logo
Gov. DeWine vetoes measure that would have been ‘suicide' for Ohio pharmacies

Gov. DeWine vetoes measure that would have been ‘suicide' for Ohio pharmacies

Yahoo3 days ago
(Stock photo)
Ohio pharmacists were worried that a measure inserted into the state budget would cause mass closures. Gov. Mike DeWine on Monday vetoed it, saying that lawmakers in the Ohio House and Senate asked him to.
In his veto message, DeWine acknowledged that Ohio pharmacies are closing rapidly, and said he and Lt. Gov. Jim Tressel will keep working on the problem.
Last year, Ohio lost 215 pharmacies and the total number dropped below 2,000 for the first time in memory, according to an online tracker launched by the Ohio Board of Pharmacy. Pharmacy owners have long complained that huge pharmacy middlemen with conflicted interests have used a non-transparent system to underpay them and drive them out of business.
In response, legislation was introduced in the Ohio House earlier this year that would require the middlemen to reimburse pharmacies for drugs based on a public database compiled by the federal government.
That would only allow pharmacies to break even on drugs. So the legislation also required the middlemen to pay a $10 per-prescription dispensing fee to cover pharmacies' overhead such as payroll, rent, taxes, and insurance. It's based on a statewide survey regularly conducted among pharmacies.
Then the Ohio Chamber of Commerce got involved, telling state senators that the dispensing fees were a tax and that they should oppose them. The chamber made that claim even though the Ohio Department of Medicaid in 2022 adopted a similar system and saved $140 million in the process.
Despite requests, the Ohio Chamber hasn't disclosed how much money it gets from the middlemen, known as pharmacy benefit managers, or PBMs. The company that owns the biggest PBM, CVS Health, was a 'presenting sponsor' of the Chamber's 2024 Healthcare Summit, and an executive with the company delivered a keynote speech.
The Ohio Senate attempted a compromise between the House legislation and the Ohio Chamber's demand for no dispensing fees. It would have required PBMs to reimburse pharmacies in a transparent system, but it would have eliminated minimum dispensing fees.
The Ohio Pharmacists Association said that would be much worse for pharmacies than the current, inadequate setup. Pharmacies could only break even on their drugs, and they couldn't recoup their overhead, they said.
'It's any pharmacist's suicide bill,' Dave Burke, the organization's executive director, said last week.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
In vetoing it, DeWine agreed.
'This item was intended to strike a compromise between interested parties on how to best regulate the practice of pharmacy benefit managers in Ohio and the requirements for fair and transparent reimbursement for Ohio pharmacies,' the governor's veto message said. 'However, due to drafting errors, the language will not achieve the legislative intent of providing the needed oversight of pharmacy benefit manager practices. Subsequently, the language as written, may result in further detriment to Ohio pharmacies, especially those in small, rural communities, and could result in a reduction in health care access for many Ohioans.'
The message explained that those who wrote the legislation into the state budget asked that it be pulled back.
'Due to the errors in drafting final language, the Ohio House of Representatives and Ohio Senate have requested this veto,' DeWine's veto message said. 'Therefore, a veto of this item is in the public interest.'
In an interview Tuesday, Burke said he didn't think there was any ill intent on the part his former colleagues in the Ohio Senate.
'I think people are getting misinformation from the PBMs, who are trying to maintain their foothold and prevent a free and transparent market,' he said.
Burke also said he didn't believe the Ohio Chamber was selling out its Ohio membership in favor of out-of-state, Fortune 15 health conglomerates that own the big-three PBMs.
'I don't think the Ohio Chamber is anti-pharmacy,' said Burke, who is himself a pharmacist. 'I think they just don't understand how their benefits are actually being administered.'
But he added that every business in Ohio has an interest in a healthy network of pharmacies.
'I don't know what they're going to do when their employees can't get their prescription drugs where they live,' Burke said. 'That's happening now in real time. We have pharmacy deserts and they're getting worse every year.'
Denise Conway, who in 2019 restored pharmacy services in Danville, said the veto is far from enough to solve the problems besetting Ohio pharmacies.
'It is a slight win for pharmacies across Ohio and I am grateful for the governor's vision to see that things aren't being addressed,' she said in a text message Tuesday.
In his veto message, DeWine said more needs to be done.
'It is important to note that the DeWine-Tressel Administration is committed to further reforms of pharmacy benefit managers, as already demonstrated in improvements made in Ohio's Medicaid program through the adoption of the Single Pharmacy Benefit Manager,' it said, referring to the measure that saved taxpayers $140 million. 'This administration is committed to working with the Ohio General Assembly in the future to deliver a pharmacy-benefit-manager regulatory bill.'
Burke said that he might be partly to blame for the PBM-aligned position taken by the Ohio Chamber.
'I have to think, knowing (Senior Vice President) Rick Carfagna and (President and CEO) Steve Stivers, that they're not ignorant and they're not bought and paid for,' Burke said. 'They're intelligent people. Maybe it's my fault for not stopping by and sitting down with them.'
He added that he's ready to work with the Ohio Chamber or anybody else to shore up Ohio's dwindling network of pharmacies.
'We're in a bad place,' Burke said. The Ohio Pharmacists Association 'definitely has an open hand and an open mind for anyone who's willing to work with us on this issue. But we are running out of time.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Musk doubles down on third party threat with Independence Day poll
Musk doubles down on third party threat with Independence Day poll

