🌟The Bright Side: Women in Ivory Coast celebrate reconstructive surgery after FGM
The 45-year-old midwife is one of 28 women from the west African country who underwent the procedure last month at a public hospital in Ivory Coast's economic capital.
In charge of the surgery was obstetric surgeon Sarah Abramowicz, a leading specialist in female genital reconstruction in France.
Sungbeu, who has three boys aged 22, 16 and 12 and is going through a divorce, said before the operation that her circumcision did not cause her any difficulties.
But she said she felt "embarrassed" by the way partners looked at her.
"They don't say anything but you feel that they're not comfortable," she added. "And that makes you feel uncomfortable."
"When you look at other women, you're completely different. That's my problem. When I open my legs, it's completely flat."
Sungbeu said she had been trying to get the delicate surgery to repair her clitoris and labia minora for some time.
After the operation, she said she was "proud to have done it".
Another woman at the clinic, who preferred not to give her name as she waited her turn, said she travelled to neighbouring Burkina Faso and paid 370,000 CFA francs ($635) for the procedure.
But the operation was never carried out.
"I was circumcised at the age of six by a midwife. It's hampering my relationships and my husband left because of it," said the woman, 31.
'Militant' act
One of the aims of the initiative, spearheaded by the Muskoka Fund set up in 2010 by the French government, is to treat women for free in hospitals.
"It shouldn't be something accessible only to those who can afford it through private doctors," said the fund's coordinator Stephanie Nadal Gueye.
The mission has a budget of 60,000 euros ($67,500) and includes a significant and unprecedented training component for hospital obstetricians.
Abramowicz, one of the only women working in the field in France, has trained 10 surgeons from six French-speaking African countries – Guinea, Benin, Senegal, Chad, Togo and Ivory Coast.
She also brought in seven paramedics, mainly midwives, to provide comprehensive care for the 28 patients last month, including psychosocial care to prevent them being stigmatised for having undergone the procedure.
A report by the UN children agency, UNICEF, last year estimated that more than 230 million girls and women worldwide have undergone female genital mutilation – 30 million more than in 2016.
In Ivory Coast, one woman in three is a victim of FGM.
The practice is internationally recognised as a human rights violation.
01:59
Abramowicz said her happy and proud former patients had since been sending her "10 photos a day" of their reconstructed genitals.
"The value of this mission is that it has planted seeds among healthcare workers but also among these women," she said.
"They should become advocates. There's something militant about getting repaired. The fight begins like that."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
3 hours ago
- LeMonde
France says it cannot save contraceptives US plans to destroy
France said Friday, August 1, it could not seize women's contraception products estimated to be worth $9.7 million that the United States plans to destroy, after media reported the stockpile would be incinerated in the country. The contraceptives – intended for some of the world's poorest countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa – were purchased by the US foreign aid agency USAID under former president Joe Biden. But France's health ministry told Agence France-Presse Friday there was no legal way for it to intervene. The administration of Biden's successor Donald Trump, which has slashed USAID and pursued anti-abortion policies, confirmed last month it planned to destroy the contraceptives, which have been stored in a warehouse in the Belgian city of Geel. According to several media reports, the unexpired products were to be incinerated in France at the end of July by a company that specialises in destroying medical waste. France's government has come under pressure to save the contraceptives, with women's rights groups calling the US decision "insane." The health ministry told AFP that the government had "examined the courses of action available to us, but unfortunately there is no legal basis for intervention by a European health authority, let alone the French national drug safety authority, to recover these medical products. Since contraceptives are not drugs of major therapeutic interest, and in this case we are not facing a supply shortage, we have no means to requisition the stocks." The ministry also said it had no information on where the contraceptives would be destroyed. Leaving Belgian warehouse Sarah Durocher, head of the French women's rights group Family Planning, told AFP that some contraceptives had already left the Belgian warehouse. "We were informed 36 hours ago that the removal of these boxes of contraceptives had begun," Durocher said Thursday. "We do not know where these trucks are now – or whether they have arrived in France," she added. "We call on all incineration companies not to destroy the contraceptives and to oppose this insane decision." French company Veolia confirmed to AFP that it had a contract with the US firm Chemonics, USAID's logistics provider. But Veolia emphasized that the contract concerned "only the management of expired products, which is not the case for the stockpile" in Belgium. The products, mostly long-acting contraceptives such as IUDs and birth control implants, are reportedly up to five years away from expiring. Outrage over decision The US decision has provoked an outcry in France, where rights groups and left-wing politicians have called on their government to stop the plan. "France cannot allow itself to become the stage for such actions. A moratorium is necessary," wrote five NGOs in an op-ed in Le Monde, condemning the "absurdity" of the US decision. Among them was MSI Reproductive Choices, one of several organisations that have offered to purchase and repackage the contraceptives at no cost to the US government. All offers have been rejected. Last week, New Hampshire's Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen pointed to the Trump administration's stated goal of reducing government waste, saying the contraceptives plan "is the epitome of waste, fraud and abuse." A US State Department spokesperson told AFP earlier this week that the destruction of the products would cost $167,000 and "no HIV medications or condoms are being destroyed." The spokesperson pointed to a policy that prohibits providing aid to non-governmental organisations that perform or promote abortions. The Mexico City Policy, which critics call the "global gag rule," was first introduced by President Ronald Reagan in 1984. It has been reinstated under every Republican president since. Last month, the US also incinerated nearly 500 metric tons of high-nutrition biscuits that had been meant to keep malnourished children in Afghanistan and Pakistan alive.
