Recreational salmon fishing resumes in California this weekend for limited time
Coastal salmon fishing was banned in 2023 and 2024 in an effort to help the population recover after years of declines. While commercial fishing remains canceled for a third consecutive year, fishery regulators recently decided to allow a limited season for recreational fishing on certain dates and with strict quotas.
'We're all very excited,' said William 'Captain Smitty' Smith, who was readying his charter fishing boat Riptide at Pillar Point Harbor in Half Moon Bay. 'There's a lot of buzz all around the harbor with everybody getting ready for it.'
Smith and his two deckhands have been buying bait and preparing hooks, nets and other gear to take 18 passengers fishing Saturday and Sunday. He said within hours of the April announcement that limited fishing would be allowed, 'my regulars all called and basically filled the boat.'
Smith is 71 and has been in the charter boat business for 50 years. The last time he was able to take passengers fishing for salmon was in 2022.
As his business has struggled during the last two years, he has turned to other types of outings to make ends meet, including fishing for rockfish, leading whale-watching trips and holding burials at sea where mourners scatter the ashes of loved ones.
He said anglers are 'chomping at the bit to go.' Each person will be allowed to catch up to two fish per day.
Read more: U.S. panel calls for suspending commercial salmon fishing in California for third year
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife is limiting ocean fishing under quotas in two windows in the summer and fall. The first is set to open Saturday-Sunday and allow for up to 7,000 salmon to be caught statewide.
If that number of fish isn't reached during the opening weekend, salmon fishing will be allowed until the limit is reached in subsequent stretches, which may include July 5-6, July 31-Aug. 3, and Aug. 25-31.
In addition to Half Moon Bay, fishing boats are expected to head out this weekend from other harbors in Central and Northern California such as Morro Bay, Santa Cruz, San Francisco, Bodega Bay and Fort Bragg.
'Given the 2-year ocean salmon fishery closure and the short duration of this fishing period, angler participation is expected to be high,' the department said in its announcement. 'Anglers should prepare for crowds and long wait times at public launch ramps and marinas and consider travel, parking, and launch ramp conditions when finalizing plans.'
The agency said fishing will reopen in the fall in some regions — including from Point Reyes in Marin County south to near Half Moon Bay, and from there to Point Sur in Big Sur — under a separate harvest limit guideline of 7,500 Chinook salmon.
The fishing industry depends on fall-run Chinook, which migrate upstream to spawn from July through December. For decades, government-run hatcheries in the Central Valley have reared and released millions of salmon each year to help boost their numbers.
Read more: Salmon populations are struggling, bringing economic woes for California's fishing fleet
Other salmon runs have suffered more severe declines. Spring-run Chinook are listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act, and winter-run Chinook are endangered.
Biologists say salmon populations have declined because of a combination of factors including dams, which have blocked off spawning areas, the loss of vital floodplain habitats, and global warming, which is intensifying droughts and causing warmer temperatures in rivers.
During the severe 2020-22 drought, the water flowing from dams sometimes got so warm that it was lethal for salmon eggs. Although that drought was a major factor behind the declines in the salmon population, those who work in fishing also blame California's water managers and policies, saying too much water has been pumped to farms and cities, depriving rivers of sufficient cold water at the times salmon need it.
Smith said he hopes to see 'responsible water management' where state officials prioritize river flows for fish, as well as efforts to restore floodplains and improve hatchery operations.
Read more: 'A beautiful thing': Klamath River salmon are spotted far upstream in Oregon after dam removal
Because salmon typically feed in the ocean for about three years and then return to their natal streams, the decline in the numbers of surviving juvenile fish during the drought left a reduced population of adult fish. Scientists expect the population should improve somewhat next year because of the boost they received during 2023's historic wet winter, though they also caution that the situation facing California's salmon remains dire.
Smith said one change that has nurtured his hopes came last year, when the last of four dams were dismantled on the Klamath River in Northern California, enabling salmon to reach upstream spawning areas that had been sealed off for more than a century.
'I'm very hopeful for our future,' he said, adding that he is thinking about his 13-year-old grandson and the next generation.
'I want there to be a fishery for my grandson. I want him to be able to experience the thrill of catching a fish in the ocean.'
