logo
Mystery ruins turn out to be ‘once-in-a-lifetime' ancient find in North Macedonia

Mystery ruins turn out to be ‘once-in-a-lifetime' ancient find in North Macedonia

Miami Herald10-04-2025
Under a grassy field in southeastern Europe sat some mysterious ancient ruins. Archaeologists had known about the site for decades but didn't know much about its age or purpose — until now.
Recent excavations and radar scans showed the site to be a 'once-in-a-lifetime discovery.'
A joint team of American and Macedonian archaeologists decided to revisit the archaeological site of Gradishte near Crnobuki, North Macedonia, in 2023 and 2024. Known since the 1960s, past archaeologists had excavated Gradishte and suspected it was 'a military outpost built to defend against Roman attacks,' California State Polytechnic University, Humboldt, said in an April 4 news release.
In hopes of solving the mystery, the team used 'ground penetrating radar and cutting-edge drone-deployed LIDAR' scans to survey Gradishte. To their surprise, the scans revealed the ruins actually spanned over 7 acres.
When the team began digging, they encountered another surprise: a small silver coin made during the reign of Alexander the Great, about 2,300 years ago, the university said. They also found game pieces, tools, pottery and even a theater ticket.
Based on their finds, archaeologists identified Gradishte as a forgotten city established by ancient Macedonians before the rise of the Roman Empire.
Archaeologists described it as 'a once-in-a-lifetime discovery,' the university said.
'This discovery is significant,' Nick Angeloff, a university professor and archaeologist, said in the release. 'It highlights the complex networks and power structures of ancient Macedonia, especially given the city's location along trade routes to Constantinople (modern-day Istanbul, Turkey).'
Much about the ancient city remains a mystery. Archaeologists suspect the city ruins may have a 'Macedonian-style theater' yet to be discovered.
Angeloff theorized that Gradishte could be 'the lost capital city of the Kingdom of Lyncestis' or the birthplace of 'the grandmother of Alexander the Great,' but neither possibility has been confirmed.
'All these studies are just a small part of the research of early European civilizations,' Engin Nasuh, an archaeologist with North Macedonia's National Institute and Museum Bitola, said in the release. 'We're only beginning to scratch the surface of what we can learn about this period.'
Excavations at Gradishte also unearthed a roughly 4,000-year-old workshop used for 'seed processing' and 'milling,' suggesting 'humans began occupying (the area) as far back as the Bronze Age.'
Archaeologists plan to continue work at the Gradishte site. North Macedonia is a landlocked country in southeastern Europe, bordering Albania, Bulgaria, Greece, Kosovo and Serbia.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Livestream of deep-sea creatures transfixes Argentina
Livestream of deep-sea creatures transfixes Argentina

