Global media highlights ICJ's dismissal of SAF's lawsuit; urges end to futile conflict
CAPITALS (WAM)International media outlets have described the International Court of Justice's (ICJ) decision to dismiss the lawsuit filed by the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) against the UAE as a firm rejection of what they see as an attempt to deflect responsibility for the ongoing conflict.Commentators and analysts emphasised that the SAF should have prioritised ending the senseless war, and worked with regional and international partners to restore stability in Sudan.Various international media outlets highlighted in their coverage the dire humanitarian consequences of the ongoing civil war in Sudan.Reports described the situation as one of the world's worst humanitarian crises.CNN reported that the ICJ dismissed Sudan's case alleging that the UAE violated the Genocide Convention. CNN quoted Reem Ketait, Deputy Assistant Minister of Political Affairs in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, as saying, "This decision is a clear and decisive affirmation of the fact that this case was utterly baseless."
"The Court's finding that it is without jurisdiction confirms that this case should never have been brought," Ketait has said.
"Quite simply, today's decision represents a resounding rejection of the SAF's attempt to instrumentalise the Court for its campaign of misinformation and to distract from its own responsibility," she added.The Associated Press (AP) reported on the bloody conflict that Sudan descended into in mid-April 2023, referring to the case filed by Sudan against the UAE, which the court decided to dismiss after "judges found that the International Court of Justice lacked the authority to continue the proceedings".The Guardian published an article stating that the ICJ rejected and struck the case entirely its list. The paper quoted Reem Ketait's statement, who said, "The facts speak for themselves: the UAE bears no responsibility for the conflict in Sudan. On the contrary, the atrocities committed by the warring parties are well documented.""The conflict, which has been ongoing since April 2023, has caused one of the world's worst humanitarian crises despite international peace efforts," The Guardian reported.Russia Today reported that the UAE government welcomed the decision, calling it a "categorical rejection of Sudan's false claim." It quoted Reem Ketait's statement: "The decision clearly and unequivocally confirms that the case is without merit… [It] represents a decisive rejection of the Sudanese Armed Forces' attempt to exploit the court to spread misinformation and divert attention from its responsibility in the conflict".In its coverage, Al-Arab newspaper described the ICJ's dismissal of the SAF's lawsuit as a political victory for the UAE, in the face of the SAF's attempts to deflect attention from its role in initiating and prolonging the war, and stalling progress toward a political agreement despite multiple regional and international initiatives.The paper also quoted observers as saying the Sudanese military's legal complaint against the UAE represented a tactic to buy time, and avoid accountability for its failure to achieve stability following the army's coup against the democratic transition and civilian rule, a move that triggered a civil war in April 2023.Several journalists and political observers criticised the legal action filed by General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan's team, stating it reflected a lack of understanding of diplomatic and legal frameworks, and was based on a weak, unsubstantiated file that clearly aimed to divert attention from the military's failures.They stressed that the group behind the lawsuit does not represent Sudan or the will of its people, who continue to suffer the devastating consequences of the war. Meanwhile, this faction, they said, has been pursuing political gains at the expense of the Sudanese people.They reiterated that the SAF should have focused on ending the senseless conflict, and engaged regional and international allies to support Sudan's stability.
They also highlighted that the UAE's diplomatic and humanitarian efforts stand as clear testimony to its active and constructive role in supporting the Sudanese people.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Etihad
2 hours ago
- Al Etihad
Lebanon president promises justice 5 years after Beirut port blast
4 Aug 2025 12:16 BEIRUT (AFP)Lebanese President Joseph Aoun on Monday vowed that 'justice is coming', five years after a catastrophic explosion at Beirut's port for which nobody has been held to explosion on August 4, 2020 was one of the world's largest non-nuclear explosions, devastating swathes of the Lebanese capital, killing more than 220 people and injuring more than 6, explosion was triggered by a fire in a warehouse where tons of ammonium nitrate fertiliser had been stored haphazardly for years after arriving by ship, despite repeated warnings to senior officials. Aoun said that the Lebanese state 'is committed to uncovering the whole truth, no matter the obstacles or how high the positions' involved. 'The law applies to all, without exception,' Aoun said in a has been declared a day of national mourning, and rallies demanding justice are planned later in the day, converging on the port."The blood of your loved ones will not be in vain," the president told victims' families, adding: "Justice is coming, accountability is coming."After more than a two-year impasse following political and judicial obstruction, investigating judge Tarek Bitar has finished questioning defendants and suspects, a judicial official told AFP on condition of is waiting for some procedures to be completed and for a response to requests last month to several Arab and European countries for 'information on specific incidents', the official added, without judge will then finalise the investigation and refer the file to the public prosecution for his opinion before he issues an indictment decision, the official Aoun said that 'we are working with all available means to ensure the investigations are completed with transparency and integrity.'Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, a former International Court of Justice judge, said on Sunday that knowing the truth and ensuring accountability were national issues, decrying decades of official resumed his inquiry after Aoun and Salam took office this year pledging to uphold judicial Sunday, Culture Minister Ghassan Salame said the port's gutted and partially collapsed wheat silos would be included on a list of historic buildings. Victims' families have long demanded their preservation as a memorial of the catastrophe.
