential contenders. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination. Related videos £50k in savings? Here's how to unlock up to £4.5k in passive income overnight Down 55% in 5 years, but this FTSE stock offers a 9.5% dividend yield for income investors! How will the Lloyds share price be affected by today's Supreme Court ruling? Meet the 75p dividend stock with a higher yield than Legal & General shares Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store