Boston Globe

time8 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

Livestream of deep-sea creatures transfixes Argentina

The video feed has attracted more than 1.6 million views a day on YouTube, dominated TV news broadcasts, and even sparked a national conversation about the defunding of Argentine science under libertarian President Javier Milei. 'It was a huge surprise for us,' said expedition leader Daniel Lauretta. 'It's something that fills our hearts because we want to spread the word.' Advertisement Outfitted with high-definition cameras and state-of-the-art sensors, the roving robot captures the enigmatic organisms of Mar de Plata's submarine canyon with exceptional clarity and detail for the first time. The region, where the warm current from Brazil meets the cold current coming up from the Falkland Islands, is known for its little-studied biodiversity. In dives lasting around eight hours a day, the camera encounters an array of surprising creatures lurking in the inky depths off the coast of Buenos Aires: An orange starfish so bright it drew comparisons to Patrick of 'SpongeBob SquarePants' cartoon fame, a sea cucumber viewers nicknamed 'sweet potato,' a deep sea crab that looked like a hairy spider. 'The colors, the zoom capability — that really amazed me,' Lauretta said. 'I think that feeling reached the public too.' Advertisement Often peaking at some 50,000 simultaneous viewers, the livestream from the deep-sea research vessel kicked off last week and runs until Sunday. Argentine researchers and American experts from the nonprofit of former Google CEO Eric E. Schmidt, the Schmidt Ocean Institute Foundation, use the vehicle to map the underwater gorge, collect samples and identify scores of new species at a depth below the reach of sunlight, where scientists have only begun to scratch the surface when it comes to understanding marine life. Few viewers have been able to resist the impulse to anthropomorphize the featured life-forms, assigning zodiac stars to invertebrates and sharing social media quizzes along the lines of 'Which deep-sea creature are you based on how you handle stress?' If you ignore the world, you're a translucent squid; if you explode with anger, you're apparently a pistol shrimp. 'Argentines are very passionate about everything that happens in Argentina,' said Georgina Valanci, 40, her eyes fixed on floating translucent fish while crocheting on Monday. 'I think it represents a bit of the pride that something like this is being done in our country.' Most Argentine researchers on the expedition come from Conicet, Argentina's leading scientific funding and research body, shining a light on the institute's work at a moment when its funding is under attack. President Milei has taken his bureaucracy-slashing chainsaw to Argentine research projects and grants, curbing science spending as a part of a broader drive to eliminate Argentina's chronic fiscal deficit and bring down inflation. State-backed science organizations have lost 4,000 positions in the last year and a half — a combination of layoffs, frozen contracts, and resignations over poor working conditions and low pay. Advertisement Conicet suffered a 21 percent budget cut in real terms last year. Salaries for Conicet researchers have lost 35 percent of their value. Many warn that the measures are setting off a brain drain. Seizing on the surge of public excitement about Conicet, researchers have called for a 48-hour nationwide strike on Wednesday to draw attention to their plight. Although Milei has not commented on the livestream, his allies have expressed disdain. 'They should livestream an offshore drilling operation instead,' said Alejandro Álvarez, an official in Milei's government, referring to growing crude production in Argentina's Vaca Muerta shale formation — an oil boom that Milei hopes can help revive the nation's crisis-stricken economy. 'It's a beautiful process of wealth creation and natural resource exploitation that will make Argentina greater.' In the meantime, Argentines seem content to be mesmerized by orange starfish.

Experts explain why daydreaming could actually be key to a productive day
Experts explain why daydreaming could actually be key to a productive day

Yahoo

time13 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Experts explain why daydreaming could actually be key to a productive day