Middle East Eye
10 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Australia pledges additional $20 million in aid for Gaza
Australia announced today that it is making a further humanitarian contribution of $20 million in response to "the catastrophe in Gaza." The additional donation will support organisations with the scale and capacity to respond quickly, delivering food, medical supplies for field hospitals, and other lifesaving support to women and children in Gaza, a statement shared by Senator Penny Wong said. The latest contribution brings the total donation from the Australian Government to more than $130 million to support civilians in Gaza and Lebanon since 7 October 2023. "Australia has consistently been part of the international call on Israel to allow a full and immediate resumption of aid into Gaza, in line with the binding orders of the International Court of Justice," the statement read, as it called for "the suffering and starvation of civilians in Gaza" to end. "Australia will continue to work with the international community towards an immediate and permanent ceasefire, the release of hostages and a two-state solution — the only path to enduring peace and security for the Israeli and Palestinian peoples."
Middle East Eye
2 days ago
- Middle East Eye
Why Sudanese people are losing faith in the 'government of hope'
When former UN official Kamil Idris was sworn in as Sudan's new prime minister this spring, he became the first person to hold the position in a permanent capacity since Abdalla Hamdok resigned in January 2022 amid ongoing political turmoil. His appointment by Sudanese army chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan elicited a polarised response. Proponents viewed it as a potential turning point in Sudan's democratic transition, citing Idris's political independence, technocratic expertise, and established ties with international organisations. They argued that his non-partisan background would help in navigating Sudan's complex transitional landscape. Sceptics, meanwhile, questioned the legitimacy of an unelected leader, arguing that his appointment - as opposed to a popular mandate - could constrain his autonomy. Critics have also pointed to the persistence of military influence, suggesting that Idris might function as a civilian proxy, with his authority circumscribed. This perspective underscores broader apprehensions about the deep involvement of the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) in politics - a role that contradicts the principle of a military remaining neutral in governance. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters While not all observers may recognise this dynamic, analysts, and those closely following Sudanese politics, note SAF's entrenched influence in political life. Furthermore, during the ongoing conflict in Sudan this politicisation of the army has led to suggestions about the close connections with the Islamist-led regime which had been overthrown by the revolution of 2018/2019. There is heightened skepticism about whether Sudan's current transition will produce a genuinely inclusive civilian government, or if military-backed structures will continue to shape power behind the scenes, and therefore the risks of a facade of civilian rule without substantive democratisation. Idris faces multiple challenges, chief among them the ongoing war between the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which has raged since April 2023, severely destabilising Sudan's economy and social cohesion. Forming a new government was his first hurdle. Last month, Idris unveiled plans for a non-partisan, technocratic "government of hope" - a move that swiftly drew criticism from key political factions, who accused him of sidelining major civilian coalitions that had been instrumental in resisting military rule. Escalating tensions Although Idris has vowed to convene an inclusive dialogue with Sudan's political and social stakeholders, this initiative faces significant challenges, as some parties contest the legitimacy of his appointment and decry his government as unrepresentative of their interests. Notably, the Sudanese Congress Party, the Socialist Arab Ba'ath Party, and Somood, the Civil Democratic Alliance (CDA) led by the former Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok. The latter was a product of the fragmentation of Taqadum, a civilian coalition formed in early 2024 of specific political actors from the Forces of Freedom and Change (FFC). Eventually, Tadadum split with two movements emerging; some FFC members joined Somood under Hamdok's leadership while others joined the Sudan Founding Alliance (Ta'sis), championed by RSF leader Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo (Hemeti). By forming an alliance with the latter, these civilian political actors rejected the authority of the Idris-led government. For its part, Somood has opted instead to engage directly with warring factions, circumventing