Labor's YouTube ban would face backlash from parents as overwhelming majority say it helps kids learn
It comes after a growing group of lawmakers expressed frustration that the government backflipped on its previous exemption for YouTube in the under-16 social media ban laws.
Labor has considered breaking its promise and dragging YouTube into the ban after being lobbied by Chinese-owned platform TikTok.
eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant has also pressured Labor to break its pledge and ban the video sharing platform.
YouTube has since released new research by Oxford Economics which found 72 per cent of parents think the video sharing platform 'helps their children learn'.
Head of YouTube Australia Ed Miles said families took advantage of sophisticated parental controls and safety features to make the platform appropriate for learning.
'This new research from Oxford Economics demonstrates that Australian parents not only trust YouTube as a valuable learning resource, but also feel confident in guiding their children to use YouTube responsibly,' he said.
'This reflects parents' active involvement and their comfort in navigating YouTube alongside their children, using our safety features and parental controls.'
The research also found: 72 per cent of parents who use YouTube agree that YouTube (or YouTube Kids) helps their children learn.
79 per cent of parents who use YouTube agree that YouTube (or YouTube Kids) provides quality content for their children's learning and/or entertainment.
74 per cent of parents who use YouTube feel confident in their ability to guide their child on how to use YouTube (or YouTube Kids) responsibly.
The figures come after SkyNews.com.au revealed Ms Inman Grant misled Labor by suggesting YouTube was an algorithmically dangerous platform, falsely suggesting her comments were based on evidence.
"I don't make determinations or write recommendations to the minister based on whether I keep the public onside. I follow the evidence," she said, at the National Press Club in June.
"My main concern with these platforms is that harms are happening, but I talked about the pervasive design features.
"YouTube has mastered those. Opaque algorithms driving users down rabbit holes they're powerless to fight against."
Both Labor and eSafety refused to share this research until SkyNews.com.au lodged a Freedom of Information request.
Once SkyNews.com.au obtained the research it was clear the findings had been misrepresented.
In fact, it found that YouTube was one of the safest platforms for key risk concerns such as grooming, sexual harassment and bullying.
Children are more likely to be bullied via text messages than on YouTube.
The percentage of teenagers who reported being groomed on YouTube was three per cent, the same percentage as teenagers who reported grooming via text messages.
On Snapchat the figure was seven times higher at 23 per cent. On Instagram it was five times higher at 17 per cent.
There was no recommendation from Ms Inman Grant to ban text messages for teenagers.
Users need to be at least 13-years-old to create a YouTube account, meaning eSafety's proposed ban would only impact teenagers.
Sky News Digital Editor Jack Houghton, host of The Media Show, told his audience the survey was a "flawed" way to research the issue as it was based on the perceptions of young children who were being asked to self-identify 'harmful content'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
40 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
First sitting week of parliament branded ‘unusually entertaining'
Former Howard government minister Peter McGauran discusses the first sitting week of Labor's second term and how it was 'unusually entertaining'. Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce delivered a hilarious and wild response to being compared to a "steer in a paddock" after he called for Australia to dump net zero targets. 'We had the government trying to keep its hubris and self-satisfaction under control and not doing it entirely perfectly,' Mr McGauran told Sky News Australia. 'Overall, the government is trying to set a tone of working for the Australian people and in harmony to the greatest extent possible with the crossbench.'

Sydney Morning Herald
2 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘Ridiculous': Hong Kong places bounty on Australian professor
An Australian pro-democracy academic has labelled a warrant for his arrest by Hong Kong's national security police as 'ridiculous', as authorities there pursue 19 overseas-based members of what they describe as a subversive organisation. University of Technology Sydney China studies professor Dr Feng Chongyi – who in 2017 was detained for 10 days while on a research trip to China – now has a bounty on him over his involvement in an unofficial pro-democracy group, Hong Kong Parliament. He is accused of helping to organise or participate in the largely Canada-based group, which authorities in Hong Kong say aimed to subvert state power under a national security law that China imposed on the territory in 2020, following months of pro-democracy protests the year before. Feng and the others are accused of having launched a referendum or run as candidates in the unofficial 'Hong Kong Parliament' group, which authorities say aims at achieving self-determination and drafting a 'Hong Kong constitution'. Hong Kong police said the organisation sought to overthrow the governments of China and Hong Kong by unlawful means, that they were still investigating, and further arrests could follow. Loading Regarding its 'election' process, the Hong Kong Parliament group has said on social media that it drew about 15,700 valid votes through mobile app and online voting systems. It said the candidates and elected members came from around the world including Taiwan, Thailand, Australia, the US, Canada and the UK. Feng isn't from Hong Kong, but said he had agreed to join the group as an academic. 'It's certainly ridiculous, it does not offend me in any sense … they've got the power, they've got the influence overseas, they want to control everything even overseas,' Feng told this masthead on Saturday.

The Age
2 hours ago
- The Age
‘Ridiculous': Hong Kong places bounty on Australian professor
An Australian pro-democracy academic has labelled a warrant for his arrest by Hong Kong's national security police as 'ridiculous', as authorities there pursue 19 overseas-based members of what they describe as a subversive organisation. University of Technology Sydney China studies professor Dr Feng Chongyi – who in 2017 was detained for 10 days while on a research trip to China – now has a bounty on him over his involvement in an unofficial pro-democracy group, Hong Kong Parliament. He is accused of helping to organise or participate in the largely Canada-based group, which authorities in Hong Kong say aimed to subvert state power under a national security law that China imposed on the territory in 2020, following months of pro-democracy protests the year before. Feng and the others are accused of having launched a referendum or run as candidates in the unofficial 'Hong Kong Parliament' group, which authorities say aims at achieving self-determination and drafting a 'Hong Kong constitution'. Hong Kong police said the organisation sought to overthrow the governments of China and Hong Kong by unlawful means, that they were still investigating, and further arrests could follow. Loading Regarding its 'election' process, the Hong Kong Parliament group has said on social media that it drew about 15,700 valid votes through mobile app and online voting systems. It said the candidates and elected members came from around the world including Taiwan, Thailand, Australia, the US, Canada and the UK. Feng isn't from Hong Kong, but said he had agreed to join the group as an academic. 'It's certainly ridiculous, it does not offend me in any sense … they've got the power, they've got the influence overseas, they want to control everything even overseas,' Feng told this masthead on Saturday.