Every day, we're faced with constant opportunities for stimulation. With 24/7 access to news feeds, emails and social media, many of us find ourselves scrolling endlessly, chasing our next hit of dopamine. But these habits are fuelling our stress – and our brains are begging for a break. What our brains really need is some much-needed time off from concentrating. By not consciously focusing on anything and allowing the mind to drift, this can reduce stress and improve cognitive sharpness. This can often be easier said than done. But attention restoration theory (Art) can help you learn to give your brain space to drift. While this might sound like a fancy name for doing nothing, the theory is supported by neuroscience. Attention restoration theory was first put forward by psychologists Rachel and Stephen Kaplan in 1989. They theorised that spending time in nature can help restore focus and attention. They proposed there are two distinct types of attention: directed attention and undirected attention. Directed attention refers to deliberate concentration – such as studying, navigating through a busy place or posting on social media. Basically, it's any activity where our brain's attention is being directed at a specific task. Undirected attention is when we're not consciously trying to focus on anything – instead allowing things to gently capture our attention without trying. Think listening to chirping birds or watching leaves gently rustling in the breeze. In these instances, your attention naturally drifts without having to force your focus. Without time for undirected attention, it's thought that we experience 'attentional fatigue'. This can make it increasingly difficult to focus and concentrate, while distractions become more likely to grab our attention. In the past, we encountered many situations in our daily lives that we might classify as 'boring'. Moments such as waiting for the bus or standing in the supermarket queue. But these dull moments also gave our minds a chance to switch off. Now, our smartphones give us the opportunity for constant entertainment. Being able to constantly expose ourselves to intense, gripping stimuli offers little mental space for our overworked brains to recover. But attention restoration theory shows us how important it is to create space for moments that allow our brains to 'reset'. Restoring attention The origins of Kaplan and Kaplan's theory can actually be traced back to the 19th century. American psychologist William James was the first to formulate the concept of 'voluntary attention' – attention that requires effort. James' ideas were published against the backdrop of the broader cultural movement of Romanticism, which lauded nature. Romantic ideas about the restorative power of nature have since been backed by research – with numerous studies showing links between time in nature and lower stress levels, better attention, improvements in mental health, mood and better cognitive function. The restorative benefits of nature are backed by neuroscience, too. Neuroimaging has shown that activity in the amygdala – the part of the brain associated with stress and anxiety – was reduced when people were exposed to natural environments. But when exposed to urban environments, this activity was not reduced. Numerous studies have also since backed up Kaplan and Kaplan's theory that time in nature can help to restore attention and wellbeing. One systematic review of 42 studies found an association with exposure to natural environments and improvements in several aspects of cognitive performance – including attention. A randomised controlled trial using neuroimaging of the brain found signs of lower stress levels in adults who took a 40-minute walk in a natural environment, compared to participants who walked in an urban environment. The authors concluded that the nature walk facilitated attention restoration. Research has even shown that as little as ten minutes of undirected attention can result in a measurable uptick in performance on cognitive tests, as well as a reduction in attentional fatigue. Even simply walking on a treadmill while looking at a nature scene can produce this cognitive effect. Time in nature There are many ways you can put attention restoration theory to the test on your own. First, find any kind of green space – whether that's your local park, a river you can sit beside or a forest trail you can hike along. Next, make sure you put your phone and any other distractions away. Or, when you face boring moments during your day, instead of picking up your phone try seeing the pause as an opportunity to let your mind wander for a bit. Each of us may find certain environments to be more naturally supportive in allowing us to switch off and disengage the mind. So, if while trying to put attention restoration theory into practice, you find your brain pulling you back to structured tasks (such as mentally planning your week), this may be sign you should go someplace where it's easier for your mind to wander. Whether you're watching a ladybird crawl across your desk or visiting a vast expanse of nature, allow your attention to be undirected. It's not laziness, it's neurological maintenance. Anna Kenyon is a Senior Lecturer in Population Health at the University of Lancashire. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Did ancient Romans collect fossils too? New discovery offers a clue.
Did ancient Romans collect fossils too? New discovery offers a clue.

National Geographic

time19 hours ago

  • National Geographic

Did ancient Romans collect fossils too? New discovery offers a clue.

