logo
US Supreme Court clears Trump's immigration crackdown, lifts Florida curbs

US Supreme Court clears Trump's immigration crackdown, lifts Florida curbs

First Post2 days ago
Florida's immigration measure was passed by the state's Republican-controlled legislature and signed into law in February by Republican Governor Ron DeSantis read more
Journalists sit outside the US Supreme Court in Washington, DC, on June 27, 2025. AFP Photo file
The U.S. Supreme Court maintained on Wednesday a judicial block on a Republican-crafted Florida law that makes it a crime for immigrants in the United States illegally to enter the state.
The justices denied a request by state officials to lift an order by Florida-based U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams that barred them from carrying out arrests and prosecutions under the law while a legal challenge plays out in lower courts. Williams ruled that Florida's law conflicted with the federal government's authority over immigration policy.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The Supreme Court's action came in a brief, unsigned order with no noted dissents.
Florida's Attorney General James Uthmeier, a Republican, and other state officials filed the emergency request on June 17 asking the Supreme Court to halt the judge's order. Williams found that the Florida law was likely unconstitutional for encroaching on the federal government's exclusive authority over U.S. immigration policy.
More from World
In a landmark ruling, court finds Russia guilty of shooting down flight MH17, killing 298 onboard
The state's request to the justices was backed by America First Legal, a conservative group co-founded by Stephen Miller, a senior aide to President Donald Trump and a key architect of the administration's hardline immigration policies.
Florida's immigration measure was passed by the state's Republican-controlled legislature and signed into law in February by Republican Governor Ron DeSantis. It made Florida one of at least seven states to pass such laws in recent years, according to court filings.
The American Civil Liberties Union in April filed a class action suit in federal court on behalf of two immigrants in the country illegally who reside in Florida, an immigration advocacy group and the nonprofit group Farmworker Association of Florida, whose members include immigrants in the United States illegally who travel in and out of Florida seasonally to harvest crops.
Cody Wofsy, deputy director of the ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project, said the Supreme Court's denial of Florida's request 'reaffirms a bedrock principle that dates back 150 years: States may not regulate immigration.'
'It is past time for states to get the message,' Wofsy said.
The law imposes mandatory minimum sentences for adult immigrants in the country illegally who are convicted of entering Florida after arriving in the United States without following federal immigration law. Florida officials contend that the state measure complies with - rather than conflicts with - federal law.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Sentences for violations begin at nine months imprisonment for first offenders and reach up to five years for certain immigrants in the country illegally who have felony records and enter Florida after having been deported or ordered by a federal judge to be removed from the United States.
The state law exempts immigrants in the country illegally who were given certain authorization by the federal government to remain in the United States. Florida's immigration crackdown makes no exceptions, however, for those seeking humanitarian protection or with pending applications for immigration relief, according to the ACLU.
Williams issued a preliminary injunction in April that barred Florida officials from enforcing the measure. The Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in June declined to halt the judge's ruling.
Trump's administration filed a brief to the 11th Circuit backing Florida in their appeal of the judge's ruling, arguing that the state measure does not conflict with federal immigration law.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
On the same day that Uthmeier filed the state's Supreme Court request, Williams found him in civil contempt of court for failing to follow her order to direct all state law enforcement officers not to enforce the immigration measure while it remained blocked by the judge.
Williams ordered Uthmeier to provide an update to the court every two weeks on any enforcement of the law.
The tough approach by Florida officials toward immigration mirrors that of Trump. The Republican president joined DeSantis during a July 1 tour of a remote migrant detention center in the Florida Everglades dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz.' The complex is estimated to cost $450 million annually and could house some 5,000 people.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

"Congress showing double standards on Aadhaar issue": BJP's Sambit Patra after Supreme Court verdict on SIR
"Congress showing double standards on Aadhaar issue": BJP's Sambit Patra after Supreme Court verdict on SIR

India Gazette

timean hour ago

  • India Gazette

"Congress showing double standards on Aadhaar issue": BJP's Sambit Patra after Supreme Court verdict on SIR

