
Olympian Vinesh Phogat, husband Somvir Rathee blessed with baby boy
Former wrestling star and Congress MLA Vinesh Phogat gave birth to a baby boy on Tuesday morning at a private hospital in Delhi. This is the first child for 30-year-old Vinesh and her husband, wrestler Somvir Rathee.
Vinesh's elder brother Harvinder Phogat confirmed the news. 'Vinesh gave birth to a baby boy this morning. Both mother and baby are healthy. It's a moment of great joy for our family,' Harvinder told
The Indian Express
.
Vinesh had announced her pregnancy in March on social media. She shared a photo with the message, 'Our love story continues with a new chapter,' along with baby and heart emojis. Harvinder added that Vinesh will return to Somvir's home in a few days.
'We will all visit her soon. Everyone in our village, Balali, is excited to welcome her and the baby,' he said.
The 30-year-old was disqualified from the women's 50kg final at the Paris Olympics last year for going over the weight limit. After that, she said the missed Olympic medal was the 'biggest wound' of her life but added she might return to wrestling in the future.
In September last year, Vinesh joined the Indian National Congress and later won the Julana seat in the Haryana Assembly elections by beating BJP's Yogesh Kumar. After the baby's birth, Congress leader Kumari Selja congratulated her. 'Hearty congratulations and best wishes… I pray the newborn brings happiness and good health to the family,' wrote the politician.
Poll
Do you think Vinesh Phogat will return to the mat?
Yes
No
Vinesh also led protests against former Wrestling Federation of India president Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh, who was accused of sexually harassing women wrestlers.
Game On Season 1 continues with Mirabai Chanu's inspiring story. Watch Episode 2 here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
22 minutes ago
- India Today
Barred in own constituency, Manipur Congress MP slams buffer zone enforcement
Congress MP from Inner Manipur, Angomcha Bimol Akoijam, has criticised what he called an "unconstitutional and imaginary buffer zone" enforced by security forces in parts of the conflict-hit at his residence in Imphal on Tuesday, Bimol raised serious concerns about being denied entry into a locality within his own constituency, alleging that such actions were violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Indian Congress MP said he was stopped on June 29 by security forces while trying to visit Phougakchou-Ikhai Makha Leikai Keithel in Bishnupur district, an area that falls under his parliamentary constituency. "Stopping an Indian citizen - especially an elected Member of Parliament - from moving freely within his own constituency is a direct violation of Article 19 of the Indian Constitution," Bimol said, calling the move an example of growing authoritarianism and institutional bias. He alleged that security forces, particularly the 6 Assam Rifles, were actively enforcing a non-existent buffer zone that had originally been put in place in May 2023 to curb mob violence. According to him, the so-called buffer zone is now being used selectively to prevent Meitei individuals, including elected leaders, from entering certain areas while members of other communities are allowed free is not just about me being stopped. It's about covert, communal segregation being carried out under the guise of security. It's creating a dangerous precedent," Bimol said. Taking to social media, he highlighted the incident, arguing that such enforcement amounts to institutionalised discrimination between the Meitei and Kuki pointed to recent incidents of violence and obstruction against Meitei farmers, including an alleged attack in Imphal East on June 16 and another in Phubala on June 20, where farmers were reportedly prevented from accessing their land. Bimol claimed these actions reflect a coordinated attempt to intimidate Meiteis and deter them from farming on their own dismay, he stated that such barriers only serve to divide the people of Manipur and increase communal mistrust. "Manipur is not divided by communal ideology. The continued enforcement of this so-called buffer zone only deepens mistrust and weakens unity," he of now, there has been no official response from the security forces to the allegations made by the Congress MP.- EndsMust Watch


Mint
25 minutes ago
- Mint
BJP MPs protest parliament panel inviting Prakash Raj, Medha Patkar; meeting cancelled
A parliamentary committee meeting ended abruptly on July 1 as Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MPs protested against the panel's decision to hear activist Medha Patkar and actor-turned-activist Prakash Raj. The Standing Committee on Rural Development and Panchayati Raj, headed by Congress MP Saptagiri Sankar Ulaka, had called Patkar and Raj to hear her views on the implementation and effectiveness of the land acquisition law enacted by Parliament when the Congress-led UPA government was in power in 2013. Patkar had led protests against raising the height of Sardar Sarovar Dam in Gujarat and is accused by the ruling party of working against the country's development interests in the name of public and environmental causes. Former Union minister and BJP MP Parshottam Rupala was joined