logo
2-in-1 COVID-flu vaccine looks promising in trial — but experts say approval may be delayed

2-in-1 COVID-flu vaccine looks promising in trial — but experts say approval may be delayed

Business Mayor20-05-2025
Two might be better than one: A new vaccine that targets the viruses behind seasonal flu and COVID-19 triggers a stronger immune response than flu and COVID shots given separately, trial data suggest.
The combination shot, dubbed mRNA-1083, is made by the pharmaceutical company Moderna. The promising results of the Phase 3 clinical trial of the vaccine were published May 7 in the journal JAMA . This late-stage trial included two groups of adults ages 50 and older who were given either the new vaccine or a combination of previously approved flu and COVID-19 vaccines.
The trial runners looked at the quantity of antibodies , or protective immune proteins, made in response to each vaccine regimen. Antibody levels correlate with how well a shot should protect against a disease and how long that protection might last. They do not provide direct data on how well a shot drives down infection rates in real life — but ethically, such real-world data is difficult to gather when effective vaccines against an illness already exist .
You may like
While the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not yet given mRNA-1083 a final stamp of approval, experts told Live Science that the trial results are largely positive. However, political factors could hinder the shot's approval, some say.
Why do we need a combination vaccine?
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) already recommends that people get both their annual flu and updated COVID-19 vaccines at the same time. But at the moment, that requires two separate shots to be given at the same appointment.
The combination vaccine would be 'a one-stop shop,' said Dr. Peter Chin-Hong , an infectious-disease doctor at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) who was not involved in the Moderna trial. 'A lot of times, people are not excited about needles. I mean, who likes getting a shot?' he told Live Science. With the decline in vaccination rates in the United States, a combination vaccine offers more convenience and helps people get on top of their immunization, he said.
The idea of combining multiple immunizations into one shot is not new.
Get the world's most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.
'It is a very commonly used strategy, especially in children,' said Dr. Monica Gandhi , an infectious-disease doctor at UCSF who was not involved in the study. An example of this is the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine , which is a combination of three vaccines in one shot.
What is in mRNA-1083?
The new mRNA-1083 vaccine is based on the same messenger RNA (mRNA) technology that Moderna used in its FDA-approved vaccine against SARS-CoV-2, the virus behind COVID-19. mRNA is a genetic molecule that relays instructions for cells to build different proteins.
The new COVID-flu shot combines the company's updated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine , called mRNA-1283, and its newly developed flu vaccine, mRNA-1010. As of yet, there is no FDA-approved flu shot that contains mRNA, so this could be the first.
The culprits behind seasonal flu are influenza A and B viruses, which can be further classified into subtypes and lineages. Current flu vaccines in the U.S. guard against two subtypes of influenza A viruses, called H1N1 and H3N2, and one influenza B virus lineage, known as the Victoria lineage. (Until very recently, the shots also guarded against a second lineage, called 'Yamagata,' but it's likely extinct .)
The flu component of the new vaccine contains genetic instructions for human cells to make glycoproteins — molecules of protein and carbohydrate — found in these four flavors of influenza A and B viruses. These glycoproteins, known as hemagglutinins (HA), are located on the surface of flu viruses and enable the viruses to latch onto host cells and initiate infection. Once made, these proteins are shown to the immune system so it can recognize the viruses and fight them off.
Likewise, the COVID component of the new vaccine contains the genetic instructions to make the proteins displayed by SARS-CoV-2, called spike proteins.
Current flu shots in the U.S. guard against three broad types of flu virus.
(Image credit: KATERYNA KON/SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY via Getty Images)
'mRNA vaccine is the vaccine of the future, particularly when you want to respond to rapidly changing diseases or new variants,' Chin-Hong said. Whereas the molecules in mRNA vaccines can be manufactured very quickly as a virus evolves, conventional flu vaccines take months to make. Chin-Hong described mRNA vaccine production as 'cutting and pasting a code'; the mRNA that encodes the virus protein can be conveniently incorporated into the platform.
Moderna has already completed Phase 3 clinical trials for the individual flu and COVID components of its new combo vaccine.
On its own, the flu shot triggered higher immune responses than two conventional flu vaccines — Fluarix and the high-dose Fluzone — against A(H1N1) and A(H3N2) strains. It triggered comparable immune responses against influenza B viruses, based on the trial results. Moderna also showed that its new COVID vaccine induced greater immune responses than Spikevax — the FDA-approved shot — against XBB.1.5 , a version of the omicron variant that's been circulating recently. Both vaccines were tested on adults ages 18 and older.
How did the combination vaccine perform?
The purpose of Moderna's latest Phase 3 clinical trial was to measure the robustness of the immune response the mRNA-1083 vaccine triggers in people. The trial runners measured this by looking at the number of antibodies vaccinated people produced against both the flu and the SARS-CoV-2 viruses. Real-world data , which would indicate whether the vaccine effectively lowers rates of hospitalization or emergency visits from the infections, is not yet available.
Consistent with these earlier studies on individual vaccines, the mRNA-1083 combination shot triggered a strong immune response against all four influenza viruses and XBB.1.5.
