How to invest through Trump's turbulent tariffs for a young investor
Knowing that, how should you invest differently? Buy stocks, they say – but which ones? Stocks from practically every developed country will benefit. Or buy the US dollar, which investors have fled from since the tariffs? Perhaps sell gold, which investors have lately been turning to for safety?
The problem, as you may have already realised, is that unless you had insider knowledge that the tariff pause was going to happen, it's probably too late to do all of these things.
The S&P 500 stock market index jumped 3.3 per cent (that's huge for an index) on Monday (May 12), following the tariff pause announcement. The US dollar surged while gold lost 2.7 per cent.
Some may say that the news of the tariff pause is 'priced-in'. As regular Joe investors, that's the challenge we often face.
We'll often be late if we try to make short-term trading decisions based on the news we read. (Trading bots and professional traders would have reacted before we finished reading the article.)
A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU
Friday, 3 pm Thrive
Money, career and life hacks to help young adults stay ahead of the curve.
Sign Up
Sign Up
We're at the stage now where the US tariffs on most countries, including China, have been temporarily lowered. (Additional tariffs on Chinese imports were reduced from 145 per cent to 30 per cent, and the universal 10 per cent tariffs on most countries remain in place.)
While financial markets cheered the move, businesses are still unsure of what will happen after the 90 days. So, how should we invest when the future is so uncertain?
🕜 How long is 'long term'?
Firstly, don't panic and avoid knee-jerk reactions. One of the golden rules of long-term investing is to stay invested and not panic sell at the first hint of trouble.
Your stock investments may rise and fall dramatically from week to week. But zoom out, and you'll see that stocks will rise over the long term.
But there's nuance to this truism – I'll touch on two.
Firstly, the US stock market often bounces back quickly after a decline. This may take months or a couple of years. Some crashes have taken longer.
If you had invested in the S&P 500 index before the dot-com bubble in 2000, your investment wouldn't have grown even after 10 years had passed. Going further back to the Great Depression in the 1930s, the S&P 500 took 15 years to recover.
Christopher Tan, chief executive officer of wealth advisory firm Providend, notes that it was during this time that the US enacted the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, now widely blamed for worsening the Great Depression. The Act raised US tariffs on foreign imports by about 20 per cent – sounds familiar?
While there's no telling if history will repeat itself, it's important to prepare for the possibility of prolonged drawdowns to our portfolios. And if we can't stomach that, take steps to strike a balance that'll help us sleep well at night.
🧺 What you're invested in matters
Secondly, we've so far been talking about the S&P 500, the de facto measure of the US stock market that tracks the performance of the 500 leading companies listed in the US.
It's often said that all you need for investments is to buy an S&P 500 index fund, and you're set. While investors who followed this bit of advice have profited greatly, experts have warned that investors who hold only an S&P 500 index fund may not be diversifying their investments enough.
While the US market has done well over the past 100 years, there's a growing worry that things will not remain the same in the future, especially given US President Donald Trump's on-again, off-again stance on tariffs.
With volatility ahead, many analysts recommend reducing risk to protect your capital. After all, Trump's trade war has only paused, not ended, and the US' 10 per cent tariffs on most foreign goods are still in place.
But rather than sell off your investments and wait for things to settle down, consider spreading your funds across different assets and geographies.
Diversify by geography: If you're heavily invested in the US stock market, consider adding stocks or index funds from countries as well. Alternatively, you may wish to invest in a fund that tracks a globally diversified index such as the MSCI All-Country World Index or the FTSE All-World Index.
An added benefit of diversifying your portfolio beyond the US is that it reduces currency risk. With the recent weakening US dollar, those heavily invested in US stocks may have experienced their portfolios losing value in Singapore-dollar terms.
Diversify by assets: If you're heavily invested in stocks, consider adding other asset types into your portfolio that can cushion the volatility in the stock market.
Commonly, investors have turned to bonds for this because they tend to do well when stocks do badly. But this hasn't been the case in recent years, such as in 2022 when both stocks and bonds suffered negative returns.
Alternatives include gold, which has been the best-performing asset class this year. Gold prices surged more than 20 per cent this year to date, but many analysts believe it can go higher.
Gold is often described as a safe haven asset because it is a reliable store of value through times of geopolitical uncertainty and inflation. Central banks around the world have also been buying up gold as they seek to diversify their reserves from the US dollar.
Financial advisors typically recommend not holding more than 10 per cent of your portfolio in gold, in the same way you won't want to hold too large a percentage of an individual stock.
