Kristi Noem Cries 'Fake News' Amid Reports Of FEMA Failures Afte Texas Floods
Noem pushed back against a New York Times report that found thousands of calls to FEMA's disaster assistance line went unanswered in the days following the flood, in part because the Department of Homeland Security had allowed call center contracts to lapse.
'It's discouraging that during this time, when we have such a loss of life and so many people's lives have been turned upside down, that people are playing politics,' she told host Kristen Welker, calling the investigation 'false reporting.'
Documents reviewed by the Times showed that nearly two-thirds of calls to FEMA's disaster assistance line went unanswered on July 6 and 7. Still, Noem insisted the story needed to be 'validified,' appearing to create a hybrid with the words 'validated' and 'verified.'
She also dismissed accounts from FEMA whistleblowers as 'anonymous attacks' aimed at politicizing the situation.
WELKER: The NYT is reporting that thousands of calls from flood victims to FEMA calls centers went unanswered in the middle of this ongoing disaster because you didn't renew contracts to keep call center staff in place until nearly a week after the floods.NOEM: False reporting.… pic.twitter.com/4dKq64zSm3
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) July 13, 2025
The Times report noted that it took until five days after the July 4 floods to reinstate call center contracts, in part due to a new internal policy requiring Noem to personally sign-off on all DHS contracts over $100,000.
In an email to the Times, a spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security blamed FEMA's responsiveness issue on an unexpected spike in demand.
'When a natural disaster strikes, phone calls surge, and wait times can subsequently increase,' they wrote. 'Despite this expected influx, FEMA's disaster call center responded to every caller swiftly and efficiently, ensuring no one was left without assistance.'
Elsewhere in the interview, Noem tried to reframe former President Donald Trump's calls to dismantle FEMA, claiming he isn't looking to eliminate the agency but simply wants to see it 'remade.'
'I think the president recognizes that FEMA should not exist in the way that it always has,' she said. 'It needs to be redeployed in a new way, and that's what we did during this response.'
Search For Texas Flood Victims Paused As Heavy Rains Bring New Threat Of High Waters
Trump Calls Reporter An 'Evil Person' For Asking About Families Impacted By Texas Flood
Report: FEMA Repeatedly Loosened Oversight At Texas Camp Where 27 People Died In Flooding
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
15 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Karen Bass is resisting Trump's crackdown. Can she make a difference?
Last Monday, as federal forces stormed MacArthur Park in an operation that appeared to have no clear objective beyond spectacle, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass arrived at the scene to demand an immediate end to the operation. She got on the phone with Gregory Bovino, chief of the U.S. Border Patrol, and said she demanded Bovino to have his agents 'leave, immediately.'
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I'm A FEMA Responder. Here's What No One Is Telling You About The Tragic Texas Floods.
The catastrophic floods in Texas killed more than 100 people – including at least 28 children, most of them at a Christian summer camp that was devastated by last week's disaster. Despite the horror, these children were not the first young Americans to have their futures destroyed by climate change. Nor will they be the last. Though the White House has described the floods as 'an act of God,' the disaster was not divine intervention, but part of a deadly chain of undeniable global climatic shifts that we are wholly unprepared for. As an emergency health care worker, FEMA responder and proud woman of faith, I know this tragedy stems from years of climate denialism and reckless cuts to science, preparedness and infrastructure. I've seen hospitals overheat during heatwaves — my own cousin was denied a proper funeral because the morgue couldn't keep his body cool. My organization, Health4Peace, has sent thousands of dollars to hospitals only to learn it's often spent on air conditioning, not advanced treatment. That's just one of the ways that climate change is quietly rewriting our priorities. In church, I've heard people say 'God is in control' to dismiss the crisis — but my faith calls me to speak up, gently but firmly. Because staying quiet would be a betrayal of both my beliefs and what I see on the frontlines. Cuts now being deepened under Donald Trump are harming an entire generation of American children. Kids are physically more vulnerable to climate change and its effects – they breathe more air, eat more food, and drink more water relative to their body size, making them more susceptible to pollution, heat and disease. Psychologically, studieslink childhood exposure to natural disasters with higher rates of anxiety, depression, and PTSD. Climate change is already reshaping childhood. And as the crisis worsens, they'll face growing threats: less access to clean water and healthy food, more illness, and more extreme weather disasters. Since 2022, extreme weather has forced over 400 million students worldwide out of school. Even when classrooms stay open, disasters disrupt learning, displace families and put children at risk. In 2024 alone, more than 11 million Americanswere displaced by climate-fueled events — uprooting children into instability, where they face greater risks of abuse, exploitation, and long-term psychological distress. In New Mexico last summer, wildfires destroyed 1,400 structures, including homes and schools. This year, fires in Los Angeles wreaked even greater havoc, with several schools and hospitals severely damaged or destroyed completely. The Texas floods highlighted another blind spot: Every summer, 26 million American children attend