logo
School system 'fair' but we've been pretending it's 'great'

School system 'fair' but we've been pretending it's 'great'

RNZ News21 hours ago
An international consultancy firm rated New Zealand's education system at the top of "fair", along with countries including Armenia and Greece, and behind Australia which was considered low in the "good" ranking.
Photo:
Supplied / Ministry of Education
How good is the school system? According to an internal Education Ministry document it's "fair" and we've been fooling ourselves that it's "great".
The document, sighted by RNZ and understood to date from 2023, also sets out three options for improving the system by specifying through the curriculum what teachers teach and how they teach it.
"Our data suggests that the New Zealand education system would be defined at the top of FAIR by McKinsey 2010 yet we have been behaving as if it is GREAT," it said.
The McKinsey reference appeared to be to a report by an international consultancy firm that rated education systems from "poor" to "excellent" based on performance in OECD tests between 2000 and 2010.
The report placed New Zealand at the top of "fair" along with countries including Armenia and Greece and behind Australia which was considered low in the "good" ranking.
Despite
steadily declining scores
, New Zealand ranked 10th in reading, 11th in science and 23rd in maths in the most recently published OECD Pisa tests of 15-year-olds.
The ministry's document said the introduction of a new curriculum in 2007 without sufficient support caused problems for schools.
"As we sought to shift from great to excellent, the 2007 curriculum went straight from a detailed curriculum to a very open curriculum. It did so however, without providing the supports needed to maintain and build on system coherence and capability," it said.
"Some schools with strong networks, resources, and accountabilities manage to perform well with minimal system supports but many of those carrying the weight of high needs and complex issues struggle. Teacher and learners both struggle."
The options for increasing the level of prescription in the curriculum ranged from a high degree practiced in "developing nations including Rwanda" to allowing a balance between the national curriculum and local decision-making similar to schools in Scotland and British Columbia.
The document said the most severe option was designed to move schools from poor to fair and the least severe from good to great.
The middle option, for moving school systems from fair to good, would mandate the school-level curriculum including what would be taught and when, though schools would retain some ability to localise their curriculum.
It said similar approaches were used in Australia and Alberta in Canada.
The document said under-prescription left decisions with schools and teachers "who do not always have the capacity or expertise to select appropriate content or approaches".
"This can contribute to learner under-achievement and exacerbate inequitable outcomes. The New Zealand curriculum environment shows evidence of under prescription in the highly variable quality of learning that students receive," it said.
The paper said over-prescription limited the ability of schools to respond to learners and contexts and to be innovative.
"Over time, over prescription may contribute to curriculum overcrowding and a focus on coverage rather than meaningful learning; this can contribute to poor learner outcomes," it said.
"Prescribed curricula are also liable to become outdated and require monitoring and support to stay up-to-date. A primary rationale for the design of the 2007 curriculum was to address over prescription in previous curricula."
The paper said over-prescription limited the ability of schools to respond to learners and contexts and to be innovative.
Photo:
RNZ / Mark Papalii
The ministry did not tell RNZ which of the options was being followed.
However, it said it had advised successive governments about the need to balance national direction with local flexibility.
"While high autonomy suits systems with uniformly strong practice and outcomes, New Zealand's variable, inconsistent, and inequitable performance-particularly for Māori, Pacific, disabled and low socio economic students means our current high autonomy settings are not justified," acting curriculum centre leader Pauline Cleaver said.
She said the previous government acted on the ministry's advice by starting to
make the curriculum clearer
about what all learners must know and do, and deciding to mandate a common practice model for how literacy and mathematics should be taught.
"The current minister has continued that trajectory, starting with issuing detailed curriculum and teaching practice expectations for English (Years 0-6), Mathematics & Statistics (Years 0-8), Te Reo Rangatira (Years 0-6) and Pāngarau (Years 0-8)."
Cleaver said the documents specified what students should learn over time, when and how key content must be taught, and how it should be assessed.
Auckland University professor of curriculum and pedagogy Stuart McNaughton said New Zealand's results in international tests were relatively good, but its ability to improve was only fair.
"In terms of the the quality judgement from the OECD in point of time and then over time, we're relatively good, relatively high quality," he said.
"But having said that, it is also true to say that we have had some declines in achievement and we need to recognise those overall declines in achievement which have in some of the assessments come from high performing students not performing quite as highly," he said.
"It is an unfair system and we have a real problem with our equity profile."
McNaughton agreed a greater level of prescription was required in the curriculum to improve New Zealand's school system, but he worried it might be going too far in places.
"It depends very much on the degree to which both content and teaching are prescribed because if you take it too far, you undermine the agency of the teacher, which is a great risk in a system that that prides itself on innovation and expertise, and the second risk is you've got to be really sure that you've got a good evidence-base for the content that you're providing," he said.
McNaughton said the recently-introduced primary school English curriculum over-prescribed how the youngest children should be taught to read because years of evidence showed different children needed different approaches.
Post Primary Teachers Association vice-president Kieran Gainsford said he agreed schools lost centrally-provided support in 2007.
He said teachers were hopeful it would be restored under the current reforms, but worried the ministry might not be able to provide it and teachers would be left to introduce the new curriculum on their own.
Principals Federation president Leanne Otene.
Photo:
Supplied
Principals Federation president Leanne Otene said years of "flip-flopping" education policies had damaged the school system.
"We have never been given an opportunity as a workforce to embed a curriculum and to really ensure that our workforce is confident and competent in the curriculum document and its teaching so that we can see improvement in student outcomes. We are just flip-flopping every time there's a change of government," she said.
Otene said the problem was happening again with more than 70 percent of teachers and principals telling a recent NZEI survey that curriculum change was happening too fast.
"At the moment that pace of change is overwhelming schools... Our principals who are leading teaching and learning for goodness sake, haven't even received any professional development yet and they are supposed to be leading these curriculum changes in their schools. So I would agree, we're not a world class education system," she said.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Politics Panel for 23 Jully 2025
The Politics Panel for 23 Jully 2025

