Rookie cops NYPD is trying to fire can remain on job amid legal battle, judge rules
At a hearing, state Supreme Court Justice Phaedra Perry-Bond denied a request from the city to lift a July 10 temporary restraining order obtained by the Police Benevolent Association union that stopped the NYPD from firing the cops.
The department is trying to fire the officers after determining they weren't qualified to join the force in the first place based, they say, on checkered histories that include arrests, drug use, hiring sex workers, traffic violations, and 'serious disregard for rules and consequences,' according to lawyers for the city and the NYPD.
All of the cops in question either failed a psychiatric evaluation or a character assessment while they were being vetted, according to the NYPD, and were told as such.
However, the city claims that a lone commanding officer, Inspector Terrell Anderson, the head of the NYPD's Candidate Assessment Division, mistakenly approved them after calling them back for additional interviews, sending them off to be sworn in and trained at the Police Academy.
'These candidates were approved by an individual whose actions were unauthorized. Now, we have them working in the field when they have been disqualified,' city Law Department attorney Marina Sukonnik said in court.
One officer the NYPD says was unqualified to serve — who, like all of the cops, has been on desk duty without a badge or a gun since July 10 — 'reported using LSD and marijuana to cope with stress,' while a third showed 'an extensive history of poor decision-making and recklessness,' the NYPD said in court papers.
Another officer 'openly discussed arguments and conflicts with other people in a boastful manner' during an NYPD psychological interview and said that when she received a failing grade from a college professor, she told the teacher, 'No one likes you; I don't like you, your students don't like you.'
Another officer was deemed unfit because 'he had a prior history of paying prostitutes for sexual favors,' the NYPD said in court papers.
'Because of the public trust placed in the NYPD and the sensitivity of many issues faced regularly by police officers, the police commissioner must have the ability to demand a high degree of character and fitness from police officers and certainly must demand that they be qualified under the appointment standards for the position,' the city said in court papers.
In court Tuesday, Matthew Daly, a lawyer for the PBA, said most of the cops were of minority, non-affluent backgrounds and had been making arrests and working patrol without incident — in some cases, commended for their performance — when they turned up to work last week and told to resign or face being fired before a court order put the firings on hold. Some have been on the job for more than 18 months.
Calling the NYPD's hasty firing attempt 'sloppy and heavy-handed,' Daly suggested the commanding officer had been scapegoated despite an ongoing internal investigation into the mix-up. He said many of the cops had left other jobs after the NYPD hired them and risk homelessness, student loan delinquency, and losing their family's medical insurance were they to get the boot.
The union lawyer stated that the PBA's position was that the NYPD had no right to revive the disqualifications; however, if it did so, Daly said the officers should be given 30 days to appeal.
'The city is trying to humiliate and condemn them,' Daly said. 'All we're asking for is that the status quo be maintained.'
Sukonnik countered by saying the officers had no right to keep their jobs or to appeal now the findings that they were unfit.
In pointed questions to the city's attorney, Perry-Bond sounded skeptical about the department's position that the rookie cops had blown the deadline to appeal the finding within the 30-day timeframe while simultaneously acknowledging they'd been rehired during that period and pressed Sukonnik about whether the NYPD was acting fairly.
'It isn't just, 'Oh, you shouldn't have been hired. Goodbye,'' the judge quipped, a few beats later denying the city's efforts to lift the restraining order and ordering the parties back in court in 60 days.
'There are people whose lives are on hold here.'
Union officials who attended Tuesday's hearing said the cops highlighted by the NYPD made up a small portion of the 31 whose jobs are on the line and that many of the group had worked for various city and law enforcement agencies in the past. One had worked as a correction officer for 10 years, and another had worked as an investigator for the Brooklyn D.A.'s office before being hired by the NYPD.
PBA President Patrick Hendry said singling out certain officers in court documents amounted to a 'shameful smear campaign' against the entire group.
'We're grateful to the judge for taking this case seriously, understanding that these are 31 police officers' lives. their livelihood. That she understands that they have families, understands that they have bills, understands that they have rent, understands that they were just told, 'Hey, you're not entitled to any process here. You're fired,' That is wrong,' Hendry said.
'They were deemed to be qualified to be New York City police officers. They were called back, they completed what they were asked to complete, those investigations, and they got hired by the police department. … They've been doing a great job, and they deserve to continue the job that they love.'
Capt. Chris Monahan, president of the Captains' Endowment Association, the union that represents NYPD captains and inspectors, staunchly defended Anderson on Thursday.
'Inspector Anderson had the authority under previous administrations to hire candidates,' Monahan said. 'He was under tremendous pressure to fill NYPD recruit classes. He had a careful review process and didn't place candidates with diagnosed mental health issues in any classes.'
Earlier this year, NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch said the department is in a 'hiring crisis' and significantly reduced the number of college credits required to join the force to broaden the candidate pool.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
He Says He Was Sexually Abused by His Mother: Is His Younger Brother Actually His Son?