In the trial, the company recruited two groups of participants: one consisting of adults ages 50 to 64, and another including people 65 and older. Each cohort consisted of about 4,000 adults. The 50-to-64-year-olds received either the new combo shot or a combination of Fluarix and Spikevax. The 65-and-older cohort received either mRNA-1083 or a combination of high-dose Fluzone and Spikevax. (Fluzone, a high-dose flu shot, is approved for adults ages 65 and older and some younger people with weakened immune systems.)
The researchers sampled the trial participants' blood at Day 1 and Day 29 of the experiment to measure the levels of antibodies. They found that the mRNA-1083 vaccine triggered a more robust immune response — as reflected in higher levels of antibodies — than the other vaccine combinations against the SARS-CoV-2 variant.
It also triggered a stronger antibody response against all four influenza strains compared with Fluarix, and three influenza subtypes — H1N1, H3N2 and Victoria — compared with Fluzone.
Will the combo vaccine be tested in younger adults?
While the individual components of the new vaccine have been tested in individuals ages 18 to 49, the latest clinical trial for mRNA-1083 did not include this population.
'It was done in people who are at the highest risk of getting in trouble medically [from both the flu and COVID-19],' said Dr. Robert Schooley , an infectious-disease specialist at the University of California, San Diego. 'But it doesn't mean that if you're under 50, you don't want to get a booster shot.' Everyone 6 months and older is recommended to get an updated COVID-19 shot when new ones become available, typically on an annual basis.
In a recent statement , Moderna announced that the company is deprioritizing further research on mRNA-1083 testing in adults ages 18 to 49. In the same announcement, the company cited an effort to reduce its operational expenses as a factor in the decision. It is unclear if or when the company might resume testing in this age group.
It's unclear whether the new vaccine may face barriers to approval, despite strong trial data.
(Image credit: PeopleImages.com – Yuri A via Shutterstock)
Does the combo shot have more side effects?
Based on the clinical trial results, the likelihood of mild side effects — such as fever, fatigue and chills — was higher with the combination vaccine than with the currently available vaccines given separately.
'These are expected. The side effect is actually your immune system waking up, and likely shows that you'll get a very durable response,' Chin-Hong said.
He also added that serious side effects are very uncommon for both the already-approved COVID and flu shots and in the trials of the new combo vaccine. There were no serious side effects related to the new vaccine, the trial runners reported.
When could the vaccine be approved?
Moderna initially applied for FDA approval back in 2024, using the preliminary results from the same Phase 3 trial . At the time, the FDA asked for more data to show efficacy against the flu. With more data in hand, the company is now 'targeting approval' for the vaccine in 2026, according to a recent statement .
However, when it comes to mRNA vaccines, both scientific and political factors are at play, Chin-Hong said.
'The science is unmistakable: it [mRNA] is very nimble; it is durable; it is effective in general,' he said. But he pointed out that mRNA vaccine technology itself has been the target of political criticism in the U.S. that traces back to the COVID-19 pandemic, when the vaccines' development was expedited and safety concerns were raised. Even though mRNA vaccines have proved to be very safe and effective, this history may pose a barrier to FDA approval of the new combination vaccine, Chin-Hong said.
In addition, the existence of already-approved separate vaccines for flu and COVID-19 may lessen the urgency in getting the mRNA-1083 approved, he added.
Research funding through the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has been widely cut or frozen, and research on vaccine hesitancy and the boosting of vaccination rates was specifically affected. Experts told NPR that they're concerned mRNA research will soon face similar cuts. NIH officials were cautioned to keep the term 'mRNA' out of grant applications, KFF reported .
There are also uncertainties about whether mRNA-1083 will be subject to the new framework on vaccine approval . On May 1, a Department of Health and Human Services spokesperson told The Washington Post that 'all new vaccines will undergo safety testing in placebo-controlled trials prior to licensure.' A placebo is an inert or inactive substance, such as a saline shot, that new vaccines would have to be compared against during a clinical trial.
Many trials of brand-new vaccines already include placebos. But when there are already existing and effective vaccines for a given disease, comparing a new shot against a placebo isn't necessarily helpful or ethical. Scientists want to understand how much better the new shot works compared with the previous one.
'I don't think it's ethical to give someone a shot that is a placebo, that can in no way help them, when you know there's an existing technology that can,' said Dr. Paul Offit , a virologist, immunologist and director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Because mRNA-1083 is a modified version of an already-approved vaccine, 'I'm not sure whether that counts as new,' Offit said. He thinks a placebo-controlled trial would not be appropriate in this case.
Although the new combo shot still awaits approval, Gandhi said the current clinical trial results were 'already convincing.' The Phase 3 clinical trial demonstrated that the vaccine is safe and triggers a robust immune response, she added.
'I don't see any red flags at this point,' Schooley said. 'I'd be confident to take the vaccine myself.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Products with opioid-like effects sold at gas stations may be banned as illicit substances
Products with opioid-like effects sold at gas stations may be banned as illicit substances