The Hill

time6 hours ago

  • The Hill

Musk doubles down on third party threat with Independence Day poll

Tech billionaire Elon Musk on Friday leaned into his proposal for a third party amid his growing feud with President Trump over the 'big, beautiful' spending and tax bill with an Independence Day poll online. Hours before Trump signed the sprawling reconciliation package into law, Musk asked followers on social platform X whether he should move forward with creating the 'America Party.' He first floated the idea after his first public spat with the president early last month. 'Independence Day is the perfect time to ask if you want independence from the two-party (some would say uniparty) system!' he wrote. 'Should we create the America Party?' The Tesla CEO, who also owns X, reupped the survey several times throughout the day and even gave a glimpse into his potential strategy. 'One way to execute on this would be to laser-focus on just 2 or 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House districts,' he shared in a subsequent post. 'Given the razor-thin legislative margins, that would be enough to serve as the deciding vote on contentious laws, ensuring that they serve the true will of the people.' The poll, similar to one he set up for followers last month, is just the latest way Musk sought to get under Trump and GOP lawmakers' skin as the bill made its way to Trump's desk. The House passed the final bill on Thursday, after hours of tense negotiations with GOP holdouts. While the Senate worked to pass its own version of the megabill earlier this week, Musk threatened to back primary challengers of those who supported the legislation. In response, the president warned the billionaire that he could cut government contracts for his many companies and also left open the possibility of deporting the South African CEO. Musk left his senior Trump administration adviser position in late May, after his special government employee designation lapsed. He had originally been tapped to lead the president's Department of Government Efficiency — a commission created to root out waste and fraud within the federal government. While many questioned how long the relationship between the world's richest man and Trump would last, the rift only began after Musk criticized the reconciliation package as a 'disgusting abomination' and said it would be 'political suicide' for Republicans. The president said he was disappointed with the billionaire's analysis, which led to a tense back-and-forth between the men online. Tesla sales have plunged since the squabble. Musk admitted at one point that his comments 'went too far' and the ice seemed to be thawing, but the feud was reignited earlier this week over the bill — which includes an extension on Trump's 2017 tax breaks and sweeping cuts to Medicaid and energy tax credits. During a signing ceremony at the White House Friday, Trump said, 'We made promises, and it's really promises made, promises kept, and we've kept them.' 'This is a triumph of democracy on the birthday of democracy,' he continued. 'And I have to say, the people are happy.'