camps, often in areas particularly vulnerable to floods or extreme heat, with almost no oversight or preparation for the new climate realities. We know from officials in Kerr County that lifesaving warnings were delayed due to bureaucracy and systematic defunding of warning and response systems. This tragedy was the inevitable result of deliberate policy choices that have gutted our capacity to respond. And it's only going to get worse. In his first term, Trump wanted to slash FEMA's pre-disaster mitigation budget by almost two-thirds. This time, he plans to phase it out altogether — with hundreds of billions of dollars already wiped out. NOAA's budget for vital climate research and weather forecasting is set to be cut by roughly $2.3 billion, around 40% year-on-year, eliminating a lab that was specifically working on a flash-flood forecasting tool. The current administration insists on framing the climate crisis as a partisan fight. But what could be more bipartisan, more deeply American, than keeping our children safe? This is a moral emergency that calls for the very 'family values' the MAGA movement so loudly proclaims. We should demand they live up to that promise and apply those values where they are needed most. First, the Trump administration must urgently reinstate and expand federal support for early warning systems, emergency planning in schools and camps, and climate-resilient infrastructure in every community, not just the ones who can afford it. Instead of stripping the Department of Education and its internal Emergency Management arm, local authorities should be properly equipped with the tools and funding to retrofit schools, camps, and childcare facilities to withstand climate extremes. At the same time, we cannot stop at emergency response alone. We also need to confront the root causes driving these disasters — cutting emissions, restoring ecosystems that buffer against floods and heat, and investing in sustainable infrastructure that protects both people and the planet. Critically, we must also invest in climate education, so the next generation understands the crisis they're inheriting and is empowered to act. Young people should be informed of the latest climate research and equipped with leadership skills to fill gaps left by policymakers. Just recently, Duke University's Divinity School signed a Memorandum of Understanding to continue its pioneering youth fellowship program in partnership with Faith For Our Planet, a global interfaith nonprofit established by the Muslim World League (MWL). Under the leadership of MWL Secretary General Sheikh Mohammad Al-Issa, the program equips young faith leaders with tools to identify climate risks and build climate resilience in their communities. Al-Issa, who met personally with the Duke president, has long argued that faith is an underutilized framework and should be harnessed to deliver values-based solutions to the climate crisis. On the other hand, programs like Climate Generation's Youth Environmental Activists (YEA!) network work directly with students and teachers in public schools to develop climate literacy, train young leaders and organize community-wide preparedness projects. However, the truth is, no amount of grassroots heroism can fully replace what deliberate federal policy has destroyed. Local efforts are holding the line, but they are forced to do so with shrinking resources and against rising odds. The floods in Texas should remind us that climate change is not just an environmental issue, but a test of our collective morality — of whether we will stand idle or rise to meet this moment. Americans of faith, of science and of conscience have already begun to fill the gaps left by government failure. Now it's time for our leaders to catch up. Ultimately, our children are not bargaining chips in a culture war. They are the future of our nation. And they deserve a country willing to fight for them. Dr. Nathalie Beasnael is a nurse, FEMA trainee, diplomatic envoy for Chad, COP28 delegate and the founder of Health4Peace. Do you have a compelling personal story you'd like to see published on HuffPost? Find out what we're looking for here and send us a pitch at pitch@
Washington Post
26 minutes ago
- Washington Post
A Senate vote this week will test the popularity of DOGE spending cuts
WASHINGTON — Senate Republicans will test the popularity of Department of Government Efficiency spending cuts this week by aiming to pass President Donald Trump's request to claw back $9.4 billion in public media and foreign aid spending. Senate Democrats are trying to kill the measure but need a few Republicans uncomfortable with the president's effort to join them. Trump's Republican administration is employing a rarely used tool that allows the president to transmit a request to cancel previously approved funding authority. The request triggers a 45-day clock under which the funds are frozen. If Congress fails to act within that period, then the spending stands. That clock expires Friday. The House has already approved Trump's request on a mostly party line 214-212 vote. The Senate has little time to spare to beat the deadline for the president's signature. Another House vote will be needed if senators amend the legislation, adding more uncertainty to the outcome. Here's a closer look at this week's debate. Trump has asked lawmakers to rescind nearly $1.1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting , which represents the full amount it's due to receive during the next two budget years. The White House says the public media system is politically biased and an unnecessary expense. The corporation distributes more than two-thirds of the money to more than 1,500 locally operated public television and radio stations, with much of the remainder assigned to National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting System to support national programming. The potential fallout from the cuts for local pubic media stations has generated concerns on both sides of the political aisle. Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., said he's worried about how the rescissions will hit radio stations that broadcast to Native Americans in his state. He said the vast majority of their funding comes from the federal government. 'They're not political in nature,' Rounds said of the stations. 'It's the only way of really communicating in the very rural areas of our state, and a lot of other states as well.' Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Ala., said that for the tribal radio stations in her state, 'almost to a number, they're saying that they will go under if public broadcasting funds are no longer available to them.' To justify the spending cuts, the Trump administration and Republican lawmakers have cited certain activities they disagree with to portray a wide range of a program's funding as wasteful. In recent testimony , Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought criticized programming aimed at fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion . He said NPR aired a 2022 program entitled 'What 'Queer Ducks' can teach teenagers about sexuality in the animal kingdom.' He also cited a special town hall that CNN held in 2020 with 'Sesame Street' about combatting racism. As part of the package, Trump has asked lawmakers to rescind about $8.3 billion in foreign aid programs that aim to fight famine and disease and promote global stability. Among the targets: — $900 million to combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases and strengthen detections systems to prevent wider epidemics. — $800 million for a program that provides emergency shelter, water and sanitation and family reunification for those forced to flee their own country. — $4.15 billion for two programs designed to boost the economies and democratic institutions in developing and strategically important countries. — $496 million to provide humanitarian assistance such as food, water and health care for countries hit by natural disasters and conflicts. Some of the health cuts are aimed at a program known as PEPFAR, which President George W. Bush, a Republican, began to combat HIV/AIDS in developing countries. The program is credited with saving 26 million lives and has broad bipartisan support. On PEPFAR, Vought told senators 'these cuts are surgical and specifically preserve life-saving assistance.' But many lawmakers are wary, saying they've seen no details about where specifically the administration will cut. The administration also said some cuts, such as eliminating funding for UNICEF, would encourage international organizations to be more efficient and seek contributions from other nations, 'putting American taxpayers first.' U.S. leaders have often argued that aiding other nations through 'soft power' is not just the right thing to do but also the smart thing. Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., told Vought there is 'plenty of absolute nonsense masquerading as American aid that shouldn't receive another bit of taxpayer funding,' but he called the administration's attempt to root it out 'unnecessarily chaotic.' 'In critical corners of the globe, instead of creating efficiencies, you've created vacuums for adversaries like China to fill,' McConnell told Vought. The president has issued a warning on his social media site directly aimed at individual Senate Republicans who may be considering voting against the cuts. He said it was important that all Republicans adhere to the bill and in particular defund the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. 'Any Republican that votes to allow this monstrosity to continue broadcasting will not have my support or Endorsement,' he said. For individual Republicans seeking reelection, the prospect of Trump working to defeat them is reason for pause and could be a sign the package is teetering. Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., opted to announce he would not seek reelection recently after the president called for a primary challenger to the senator when he voted not to advance Trump's massive tax and spending cut bill . Spending bills before the 100-member Senate almost always need some bipartisan buy-in to pass. That's because the bills need 60 votes to overcome a filibuster and advance. But this week's effort is different. Congress set up a process back when Republican Richard Nixon was president for speedily considering a request to claw back previously approved spending authority. Under those procedures, it takes only a simple Senate majority to advance the president's request to a final vote. It's a rarely employed maneuver. In 1992, President George H.W. Bush, a Republican, had some success with his rescissions request, though the final bill included some cuts requested by the president and many that were not. Trump proposed 38 rescissions in 2018, but the package stalled in the Senate. If senators vote to take up the bill, it sets up the potential for 10 hours of debate plus votes on scores of potentially thorny amendments in what is known as a vote-a-rama. Democrats see the president's request as an effort to erode the Senate filibuster . They warn it's absurd to expect them to work with GOP lawmakers on bipartisan spending measures if Republicans turn around a few months later and use their majority to cut the parts they don't like. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer offered a stern warning in a letter to colleagues: 'How Republicans answer this question on rescissions and other forthcoming issues will have grave implications for the Congress, the very role of the legislative branch, and, more importantly, our country,' Schumer said. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., took note of the warning. 'I was disappointed to see the Democrat leader in his recent Dear Colleague letter implicitly threaten to shut down the government,' Thune said. The Trump administration is likening the first rescissions package to a test case and says more could be on the way if Congress goes along.
