Shiv Sena (UBT) delegation meets governor, submits letter demanding dismissal of tainted, corrupt and insensitive ministers
"Information was given about the malpractices and cases of many ministers in the state cabinet. The factual situation of the serious cases of minister Sanjay Shirsat, agriculture minister Manikrao Kokate, minister of state Yogesh Kadam, and minister Nitesh Rane was presented before the governor. Information was given to the governor regarding many cases such as the honey trap case, the Thane-Borivli tunnel case, and irregularities in the land acquisition process of Mira-Bhayandar Municipal Corporation," Danve said.
"These incidents are not just a matter of law and order but are a clear insult to the democratic values and fundamental rights of the citizens of that state. The representatives of the ruling party and their supporters are giving an unspoken signal to the public that the law is supreme and there is a complete breakdown of law and order in the state. Due to this, an atmosphere of fear and insecurity was created among the common citizens.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
(1) Activate Antivirus License Now
McAfee.com
Click Here
Undo
Considering the seriousness of your position as the protector of the Constitution, we are requesting you to issue clear instructions to the CM to dismiss all these corrupt and tainted ministers and violent MLAs and take strict action," Danve said in his letter to the governor.
You Can Also Check:
Mumbai AQI
|
Weather in Mumbai
|
Bank Holidays in Mumbai
|
Public Holidays in Mumbai
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump stakes reputation as dealmaker with tariff policy
Donald Trump is staking his reputation as a tough negotiator and slick dealmaker -- that has served him well throughout his life -- with his ultra-muscular, protectionist tariffs policy. On Friday, the White House released a picture of the US president seen with a smartphone pressed to his ear, with the caption: "Making calls. Making deals. MAKING AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Operations Management others Others Artificial Intelligence Technology healthcare Healthcare Product Management Design Thinking Digital Marketing MBA Data Science Finance MCA PGDM Cybersecurity Degree CXO Project Management Leadership Data Science Data Analytics Public Policy Management Skills you'll gain: Quality Management & Lean Six Sigma Analytical Tools Supply Chain Management & Strategies Service Operations Management Duration: 10 Months IIM Lucknow IIML Executive Programme in Strategic Operations Management & Supply Chain Analytics Starts on Jan 27, 2024 Get Details Every trade deal announced by the president, who is convinced that tariffs are both a tool and manifestation of America's economic might, is celebrated by his supporters as a show of his negotiating prowess. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 15 Most Beautiful Female Athletes in the World Click Here Undo This week's flurry of rate changes was no different. On Thursday, with the stroke of a black marker, the former real estate developer slapped fresh tariffs on dozens of US trade partners . Live Events They will kick in on August 7 instead of August 1, which had previously been touted as a hard deadline. The Republican leader's backtracking, frequently setting trade deadlines only to rescind or extend them -- he most recently granted Mexico a 90-day extension -- has given rise to the mocking acronym "TACO" ("Trump always chickens out"). The jokes implying Trump is all talk and no action on trade have previously struck a nerve for the president. Not chicken But analysts believe there will be no going back this time. Trump has "not chickened out," according to Josh Lipsky, an international economics expert at the Atlantic Council think tank. Lipsky told AFP the president is "following through, if not exceeding" what he vowed during his campaign in respect to tariffs. Matthew Aks, a public policy analyst at Evercore ISI, said he did not anticipate a "massive shift" on the latest order, aside from some economies like Taiwan or India striking deals during the seven-day buffer. Following crunch negotiations leading up to the tariffs announcement, Trump struck a series of compromises, notably with the European Union, Japan, and South Korea, setting varying tax rates and touting high investments in the United States. The details of these agreements remain vague and leave the door open to key questions: Are exemptions possible? What will become of key sectors like automobiles, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors? And what of China? The US president and leaders of other countries "have reasons to avoid going into detailed agreements" explained Aks, allowing all sides to present the deals in the most positive, or least negative, way possible to their public. The ability to conclude deals -- often with or without crucial detail -- is, for the 79-year-old Republican, an integral part of his political signature. Art form In his book "The Art of the Deal," the billionaire wrote: "Deals are my art form. Other people paint beautifully on canvas or write wonderful poetry. I like making deals, preferably big deals. That's how I get my kicks." Trump explained in his book that he always "protects" himself "by being flexible." "I never get too attached to one deal or one approach." But despite comments about his trade policy reversals, Trump has hardly budged from his trade strategy, and that could prove politically painful. In a survey conducted by Quinnipiac University published in mid-July, only 40 percent of respondents said they supported the president's trade policy, while 56 percent criticized it. The latest employment figures bear the marks of Trump's protectionist offensive, according to experts. Job creation in May and June was revised sharply downward, falling to levels not seen since the Covid-19 pandemic.