TL;DR
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Brics nations to denounce Trump tariffs
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Artificial intelligence and health will also be on the agenda at the summit. RIO DE JANEIRO, Brazil - Brics leaders meeting in Rio de Janeiro from July 6 are expected to decry US President Donald Trump's hardline trade policies, but are struggling to bridge divides over crises roiling the Middle East. Emerging nations representing about half the world's population and 40 per cent of global economic output are set to unite over what they see as unfair US import tariffs, according to sources familiar with summit negotiations. Since coming to office in January, Mr Trump has threatened allies and rivals alike with a slew of punitive tariffs . His latest salvo comes in the form of letters due to be sent starting July 4 informing trading partners of new tariff rates expected next week on July 9. Diplomats from 11 emerging nations, including Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, have been busy drafting a statement condemning the economic uncertainty. Any final summit declaration is not expected to mention the United States or its president by name. But it is expected to be a clear political shot directed at Washington. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore From temples to towers: Old memories collide with new money in Geylang Singapore Clans of Geylang: The fight for survival and revival World Hamas says it responds to Gaza ceasefire proposal in 'a positive spirit' Asia Surviving 40 deg C summer in Chongqing, one of China's hottest cities Singapore PAP has begun search for new candidates; PM Wong hopes to deploy them earlier ahead of next GE Singapore 20 retired MPs spoke up on many issues in Parliament, helped successors prepare for new role: PM Wong Singapore $3b money laundering case: 9 financial institutions handed $27.45m in MAS penalties over breaches Asia JB petrol station shooting: Dead man with bullet wounds dumped at hospital 'We're anticipating a summit with a cautious tone: it will be difficult to mention the United States by name in the final declaration,' Adjunct Professor Marta Fernandez, director of the Brics Policy Centre at Rio's Pontifical Catholic University said. This is particularly the case for China, which has only recently negotiated with the US to lower steep tit-for-tat levies. 'This doesn't seem to be the right time to provoke further friction' between the world's two leading economies, Prof Fernandez said. Conceived two decades ago as a forum for fast-growing economies, the Brics have come to be seen as a Chinese-driven counterbalance to Western power. But the summit's political punch will be depleted by the absence of China's Xi Jinping, who is skipping the annual meeting for the first time in his 12 years as president. 'I expect there will be speculation about the reasons for Xi's absence,' said Mr Ryan Hass, a former China director at the US National Security Council who is now with the Brookings Institution think tank. 'The simplest explanation may hold the most explanatory power. Xi recently hosted Lula in Beijing,' said Mr Hass. The Chinese leader will not be the only notable absentee. War crime-indicted Russian President Vladimir Putin is also opting to stay away, but will participate via video link, according to the Kremlin. Mr Hass said Mr Putin's non-attendance and the fact that India's prime minister will be a guest of honour in Brazil could also be factors in Mr Xi's absence. 'Xi does not want to appear upstaged by Modi,' who will receive a state lunch, he said. 'I expect Xi's decision to delegate attendance to Premier Li (Qiang) rests amidst these factors.' Still, the Mr Xi no-show is a blow to host President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, who wants Brazil to play a bigger role on the world stage. In the year to November 2025, Brazil will have hosted a G-20 summit, a Brics summit, and COP30 international climate talks, all before heading into fiercely contested presidential elections in 2026, in which he is expected to run. Middle path Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian, whose nation is still reeling from a 12-day conflict with Israel is also skipping the meeting. A source familiar with the negotiations said the Brics countries were still in disagreement over how to respond to the wars in Gaza and between Iran and Israel. Iranian negotiators are pushing for a tougher collective stance that goes beyond referencing the need for the creation of a Palestinian state and for disputes to be resolved peacefully. Artificial intelligence and health will also be on the agenda at the summit. Original members of the bloc Brazil, Russia, India, and China have been joined by South Africa and, more recently, by Saudi Arabia, Iran, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, Ethiopia and Indonesia. Analysts say that it has given the grouping more potential international punch. But it has also opened many new fault lines. Brazil hopes that countries can take a common stand at the summit, including on the most sensitive issues. 'Brics (countries), throughout their history, have managed to speak with one voice on major international issues, and there's no reason why that shouldn't be the case this time on the subject of the Middle East,' Brazil's Foreign Minister Mauro Vieira told AFP. AFP
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
Brics nations to gather without Xi, Putin
