
Scotland wants the EU, the EU wants us. What's stopping us?
If only Zelenskyy were Scottish
I read Ian Lakin's support for Reform (Letters, July 16) with great sadness. Whilst I accept that Scotland, like the rest of the UK, is in a mess I cannot accept that a new right-wing party with the same background as the Tory/ Eton mess is the solution. Especially as it is led by some of the very rich southerners who led us into Brexit with many unfulfilled promises.
The UK is small but made up of four nations, the largest of which has regions, all with varying problems and needs. Only one region is suffering least and it just happens to be the seat of government, financial control, privilege and prestige – no matter which of the major parties is in control. Both these major parties and the present system of government have got us into this mess. Limited devolution, mayors in some cities and supposed levelling-out policies were just sops to every area outwith London and its neighbours. A change of governance is long overdue.
Our demise started nationwide with our big businesses not developing and modernising. Loss of trade did not affect the London investment services which dealt with worldwide business. Privatisation of public services – ultimately often acquired by foreign companies – completed our losses.
Blame ultimately must be accepted by the so-called Establishment, including our leaders of business and investment, and the parties they put into power.
The SNP and the Scottish branches of the major parties have their hands tied behind their backs by the limited fiscal and legal powers allowed to Holyrood. Further, they do not have the support of major companies and investment which Labour and, in particular, the Tories have. A wish for independence is fuelled by these facts.
Both in Westminster and Holyrood there have been many mistakes. Some are due to a desire for improvement, some caused by political bias – particularly the need to get voters' support. It is too easy for a shallow new party to promise great things – without any detail – in the present situation. Equally it is easy to be attracted to a more charismatic party leader when his opponents are rather weak, bland or wavering. Adolf Hitler and Volodymyr Zelenskyy rose to power under such conditions but only President Zelenskyy has shown honest fortitude. Oh, if only he were Scottish.
JB Drummond, Kilmarnock.
Read more letters
Patrick Harvie v Donald Trump
Patrick Harvie, somewhat repetitively and sadly predictably, urges opposition to the pending trip to Scotland of the President of the USA ("Patrick Harvie slams Swinney over plans to meet with Trump", heraldscotland, July 16), despite him visiting his successful Scottish businesses which provide much-needed employment and essential tourism income to the country.
Mr Trump has won two elections in the USA, receiving the support of 77.3 million voters in 2024. By contrast Mr Harvie has stood five times in Scottish elections – won none, finished sixth or seventh each time at the foot of the list MSPs for Glasgow, and at his highest polling received 9,077 votes in 2021. By my reckoning, that makes one Trump equal to approximately 8,500 Harvies.
In the Nationalists' search for a solution to Scottish currency, I can therefore offer them a solution. Instead of pounds and pence, the currency shall be the "Scottish Trump", subdivided into loose change in the form of low-value "Harvies" – akin to the old farthing and to be known colloquially as "Little Patricks" – and will generally lie forgotten in a jar until such times as they may amount to anything worthwhile.
Steph Johnson, Glasgow.
A lesson for Swinney
We read that Donald Trump will meet up with John Swinney during the President's tour of golf courses later this year ("First Minister to meet with President Trump during Scottish holiday", The Herald, July 16). I wonder how well that meeting is likely to go.
Mr Trump tends to have a long memory for insults and slights. He will no doubt readily recall that Mr Swinney supported his opponent during the last presidential election. Mr Trump is quick to hand out derogatory remarks but is not too keen on them when he is the recipient.
There is a lesson for "Honest John". If you are going to advise people in other countries how to vote at election time, you had better have picked the candidate who turns out to be the winner.
Ian W Thomson, Lenzie.
Will heads roll this time?
There have been repeated calls for 'heads to roll' at the BBC in recent weeks. No such calls have been made over the Afghan data breach ("Thousands relocated to UK after leak of Afghans' personal data", The Herald, July 16).
This is normal, as data breaches, secret/classified documents left (in trains, taxis or bars) by civil servants, politicians and senior military figures never lead to consequential action: indeed those involved are appalled and indignant at the very thought. Why is that?
GR Weir, Ochiltree.
Do we lack a strong leader with honest fortitude like Volodymyr Zelenskyy? (Image: PA)
Skewed priorities
May I join your correspondents (Letters, July 16) in congratulating Kevin McKenna for his splendid article ('Sandie Peggie's case against NHS Fife is more important than Supreme Court judgment', July 15), and add my thanks to Andrew Learmonth for his piece – particularly his confirmation that NHS Fife pays Isla Bumba, a twentysomething-year-old with no legal training as its 'equalities and human rights lead officer' no less than £50-59,000 per annum (no doubt with matching pension entitlement) to advise staff on gender issues ("The story so far: A brief recap of events as Sandie Peggie tribunal reopens", The Herald, July 16).
