logo
Mone accuses Covid inquiry of 'cover-up'

Mone accuses Covid inquiry of 'cover-up'

Yahoo13-03-2025
Baroness Mone and her husband Doug Barrowman have accused the Covid inquiry of an "establishment cover-up" after their second attempt to be given an official role in the inquiry was rejected.
The couple claimed they were the targets of a "politically motivated witch hunt" after the inquiry's chairwoman, Baroness Hallett, refused their application to be made "core participants".
PPE Medpro, a firm led by Mr Barrowman, was awarded government contracts worth more than £200m after Baroness Mone recommended it to ministers.
If approved, the official status would have allowed the couple to access inquiry documents, make statements and apply to ask questions of witnesses.
Baroness Hallett first rejected their approach in February, saying it came 468 days after the deadline for applications, and she did not accept they had a large enough role "in the matters to be investigated by the inquiry".
She had previously said her main focus is on the approach of ministers and the government, rather than Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) suppliers.
The Covid inquiry is conducting four weeks of hearings looking at deals to buy £15bn of PPE during Covid.
The National Crime Agency (NCA) has been investigating PPE Medpro since May 2021 over suspected criminal offences committed in the procurement process.
To date no charges have been brought and the Crown Prosecution Service has not been instructed in the case. Baroness Mone, 52, and Mr Barrowman, 59, have both denied wrongdoing.
A special inquiry hearing about the company will take place behind closed doors next week after Baroness Hallett said she was satisfied there was a risk of prejudice to the ongoing NCA investigation if "sensitive evidence" was made public.
In a joint statement, Baroness Mone and her husband said the decision to hear evidence in private was "a blatant betrayal of transparency and justice" and accused the NCA of waging "a ruthless smear campaign".
The couple said: "While the inquiry refused to exclude PPE Medpro, it handed the NCA the power to dictate the proceedings behind a wall of secrecy, ensuring that only their version of events is heard – while we are denied the right to defend ourselves."
In a social media post, Baroness Mone said she did not realise that the company would be "specifically profiled" by the inquiry until the end of February.
"Until then, it was understood that discussions were general, covering overall PPE procurement, not targeting any individual entity," she added.
The couple's statement was released after their second approach to be made core participants was rejected.
Baroness Hallett said allowing the application to proceed would have led to a "further diversion of resources" and have caused "significant disruption" to the inquiry's timetable.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Precinct DTLA, well-known gay bar, warns it could close after former employee claims discrimination
Precinct DTLA, well-known gay bar, warns it could close after former employee claims discrimination

Los Angeles Times

time2 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Precinct DTLA, well-known gay bar, warns it could close after former employee claims discrimination

A downtown Los Angeles bar known as a haven for the gay community is warning it could soon shutter as it faces a costly legal fight with a former employee. 'We're a couple of slow weekends away from having to close our doors,' owners of Precinct DTLA wrote Friday on Instagram. 'Like many small businesses, we've taken hit after hit — from COVID shutdowns and ICE raids to citywide curfews and the ongoing decline of nightlife. But what we're facing now is even more devastating.' In May, Jessica Gonzales sued the bar, its owner, manager and an employee, alleging she faced discrimination and harassment as a cisgender, heterosexual woman and was subjected to an unsafe work environment. Gonzales, who worked at the bar on Broadway for eight years, claimed that when she reported employees and patrons were having sex in the bar, its owner told her to 'stop complaining.' According to a complaint filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court, Gonzales was required to work the coat check for Precinct DTLA's weekly 'jockstrap / underwear party' without receiving pay. She said the bar's manager eliminated the coat check fee, believing it would 'incentivize more patrons to drop their pants.' Gonzales claimed the environment grew so hostile she needed to bring stress balls to work. One day, her complaint said, another employee grabbed her stress ball and refused to give it back to her. In a struggle over the stress ball, Gonzales claims the employee broke two of her fingers. According to her lawsuit, Gonzales was effectively fired after the incident, in part because Precinct DTLA's owner and manager wanted to replace her with a gay male employee. 'These claims are completely false,' the bar's representatives wrote on Instagram. In the post, they added that the lawyer representing Gonzales 'appears to have a clear anti-LGBTQ agenda.' 'There are multiple reports — including from individuals who previously worked with him — that he used anti-LGBTQ slurs in written emails while at his former firm,' they wrote on Instagram. Gonzales is represented by John Barber, court records show. The Times reported in 2023 that Barber and his colleague, Jeff Ranen, regularly denigrated Black, Jewish, Middle Eastern, Asian and gay people in emails they exchanged while partners at Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith. After Barber and Ranen left to start their own firm, Lewis Brisbois released scores of the lawyer's emails, which showed the men regularly used anti-gay slurs to refer to people, The Times reported. In a joint statement at the time, Barber and Ranen said they were 'ashamed' and 'deeply sorry.' Barber didn't immediately return a request for comment Saturday. In the Instagram post, Precinct DTLA's representatives said defending themselves from Gonzales' allegations was 'draining us emotionally and financially.' 'Come to the bar,' they wrote. 'Buy a drink. Order some food. Tip the staff. Show up.'