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Products with opioid-like effects sold at gas stations may be banned as illicit substances

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is recommending banning a compound found in unregulated tablets, gummies and drink mixes sold online and at gas stations and convenience stores, the Trump administration announced this week. The substance, known as 7-OH, will be scheduled as an illicit drug if the Drug Enforcement Administration − a branch of the US Justice Department responsible for classifying drugs as controlled substances − approves the sanction after a review. "Dark innovations in chemistry have exacerbated the addiction crisis in this country," US Department of Health and Human Services Deputy Secretary Jim O'Neil told reporters during a Tuesday, July 29, press conference in Washington DC. "Synthetic opioids like carfentanill and the substance we're here to take action on today: 7-Hydroxymitragynine." O'Neil said 7-hydroxymitragynine, 7-OH, is deliberately addictive and a powerful opioid agonist many times more potent than morphine. Calling it "a recipe for public health disaster," O'Neill, said 7-OH products are often sold without warnings or controls. "We've seen a disturbing rise in reports of overdoses, poisonings and emergency room visits linked to products containing 7-OH,' O'Neil said. "These substances are often sold online or in convenience stores with no quality control, no dosage control and no warnings." 'They've killed thousands and thousands' During the press conference, FDA commissioner Martin Makary spoke alongside US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., as they announced they planned to send warning letters to companies for illegally marketing products containing 7-OH in an effort to combat the country's opioid addiction problem. 'We have a history in public health of being asleep at the wheel,' Makary said. 'Public health is supposed to prevent disasters, not just clean them up after they've killed thousands and thousands of people.' Which states felt tsunami waves? See list of where it hit after Russia earthquake What is 7-OH? The compound 7-OH is a naturally occurring substance in the kratom plant (Mitragyna speciosa), according to the FDA, but only a minor component comprising less than 2% of the alkaloid content in natural kratom leaves. "However, 7-OH demonstrates substantially greater mu-opioid receptor potency than kratom's primary alkaloid constituent mitragynine, as well as other classical opioids such as morphine," the FDA wrote in its findings. Mu-opioid receptors, found in the brain and spinal cord, are primarily responsible for pain relief and other opioid effects like euphoria and respiratory depression, according to research published on the National Institutes of Health's National Library of Medicine. Contributing: Adrianna Rodriguez Natalie Neysa Alund is a senior reporter for USA TODAY. Reach her at nalund@ and follow her on X @nataliealund. (This story was updated to include video.) This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: What is 7-OH? Opioid-like product may get banned by FDA Solve the daily Crossword

Kennedy targets vaccination injury program
Kennedy targets vaccination injury program