If the BMA were to campaign against nonsenses like that, they would surely gain more public support overnight for some of their other demands. How many similar positions are there throughout the UK's NHS – instead of training and employing sufficient front-line medical staff at all levels and specialities? What skewed priorities.
But it is a pity Mr Learmonth uses the inelegant and ungrammatical 'they' and its derivatives (which in some contexts are misleading or ambiguous) in relation to Dr Beth Upton, to avoid writing either he or she or 'he or she' or even 's/he'. Could our journalists as linguistic experts not by now have created an acceptable new word rather than always employing the plural form in a singular context?
John Birkett, St Andrews.
• Is it any wonder that the NHS in Scotland is in a challenging financial situation when bodies like NHS Fife can pay a twentysomething with no legal training £50k-plus per year as a 'support aid' for staff addressing concerns such as the correct pronouns to use?
I would suggest users of NHS Fife would prefer all available funds be used to support the delivery of frontline health services. How many other NHS bodies are funding roles like this across Scotland and what value are they adding?
Linda McPherson, Edinburgh.
This was hate speech
I generally don't bother reading Kevin McKenna's articles these days as I find them boring and repetitive; does he use AI to produce them? However, there were two letters today (July 16) mentioning his Tuesday article, so I went back and read it .
And, yes, more of the same from Mr McKenna: "working people" (copyright: Sir Keir Starmer) are marvellous and salt of the earth, at least as long as they share his opinions, while managers and politicians are all ignorant, incompetent grifters.
Mr McKenna writes: 'Scotland's governing class are like cockroaches.' That was the word used by Hutu politicians and commentators to describe the Tutsi minority in Rwanda, so it can safely be described as hate speech. I'm surprised to see it in The Herald.
Doug Maughan, Dunblane.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Herald Scotland
40 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Dear Ash Regan, we are sex workers and we don't want your Nordic Model
Your proposed Prostitution (Offences and Support) (Scotland) Bill aims to criminalise the clients of sex workers, which would put sex workers ourselves at higher risk of violence and poverty. This form of legislation, often known as the Nordic model, has endangered sex workers in every country where it has been implemented. You did not consult with any current sex workers before drafting this legislation, which should be unthinkable in our current climate. Policy and laws should centre those who will be most affected by them, as we are the experts on our own lives and on how this law would negatively impact us. Nothing about us, without us. Sex workers don't want this bill, and neither do the Scottish public. When surveyed, 69% of Scots say the Scottish Government should focus on protecting the health and safety of sex workers, and providing support to people who want to leave the industry. This is compared to only 14% who support the government passing new laws to prevent people exchanging sexual services for money. Your bill offers no support to people looking to exit the sex industry. It does not offer any financial backing to struggling organisations which provide services for sex workers, a sector and funding system which the [[Scottish Government]]'s own research has shown is not fit for purpose. The bill does not propose to change policies around benefits or housing to reduce poverty and make sure that fewer people are driven into sex work by financial need. This is despite the fact that 2019 Home Office-commissioned research identified that 'a substantial proportion of individuals … are selling sex to get by financially'. In your bill consultation paper you included a quote which stated that anyone who sells sex is no longer a whole human being, and can never be whole again. This offensive language perpetuates stigma and violence against sex workers, and we reject it. We are whole, we are valuable, and we deserve to be heard. Read more Prostitution is not like Pretty Woman - it harms the most vulnerable | The Herald Regan Nordic Model Bill 'targets demand, protects women' | The Herald 'Becoming a sex worker saved my life - don't take that away from us' | The Herald Often the topic of sex work can be highly emotive and polarising. This is why it's so important to place both evidence, and the voices of current sex workers, at the centre of these discussions. All sex worker-led organisations in the UK support decriminalisation, and oppose the criminalisation of clients. The evidence is clear: the Nordic model, which criminalises the client, puts sex workers in more danger and does not decrease demand. In Northern Ireland, a Ministry of Justice review found that violence against sex workers increased by 225% after similar legislation was passed. According to Ugly Mugs Ireland, crimes against sex workers almost doubled in the two years following the introduction of the law. A Medicins du Monde report found that similar laws in France have led to 42% of workers being more exposed to violence, and 63% experiencing a deterioration of living conditions. An Amnesty International report on the impacts of the Nordic model in Norway found that the police still primarily target sex workers for criminalisation, rather than clients. Clearly, the Nordic model does not work. Public policy should not be based on ideological positions, but on the evidence of what will truly help those in need. This is why Scotland for Decrim calls for further measures to help those in poverty, as we do not want anyone to have to sell sex to survive. We want to see the introduction of rent controls, further support for disabled people and an end to attacks on their rights and income, and the implementation of a Universal Basic Income. We want a reversal of the slashing of services designed to help those escaping abuse, and a complete overhaul of the immigration system to avoid keeping people in dire situations of poverty for long periods of time. These measures are what has been proven to effectively tackle exploitation according to academics at Dundee and Edinburgh Napier universities, not the further criminalisation of an already vulnerable group. Ash Regan (Image: Newsquest) Best evidence demonstrates that full decriminalisation is the most effective measure to ensure sex workers' ability to work in the safest ways possible. In New Zealand where decriminalisation was implemented in 2003, violence against sex workers has decreased, access to healthcare has improved, and relations with the police moved from being combative to collaborative. In Belgium, which decriminalised sex work in 2023, sex workers are now able to form trade unions and have won the right to maternity pay, which will decrease exploitation and child poverty. Bellatrix, a sex worker from Scotland, had this to say to you: 'No matter your personal feelings on sex work, the evidence shows that decriminalisation is the safest for us. Not all issues are made better by involving the criminal justice system. Focus on how to help us avoid poverty, how to not lose our housing, how to find jobs that will actually work around our childcare responsibilities, and our disabilities. Do not criminalise us for existing within the margins.' We call on the Scottish public to join us in the fight against this dangerous bill and for the full decriminalisation of sex work. Visit our website or find us on Instagram at scotland4decrim to find out more.


Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Police Scotland ban uniformed officers from taking part in Pride march
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) SCOTTISH cops have been banned from marching in pride parades while on-duty. An LGBT+ march will be held on the streets of Glasgow today, but unlike previous years there will be no uniformed cops taking part. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 4 A pride parade will be held in Glasgow today Credit: Getty 4 Uniformed cops will not be taking part Credit: Tom Farmer - The Sun Glasgow 4 The march decision followed a ruling from the High Court Credit: Tom Farmer It comes after an English police force was found to have "breached impartiality" by the High Court. Northumbria Police's Chief Constable was found to have acted unlawfully by allowing uniformed cops to take in part in last year's Newcastle Pride. It was argued officers taking part in the parade could harm the force's impartiality if a dispute kicked off between gender-critical and trans rights supporters. After the ruling, Scottish cops are now not marching in the event today in Glasgow. It is understood uniformed officers were already not taking part in the parade, but the court ruling saw force chiefs ditch plans for information stalls had been ditched. Officers will still be able to attend the pride parade if they are off duty. Deputy Chief Constable Alan Speirs told the Daily Mail: "Police Scotland has vast experience in policing events and in the coming days we will continue to do so in a professional, engaging, and proportionate manner. "Glasgow's Pride will be no different and we will continue to engage closely with event organisers, although no officers will participate in forthcoming events in uniform. "We continue to review the UK High Court judgement on Northumbria Police's participation in Newcastle Pride 2024 and its implications. "We will ensure Police Scotland's response to events continues to be in line with our values and code of ethics, providing a professional and impartial service which upholds the human rights of all." NYC Pride ends in chaos after teen girl shot in the head near Stonewall Inn hours after 50 hurt by bear spray attack The Scottish Police Federation (SPF), which represents rank-and-file cops welcomed the decision. SPF General Secretary David Kennedy said they support the values of pride but said officers taking part in any kind of march could harm the force's objectivity. He said: "The SPF proudly supports the principles and values of the Pride movement, including equality, inclusion, and the right of all individuals - regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity - to live free from discrimination and prejudice. "Participating in any march while on duty, including Pride, can give rise to questions around neutrality and may impact perceptions of police objectivity. "Officers who wish to take part in Pride events in their own time should be supported and encouraged to do so, and we welcome efforts to facilitate this wherever possible. 'Supporting Pride and supporting operational clarity are not mutually exclusive—we believe both can, and should, co-exist."