LeMonde
5 hours ago
- LeMonde
Contraceptives destroyed in silence: 'Can France accept to become the executor of a senseless policy imposed by the US?'
A stockpile of several million doses of contraceptives, valued at $9.7 million, financed by USAID and usable until 2031, is currently being incinerated in France. These products, originally intended for women in extreme poverty in countries in the Global South, are being destroyed for purely ideological reasons, at the request of the Trump administration. The service provider tasked with the incineration has not yet been identified. This human and environmental waste must be stopped immediately. Why is this happening? Because the US administration, following a blinkered ideological agenda, ordered their destruction as part of the dismantling of USAID. It even refused to transfer the stock to NGOs who were ready to transport and distribute it. This is not a public health issue or a logistical problem. It is a radical political choice. USAID's logistics program, which is usually operated by the company Chemonics, appears to be linked to this operation. However, this cannot be confirmed, since neither the name of the logistics provider nor the name of the incinerator has been made public. The stock, which was previously stored in Belgium, was transported to France in about 10 trucks at the end of July. The exact location of the incineration is deliberately undisclosed. Despite the scale of the operation, the company responsible for handling the medical waste has not been identified. We contacted four major French waste management companies to ask whether they were involved in this operation. All replied that they were not concerned. An economic and environmental absurdity As NGOs active in several African countries, we know exactly what a contraceptive shortage means: unintended pregnancies, abandoned children, unsafe abortions, and girls forced out of school at age 12. It also means women trapped in unwanted motherhood. Can France accept to become the executor of a senseless policy imposed by the US without reaction? This destruction is also an economic and environmental absurdity. It costs more ($167,000) than it would to redistribute contraceptives to countries experiencing shortages. Eliminating usable products that are urgently needed in empty health centers will also generate metric tons of CO₂. It's a total waste.
France 24
15 hours ago
- France 24
What are all these microplastics doing to our brains?
These mostly invisible pieces of plastic have been found everywhere from the top of mountains to the bottom of oceans, in the air we breathe and the food we eat. They have also been discovered riddled throughout human bodies, inside lungs, hearts, placentas and even crossing the blood-brain barrier. The increasing ubiquity of microplastics has become a key issue in efforts to hammer out the world's first plastic pollution treaty, with the latest round of UN talks being held in Geneva next week. The effects that microplastics and even smaller nanoplastics have on human health is not yet fully understood, but researchers have been working to find out more in this relatively new field. The most prominent study looking at microplastics in brains was published in the journal Nature Medicine in February. The scientists tested brain tissue from 28 people who died in 2016 and 24 who died last year in the US state of New Mexico, finding that the amount of microplastics in the samples increased over time. The study made headlines around the world when the lead researcher, US toxicologist Matthew Campen, told the media that they detected the equivalent of a plastic spoon's worth of microplastics in the brains. Campen also told Nature that he estimated the researchers could isolate around 10 grammes of plastic from a donated human brain -- comparing that amount to an unused crayon. Speculation 'far beyond the evidence' But other researchers have since urged caution about the small study. "While this is an interesting finding, it should be interpreted cautiously pending independent verification," toxicologist Theodore Henry of Scotland's Heriot-Watt University told AFP. "Currently, the speculation about the potential effects of plastic particles on health go far beyond the evidence," he added. Oliver Jones, a chemistry professor at Australia's RMIT University, told AFP there was "not enough data to make firm conclusions on the occurrence of microplastics in New Mexico, let alone globally". He also found it "rather unlikely" that brains could contain more microplastics than has been found in raw sewage -- as the researchers had estimated. Jones pointed out the people in the study were perfectly healthy before they died, and that the researchers acknowledged there was not enough data to show that the microplastics caused harm. "If (and it is a big if in my view) there are microplastics in our brains, there is as yet no evidence of harm," Jones added. The study also contained duplicated images, the neuroscience news website The Transmitter has reported, though experts said this did not affect its main findings. - 'Cannot wait for complete data' - Most of the research into the effects microplastics have on health has been observational, which means it cannot establish cause and effect. One such study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine last year, found that microplastics building up in blood vessels was linked to an increased risk of heart attack, stroke and death in patients with a disease that clogs arteries. There have also been experiments carried out on mice, including a study in Science Advances in January which detected microplastics in their brains. The Chinese researchers said that microplastics can cause rare blood clots in the brains of mice by obstructing cells -- while emphasising that the small mammals are very different to humans. A review by the World Health Organization in 2022 found that the "evidence is insufficient to determine risks to human health" from microplastics. However many health experts have cited the precautionary principle, saying the potential threat microplastics could pose requires action. A report on the health risks of microplastics by the Barcelona Institute for Global Health published this week ahead of the treaty talks said that "policy decisions cannot wait for complete data". "By acting now to limit exposure, improve risk assessment methodologies, and prioritise vulnerable populations, we can address this pressing issue before it escalates into a broader public health crisis," it added. The amount of plastic the world produces has doubled since 2000 -- and is expected to triple from current rates by 2060.