New Delhi [India], July 12 (ANI): Reacting to the Supreme Court's decision on the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in Bihar, BJP MP Sambit Patra accused the Congress and Opposition parties of hypocrisy, stating they earlier opposed Aadhaar-voter ID linkage but are now demanding its inclusion. He said this shift exposes their 'double standards' on Aadhaar's role in electoral reforms. Speaking to ANI, Patra said, 'The way the Opposition and the Congress are opposing the Aadhar Card, it shows their double standards. When PM Modi spoke about Aadhaar in the Parliament and said that if there are to be no middlemen, then Aadhaar is required... The Opposition and the Congress spoke against the PM.' 'In 2022, when the government decided to link Aadhaar with the voter card, Congress took the matter to the Supreme Court, arguing that Aadhaar is solely for identification purposes and that linking it with the voter card was inappropriate. Today, they are saying that voting rights and citizenship should be decided based on Aadhaar. This reflects the double standards of the Congress,' he added. Reacting to the same court order, Congress Rajya Sabha MP Jairam Ramesh stated that the Election Commission of India's (ECI) 'spin' on 'no stay' being given has been clearly 'exposed' by the Supreme Court. Ramesh, the General Secretary in charge of Communications for Congress, posted a picture of the order on X, stating that Page 7 of the order clearly indicated that any requested no stay of the petitioners. He then said that deliberately 'misleading' headline management does not befit a Constitutional authority. Meanwhile, All India Majlis-E-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) chief Asaduddin Owaisi welcomed the top court's decision while hitting out at 'ECI sources' for misrepresenting the court's order. He criticised the claims made by EC sources that the constitutional body accepts Aadhar as per page 16 of the Special Intensive Revision, while also informing about the EPIC number being 'pre-printed' on the enumeration forms being meted out. On Thursday, the Supreme Court allowed the Election Commission to continue with its exercise of conducting a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar. A bench of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Joymalya Bagchi did not stay the SIR process but asked the ECI to consider allowing Aadhaar, ration cards, and electoral photo identity cards as admissible documents to prove voter identity during the SIR of electoral rolls being undertaken in Bihar. 'We are of the prima facie opinion that in the interest of justice, the Election Commission will also include documents like Aadhaar, Ration Card, Voter ID card, etc. It is for the ECI to decide whether it wants to accept the documents or not, and if it does not, then provide reasons for its decision, which shall be sufficient to satisfy the petitioners. Meanwhile, petitioners are not pressing for an interim stay,' the bench stated in its order. In its order, the top court noted that the timeline for the process is very short since elections in Bihar are due in November. The apex court posted for hearing on July 28 the pleas challenging ECI's move to conduct SIR of electoral rolls in Bihar and asked the poll panel to file its affidavit within one week. During the hearing, the bench opined that Aadhaar should be included within the list of documents permissible as an ID proof. The apex court was hearing a batch of pleas challenging the Election Commission of India's move to conduct the SIR of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar. The petitions challenging the ECI decision were filed by RJD MP Manoj Jha, the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), PUCL, activist Yogendra Yadav, Trinamool MP Mahua Moitra, and former Bihar MLA Mujahid petitions sought a direction to quash the ECI's June 24 directive, which requires large sections of voters in Bihar to submit proof of citizenship to remain on the electoral rolls. The petition also raised concerns over the exclusion of widely held documents like Aadhaar and ration cards, stating that this would disproportionately affect the poor and marginalised voters, especially in rural Bihar. Meanwhile, All India Majlis-E-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) chief Asaduddin Owaisi welcomed the top court's decision while hitting out at 'ECI sources' for misrepresenting the court's order. He criticised the claims made by EC sources that the constitutional body accepts Aadhar as per page 16 of the Special Intensive Revision, while also informing about the EPIC number being 'pre-printed' on the enumeration forms being meted out. (ANI)

As Truth Social business struggles, Trump Media goes big on crypto
As Truth Social business struggles, Trump Media goes big on crypto