The Hill

time10 hours ago

  • The Hill

Kennedy targets vaccination injury program

Health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is targeting a little-known but crucial program that underpins all childhood vaccinations. Kennedy took to social media and the show of conservative activist Charlie Kirk this week to rail against the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program and pledge significant changes. 'The VICP is broken, and I intend to fix it,' he wrote on social platform X. 'I will not allow the VICP to continue to ignore its mandate and fail its mission of quickly and fairly compensating vaccine-injured individuals.' Attorneys and other experts say Kennedy is right that the program, which was created in 1986 in order to give quick payouts to families who can prove a child was injured from a vaccine, is badly in need of modernization. 'There's a lot of low hanging fruit that [Kennedy] can act on that would immediately alter the course of the vaccine program for the better,' said David Carney, a vaccine injury attorney in Philadelphia and president of the Vaccine Injured Petitioners Bar Association. Cases could be settled quicker, rather than going through a trial, Carney said. Kennedy could also press Congress to act on legislation that would increase the court staff, increase the pain and suffering caps, and add COVID-19 vaccines to the list of shots eligible for the program. It has too few staff available to handle a massive caseload, leaving patients waiting for years just to have their cases heard. It covers almost three times as many vaccines as when it was first created, but the number of 'special masters' who hear cases has stayed the same. Attorneys who argue vaccine injuries said the government has been more favorable to vaccines than petitioners in recent years, fighting against claims that would have previously been easily settled. 'It's not the fast, informal, petitioner-friendly program that Congress designed. It is very adversarial and litigious. That's absolutely, 100% true,' said Renée Gentry, director of the Vaccine Injury Litigation Clinic at George Washington University Law School. But there's fear the changes Kennedy wants will undermine the program, or tear it down entirely, risking driving drugmakers from the market and threatening access to childhood shots. Kennedy has long targeted the VICP, and his X post echoed many of his previous arguments. He did not elaborate on what changes he is making but said he is working with Attorney General Pam Bondi. He has previously said he wants to expand the program, making it easier for claimants to qualify for awards based on adverse events he claims are associated with vaccines but are not currently part of the program. People can prove injuries two ways, said Dorit Reiss, a vaccine law expert and law professor at UC San Francisco. Either you fit into the table of injuries, and then there's a presumption that the vaccine caused the harm, or you have to show causation for an injury outside the list. Kennedy has the power to add new injuries to the eligible list, like autism, which he has repeatedly linked to vaccines. In an interview with Tucker Carlson earlier in July, Kennedy also suggested vaccines are linked to numerous chronic ailments like diabetes and narcolepsy. 'We have now this epidemic of immune dysregulation in our country, and there's no way to rule out vaccines as one of the key culprits,' Kennedy said. In order to add an injury to the list, Kennedy would have to go through the federal government's cumbersome notice-and-comment rulemaking process. Experts said it's usually a time consuming and expensive undertaking, and often the scientific reviews don't show enough evidence to prove if the vaccine caused harm or not. Kennedy could also unofficially start settling cases for more injuries without adding them to the list. Yet either change could risk bankrupting the program. Families are paid through a trust fund that's funded by an excise tax on vaccine makers, so there's a finite pot of money available. The program's fund covers lawyers' fees and the costs, even for losing cases. In exchange for the tax, vaccine makers have a limited liability shield. Petitioners file claims against the federal government, not the manufacturers, and families can get compensation without having to prove that drugmakers were negligent. Kennedy has suggested he wants to change that. 'The VICP has devolved into a morass of inefficiency, favoritism, and outright corruption as government lawyers and the Special Masters who serve as Vaccine Court judges prioritize the solvency of the HHS Trust Fund, over their duty to compensate victims,' Kennedy wrote. An HHS spokesman declined to say what, if any changes Kennedy is considering, saying the secretary's comments speak for itself. A popular anti-vaccine talking point is the desire to eliminate the vaccine makers' limited liability shield. But that's only something Congress can do. Kennedy does have the power to drop vaccines from the program. Right now, it covers 16 routinely recommended immunizations for children or pregnant women. But if a shot is no longer routinely recommended, it can be removed. In early June, Kennedy abruptly fired all members of the outside advisory group responsible for making vaccine recommendations. He appointed a new group of hand-picked replacements. If that group no longer recommends the HPV vaccine, for instance, Kennedy can revise the injury table to remove it. 'If he takes it away, then those people have no right to be in this program, and they're going to have to be stuck with civil litigation,' said Gentry, which is much more difficult and expensive.

What still causes the plague in the US?
What still causes the plague in the US?