[RIO DE JANEIRO] Brics leaders will meet in Rio de Janeiro from Sunday (Jul 6), with the bloc depleted by the absence of China's Xi Jinping, who is skipping the annual summit of emerging economies for the first time in 12 years. The grouping – often seen as a Chinese-driven counterbalance to Western power – meets as members face imminent and costly tariff wars with the United States. Conceived two decades ago as a forum for fast-growing economies, the Brics have come to be dominated by Beijing, which grew much faster and larger than the rest. China has not said why Xi will miss the summit, a first since he became president in 2012. 'I expect there will be speculation about the reasons for Xi's absence,' said Ryan Hass, a former China director at the US National Security Council who is now with the Brookings Institution think tank. 'The simplest explanation may hold the most explanatory power. Xi recently hosted Lula in Beijing,' said Hass. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The Chinese leader will not be the only notable absentee. War crime-indicted Russian President Vladimir Putin is also opting to stay away, but will participate via video link, according to the Kremlin. So too will Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian, whose nation is still reeling from a 12-day conflict with Israel. Hass said that Putin's non-attendance and the fact that India's prime minister will be a guest of honour in Brazil could also be factors in Xi's absence. 'Xi does not want to appear upstaged by Modi,' who will receive a state lunch, he said. 'I expect Xi's decision to delegate attendance to Premier Li (Qiang) rests amidst these factors.' Still, the Xi no-show is a blow to host President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, who wants Brazil to play a bigger role on the world stage. In the year to November 2025, Brazil will have hosted a G20 summit, a Brics summit, and COP30 international climate talks, all before heading into fiercely contested presidential elections next year. Lula is expected to run again for an unprecedented fourth term in office. Cautious tone For Brics leaders who do make the trip to the 'cidade maravilhosa', the marvellous city, the economy will be top of the agenda. Lula on Friday defended the idea of finding an alternative to the US dollar for trade among Brics nations. 'I know it is complicated. There are political problems,' Lula said at a Brics banking event. 'But if we do not find a new formula, we are going to finish the 21st century the way we started the 20th.' But with many, including China, locked in difficult trade negotiations with the United States, they may be wary of roiling the mercurial US president. US President Donald Trump has warned that starting on Friday, countries will receive letters stating the amount their exports to the United States will be tariffed. He has also threatened to impose 100 per cent tariffs on countries that challenge the US dollar's international dominance. 'We are anticipating a summit with a cautious tone: it will be difficult to mention the United States by name in the final declaration,' Marta Fernandez, director of the Brics Policy Center at Rio's Pontifical Catholic University, said. This is particularly the case for China, she said: 'This doesn't seem to be the right time to provoke further friction' between the world's two leading economies. On a range of other issues, from the Middle East to climate, Brics members will have to overcome deep-seated differences. Consensus-building difficult Original members of the bloc Brazil, Russia, India, and China have been joined by South Africa and, more recently, by Saudi Arabia, Iran, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, Ethiopia, and Indonesia. Analysts say that it has given the grouping more potential international punch. The Brics now represent nearly half of the world's population and 40 per cent of its GDP. But it has also opened many new fault lines, not least over how strongly to challenge the United States. This expansion 'makes it all the more difficult to build a strong consensus,' said Fernandez. Brics members did not issue a strong statement on the Iran-Israel conflict and subsequent US military strikes due to their 'diverging' interests, according to Oliver Stuenkel, a professor of international relations at the Getulio Vargas Foundation. Brazil, nevertheless, hopes that countries can take a common stand at the summit, including on the most sensitive issues. 'Brics (countries), throughout their history, have managed to speak with one voice on major international issues, and there's no reason why that shouldn't be the case this time on the subject of the Middle East,' Brazil's Foreign Minister Mauro Vieira said. Artificial intelligence and global governance reform will also be on the menu. AFP
Business Times
4 hours ago
- Business Times
Trumponomics 2.0 will erode the foundations of America's prosperity