the government based in Port Sudan. Tensions had been escalating since Idris dissolved the previous caretaker government in early June. Signatories of the Juba Peace Agreement protested the move, viewing it as an erosion of their negotiated gains. The dispute revolves around an article in the Juba agreement that had guaranteed signatories a 25-percent share of executive authority throughout the transitional period established by the Constitutional agreement of August 2019. Critics argue that the Juba deal has failed to address broader societal demands or to resolve persistent on-the-ground grievances, intensifying calls for its revision or scrapping. But ignoring its safeguards would erode trust in political settlements, destabilise the transition, and undermine national unity. Idris's technocratic experiment thus raises existential questions: is this a genuine democratic step, or another military facade? Mohamed Sid Ahmed al-Jakumi, head of the Northern Track, a signatory to the Juba deal, has demanded adherence to the 'quarter of power' principle, under threat of legal action. He has called for key ministries to be led by independent experts, rejecting the 'monopolisation' of power by any party. Amid this dispute, Idris advanced his cabinet formation late last month, issuing decisions to appoint Lieutenant General Hassan Daoud Kabron Kayan as defence minister and Lieutenant General Babiker Samra Mustafa Ali as interior minister. In early July, three technocratic appointments followed, with several Sudanese professors placed in charge of the agriculture, higher education and health ministries. Among the figures were Muiz Omer Bakhit, minister of health, Ismat Gurashi Abdullah Mohamed, minister of Agriculture and Irrigation, Ahmed Mudawi Musa Mohamed, minister of Higher Education and Scientific Research. These three ministries were said to be pro-revolution. Idris emphasised merit-based selection, but the nominations have ignited a backlash, with critics scrutinising the appointees' allegiances and warning of militarised governance. Significant setback Since then, Idris has appointed another 10 ministers to his 'government of hope', filling the rural development, justice, finance, trade, and religious affairs ministries on 7 July; and the fisheries, culture, minerals, social welfare, and transport portfolios a week later. Idris described the appointments as the result of a thorough review of national competencies and expertise. The remaining seven ministerial appointments remain pending. But already, the ministerial appointments represent a significant setback for the transitional process. Many of the appointees were involved in the previous government. For example, just to cite a few names, Mahassen Ali Yacoub who was the acting minister of trade and industry in the previous government that took over after the coup of 2021, is holding the same post in Idris-led government. Also, Abdall Mohamed Daraf, who is appointed as minister of Justice, is publicly known for his political support for the previous government, raising questions about the extent of his neutrality in this sensitive position. Sudan crisis: How a parallel RSF government could destroy the nation Read More » This could undermine trust in the state's commitment to meaningful reforms, while sending a deeply concerning signal to both the international community and the US-hosted process aimed at resolving the Sudanese crisis. Rather than advancing progress, these appointments reflect is only a repetition of past mistakes and failed modalities of governance despite different forms of organisation. Finally, Tasis finalised its charter and managed to establish a parallel 'peace and unity government' on 26 July with Hemeti as the leader of the presidential council. It has espoused a compromise pertaining to the commitment of its ally Al Hilu, the leader of one of the fragments of the Sudan People's Liberation Movement/Army (SPLM/A-North) and a stanuch advocate of a secular Sudanese state. Overall, Idris's efforts have unveiled deepening fractures between civilian and military actors, among Juba signatories, and within the realm of public opinion. Sudan's political landscape remains paralysed by entrenched polarisation, with the war economy and societal fragmentation aggravating divisions. This deadlock, compounded by grievances and institutional distrust, risks precipitating state fragmentation unless a consensus-driven dialogue emerges among military, political and civilian forces. The enduring contest for dominance has left Sudan trapped in a cycle of instability for nearly seven decades, as political and military elites have consistently failed to resolve their protracted power struggles. Idris's technocratic experiment thus raises existential questions: is this a genuine democratic step, or another military facade? As fragmentation looms, Sudanese people demand action, not just hope. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