Logan Gifford says his mother sexually abused him as a child — and now, a DNA test has left him questioning whether her youngest son is also his childNEED TO KNOW Logan Gifford alleges his mother, Doreene Gifford, sexually abused him as a child She gave birth when Logan was 11 — a paternity test showed both Logan and his biological father are likely matches Doreene was convicted of attempted sexual assault and incest in 2015A Las Vegas man who says his sex offender mom subjected him to years of childhood sexual abuse now fears the unthinkable: that his younger brother may also be his biological son. Logan Gifford, 26, has stepped in to care for his 15-year-old younger brother — the child their mother gave birth to when Logan was 11 years old. The teen has disabilities, according to Logan, who said his brother requires additional support at home and school. Their mother, Doreene Gifford, was convicted in 2015 of attempted sexual assault, incest and lewdness with a child under 14, per court documents. Logan maintains that his mother repeatedly sexually assaulted him throughout his childhood, beginning when he was 10 and continuing for seven years, per the Las Vegas Review-Journal, 8 News Now and his GoFundMe initiative for court took an Alford plea — meaning she did not admit guilt but acknowledged that prosecutors had enough evidence to convict — and was sentenced to 8 to 20 years in prison when Logan was 17. "Sending her to prison was halfway vindicating since I thought the largest problem of my life was originally dealt with," Logan told 8 News Now. After nine years behind bars, Doreene Gifford is now a registered sex offender in Nevada — she was released on parole in July of 2024, but was arrested this January after violating a condition that she have no victim contact. She was not listed in Clark County inmate databases as of August 2025; Logan told 8 News Now she currently resides in Massachusetts. In a statement on his GoFundMe for legal expenses, Logan said he is now in a custody battle over the teen, who had previously been living with their biological father. "I believe he might be my son, a haunting possibility tied to the abuse I suffered around the time he was conceived," Logan wrote. 'Look at the mess that I'm left with,' he told the Review-Journal. 'I didn't ask for any of this. I was a child when all of this happened and yet now I'm responsible for picking up the pieces of something that really is still continuing to have an impact in my life and dragging me to deal with that. I feel that as though it is my obligation or my duty to [him] to do this and find out who his biological father really is.' Earlier this year, Logan filed a paternity petition in Clark County Family Court and asked for a judge to approve an advanced DNA test. He told 8 News Now and the Review-Journal that his DNA and that of his biological father both matched the teen's at 99.9%, suggesting that either man could be the father, due to shared genetic overlap among judge offered Logan the option of pursuing more advanced testing, which could help clarify the boy's parentage. DNA testing between a full sibling and a potential father can be challenging because both may share about 50% of their DNA with the child. Full siblings often match at the same genetic markers used in standard paternity tests, making it difficult to determine paternity without advanced genetic methods or additional family samples. "It's ugly and visceral, but it doesn't change the fact but it needed to be done," Logan told 8 News Now. "If it comes back negative, I'm still filing for custody, because it doesn't change the obligation that I have to him now." If you or someone you know has been sexually assaulted, please contact the National Sexual Assault Hotline at 1-800-656-HOPE (4673) or go to . If you or someone you know has been a victim of sexual abuse, text "STRENGTH" to the Crisis Text Line at 741-741 to be connected to a certified crisis counselor. Read the original article on People
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ghislaine Maxwell quietly moved from Florida prison to softer Texas ‘honor dorm' after asking for Trump pardon
Jeffrey Epstein's long-time associate Ghislaine Maxwell has reportedly been moved from her prison in Florida to another institution in Texas, The New York Sun reports. Maxwell is currently serving a 20-year sentence for her role in helping Epstein recruit, groom and abuse young girls. She was being held at a federal prison in Tallahassee. Now, she's at the Federal Prison Camp Bryan in southeast Texas, a Bureau of Prisons spokesperson told the Sun. The Florida prison was classified as a minimum security prison with a detention center that housed nearly 1,200 men and women. She was being housed in an 'honor dorm' for the best-behaved inmates, and activities included yoga and pilates. Her new prison is an all-female prison camp that houses 600 inmates. It has limited perimeter fencing and is home to fraudster Elizabeth Holmes and reality star Jen Shah. Maxwell was temporarily placed at a federal prison in Oakdale, Louisiana, before she was moved to Texas, the Sun reports. Maxwell was thrust back in the spotlight during the fallout over the release of the Epstein files. Trump's administration said no more information would be released despite promises during the campaign. That angered his base and created weeks of tension with his supporters as Democrats attacked the White House over the nondisclosure. In recent weeks, DOJ officials met with Maxwell to discuss the files and Epstein, and that has fueled speculation of a pardon for the British socialite. 'Well, I'm allowed to give her a pardon, but nobody's approached me with it,' Trump said Monday. 