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

As Truth Social business struggles, Trump Media goes big on crypto

Trump has no official position at Trump Media and does not advise it on corporate policy. But he is the company's largest shareholder, and he and his family have become big crypto boosters over the past year. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Donald Trump has reinvented himself many times over, going from real estate developer to TV personality to world his social media company, Trump Media & Technology Group, which is the parent of the president's Truth Social site, is undergoing its own metamorphosis, becoming a major player in the crypto just the past few months, Trump Media has raised $2.5 billion in cash to invest in bitcoin and is working to bring crypto-related exchange traded funds, or ETFs, to has no official position at Trump Media and does not advise it on corporate policy. But he is the company's largest shareholder, and he and his family have become big crypto boosters over the past pivot to crypto highlights the reality of one of the president's highest-profile business interests. Truth Social may serve as Trump's online megaphone, which he uses to attack his enemies, praise his allies and announce executive orders, tariffs and ceasefires. But the 3-year-old social media platform has struggled to generate advertising has made Trump Media, which went public in March 2024, a consistently money-losing company, and its stock has been shedding value since its debut. This year, shares of Trump Media are down 43%.In June, Truth Social had a bit of a moment. Trump amassed more than 10 million followers. And the platform saw a big surge in daily visitors, according to Similarweb, a digital market intelligence Truth Social is still small compared with X, the social platform owned by Elon Musk, Trump's billionaire 80% of the traffic last month to Truth Social's website was to view the comments from the president, according to is one reason Trump Media has struggled to expand its user base and attract advertisers beyond those selling products geared to Trump's base. The Florida-based company with just 29 employees has also never made a big commitment to selling ads and has just a few people on staff charged with that Media incurred a $31 million net loss in the first quarter of this year and has yet to post a profit since going Devine, a Trump Media spokesperson, said, "The New York Times, in a typical partisan and brainless hit piece that reads like it was written by an AI chatbot, fails to note that Trump Media is rigorously fulfilling our plan: build up our core infrastructure, then expand throughout the patriot economy -- while amassing around $3 billion in liquid assets."The company's move into bitcoin has been fast and April, Trump Media entered into a four-year partnership with a Singaporean-based cryptocurrency exchange, to launch at least three ETFs, which are slated to trade on the New York Stock ETF is an investment fund that invests in a particular asset -- stocks, bonds, gold or crypto -- and trades like a stock. New ETFs normally need to be approved by the Securities and Exchange year's end, investors may be able to buy and sell shares of Truth Social Bitcoin ETF and Truth Social Bitcoin Ethereum ETF. (Ethereum is the platform behind the second-most-popular digital asset after bitcoin.) On Tuesday, the company filed for a blended crypto ETF called Truth Social Crypto Blue Chip ETF, which will invest in five different crypto Media is just licensing the Truth Social name to promote the securities, according to a company regulatory filing. The filing does not disclose any information about financial remuneration to Trump filing also says any marketing information for the ETFs will carry a disclaimer that says Trump Media does not take a position "regarding the advisability of investing in this fund."Trump Media will be competing with about a dozen other bitcoin-focused ETFs, including one sponsored by iShares, a division of BlackRock, the world's largest asset management firm."My guess is they look to compete based on the Trump name," said Bryan Armour, the director of ETF research with Morningstar, an investment research firm. "There's not much to distinguish them."In May, Trump Media said it had raised $2.5 billion to invest in bitcoin by selling stocks and bonds to dozens of hedge funds and the Wall Street trading firm Jane Street Capital. The deal could eventually make Trump Media the fourth-largest public company to hold bitcoin in the world."Trump's connections have likely played a critical role in securing such significant funding," said Vetle Lunde , the head of research for K33, a crypto firm. "This development further entangles Trump's financial interests with the crypto sector."Trump has drawn criticism over his family's deepening involvement with the crypto industry and the light-touch regulatory approach to digital assets adopted by his administration. One of his first steps as president was to signal his strong support for crypto and to rein in the companies donated nearly $18 million to Trump's inaugural committee. The corporate parent of for instance, gave $1 million to the inaugural in March, said the SEC had notified it that an investigation into the platform's activities had been closed. In all, the SEC has dismissed or closed about a dozen matters involving crypto companies since Trump was sworn into representatives did not return requests for comment."The concern you come back to with all Trump products are whether they are being used as a way to curry favor with the administration," said Hilary Allena professor of law at the American University Washington College of Law who has specialized in crypto 115 million shares are worth about $2 billion -- though at the stock's peak his stake was worth nearly $6 billion. Trump's shares are held in a trust managed by his eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., who is a Trump Media board member and crypto proponent himself."President Trump's assets are in a trust managed by his children," said Anna Kelly, a White House spokesperson. "There are no conflicts of interest."Some individual investors in Trump Media and regular Truth Social users are open to seeing if the shift to crypto Nedohin, a part-time pastor who has been one of Trump Media's biggest proponents, said he had personal and religious objections to crypto, which he said had a "scammy culture." But he recognizes the company needs to do something to make money and enable Truth Social to survive."Social media is not actually a profitable business," said Nedohin, who started a popular message board on Truth Social that was focused on the company's prospects. "This administration is extremely pro-cryptocurrency, and thus bitcoin is likely to rise significantly during President Trump's term."Greg Bowden, a supporter of Trump and a day trader, said he had bought and sold Trump Media shares on and off over the past year. He said he had last sold Trump Media shares around the time of Trump's inauguration, but would look to get back into it when it gets over $17. It's currently trading around $ said moving into bitcoin made sense strategically for Trump Media, given the growing popularity of some investors in Trump Media are buying in as a show of support for the president, Bowden has no illusions about Trump's ultimate goals when it comes to all of his business ventures."Trump's in it for the money," he said.

SHRC demands action as custodial violence cases highlight need for reform
SHRC demands action as custodial violence cases highlight need for reform

New Indian Express

time2 hours ago

  • New Indian Express

SHRC demands action as custodial violence cases highlight need for reform

The State Human Rights Commission (SHRC) on June 24, 2025, directed the TN government to pay a compensation of Rs 50,000 to V Priyadharshini, a complainant, and recover it from K Santhamoorthi for violating her human rights when he was the Inspector of C2 Race Course police station in Coimbatore. The order passed by SHRC member V Kannadasan, which directed the government to initiate disciplinary proceedings against Santhamoorthi, quoted Section 58 of the Police Act, 2006, on the social responsibilities of the police. Priyadharshini had approached the police with a complaint against her father and brother of criminal intimidation and use of filthy language. Instead of conducting an impartial inquiry, the Inspector sided with the accused and intimidated her. The mandate of the police is to protect and uphold the dignity of people. Article 14 of our Constitution ensures every person the right of equality before the law and equal protection of the laws. India is a signatory to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which recognises right to life, liberty and security of everyone and says, 'No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment'. The Supreme Court and the various high courts have repeatedly issued guidelines to the police on how to treat people humanely. Yet, we read and, now with the visual media, see how brutal the police force is in its day-to-day duties.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store