The Hill

time11 hours ago

  • The Hill

What still causes the plague in the US?

(NEXSTAR) — Northern Arizona recently recorded its first pneumonic plague-related death since 2007. Early last year, Oregon saw its first case of the bubonic plague since 2015. Person-to-person spread of the plague hasn't been seen in more than 100 years in the U.S., but cases occasionally pop up. So what causes them? The plague cases reported in the U.S. today are not exactly the same as those seen in medieval Europe. Between 1347 and 1352 alone, it's estimated that the plague caused the deaths of at least 25 million Europeans. Rats aboard a ship from the Crimea and Asia that docked in Sicily are blamed for bringing the bubonic plague into Europe. Once fleas ran out of host rodents in Europe – those that lacked resistance to the plague also died – they sought out humans. Fungus labeled 'urgent threat' by CDC is spreading rapidly, hospital study finds Eventually, those who were sick or at risk of carrying the plague were isolated and put into quarantine, much like guidance issued during the COVID pandemic. A vaccine in the late 19th century, improved sanitation, better health practices and modern antibiotics have been credited with helping to stop the spread of the plague when it pops up. The U.S. now sees about seven cases annually, on average, according to estimates from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The World Health Organization says most human cases over the last three decades have been in Africa. When cases do occur in the U.S., they're primarily in the West, with most reported in New Mexico and Arizona. Cases have also appeared within the region of southern Oregon, far western Nevada, and California. U.S. cases are, most often, bubonic. There are three main forms of the plague: bubonic (the most common during Europe's Black Death), septicemic, and pneumonic. Generally speaking, plague is brought on by the Yersinia pestis bacterium, with humans and mammals being affected. 'Quiet cracking' is the newest term for a workplace problem — and it's 'pretty pervasive,' expert says The three types of plague present with different symptoms and are caused by different things. Bubonic plague is caused by the bites of fleas that are mostly found on rodents. Symptoms of bubonic plague, the Cleveland Clinic explains, include a sudden high fever; chills; headaches; pain in the abdomen, arms, and legs; and large, swollen lymph nodes that can leak pus. While the bacteria will multiply in the lymph node where it entered the body, it's capable of spreading to other parts of the body if not treated with antibiotics. Septicemic plague has similar symptoms to bubonic plague, including fever, chills, extreme weakness, pain in the abdomen, shock, and the possibility of bleeding into the skin and other organs, the CDC explains. This form of plague can develop from untreated bubonic plague as well as from the handling of infected animals. Should a person with bubonic or septicemic plague go without treatment, and the bacteria reach their lungs, they can develop pneumonic plague. A person can also get pneumonic plague from breathing in 'droplets coughed out by another person or animal with pneumonic plague,' according to the CDC. Like other forms of plague, a person infected with pneumonic plague may develop a fever, headache, weakness, and pneumonia, with the latter developing 'rapidly.' While bubonic and septicemic plague may take a few days to set in, the incubation period for pneumonic plague may be just over a day, the CDC reports. It's the only form that can be spread person-to-person, and it is considered the most serious form of the disease. Between 2020 and 2023, the CDC reported 15 human plague cases were reported. Of those, three died. As the Cleveland Clinic explains, plague has to be treated with antibiotics as quickly as possible — taking antibiotics within 24 hours of symptoms gives you 'the best chance of getting better.' You could begin feeling better within a week or two, as long as you receive treatment, according to health experts. Regardless of the type of plague, about 90% survive with quick treatment. Untreated, 'plague is nearly always fatal,' the Cleveland Clinic said. Health officials have not said how the Arizona resident who died earlier this year of the pneumonic plague became infected. Oregon's case of bubonic plague last year was believed to be brought on by a pet cat. In recent years, Colorado has reported a cat testing positive for septicemic plague and a cat, two prairie dog colonies, and a squirrel testing positive for bubonic plague. Infected fleas are largely to blame for plague cases that occur in the U.S. today, but the handling of infected animals – like cats, rabbits, rats, mice, and squirrels, according to New York's Department of Health – has also been known to lead to the plague. To avoid getting the plague, it's recommended that you take steps to avoid flea bites. That includes wearing bug spray with DEET and clearing up spaces outside where the wild animals fleas love may live. It's also important to speak with your veterinarian about preventing fleas on your pets. Your pets should also not be allowed to roam outdoors freely if you live in an area prone to the plague.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store