Here's How Companies Are Dealing With $50 Billion of New Tariffs
The importer pays the duties and may choose to strike a deal with the supplier, eat the cost on their own or pass it along to consumers. (American corporations have, thus far, largely shouldered the bill.)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Reddit (RDDT) Climbs 26% on Strong Earnings
We recently published Reddit, Inc. (NYSE:RDDT) is one of the companies that stood stronger last week. Reddit saw its share prices surge by 26.04 percent week-on-week as investors took heart from a strong earnings performance in the second quarter of the year. In its updated report, Reddit, Inc. (NYSE:RDDT) said it swung to a net income of $89 million from a $10 million net loss in the same period last year, while revenues expanded by 78 percent to $500 million from $281 million year-on-year. In terms of market share, the US contributed $409 million, marking a 79-percent increase year-on-year, while the international market amounted to $91 million, or a 71-percent jump from a year earlier. For the third quarter of the year, Reddit, Inc. (NYSE:RDDT) is targeting to hit $535 million to $545 million in revenues, or a 53 percent to 56 percent surge from the $348.4 million actual revenues in the third quarter of 2024. 'Reddit is built for this moment. In a world where connection is increasingly rare, our communities show how valuable human conversation and knowledge really are,' Reddit, Inc. (NYSE:RDDT)Co-Founder and CEO Steve Huffman said. Copyright: rvlsoft / 123RF Stock Photo 'We're focused on growing globally, scaling sustainably, and making Reddit the most trusted place on the internet.' While we acknowledge the potential of RDDT as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . 擷取數據時發生錯誤 登入存取你的投資組合 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kevin O'Leary Rejects Trump's Tariff Rebate Plan, Says Taxpayers Want To See The National Debt Paid Down
President Donald Trump recently suggested that revenue from tariffs could be returned to Americans in the form of rebate checks. He floated the idea as a way to give back to "people of a certain income level," noting that the U.S. is generating "so much money" from tariffs. The concept drew attention, especially as Trump said that tariffs once funded the federal government entirely — before the income tax was permanently established in 1913. Tariffs are taxes placed on imported goods, and while they're paid by importers, the added costs can trickle down to consumers. Shop Top Mortgage Rates Your Path to Homeownership Personalized rates in minutes A quicker path to financial freedom Don't Miss: 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. You can Accredited Investors: Grab Pre-IPO Shares of the AI Company Powering Hasbro, Sephora & MGM— O'Leary Pushes Back: "Pay Down the Debt" But Kevin O'Leary, investor and chair of O'Leary Ventures, disagrees with using tariff revenue this way. "No. I tell you the idea I like — and I think every taxpayer likes better than this idea — use any excess capital to reduce the national debt," O'Leary told Fox News. O'Leary emphasized that America's growing debt isn't just a current burden — it's a long-term risk for future generations. With interest rates elevated, the cost of servicing the national debt increases, and a large portion of that debt is held by foreign entities. "Let's use any excess cash anywhere to get to that balanced budget and start paying down that debt," O'Leary urged. A Debate Within the GOP? O'Leary hinted that discussions about what to do with tariff revenue may be happening behind the scenes within Republican leadership. "Within the administration itself, this is a big debate going on," he said, suggesting there's pressure internally to shift attention toward fiscal responsibility. Trending: $100k+ in investable assets? – no cost, no obligation. He praised current efforts to lower tax rates and increase U.S. competitiveness but warned that the cost — an estimated $3 trillion addition to the national debt — means America now needs to focus on balancing the budget. Alternative Ideas for Reducing Debt In addition to using tariff revenue, O'Leary proposed another strategy: generating income from domestic energy resources. For example, he pointed to the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska — a large government-owned oil reserve — as a potential source of revenue. "We could open up the NIR in Alaska and put a tariff on that oil like they do in Norway and just use it all for debt reduction," he This Could Affect Everyday Americans O'Leary believes that reducing the national debt is critical for America's long-term financial health. He pointed out that when interest rates rise — or even remain high — the cost of servicing the debt increases. Much of that debt is held by foreign creditors, which he says makes the issue even more pressing. Whether or not Trump's rebate idea gains traction, O'Leary's response highlights a broader debate about the best use of government revenue. For taxpayers, especially those nearing or in retirement, questions about the national debt are becoming harder to ignore. Read Next: How do billionaires pay less in income tax than you?. Image: Shutterstock Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Kevin O'Leary Rejects Trump's Tariff Rebate Plan, Says Taxpayers Want To See The National Debt Paid Down originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Wall Street's view of a ‘Kevlar economy' has just been shattered, but red flags were lurking under the radar