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
The India-Italy partnership as champions for the Global South and the Indo-Mediterranean
On the 1st of March 2006, addressing the US Congress, the then Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi warned that over the next 25 years, two billion more people would mostly be born in countries excluded from prosperity, creating a world split between six billion living in poverty and fewer than two billion in wealth. He said this imbalance would drive massive migration and risk fueling hatred and fundamentalism. The solution, he argued, was to lift poor nations out of misery by spreading democracy, good governance, human rights, and free-market economies, which he described as both a moral duty and a vital interest. In a world marked by volatility where conflicts have erupted across the Indo-Mediterranean, tensions in the Indo-Pacific escalate amid China's aggressive posture, and the persistent threat of Islamic extremism continues to challenge global stability, Berlusconi's speech now resonates with prophetic clarity. Nearly two decades after that historic address, Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has at last crafted a strategic response aimed at addressing the very challenges Berlusconi warned of, warnings that until now successive Italian Prime Ministers and much of the global leadership had largely overlooked. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Public Policy Management Finance Artificial Intelligence MBA Cybersecurity PGDM Operations Management Design Thinking CXO healthcare Product Management MCA Data Science Data Science Technology Project Management Digital Marketing Others Leadership Healthcare Degree Data Analytics others Skills you'll gain: Duration: 12 Months IIM Calcutta Executive Programme in Public Policy and Management Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Economics for Public Policy Making Quantitative Techniques Public & Project Finance Law, Health & Urban Development Policy Duration: 12 Months IIM Kozhikode Professional Certificate Programme in Public Policy Management Starts on Mar 3, 2024 Get Details Prime Minister Meloni's Piano Mattei is Italy's strategic framework for cooperation with Africa, focusing on five pillars: energy, water, agriculture, health, and education. Launched in early 2024 and rooted in 'partnership among equals,' it aims to tackle migration drivers and foster investment through public–private tools. She has successfully aligned the plan with the EU's Global Gateway, co-hosting a Rome summit with President Ursula von der Leyen in June 2025 where 11 agreements were signed. The initiative has positioned Italy as a key EU player in shaping Africa policy and development engagement, and Italy has taken the leadership of the EU's much lagging Africa outreach. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like When the Camera Clicked at the Worst Possible Time Read More Under Prime Minister Narendra Modi's leadership, India has doubled down on a Global South leadership agenda by shepherding the African Union's entry into the G20 at the New Delhi Leaders' Summit in September 2023, which elevated African representation in the forum's core deliberations. It has convened the Voice of Global South Summits (January 2023 and August 2024) to channel developing country priorities into global diplomacy. Looking ahead, New Delhi is set to host the Quad Leaders' Summit in 2025, positioning Indo Pacific security dialogues alongside development concerns of the Global South. India is also a central player in an expanded BRICS, with the 2025 leaders' meeting in Rio de Janeiro offering another platform where it engaged in dialogues on finance, development and South-South partnerships. Without directly mentioning it, both Italy and India seek to counter China's debt heavy Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and its rising military influence in the global south, especially Africa, a young continent, rich in natural resources and full of future potential. While PM Meloni seeks to harness the might of the European Union, PM Modi uses India's centuries of goodwill, colonial era diaspora and soft power. Despite using different strategies both agree on the importance of Africa and the global south to the future of humanity. India and Italy are both firm champions of a more equal, value driven world, where trade wars, proxy wars, natural calamities and pandemics are especially taxing to the poor and the vulnerable. Live Events Italy's vision of an enlarged Mediterranean extending to the Horn of Africa aligns naturally with India's MAHASAGAR initiative (Mutual and Holistic Advancement for Security and Growth Across Regions), launched in March 2025 which starts at the Gulf of Aden. Building on its predecessor SAGAR (2015), which focused largely on the Indian Ocean Region, MAHASAGAR broadens India's engagement with the wider Global South, including East Africa, by emphasizing capacity building, sustainable blue-economy growth, trade, connectivity, and security cooperation. It has cemented India's status as the Indian Ocean's primary maritime security provider and a 'first responder' in crises. MAHASAGAR is designed to counter threats such as piracy, illegal fishing, and maritime terrorism while reinforcing India's commitment to a free and rules-based maritime order, reflecting its ambitions as a Global South leader in ocean diplomacy. Given the shared geography of the Indo-Mediterranean, Italy and India have much to gain by leveraging the synergies between their ambitious initiatives. The challenges they face are common, and both countries are signatories to the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC), a major trade route linking the Indo-Pacific with Europe and the United States through the Middle East. While IMEC, which brings together the