Olmsted Is Closing in Prospect Heights
Olmsted Is Closing in Prospect Heights

Eater

time5 hours ago

  • Eater

Olmsted Is Closing in Prospect Heights

is the lead editor of the Northeast region with more than 20 years of experience as a reporter, critic, editor, and cookbook author. Chef Greg Baxtrom's standout Prospect Heights restaurant Olmsted will close August 17 after nearly a decade, he announced on Instagram. Olmsted, named for the famous landscape architect Fredrick Law Olmsted, who shaped the design of public spaces such as Prospect Park and Central Park in New York, opened to much fanfare in 2016. It was in the process of being saved, he said in his post, but efforts fell through. The announcement comes weeks after Baxtrom shuttered nearby Patti Ann's, the midwestern-leaning restaurant and bakery named after his mother. His remaining restaurant, 5 Acres, continues to run at Rockefeller Center. When it debuted, Olmsted 'was originally focused on steak-and-potatoes accessibility. But that isn't quite how it played out,' Eater wrote in sizing up how it became 'the hottest restaurant in Brooklyn' by 2017. A native of Chicago, Baxtrom opened his first restaurant in New York after working at acclaimed restaurants like Mugaritz in Spain, Atera and Per Se in New York, and Blue Hill at Stone Barns in Tarrytown. He once described himself as the '18-year-old with braces' working in the kitchen at Chicago's Alinea — and his Prospect Heights restaurant recently hosted the Alinea pop-up in honor of its 20th anniversary. Olmsted reflects Baxtrom's experiences, incorporating a working garden where diners could enjoy cocktails a stone's throw from live quail. His early menus featured dishes like watermelon sushi, the famous carrot crepe with clams, guinea hen two ways, and desserts like the frozen yogurt with whipped lavender honey. And while prices were more expensive than what had been in the neighborhood, he opened with prices that were 'low' compared to similar caliber restaurants, Pete Wells said in a two-star New York Times review. Baxtrom outlines some of his reasons to close in his Instagram post. 'Deciding to close a restaurant is never based on a single decision, but rather on many factors.' First, he cites his decision to get sober five years ago, when 'it became clear that I needed to prioritize my mental health over the restaurants if I was going to continue living. However, I find it challenging to practice this in real life.' In addition, the funding that would have kept the restaurant afloat fell through. 'If you are someone who appreciated what we created and would be interested in partnering with me to save Olmsted,' Baxtrom says on Instagram, 'please reach out.' Baxtrom told Eater that their pre-COVID expansion had become 'a bit of dead weight,' he says. The plan was to revert the restaurant to its original size. 'It just required investment. Beyond my means.' He also spoke of his hopes that Vanderbilt Avenue would have become more of a destination street, with Akhtar Nawab opening Alta Calidad in 2017, along with Joe Campanale and Erin Shambura opening nearby Fausto in the old Franny's space that same year. 'I hoped more big restaurateurs were going to follow.' Today, 'Vanderbilt is surprisingly a very difficult neighborhood to navigate,' he says. On his Instagram post, he says he has 'no desire to leave the industry I love; it brings me so much joy.' And over DM with Eater, Baxtrom says that perhaps he'd like to eventually open something in Chicago. 'My folks are getting older and I'd like to be there more.' Baxtrom demonstrated through his businesses that he is close with his parents. Patti Ann's that shuttered in July wasn't just an homage in name. It referenced the food he grew up on in his family's suburban Illinois household and featured an interior that nodded to his mother's career as a teacher — complete with a map on the wall as decor, cubbies that his father helped him build, and a report card on the table's performance that came with the check. Eater NY All your essential food and restaurant intel delivered to you Email (required) Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trump's Decision to Fire BLS Chief Echoes Putin's Strategies
Trump's Decision to Fire BLS Chief Echoes Putin's Strategies