by other lawmakers from his party as they walked out of the meeting, with some dubbing Patkar as "anti-national". A BJP MP wondered if leaders from Pakistan could also be called to such a meeting, news agency PTI said, Ulaka, the panel's chairperson, however, defended the decision, saying that it is standard practice for a parliamentary committee to hear civil society members and other stakeholders on various issues. "We wanted to hear their views on the land acquisition law. We wanted an opinion from everyone, but they (BJP) didn't allow it," he told news agency PTI. Out of the 29 members of the committee, 14 members, including the chairman, were present, and a majority of them were from the BJP and its allies. The meeting's agenda was to hear from different stakeholders on the implementation and effectiveness of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, a UPA-era Act. Representatives of the Department of Land Resources (Ministry of Rural Development), the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC), the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, non-government organisations (NGOs), experts, and other stakeholders were to speak before the panel. Among those invited before the panel were officials from the Environment and Forest Ministry and activists, including Patkar and Prakash Raj, also an actor who has often criticised the BJP's politics. Former prime minister HD Deve Gowda also attended the meeting, according to PTI. A BJP MP said they were not told about the decision to ask Patkar to share her views with the committee. Generally, sources said, it is the chairman's prerogative to pick names, though members can make suggestions. A BJP member said their primary objection was to calling Patkar, who was the face of the 'Narmada Bachao Andolan' protest against a determined push by the Gujarat government, headed then by Narendra Modi as chief minister, to raise the height of Sardar Sarovar Dam. The state government's views finally prevailed, and Modi, who took over as prime minister in 2014, has often spoken about the efforts to stall the project since its foundation in the 1960s. As the BJP MPs walked out, Ulaka said he decided to end the meeting due to a lack of quorum. "As per rule, a quorum of 10 members is required. When the BJP MPs walked out, there was no quorum, and the meeting ended," he said. BJP MPs objected to Patkar appearing before the panel, and called her 'anti-national,' according to sources quoted by news agency PTI. A miffed MP also wondered if the prime minister of Pakistan could be called for questioning by the panel, the news agency report said. When the meeting started, opposition MPs were of the opinion that Patkar should be heard, to which the BJP MPs did not agree. Asked about the incident, Patkar said she was invited to appear before the panel, and while she and others were waiting, they saw some MPs leave. We wanted to hear their views on the land acquisition law. We wanted an opinion from everyone, but they (BJP) didn't allow it. She added that later, they were informed that the meeting had ended. Patkar said she had also appeared before parliamentary committees earlier. "I have never experienced anything like this before. It is important to talk about the land acquisition law," she said.


United News of India
33 minutes ago
- United News of India
BJP hits back at Priyank Kharge over RSS ban call
New Delhi, July 1 (UNI) Senior BJP leaders, including Ravi Shankar Prasad, Union Minister Giriraj Singh, and MP Kiran Choudhary, today strongly criticised Karnataka Minister Priyank Kharge for his repeated calls to ban the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), reminding the Congress of the political fallout of a similar move during Indira Gandhi's regime. Referring to Kharge's remarks, Ravi Shankar Prasad said, "When Indira Gandhi tried to ban the RSS, it backfired — she lost. Today, the RSS is one of the largest organisations in the world. What can we even say about the Congress national president's son? At least speak with an awareness of your own stature." Echoing the sentiment, Union Minister Giriraj Singh warned Kharge of repeating history, stating, "Yes, Mrs Indira Gandhi once banned the RSS — and we all saw her downfall. Now they too will meet the same fate." Emphasising the Sangh's contributions, Singh added, "During the 1971 war, floods and in every crisis, RSS workers have been the first to help. Those who criticise them don't even understand what the RSS stands for." BJP MP Kiran Choudhary also lambasted the Congress minister's comments, calling them "foolish and highly irresponsible." She said such statements stem from deep ignorance. "The RSS is made up of individuals completely devoted to the nation. They leave behind everything — even their homes — to serve the country and preserve its culture," she said. Describing the RSS as a nationalist force, Choudhary asserted, "Anyone making such statements against them reveals their own lack of understanding. The RSS deserves respect, not vilification." The BJP's sharp rebuttal follows renewed political friction between the two parties, with Priyank Kharge's comments reigniting a longstanding ideological battle over the role and legacy of the Sangh in Indian society. UNI BDN RN