US, EU, India, Italy, Germany, France, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Israel, and potentially Greece and Cyprus, will require time to develop its infrastructure, a dedicated Indo-Mediterranean corridor between Italy and India could serve as a vital interim step. The upcoming entry into force of the India - European Free Trade Association (EFTA) Trade and Economic Partnership Agreement (TEPA) on 1st October 2025 underscores this need. Switzerland, the largest EFTA economy and demographically the largest member, is landlocked and heavily dependent on Italian ports for access to India. Experts and entrepreneurs point out the advantage of establishing a dedicated Italy-India-Switzerland maritime trade corridor which would boost TEPA's implementation while laying the groundwork for IMEC's eventual operation. Just as Trieste could serve as India's gateway to Europe's industrial heartlands and Central and Eastern Europe as Europe's IMEC terminal, other Italian ports could become India's entry points into Switzerland and Lombardy, Italy's economic powerhouse. Above all, Italy's southern ports and the infrastructure projects planned under the Mattei Plan complement India's Africa-focused Mahasagar strategy. The strong personal rapport between the two prime ministers and their alignment on strategic objectives further strengthen this partnership. With the leadership of Prime Ministers Meloni and Modi, two cultural superpowers could very well be lighthouses to ships in today's storms and bring them to the shore. Senator Giulio Terzi di Sant'Agata is the President of the Italy-India Parliamentary friendship group, and Vas Shenoy is the Chief Representative for Italy of the Indian Chamber of Commerce (ICC).
Hindustan Times
44 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
View: Why Special Intensive Revision is the need of the hour
In a democracy, the relationship between the state and its citizens is marked by direct engagement, with elections serving as the primary means through which this engagement is exercised. The authority of the state is not self-derived; it flows from the collective will of the people, expressed through the act of voting. As thinkers from Locke to Ambedkar have emphasised in different contexts, the legitimacy of the state rests on the consent and confidence of the governed. This makes it not only a right but also a duty of the state to ensure that only eligible citizens are given the opportunity to vote freely, fairly, and meaningfully. A failure to do so, whether through neglect or manipulation, amounts to a failure of the state's core democratic responsibility. A view of the Election Commission of India (ECI) office in New Delhi.(File Photo) The first step of upholding the election process is a pure electoral roll, which is not only an obligation but a non-negotiable necessity for the very existence of democracy. In keeping with this mandate, the Commission decided to undertake a special intensive revision of electoral rolls across the country, beginning with Bihar, guided by the core objective that "no eligible elector is left out and no ineligible elector is included in the electoral roll." To achieve this, the legal framework provides for two distinct methodologies: the summary revision, wherein the existing roll is published as a draft and updated with additions and deletions; and the intensive revision, which involves the preparation of the roll afresh from scratch. While the summary revision has been adopted in recent years primarily for the sake of administrative convenience, the Commission, taking note of the evolving demographic profile, increasing urbanisation, and growing patterns of migration, consciously chose the more rigorous path of special intensive revision. This decision reflects the Commission's commitment to maintaining the purity and integrity of the electoral roll, which forms the bedrock of any credible democratic exercise. The exercise is being undertaken not only to ensure that all eligible citizens are included, but also to verify that those enrolled fulfill all the conditions prescribed under the Constitution and the Representation of the People Act, 1950, and are not disqualified from being registered as electors. While the debate should have focused on why such a critical exercise had not been conducted for over two decades, the narrative has instead shifted to questioning its timing—why now—when the real question ought to have been why not earlier. A sense of apprehension is being circulated by certain quarters, suggesting that the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) will result in mass-scale disenfranchisement. These concerns are largely premised on the belief that many citizens, owing to illiteracy, migration for work, or poor access to documentation, would be unable to meet the requirements outlined in the Election Commission of India's (ECI) guidelines. It is argued that a significant number of people lack the documents necessary for enumeration and therefore may be excluded from the electoral roll. The Election Commission of India, fully aware that many eligible citizens may not possess conventional documentary proof, adopted a liberal and inclusive approach while framing the guidelines dated 24.06.2025. Intentionally, the list of documents prescribed therein was kept indicative and not exhaustive, precisely to ensure that all legally permissible documents that establish the eligibility conditions under the law could be considered by the Electoral Registration Officer (ERO). The underlying objective was to avoid exclusion and to accommodate the diverse socio-economic realities of citizens across the country. However, it must also be understood that the Election Commission, as a constitutional authority, is bound to operate strictly within the framework of law laid down by Parliament. It cannot—by design or discretion—permit reliance on documents that are legally