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
14 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Doug Ford heads west to meet with Danielle Smith and promote pipelines
Premier Doug Ford is stampeding west to promote pipelines. Ford will be at the Calgary Stampede on Monday and is to sign a memorandum of understanding with Alberta Premier Danielle Smith to build new energy and trade infrastructure. 'I've never seen a country more united. I'm going to be flying out to see Premier Smith and we're going to have a great conversation about building pipelines right across our great country,' he told reporters two weeks ago. Because of U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff war against Canada, the prime minister and premiers have been forced to work together to reduce interprovincial trade barriers and look to boost trade with Asia and Europe. While any new westward oil pipeline appears to be a non-starter for British Columbia Premier David Eby — who wants to focus on 'shovel-ready projects' rather than Smith's longer-term schemes — Ford maintains momentum is building nationally for such infrastructure. 'I know one thing, we're all onside going east. We're going north,' the Ontarian said, referring to Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew's push for a pipeline to tidewater in Churchill on Hudson Bay. A rare alliance between Prime Minister Mark Carney's Liberals and Pierre Poilievre's 'That's up to Premier Eby to decide if they're going west or not. But we have to really diversify our trade as well,' said Ford, who wants Ontario's steel industry, battered by Trump's punishing tariffs, to benefit from the next generation of pipelines. Prime Minister Mark Carney's controversial Bill C-5 — the One Canadian Economy Act, the federal counterpart to Ontario's equally contentious Bill 5, the Protect Ontario by Unleashing our Economy Act — empowers Ottawa to rush through major energy projects despite concerns from some Indigenous groups and environmentalists. 'Canada's new government is breaking down trade barriers and building one strong economy — connected by Canadian projects, powered by Canadian energy, and crafted by Canadian workers,' Carney said Monday. 'Together, we can give ourselves more than any foreign nation can take away,' the prime minister added. Proponents argue that the controversial bill is essential for Ontario's economy amid U.S. Federal Transport and Internal Trade Minister Chrystia Freeland, a close Ford ally, pointed out last week's passage of Bill C-5 would 'eliminate internal trade barriers and cut red tape for Canadian businesses.' 'We are moving quickly on commitments to improve labour mobility for workers across the country, implement mutual recognition agreements to gets goods and services moving, and removing duplication of requirements which for too long have created extra costs and delays for Canadian businesses and workers,' said Freeland. 'We will create one Canadian economy; one with more opportunities for Canadian businesses and Canadian workers, an economy that will put more money in the pocket of every Canadian.' Freeland meets Tuesday in Quebec City with her provincial ministerial counterparts from across the country to discuss the next phase of red tape reduction. Ford, for his part, has inked memorandums of understanding for Ontario to scrap interprovincial trade barriers with Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Prince Edward Island. That leaves British Columbia, Quebec and Newfoundland and Labrador yet to sign pacts with Queen's Park. As Ford gears up to host the premiers at their annual Council of the Federation summer confab in Huntsville later this month, there are hopes Ontario could soon reach agreements with those remaining three provinces. Carney has said that eliminating protectionist internal barriers to trade could inject $200 billion annually into the Canadian economy. According to Ottawa, in 2023, more than $530 billion of goods and services moved across provincial and territorial borders, which represented almost 20 per cent of the nation's gross domestic product. Despite the rhetoric from political leaders, some trade barriers, such as supply management for dairy products that are subject to provincial quotas, will persist. With files from Alex Ballingall
Newsweek
a day ago
- Newsweek
Millennials Are More Patriotic Than Boomers In Car-Buying Habits: Study
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Millennials are surprisingly more patriotic than their baby boomer counterparts—at least when it comes to their car-buying habits, according to a new study. In the report from 65 percent of millennials were willing to pay more for a vehicle if it created more U.S. jobs, whereas just 37 percent of boomers said the same. Why It Matters Baby boomers have garnered a reputation for being more traditional and patriotic in nature, but their actual spending habits may reflect different priorities. Millennials, known to be more critical of traditions and patriotism, actually want to create more U.S. jobs through their vehicle purchases, the study found. On average, Americans spent $12,078 on car ownership costs in 2023, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. A Tesla charges up in the Silicon Valley town of Mountain View, California, on August 24, 2016. A Tesla charges up in the Silicon Valley town of Mountain View, California, on August 24, 2016. Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images What To Know Millennials were by far the most patriotic car buyers, scoring 65 percent, with Gen X finishing second at 50 percent, Gen Z coming in third at 48 percent and boomers finishing last with 37 percent, according to the generational study. "The generation that gets labeled as unpatriotic snowflakes is actually the one putting their money where their mouth is," Michael Ryan, finance expert and founder of told Newsweek. "Meanwhile, Boomers, who'll lecture you about supporting America all day long. They balk at paying an extra $50 for something made here." President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs have impacted car manufacturing, especially as many Americans historically purchase vehicles built by non-U.S. companies. More than half of those surveyed said they've accelerated their vehicle purchase timeline to avoid tariff-driven price hikes, and 73 percent of shoppers would consider an American-built vehicle to avoid added tariff costs. When it comes to which vehicles and car brands contribute the most to the U.S. economy through manufacturing, parts sourcing and employment, Texas-based Tesla claimed the top four spots, with its Model 3 topping the list. The Jeep Gladiator and Kia EV6 also ranked high, while Honda vehicles took three spots in the top 10 list. What People Are Saying Patrick Masterson, lead researcher for American-Made Index, said in the report: "As import tariffs shake up the auto industry and influence consumer priorities, our 2025 American-Made Index [AMI] offers a timely snapshot of which vehicles and automakers are truly driving U.S. economic impact. Tesla continues to lead, claiming the top four spots and showcasing its commitment to domestic production. About 25 percent of the more than 400 vehicles on sale in the U.S. made this year's AMI, and whether a vehicle is No. 1 or No. 99, it contributes to the U.S. economy." Ryan added to Newsweek: "Millennials aren't being patriotic in the flag waving, anthem singing way their grandparents were. They're being patriotic with their wallets. That's way more practical. Millennials came of age watching factories close, friends struggle with student debt, and entire communities devastated by job losses. "So when a millennial pays extra for an American made car, they're not thinking 'America, hell yeah!' They're thinking 'Maybe this keeps someone's dad employed' or 'Maybe this helps my town stay alive.'" Alex Beene, financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "While I'm sure there are some millennials willing to pay more for vehicles out of a genuine feeling the action would be patriotic, the reality is many millennials - particularly those on the older side of the spectrum for their generation - are entering years of their working life that result in higher pay. Financially, they may feel they can handle these price bumps at their elevated salaries and support workers in America." What Happens Next Millennials choosing to buy from brands that support American workers could have broader effects on the economy. "What this really reflects is that millennials understand something their elders missed: it's about action," Ryan said. "And when you're facing a housing crisis, climate change, and an economy that feels rigged against you ... They're not buying American cars to make America great again. They're buying them to make America work again."