Was it just a false alarm? The panic about the world economy that followed US President Donald Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs in April has given way to growing optimism. Tariffs' inflationary effect has so far been muted. In private, bosses say they now expect trade fights to produce trade deals, not to be an end in themselves. Surveys show that business and consumer confidence, though low, is improving. The S&P 500 index of stocks has hit a record high. And as we report, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (BBB) that passed the Senate on Jul 1 looks more like traditional tax-cutting, spending-slashing Republicanism worthy of Paul Ryan or Mitt Romney than it does a Maga (Make America Great Again) fantasy. Suddenly, business leaders are again willing to see Trump as the populist from his first term: a man to be taken seriously, but not literally. Unfortunately, the BBB is likely to cast a shadow over this sunny picture. It illustrates the long-term damage Trump is doing to the foundations of America's economy. Unsustainable The Bill's main effect is to extend the tax cuts from Trump's first term which were due to expire. Republicans paint this as an extension of the status quo. Yet they, like the Democrats before them, ignore the fact that the status quo is unsustainable. Over the past 12 months America's budget deficit has been an astonishing 6.7 per cent of gross domestic product. If the Bill passes, the deficit will remain around that level and the country's debt-to-GDP ratio will, in about two years, exceed the 106 per cent reached after World War II. Revenue from tariffs will help, but not enough to stop the ratio rising – meaning that the drift towards crisis will continue. To the extent the Bill tightens the belt, it does so in the wrong places. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up As life expectancies rise and the population ages, America should trim handouts to the old, for example by raising the retirement age. Instead, pensioners are getting a tax break and Republicans are cutting Medicaid, health insurance for the hard-up. Some sensible measures include reducing the ability of states to game the system for more federal cash. Yet according to official projections, the overall effect will be to add nearly 12 million to the number of Americans without health insurance. That is a scandalous number for the world's richest big country. Many of those who lose coverage will fall foul of new requirements that recipients must work. Such rules have in the past created an obstacle course of paperwork for claimants, while failing to boost employment. More savings come from repealing tax credits for clean energy passed under former president Joe Biden. The credits were littered with protectionist 'buy American' requirements. But because Congress abhors carbon-pricing, nothing will replace them. The country will once again lack a federal policy for decarbonisation, and its greenhouse gas emissions will be greater than they would have been. Trump's nostalgia for fossil fuels ignores the potential of renewables to make energy much more abundant. That is foolish when the race for artificial general intelligence is in part a race for the electricity necessary to train massive models. Even the way the Bill was passed reveals America's creeping dysfunction. The BBB is gargantuan because governing parties very rarely get more than one chance a year to pass a tax-and-spending Bill with just 51 votes in the Senate, rather than the 60 needed to circumvent the filibuster. In such a big Bill, important reforms are poorly scrutinised, and a lot of pork can be used to buy the support of congressmen. Optimists acknowledge some or all of this, but argue that economic growth will wipe out all these worries. Faster growth would ease the burden of debt, benefit the poor through more jobs and higher wages, and make political dysfunction seem economically irrelevant. Sure enough, the administration projects nearly 5 per cent more output over the next four years. Yet it is wrong to expect this Bill to create a growth boom. The tax cuts in the BBB that are already in effect offer little fresh stimulus, and tariffs are an offsetting force. In any case, interest rates are three times their level when Trump last cut taxes and the Federal Reserve is more likely to balance looser fiscal policy with tweaks to its monetary stance. Supply-side tax cuts will help boost investment, but account for just 8 per cent of the total, by cost. Many new tax cuts, including exemptions for tips and overtime, are gimmicks. The administration's deregulation agenda could help, but only on the margins. In fact, America's geyser of debt issuance will increasingly harm growth. In normal times, public debt crowds out private investment, raising the cost of capital for new projects such as data centres. And the costs of a sudden fiscal adjustment, forced on the US by bond markets, would be vast. Goldman Sachs, a bank, reckons that if Congress postpones fiscal tightening for another decade, it may then need to cut spending or raise taxes by an annual 5.5 per cent of GDP to stabilise debt-to-GDP. That is more than the austerity endured by the eurozone after its sovereign-debt crisis in the 2010s. If that proved too hard for legislators, America might resort to tactics used after World War II: inflation and financial repression. Vote-a-rama leads to borrower-drama The BBB's neglect of the long term is part of a wider malaise. Riding high on America's economic might and undoubted negotiating leverage, Trump ignores the foundations of the country's success. He has renewed his attacks on the Fed, adding another threat to economic stability. His defunding of scientific research will harm American innovation. His cavalier approach to the rule of law makes the US a riskier place to invest. And despite the moderation of his trade war, the average tariff rate is still its highest in a century and trade-policy uncertainty is a burden. Even as American assets boom in dollar terms, they have fallen behind when priced in foreign currencies. An 11 per cent fall in the dollar this year reflects long-term risks to the American economy that are real, and growing. ©2025 The Economist Newspaper Limited. All rights reserved