impermissible or explicitly excluded by statutory mandate. Its flexibility is therefore broad, but never lawless. It is also pertinent to mention that from the very first day of notification, the Election Commission, through its field machinery, undertook proactive steps to ensure full coverage and, as a result, the enumeration teams reached 99.8% of electors—a figure that directly rebuts the claim of widespread exclusion. Yet, this is not the only significant outcome of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR). The exercise also revealed that approximately 22 lakh names on the roll belonged to deceased individuals, 32 lakh were found to be permanently shifted, 4 lakh were untraceable or failed to submit their enumeration forms, and nearly 7 lakh were registered at multiple locations. In total, around 65 lakh electors do not feature in the draft electoral roll. Significantly, about 61 lakh of these were found to be either deceased, permanently relocated, or already enrolled elsewhere—categories that are legally disqualified from being included in the roll. These exclusions are, therefore, not arbitrary but necessary corrections that uphold the legal integrity of the electoral process. As for the remaining 4 lakh electors, despite repeated visits and efforts by enumerators, they were not traceable or did not submit their forms. To address any inadvertent exclusion, including among these 65 lakh names, the Commission has provided an open window for filing claims and objections. The Commission, anticipating the possibility of genuine electors being left out, has instituted a robust remedial mechanism. Any eligible citizen whose name is missing from the draft roll can submit a claim for inclusion until the final publication scheduled for 30th September. This safeguard ensures that the process remains fair and inclusive, without compromising on the legal requirements for eligibility. When initial fears of mass disenfranchisement did not materialize, attention shifted to these figures as supposed evidence of large-scale deletion. However, in line with its guiding principle that 'no eligible elector should be left out,' the Election Commission shared the complete list of such entries with district representatives of recognized political parties, inviting them to verify or trace any individuals whose names they believed had been wrongly deleted. This outreach remains especially relevant for the 4 lakh electors who could not be located during enumeration. Despite this opportunity, no substantial effort or contrary evidence has been produced by any political party to substantiate claims of erroneous deletions. Can this then be termed disenfranchisement? The answer is no. What this instead reveals is that a significant portion of the existing electoral roll included individuals who are deceased, have permanently relocated, or cannot be verified to exist at all. Rather than undermining the democratic process, the Special Intensive Revision has strengthened it by identifying and correcting large-scale inaccuracies. This exercise has not only reaffirmed the Commission's commitment to electoral integrity but has also created an opportunity for stakeholders—including political parties and civil society organizations—to assist in tracing any remaining unverified electors, particularly those who were not found despite field visits. In this crucial final phase, political parties and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) should rise above unproductive debate and instead contribute constructively to the process. Rather than casting doubts or hindering the revision effort, they should actively assist in identifying and facilitating the inclusion of any eligible electors who may have been inadvertently left out of the draft roll. They also have a valuable role in helping track the small remaining segment of 4 lakh untraceable electors, ensuring that the door remains open for rightful inclusion where possible. This last-mile exercise is essential to dispel any remaining apprehension regarding disenfranchisement. It is important to clarify that till the publication of the draft roll, no name has been deleted on the ground of non-availability of documents. Even during the scrutiny of the enumeration forms, every possible effort will be made to ensure that no eligible citizen is excluded solely due to lack of documentation. In cases where documents are unavailable, the Election Commission has deployed an additional force of over 2 lakh volunteers, apart from the 1 lakh Booth Level Officers (BLOs), to actively assist such electors in procuring the required documents from relevant government departments. Furthermore, no name shall be deleted without strictly adhering to the three foundational principles of natural justice—issuing a notice, providing a reasonable opportunity of being heard, and passing a speaking order. Any elector still aggrieved by such deletion is also afforded an opportunity to appeal under a robust two-tier appellate mechanism, thereby ensuring that the process remains both lawful and fair. The Election Commission of India has approached the Special Intensive Revision of the electoral roll with the dual responsibility of inclusion and integrity. While it is bound to ensure that every eligible citizen is rightfully included, it is equally obligated to prevent the entry of ineligible names that can distort the democratic process. The right to vote must be unhindered for those who fulfil the legal conditions, but that same right loses its meaning if the roll is polluted by wrongful entries. But democracy cannot allow those without legal entitlement to occupy the same space in the roll. In ensuring both rightful inclusion and lawful exclusion, the Commission is fulfilling not two competing tasks, but one unified constitutional duty: protecting the sanctity of the franchise. EC is simply doing its job.