Just as Wall Street was warming up to the hope that the U.S. economy was bulletproof amid President Donald Trump's trade war, the recent batch of indicators has punctured that notion. But not everyone was surprised, as some economists had previously sounded the alarm on various red flags that are associated with downturns. The recent batch of indicators has punctured the notion on Wall Street that the U.S. economy is bulletproof and can withstand headwinds like President Donald Trump's trade war. That was evident in Friday's stock market selloff as the dismal jobs report and shocking downward revisions to earlier months raised recession fears. Just days earlier, Rick Rieder, chief investment officer of global fixed income at BlackRock, said the US was 'one of the world's most shock‑resistant economies.' But not everyone was surprised, as some on Wall Street had previously sounded the alarm on overoptimism and various red flags that are associated with downturns. In a note on Tuesday, James St. Aubin, CIO of Ocean Park Asset Management, warned that investors were leaning too heavily on the narrative of economic resiliency. The idea of a 'Kevlar economy' had fueled complacency that was showing up in stretched valuations, tight credit spreads, and an underpricing of risk, he added, referring to the synthetic fiber used in bulletproof vests. One of the risks is political pressure creeping into the Federal Reserve's decision-making, St. Aubin said. For months, Trump and the other White House officials have demanded Fed rate cuts, even suggesting that cost overruns on a headquarters renovation project are grounds for Chairman Jerome Powell to be ousted. Another risk is that stock market investors viewed tariffs as a temporary speed bump that would be offset by tax cuts and the tech sector's capital spending splurge on AI. But St. Aubin pointed out that tariffs hit businesses unevenly, with some are far more exposed than others. 'If you believe in resiliency too much, you're not being fully compensated for the risks you're taking,' he added. 'Something always goes wrong eventually — whether it's a risk hiding in plain sight or something you couldn't see coming.' Consumer spending on services To be sure, the U.S. economy had previously demonstrated surprising durability. In 2022, after the Fed launched its most aggressive rate-hiking campaign in more than 40 years, Wall Street widely assumed a recession would follow. But it never came, and inflation cooled sharply. And earlier this year, economists feared Trump's tariffs would fuel a big spike in inflation. But while some import-sensitive areas have seen an uptick, the overall rate has been more muted, so far. However, a deeper dive into some of the headline numbers revealed troubling signs. Last month, economists at Wells Fargo pointed out that although discretionary spending on goods had held up, spending on services dipped 0.3% through May on a year-over-year basis. 'That is admittedly a modest decline, but what makes it scary is that in 60+ years, this measure has only declined either during or immediately after recessions,' they wrote in a note. Spending on food services and recreational services, which includes things like gym memberships and streaming subscriptions, were barely higher. Meanwhile, transportation spending was down 1.1%, led by declines in auto maintenance, taxis and ride-sharing, and air travel, which had the steepest drop at 4.7%. 'The fact that households are putting off auto repair, not taking an Uber and cutting back or eliminating air travel points to stretched household budgets,' Wells Fargo said. Housing market In May, Citi Research recalled that the late economist Ed Leamer famously published a paper in 2007 that said residential investment is the best leading indicator of an oncoming recession. 'We would be wise to heed his warning,' Citi said. In fact, residential fixed investment shrank 4.6% in the second quarter, according to data released Wednesday, after contracting 1.3% in the first quarter. And overall construction spending continued to decline in June, led by a steep plunge in new single-family homes. That's as mortgage rates remain elevated, representing a major obstacle to affordability, while home prices are still high. 'Residential fixed investment is the most interest rate sensitive sector in the economy and is now signaling that mortgage rates around 7% are too high to sustain an expansion,' Citi said in May. Labor market Citi economists have long been among the less bullish on Wall Street, and before Friday's startling payroll data, they had already sniffed out signs of weakness. In particular, they flagged a dip in the labor force participation rate, which had suppressed the unemployment rate as it meant fewer people were looking for work. Citi downplayed the notion that Trump's immigration crackdown was primarily responsible for the lower participation rate. Instead, economists pointed to low hiring as an indication of weaker demand for workers. On Friday, Citi saw its prior warnings play out and predicted Wall Street would start to come around. 'Softness that had been evident in details of the jobs report is now apparent in the headline numbers,' the bank said. 'Markets and Fed officials should now more closely mirror our view that a low-hiring labor market, together with slowing growth create downside risk to employment and reduce the risk of persistent inflation.' This story was originally featured on