Emanuel: Dems will be ‘fools' if they don't put midterm focus on Trump megabill
Emanuel: Dems will be ‘fools' if they don't put midterm focus on Trump megabill

The Hill

time7 hours ago

  • The Hill

Emanuel: Dems will be ‘fools' if they don't put midterm focus on Trump megabill

Former Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel in a recent interview weighed in on the passage of the 'big, beautiful bill,' suggesting it will be a major sticking point in next year's midterm elections. Asked by CNN's David Chalian if the bill will become 'the centerpiece' of Democrats' messaging, Emanuel replied, 'If it doesn't, we're fools.' 'As I've argued before, the bills should be just captured [as] 'tax cuts for the wealthy, health care cuts for the many,' he told the host of the outlet's 'Political Briefing' podcast, which aired before President Trump signed the legislation, full of his domestic priorities, into law Friday. 'People get that.' 'It's already underwater,' Emanuel added. 'There's nothing about reducing health care benefits for working people that is going to make it more popular.' The pundit also criticized the bill for being sympathetic to billionaires, giving the example of Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, who held an extravagant wedding as lawmakers scrambled to unite over the megabill. The House passed the final bill Thursday afternoon after hours of tense debate and with help from President Trump, who spoke to several GOP holdouts ahead of the crucial vote. The Senate a day earlier pushed through their own bill, after adjusting the language to satisfy the parliamentarian's Byrd Rule. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) had voiced optimism throughout the process that they would have the legislation to Trump's desk by July 4. While they ultimately made good on the promise, it did not come without hiccups. From internal skepticism among the GOP over cuts to Medicaid and food stamps to how it would impact the national debt to Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries' (D-N.Y.) record-breaking 'magic minute' speech that delayed the vote, the bill faced an uphill battle. Trump took a victory lap over the bill during a speech in Iowa, calling it a 'declaration of independence from a really national decline.' On Friday, during a signing ceremony, the president echoed the sentiment. 'This is a triumph of democracy on the birthday of democracy,' he said. 'And I have to say, the people are happy.' Democrats in both chambers have made it clear that they will use the legislation — which they dubbed the 'big, ugly bill' or the 'big, beautiful betrayal' — as fodder against the GOP in the upcoming midterms, zeroing in on the health care and food assistance cuts and the rollback of green energy tax credits. Emanuel's critique comes as the former mayor, who also previously served as the U.S. ambassador to Japan, has stoked speculation in recent weeks over whether he could launch a presidential bid in 2028. 'I have something I think I can offer,' he told CNN's Kaitlan Collins last month. 'But I haven't made that decision.'

Trump signs his tax and spending cut bill at the White House July 4 picnic
Trump signs his tax and spending cut bill at the White House July 4 picnic

Politico

time9 hours ago

  • Politico

Trump signs his tax and spending cut bill at the White House July 4 picnic

'America's winning, winning, winning like never before,' Trump said, noting last month's bombing campaign against Iran's nuclear program, which he said the flyover was meant to honor. 'Promises made, promises kept and we've kept them.' The White House was hung with red, white and blue bunting for the regular Fourth of July festivities. The United States Marine Band played patriotic marches — and, in a typical Trumpian touch, tunes by 1980s pop icons Chaka Khan and Huey Lewis. The two separate flyovers bookended Trump's appearance and the band playing the national anthem. Democrats assailed the package as a giveaway to the rich that will rob millions more lower-income people of their health insurance, food assistance and financial stability. 'I never thought that I'd be on the House floor saying that this is a crime scene,' Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York said during a record-breaking speech that delayed the bill's passage by eight-plus hours. 'It's a crime scene, going after the health, and the safety, and the well-being of the American people.' The legislation extends Trump's 2017 multitrillion-dollar tax cuts and cuts Medicaid and food stamps by $1.2 trillion. It provides for a massive increase in immigration enforcement. Congress' nonpartisan scorekeeper projects that nearly 12 million more people will lose health insurance under the law. The legislation passed the House on a largely party-line vote Thursday, culminating a monthslong push by the GOP to cram most of its legislative priorities into a single budget bill that could be enacted without Senate Democrats being able to block it indefinitely by filibustering. It passed by a single vote in the Senate, where North Carolina Republican Thom Tillis announced he would not run for reelection after incurring Trump's wrath in opposing it. Vice President JD Vance had to cast the tie-breaking vote. In the House, where two Republicans voted against it, one, conservative maverick Tom Massie of Kentucky, has also become a target of Trump's well-funded political operation. The legislation amounts to a repudiation of the agendas of the past two Democratic presidents, Barack Obama and Joe Biden, in rolling back Obama's Medicaid expansion under his signature health law and Biden's tax credits for renewable energy. The Congressional Budget Office estimates the package will add $3.3 trillion to the deficit over the decade and 11.8 million more people will go without health coverage.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store