'Nobody's asked me about it.' Maxwell's attorney, David Oscar Markus, told The Independent he could 'confirm that she is being moved' but declined to comment further. Maxwell asked Congress Tuesday to push for a pardon so she could 'testify openly and honestly' before lawmakers, ABC News reports. Her request is on the heels of the House Oversight Committee subpoenaing Maxwell last week, setting her deposition date for August 11. Markus said Maxwell would invoke her Fifth Amendment right and decline to testify if certain conditions aren't met. These include granting Maxwell immunity and interviewing her outside of the prison where she's carrying out her sentence. "Ms. Maxwell cannot risk further criminal exposure in a politically charged environment without formal immunity. Nor is a prison setting conducive to eliciting truthful and complete testimony," Markus wrote to House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer. "Of course, in the alternative, if Ms. Maxwell were to receive clemency, she would be willing — and eager — to testify openly and honestly, in public, before Congress in Washington, D.C.,' Markus said. 'She welcomes the opportunity to share the truth and to dispel the many misconceptions and misstatements that have plagued this case from the beginning.' Maxwell has also petitioned the Supreme Court to consider an appeal of her conviction. The Justice Department urged the court to reject her request last month, The Washington Post reports. Markus also asked the House Oversight Committee to postpone Maxwell's deposition until the Supreme Court has decided whether to take her case. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche also interviewed Maxwell last week. Maxwell 'never invoked a privilege' and 'never refused to answer a question,' Markus said Friday. Lawmakers subpoenaed Maxwell as the Trump administration faces blowback for its handling of the Epstein files. Democrats and Trump's MAGA supporters alike have called for the administration to release more information on the disgraced financier. The criticism comes after Justice Department and FBI released a joint memo last month indicating there would be no further disclosures in the Epstein investigation. The memo claimed Epstein never kept a 'client list' containing the names of his alleged associates. Attorney General Pam Bondi had suggested the client list was on her desk in February. The agencies also confirmed Epstein died by suicide in a New York City jail cell, following years of conspiracy theories surrounding his death. Epstein died in August 2019, a month after he was arrested for federal sex trafficking charges. That announcement angered Trump's base, who had long latched onto conspiracies about his death or the people he was connected to, including politicians and the wealthy. As tensions rose around Epstein last month, The Wall Street Journal reported Bondi notified Trump in May that his name appears in the Epstein files. The report came days after a reporter asked the president if Bondi told him his name appeared in the files. Appearing in the files also does not indicate that an individual has committed any wrongdoing. The Journal also reported Trump wrote an alleged 50th birthday card to Epstein in 2003, which included a drawing of a naked woman. The card ended with the wish, 'may every day be another wonderful secret.' Trump denied the claims, telling the outlet, 'I never wrote a picture in my life.' The president has sued the newspaper and its publishers for $10 billion.


CBS News
15 minutes ago
- CBS News
Maryland invalidates more than 1,400 lead inspection certificates
The Maryland Department of the Environment on Thursday said it invalidated more than 1,400 lead inspection certificates across the state due to an inspector's failure to comply with work practice standards. The MDE did not identify the inspector by name but said they were affiliated with Green Environmental LLC. In January, the same company was accused of using radioactive materials without a license and altering test samples during lead paint inspections, which resulted in some samples being deemed invalid. Affected rental units must now be reinspected for lead paint hazards, the MDE said. "We are reaching out to rental property owners and their tenants to be sure that families are protected from the serious health hazards of lead paint," Environment Secretary Serena McIlwain said. "Most inspectors do their jobs well and are vital to preventing childhood lead poisoning," McIlwain said. "But those who fail to follow the law endanger the health and well-being of unsuspecting and vulnerable people." No timeline has been set for the reinspections, and the department has not announced any enforcement action tied to the most recent violations. This is not the first time Green Environmental has been accused of improper lead inspections. In January, Maryland Attorney General Anthony Brown, representing the Department of the Environment, filed a civil complaint in Baltimore City Circuit Court against Green Environmental and its owner, Rodney Bryan Barkley. The complaint cited multiple alleged violations, including altering dust samples and improperly using a lead detection device containing radioactive materials. According to the lawsuit, Barkley conducted about 131 lead-free inspections between 2022 and 2024. Officials allege he manipulated sample results, failed to maintain testing equipment, and submitted false documentation. In one case, Barkley allegedly used a lead analyzer on the wrong setting and could not produce documentation for a device containing cadmium-109, a radioactive substance. Green Environmental had been accredited by MDE as a lead abatement contractor since 2019. The Attorney General's Environmental and Natural Resources Crimes Unit has also filed criminal charges against Barkley in Baltimore City Circuit Court for allegedly falsifying and submitting fraudulent lead paint certificates. Both cases are ongoing. WJZ has reached out to Green Environmental for a statement. Maryland's Lead Risk Reduction in Housing Act, enacted in 1994, was designed to minimize childhood lead poisoning while preserving affordable housing. Lead exposure has long been a concern in Baltimore. Between 75% and 95% of homes built before 1980 were estimated to contain lead paint. In 2017, the Maryland Department of Health identified lead exposure as the most widespread environmental hazard for children in the state. McIlwain advised parents of children living at affected properties to contact their child's pediatrician or primary care provider for lead testing.