A newly discovered 460-million-year-old trilobite showed signs of being shaped and flattened—the first indication that ancient Romans purposely collected and modified the tiny fossils. A computer simulation of what the trilobite fossil from A Cibdá de Armea may have looked like if it was fashioned into a pendant. Archaeologists say the ancient Romans may have worn the fossil as a protective amulet. Illustration by Fernández-Fernández, A., Valle-Abad, P., Rodríguez -Nóvoa, A.A. et al. Significance of fossils in Roman times: the first trilobite find in an early Empire context. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 17, 166 (2025) Few objects capture the modern imagination like fossils, offering glimpses of a world dominated by dinosaurs, massive mammoths and other long-gone ferocious creatures. Even in ancient times, Greeks and Romans were entranced by prehistoric remains—like bones and teeth from large extinct animals—which they venerated in their temples and incorporated into their mythology as Cyclopes or dragons. Now, a newly discovered trilobite trinket from an ancient Roman settlement suggests that humans in classical antiquity were fascinated by these tiny fossils, too. Archeologists have discovered a roughly 460-million-year-old trilobite fossil in the Roman-era site of A Cibdá de Armea in northwestern Spain. The trilobite, which likely originated from a shale bed more than 250 miles away, had been manually shaped and flattened, suggesting that ancient Romans collected and traded such fossils and may have fashioned them into ornaments or jewelry. The roughly 460-million-year-old trilobite fossil found in the Roman-era site came from a fossil bed some 250 miles away, indicating it likely arrived at the settlement via trade. Photograph by Fernández-Fernández, A., Valle-Abad, P., Rodríguez -Nóvoa, A.A. et al. Significance of fossils in Roman times: the first trilobite find in an early Empire context. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 17, 166 (2025) The trilobite fossil showed signs of having been manually shaped and flattened. Photograph by Fernández-Fernández, A., Valle-Abad, P., Rodríguez -Nóvoa, A.A. et al. Significance of fossils in Roman times: the first trilobite find in an early Empire context. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 17, 166 (2025) Scientists had previously uncovered a trilobite fossil in a French cave in 1886 that may have been used by prehistoric humans as a pendant some 14,000 years ago. But the Armea trilobite, found at a site dating between the 1st and 3rd centuries AD, is the earliest known reference to trilobites in classical antiquity, says Fernández-Fernández. It is also the first indication that Romans intentionally gathered and altered these fossils, perhaps into amulets. "If the trilobite had appeared unmodified, it would have had significant value, but its transformation to be set in jewelry gives it much greater scientific value," says Fernández-Fernández. "This gives us an idea of the importance of the fossil as a 'magical' stone." Fossil fascination Trilobites were a diverse group of extinct marine invertebrates that first appeared roughly 520 million years ago and died off about 250 million years ago. Though they varied widely in size and shape, the creatures—which loosely resemble horseshoe crabs—all had three body segments, including their head, thorax, and tail. Their name, "trilobite," refers to the three "lobes" that divide their exoskeletons lengthwise: one central, and two on either side of the spine. The Armea fossil, about an inch or so long, appears to be from the genus Colpocoryphe, which had a smooth hind section. The specimen they found preserves parts of the trilobite's exoskeleton and was flattened on the underside, which the researchers say, suggests it might have been used as a pendant or bracelet. Computer simulations of the Armea trilobite specimen mounted on a leather bracelet. Illustration by Fernández-Fernández, A., Valle-Abad, P., Rodríguez -Nóvoa, A.A. et al. Significance of fossils in Roman times: the first trilobite find in an early Empire context. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 17, 166 (2025) The archaeologists recovered the trilobite among thousands of other objects at A Cibdá de Armea, including ceramic pieces, pots, dishes, and vases. It was found in a large, open room that shared a wall with the kitchen and may have been used as a dump area. The Armea fossil is only the eleventh documented instance of a trilobite being excavated and gathered by ancient populations in an archeological context, and only the third from more than a thousand years ago. Many previous examples came from medieval sites and were found out of context, Fernández-Fernández says. "It's fascinating to imagine our ancestors collecting fossils, having the same sort of weird fascination for extinct critters as we do today," says Julien Benoit, a paleontologist at the University of the Witwatersrand, in Johannesburg, South Africa, who was not involved in the paper. The findings could also connect ancient Romans to other populations who made jewelry out of trilobites, like the Ute people of North America, Benoit says. The trilobite fossil was uncovered during an excavation at the Roman settlement site of A Cibdá de Armea in northwestern Spain. Photograph by ArqueoGEAAT/University of Vigo Adrienne Mayor, a historian of ancient science at Stanford University, and author of The First Fossil Hunters: Dinosaurs, Mammoths, and Myth in Greek and Roman Times, calls the discovery a 'highly significant' contribution to historians' understanding of how ancient populations' may have viewed fossils. Mayor, who was not involved in the research, notes that because the trilobite was likely transported to A Cibdá de Armea through trade, the discovery raises questions about whether Romans traded fossils more frequently than historians thought, and whether they understood what fossils are. While Greek and Roman literature references other large fossils, like those of mastodons and mammoths, it's less clear how they perceived trilobites. Larger fossils were "collected, measured, displayed, and interpreted as the remains of mythological monsters, giants, or larger-than-life heroes,' Mayor says. Trilobites, on the other hand, "have an intriguing appearance," resembling an insect or a water creature, she says, leaving one to wonder: "Is that how they were seen in antiquity too?' Fernández-Fernández has a hunch. He hypothesizes that Romans likely wore armored trilobite amulets because they saw them as holding mystical or protective powers. If so, he says, that belief links Roman fascinations to more modern fixations, "because protection through ancient 'magical' stones remains relevant today."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store