CNBC
2 days ago
- CNBC
Is hiring movers worth the cost? Ask yourself these 4 questions before paying for professional help
Moving can be a stressful process. And with kids or a busy job, it gets even harder. For many, hiring movers can feel like a good way to reduce the hassle — but it can also come with a high price tag. If you want to bring in professionals, the average cost of a two- to three-bedroom local move of about 7,500 pounds is $1,250, according to a moving services platform. A long-distance move of around 1,000 miles will run you $4,890 on average. That number can go up even higher, though, depending on factors such as the weight and size of your belongings, the distance of your move, the timing of it and the cost of labor. So, is it worth it to hire movers? Here are four questions to ask yourself first, according to financial experts. It might be easy to move a bedside table and a few bags of clothes with the help of a couple buddies, but consider whether you trust yourself to keep your more precious possessions safe too, says Ben Smith, a certified financial planner from Milwaukee, Wisconsin. As Smith's clients get older and accumulate pricier possessions, he finds they feel more comfortable spending money on movers to reduce the chances of breaking things or getting injured by doing the heavy lifting themselves, he says. Plus, professional moving companies usually offer insurance packages you can tack onto your deal, meaning if a flat-screen TV gets cracked in the truck, you might end up in a better position for getting a replacement than if you accidentally break it in the back of a U-Haul, Smith says. Like with any convenience service, consider the value of the time you'll get back by outsourcing in comparison to the price, Smith says. With his clients, Smith usually crunches these numbers with the help of online tools, like the salary to hourly calculators on Indeed or The Calculator Site, he says. When calculating your personal hourly rate, remember to account for base salary, bonuses, recurring job costs, benefits and vacation time. For a quick estimate, you can add your annual income and typical bonus together, then subtract estimated taxes and work-related expenses such as gas to and from the job. Divide that number by the total hours you work in a year, which is usually around 2,080 hours for full-time employees. If your hourly rate comes to $75, you may be comfortable paying someone $50 an hour on occasion to help with a tedious home maintenance task, Smith says. Moving, though, generally comes at a steeper price, and often requires you to think more long-term about managing your time, money and stress, beyond just your hourly rate. Consider the different factors that could raise the price tag and how much time you want to buy back, says Jovan Johnson, a CFP from Atlanta, Georgia. Are you willing to pay someone to help with packing, or would you prefer to save money by taking care of that step yourself? How long would it take you to get enough friends together to carry your couch out the door, into the truck and to your new place — and how much could you accomplish by using that time differently? If outsourcing can save you significant productive time, allowing you to prioritize your income, then it may be worth it, Johnson says. There are many factors to worry about when moving, and sometimes hiring professional help is key for "peace of mind," Smith says. It's why he and his wife decided to hire pros for the first time when they moved two years ago. Saving time and physical effort provided mental relief, he says, and allowed the couple to focus on other tasks, like changing addresses on credit cards. It also crucially allowed Smith to stay on track at work, he says. Your income is "the engine" of your financial health, Smith says. Prioritizing your happiness and outsourcing tasks that bog you down can reduce the risk of burnout and keep the engine running. So if hiring movers means you won't fall behind at work or into turmoil at home, then outsourcing might be the way to go, Smith says. Before hiring a moving company, it's best to shop around and find a price that won't deter your long-term financial goals, Johnson says. Depending on your budget, this may mean only hiring movers to take care of a small portion of your more breakable, bulky or precious items, while teaming up with friends or family to take care of the rest. You should never hire movers if it would jeopardize your ability to pay important bills or force you into high-rate debt, he says. Ultimately, it comes down to finding a price you can afford today that also won't deter your long-term goals, Johnson says.