Time​ Magazine

time6 hours ago

  • Time​ Magazine

Trump's Decision to Fire BLS Chief Echoes Putin's Strategies

President Donald Trump's firing of the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) on Friday afternoon just after she delivered a negative jobs report echoes the impulse of many leaders to shoot the messenger. Trump declared, 'I've had issues with the numbers for a long time. We're doing so well. I believe the numbers were phony like they were before the election and there were other times. So I fired her, and I did the right thing.' While Trump may or may not be friends with Vladimir Putin, he is clearly following the Russian President's HR staffing guidelines to eliminate lieutenants who bring bad news. As we've documented before, the Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat) has a long history of manipulating official economic statistics to please Putin, 'bending over backward to correct bad numbers and burying unflattering statistics' under the pressure the Kremlin has exerted to corrupt statistical integrity, especially since Putin's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. The reliability of official statistics from China has also been brought into question, leading analysts to rely on a wide range of unofficial or proxy indicators to gauge the true state of the Chinese economy. Even China's former Premier, the late Li Keqiang, reportedly confided that he didn't trust official GDP numbers. Read More: What to Know About the Jobs Report That Led Trump to Fire the Labor Statistics Chief Like other strongmen, Trump has repeatedly shown a pattern of manipulating data to suit his preferred narrative. Trump's surprise firing of BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer has quickly caught the attention of technical market analysts and economists on both sides of the political spectrum. One side cheers the push to disrupt a slow, bureaucratic federal agency. The other side shouts in dismay over concerns about yet another example of Trump politicizing an apolitical institution. Both responses are warranted. The accuracy of BLS data has long been questioned as major revisions only come in months later. To their credit, the BLS, in addition to other statistical agencies, has publicly recognized a need to modernize its methodology. Unfortunately, though, the severity of job revisions has worsened since the COVID-19 era, with no successful program to address the issue. The downward revision on Friday of more than 250,000 jobs marked the most significant adjustment since the depths of the pandemic. However, Trump's accusations against the BLS of rigging the job numbers to make him and the Republican base look bad, and his subsequent firing of McEntarfer based on a belief that BLS revisions were politically motivated, are yet another step closer to authoritarianism. Introducing his latest conspiracy theory, the President went even further by suggesting McEntarfer, whose career spans two decades across Republican and Democratic Administrations, rigged the numbers 'around the 2024 presidential election' in then-Vice President Kamala Harris' favor. Trump conveniently fails to mention that his definition of 'around' was back in August 2024. Recall, the 2024 presidential election was a full three months later in November. Revisions are not unusual behavior by the BLS. They are a critical part of the natural process for developing an accurate picture of the largest, most dynamic economy in the world. The average size of job revisions since 2003 is not insignificant at 51,000 jobs. And, despite what Trump may want Americans to believe, his tariff policies have created an unprecedented level of uncertainty in the U.S. economy, comparable only to that of 2020, with many economists expecting a recession to follow as a result. Bloomberg reporting has pointed to a possible connection between the severity of negative job revisions and recessionary economic environments. The BLS has also been subjected to DOGE-led hiring constraints and other resource rescissions. In addition, the Trump Administration's disbanding of the Federal Statistics Advisory Committee in March both eliminated one of the main engines for enhancing agency performance and, perhaps, in what should have been a concerning harbinger, abolished the canary in the data integrity coal mine. Complaints about BLS methods are legitimate, like the reliance on enumerators over scanner data, and deserve attention, but this is not how to fix it. Read More: What Trump's Win Means for the Economy This is far from the first time Trump has subordinated statistical integrity to political theater. From crowd sizes to weather forecasts, vote counts to tariff formulas, Trump has discarded facts for fictions that play to his political favor. Trump doesn't just bend the truth—he twists the numbers until they resemble propaganda and then silences those who disagree. As CBS News titan Edward R. Murrow warned 65 years ago: 'To be persuasive, we must be believable. To be believable, we must be credible. To be credible, we must be truthful.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store