RNZ News

time6 hours ago

  • RNZ News

The Politics Panel for 23 Jully 2025

Wallace Chapman and the Politics Panel discuss and analyse the main political stories of the day. He is joined this week by RNZ's Corin Dann, the NZ Herald's Fran O'Sullivan and former government minister Phil Goff. On the slate today: Nicola Willis says Kiwis are not getting a raw deal from high butter prices (after meeting the CEO of Fonterra); Defence Minister Judith Collins told a crowd of graduating Army recruits last week that they should prepare for "combat"; just 38 percent of respondents to a Talbot Mills poll say the government deserved a second term; is the government using locla councils as a whipping boy and National seems to have found a bright spot in one area of it's party policy: Education. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.

The Panel with Jo McCarroll and Mark Knoff-Thomas Part 1
The Panel with Jo McCarroll and Mark Knoff-Thomas Part 1

RNZ News

time8 hours ago

  • RNZ News

The Panel with Jo McCarroll and Mark Knoff-Thomas Part 1

Tonight on The Panel, Wallace Chapman is joined by panellists Jo McCarroll and Mark Knoff-Thomas. First they discuss the RNZ story by Guyon Espiner about NZ First's relationship to the nicotine industry. They then examine proposed changes to allow more housing on food productive land, and, finally, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says New Zealanders are not getting a raw deal on butter: discuss! To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.

Dog owners granted temporary reprive over off-leash ban at popular Auckland park
Dog owners granted temporary reprive over off-leash ban at popular Auckland park

RNZ News

time8 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Dog owners granted temporary reprive over off-leash ban at popular Auckland park

Auckland Council proposed dog access changes at the park after dogs were off-leash in areas they shouldn't be. Photo: RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly Dog owners advocating for an off-leash area at a popular Auckland park have been granted a last minute reprieve - for now. The High Court has granted an interim order allowing dogs to run off-leash in the bowl area of Monte Cecilia Park. It will continue until a judicial review is heard into a decision by the Puketāpapa Local Board to ban off-leash dogs there as of next Friday. The board voted four to two in favour of removing it after concerns were raised about owners letting dogs run free in areas where they were meant to be on-leash. It is part of a wider plan to review dog rules at parks and beaches. Acting chairperson of Dog Lovers of Monte Cecilia, Shireen Chua, told Checkpoint they were feeling a range of emotions in light of the decision. "There is a sense of elation, excitement, gratitude. Our community has another day getting together, walking our parks and the Monte Cecilia bowl." However, the victory is only temporary, with the High Court hearing now looming. "The process from here is that the Auckland Council will have the opportunity to send through their statement of defence and that will come through by August. And then we will have a hearing in the High Court." Chua said the group's decision to push back against the council came down to a number of reasons. "We didn't feel heard, seen or respected. The decision that the local board took went against internal staff advice. Eighty-percent of public feedback in the strong community that was there were not heard. "We felt that the decision was predetermined and it was made in contrary to the council's dog policy and also in breach of the council's obligations under the Local Government Act." When the group took its argument to the council Chua said it consisted of about 1000 members, a number which has jumped to 1200 over the past few weeks. "Predominantly it started with a whole group of us in the community here, but it's got broader than that now. "Other dog owners in other parts of other areas have started to go, 'hey, I guess this is a really sort of important topic for all of us'." Currently the cost of judicial review has been funded by members of the community, with the legal fees being covered pro bono. "We intend to raise funds in order to fund the remaining part of the Judicial Review and we have got a whole bunch of folks from the community who are selling coffee for the Dog Lovers of Monte Cecilia." The group has also received support from a dog groomer who is contributing $10 towards the judicial review for anyone that takes their dog to be groomed, as well as a Givealittle page. One of the reasons Auckland Council proposed dog access changes at the park was due to dogs being off-leash in areas of the park where they should already be on-leash. But Chua said since the review, the group had seen a slow shift in compliance, and was now issuing a plea to members to stick to the rules. "As responsible dog owners, we do want to comply with the law. "We hope to eventually also initiate a social say the park is for everyone and we want that to be the case." General manager of Policy at Auckland Council, Louise Mason, told Checkpoint that as the decision was before the court, Auckland Council could not comment at this time. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store