NBC News
2 hours ago
- NBC News
Ukrainian government raids anti-corruption campaigner, raising alarm
Ukraine risks backsliding on its endemic corruption problem — and even creeping toward authoritarianism — activists warn, following police raids against a high-profile anti-corruption campaigner and opposition figures. On July 11, armed police raided the home of Vitaliy Shabunin, the co-founder of Ukraine's Anti-Corruption Action Center. He has accused President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of 'taking the first, but confident steps toward corrupt authoritarianism,' including backing laws offering amnesty to those accused of corruption in the defense industry, and passing over an independently selected candidate for a key anti-graft role. The move has perturbed even some of Zelenskyy's supporters — people who are simultaneously worried about the heavy-handed and potentially spurious crackdown on dissent, and that such criticisms against the Ukrainian leader might be used in bad faith by opponents in Moscow or Washington. 'This is the red line which President Zelensky has crossed — and the red line is in a very wrong direction in terms of the development of Ukraine,' said Daria Kaleniuk, executive director of the Anti-Corruption Action Center, the Kyiv-based watchdog that Shabunin co-founded. She said the State Bureau of Investigations did not have the necessary court documents for the search. Shabunin has been charged with evading military service and fraud, with prosecutors alleging that while on secondment from the front lines to continue his activism back in Kyiv, he conducted activities unrelated to his military service. His defense team and supporters say the secondment was all aboveboard and ordered by his superiors, and that the allegations are trumped up and political. The case has caused grave alarm for many inside Ukraine and abroad, with even some of those who praise Zelenskyy for making progress on corruption flagging it as cause for concern that he may be engaging in some of the same questionable practices they'd hoped he was rooting out. Zelenskyy pledged to reduce corruption when he was elected in 2019, and many expert observers say he has been effective at doing so, but the tide of criticism around Shabunin's arrest comes when the president is under intense pressure to fight off Russia and keep alive support from the United States and the West that has been at risk of faltering. It's not just Shabunin's own organization that's concerned. A group of 59 nongovernmental and civil society organizations, both inside Ukraine and abroad, have signed an open letter to Zelenskyy saying the arrest 'bears signs of political motivation, abuse of rights' and either 'gross incompetence' or 'a deliberate attack to pressure' Shabunin. NBC News has contacted Zelenskyy's office and the State Bureau of Investigations for comment but has not received a response. The president has been a longtime vocal advocate on the issue of fighting corruption, particularly when it comes to suggestions from the U.S. and elsewhere that the billions of dollars in military aid his country is receiving might be being misappropriated. 'Where we saw risks that something could be happening with weapons, we cracked down hard,' he told the 'Lex Fridman Podcast' in January. Last year Shabunin himself dismissed the idea that foreign arms could be embezzled, telling the BBC that 'all weapons supplied by Western allies end up in the hands of Ukrainian troops who use them effectively. It is impossible to steal Western weapons.' Shabunin appeared in court Tuesday and was released on 'recognizance' — essentially released without having to post bail — until the next hearing Aug. 20. The German Marshall Fund, a Washington think tank and one of the international signatories of the letter to Zelenskyy, said Ukraine had made 'monumental strides' on corruption in the past 11 years. Nevertheless, 'it's always concerning when a government targets its vocal critics with flimsy charges in politically motivated investigations,' said Josh Rudolph, head of the fund's malign finance and corruption team. 'Although this is not a sign of corruption per se, it displays an alarming disregard for the fundamental values of freedom and the rule of law at a time when the international community has been rallying around Ukraine because it is defending those very values from Russia's brutal assault.' Shabunin is not the only recent arrest to cause alarm. The opposition UDAR party, headed by former heavyweight boxing champion Vitali Klitschko, says that a raid in April on the home of Kyiv City Council deputy Dmytro Bilotserkivets — again, they said, without the necessary documents — was a clear attempt to put pressure on political dissent. Corruption in Ukraine is a fraught and delicate topic, ripe for weaponization often in bad faith. Russia uses it as an example to support its otherwise untrue criticisms — such as Ukraine being run by neo-Nazis — while American and European politicians hold up such examples to bolster their pre-existing arguments about whether to support Kyiv's defense against Moscow. 'The issue of corruption in Ukraine has long been highly politicized,' said Mariya Omelicheva, a professor at the Pentagon-funded National War College in Washington, D.C. Ukrainian 'corruption is almost always co-opted — either by Ukraine's supporters or, more problematically, by its adversaries,' she added. 'This is particularly sensitive in the current U.S. political climate, where both parties — Democrats and Republicans — have used Ukrainian corruption narratives for domestic political purposes.' There is also a feeling among some Ukrainians that President Donald Trump's 'America First' focus has allowed officials abroad to act with greater impunity knowing Washington's hitherto exacting gaze is currently less troubled by world affairs. 'Our international partners, particularly the United States, don't care anymore about good governance and anti-corruption and reforms,' Kaleniuk said. Washington 'for the last 12 years had a powerful impact on how Ukraine develops, and the U.S. was usually tough on good governance, anti-corruption reforms and developments critical for democracy,' she said. 'But now America doesn't care about that.' While it's true Trump historically spoke warmly of Russian President Vladimir Putin and appeared to accept many of his war demands, in recent weeks he has been increasingly hostile to the Kremlin and signaled a renewed support for Ukraine, pledging Patriot missiles for Kyiv and tariffs on Moscow. It's also true that Ukraine — and Zelenskyy — have achieved some progress in the corruption fight in recent years. Transparency International, the best known international group that tracks this topic, says Ukraine has steadily improved in its annual 'Corruption Perceptions' index — although it still ranks 105 of 180 countries worldwide. Nevertheless, domestically there are plenty of Ukrainians alarmed at what they see is a negative direction of travel when it comes to corruption in their country. Though the immediate fight is against Russia, the ultimate battle is for their values of liberty and democracy, supporters say, without which the battlefield struggle becomes pointless. 'We are fighting for freedoms and for dignity,' Kaleniuk said. If those are lost, 'only Russia will applaud.'